President Donald Trump on Friday dismissed media reports suggesting he planned to name the new White House ballroom \u2014 which will replace the outdated East Wing \u2014 after himself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The report, published by ABC News<\/em>, claimed the 90,000-square-foot facility would be called \u201cThe President Donald J. Trump Ballroom.\u201d But Trump quickly set the record straight.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cI don\u2019t have any plan to call it after myself, that was fake news,\u201d Trump told reporters. \u201cWe\u2019re probably going to call it the presidential ballroom or something like that. We haven\u2019t really thought about a name yet.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n Trump\u2019s comments come as construction continues on what is expected to be a major modernization of the White House complex \u2014 a project the administration says will better serve official state events and visiting dignitaries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to ABC News<\/em>, roughly $350 million has been raised for the ballroom\u2019s construction, exceeding the projected $300 million cost. President Trump suggested that surplus funds could support another ambitious initiative: an iconic arch to be built at the entrance of Washington, D.C., near the Lincoln Memorial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cYou know, we\u2019re going to be building the arc,\u201d Trump said. \u201cAnd we\u2019ve raised a lot of money for the ballroom, so maybe we\u2019ll put \u2014 the arc is going to be incredible for Washington, D.C. So maybe we use it for the arc.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n The administration expects the ballroom to be completed before the end of Trump\u2019s term in 2029. Supporters say the project symbolizes renewal and the continuation of America\u2019s tradition of strength and elegance at its seat of power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Earlier this week, crews finished demolishing the East Wing \u2014 a move that drew predictable criticism from establishment voices and Democratic allies. A YouGov<\/em> poll found about half of Americans disapprove of the demolition, while many others see it as a step forward for modernization and security.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Among the most vocal critics was USA Today<\/em>, which published an opinion piece by Chelsea Clinton condemning the construction. She claimed it represented \u201ca reflection of how easily history can be erased when power forgets purpose.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Former White House aide Michael LaRosa, who worked for Jill Biden, echoed the sentiment, calling the demolition \u201csad\u201d and \u201cheartbreaking.\u201d Still, even he admitted, \u201cI don\u2019t think that there\u2019s any question a ballroom is probably needed.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n While some opponents point to the East Wing\u2019s historical roots, Trump\u2019s supporters argue that progress and preservation are not mutually exclusive. The East Wing dates back to the early 1800s, when Thomas Jefferson added colonnades that were criticized even then as \u201caristocratic.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Over the years, the space evolved \u2014 from Teddy Roosevelt\u2019s renovations to Franklin D. Roosevelt\u2019s additions, including a movie theater and a bunker used during national emergencies. That bunker, known as the Presidential Emergency Operations Center, was used by George W. Bush\u2019s cabinet on 9\/11 and by President Trump during the 2020 unrest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
A Vision for Renewal and National Pride<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
Demolition Meets Predictable Backlash<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
The East Wing: History Meets Modern Necessity<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n