In a significant setback for former Trump administration Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, the Supreme Court has denied his request to transfer his election subversion case from Georgia state court to federal court. Tuesday’s ruling means Meadows will face charges in Fulton County, where the case was brought by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. Since presidential pardons apply only to federal offenses, Meadows is now ineligible for a potential pardon, should one ever be considered.
As The Hill reports:
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis (D) charged Meadows, President-elect Trump and more than a dozen others over accusations they unlawfully attempted to overturn President Biden’s 2020 victory in Georgia.
Refusing to hear Meadows’s bid to move courts marks a win for Willis, who has attempted to keep the defendants together for a singular trial in state court.
Trump’s election as president Tuesday has complicated that goal, however. His attorneys are expected to argue the Constitution prohibits Trump’s charges from moving forward while he is in the White House.
It remains unclear how any pause would impact the Trump allies charged alongside him. The trial proceedings already are on indefinite pause amid an appeal by some defendants seeking to remove Willis over her once-romantic relationship with a top prosecutor on the case who has since stepped aside.
What Does This Mean for Meadows?
With this decision, Meadows has exhausted his options for moving the case to federal court. The implications are significant:
-Ineligibility for Presidential Pardon: Since his case remains in state court, a federal pardon would not apply.
– Advertisement –
-Focus on State Jurisdiction: The case will proceed under Georgia’s judicial system, potentially influencing how other co-defendants approach their defense strategies.
What’s Next in the Georgia Election Case?
Meadows isn’t alone in seeking relief from the legal proceedings. Other co-defendants, also charged with alleged election interference, are challenging District Attorney Willis’ authority in the case. A critical hearing is scheduled for Dec. 5 in the Georgia Court of Appeals, where arguments will be heard regarding the removal of Willis as the lead prosecutor.
Trump’s victory will likely put the Georgia election interference case against him on hold, at least until he leaves office. However, attorneys for his co-defendants told Law360 that this is unlikely to apply to their clients.
Key Points to Watch:
-Outcome of Dec. 5 Hearing: If Willis is removed, it could reshape the prosecutorial strategy and impact case proceedings for Meadows and others.
-Potential Legal Precedents: The rulings in this case could set important precedents for how state-level cases involving federal officials are handled in the future.
Article Published With The Permission of American Liberty News.
Lawfare still active
Lawfare is about all they have left in their fascist toolbox.
It appears to me that Meadows was being charged for POST ELECTION interference regarding a federal election. So the charges cannot be outside of the Federal Law regarding election interference, PLUS how is it election interference when the election (at that time) was ended, over and Biden was the elected president. At best he could be charged for public interference of official business. But election interference AFTER the election was over would be impossible!! So it is a bogus case from the beginning. Willis is fabricating false charges and making false statements regarding the Federal case and civil case comparisons! Just like the Trump Insurrection! How could Trump want to overthrow himself as President on Jan. 6th. An insurrection is wanting to over throw the current political party IN POWER AT THE TIME OF THE INSURRECTION! Trump was the sitting PRESIDENT on January 6th, 2025. The Kangaroo Courts need to stop the bull….! Stop the lies to the public and stop ruining America. Maybe just go back to Russia where you came from!
Correction January 6th 2021 Trump was the sitting President!
So, just what is it that these defendants did. Did they fix the machines, produce fake ballots to keep voting until they got the democrat voted in, what? Or, is it that the defendants don’t even know what they are being charged with doing because we readers sure don’t know. Sounds like a typical democrat new law they have made up. We don’t know what the law is saying that was broken.