Home Blog

Ted Cruz Flatly Rejects Claim GOP Is United Behind JD Vance

0
Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America,

Vice President JD Vance may be the early favorite to inherit the MAGA mantle, but Ted Cruz is warning Republicans that there will be no automatic coronation in 2028.

Asked during an interview with MS NOW’s Ali Vitali whether the GOP had already coalesced behind Vance, Cruz delivered a blunt answer.

“Oh, no!” Cruz declared. “There’s going to be a full discussion about who we are and what we believe,” according to Mediaite.

The Texas Republican said there is “no Never Trump lane” inside today’s GOP and praised President Donald Trump as a fearless and extraordinary political figure. But he argued that Trump’s support cannot simply be transferred to a handpicked successor.

“Trump is a black swan event,” Cruz said, predicting Republicans will spend the coming years debating the party’s identity after Trump leaves office.

Cruz also made clear that he intends to have a voice in that fight.

“There’ll be time to figure that out,” he said when asked whether he could enter the 2028 contest. “I’ll certainly be part of the discussion.”

Days later, Cruz stripped away even more of the mystery.

“It’s no secret that I want to be president,” the senator said Wednesday during an appearance on Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick’s podcast. Asked directly whether he would launch another campaign, Cruz replied, “Time will tell,” according to The Texas Tribune.

Cruz is also scheduled to campaign in Iowa this weekend—his second trip to the early-voting state this year. The senator won the Iowa caucuses during his 2016 presidential campaign and ultimately finished second to Trump after carrying 11 states.

Vance remains the strongest prospective candidate in the emerging field, but the numbers leave plenty of room for a fight. A May Emerson College poll placed Vance at 36% among likely Republican primary voters, just one point ahead of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, with 15% undecided.

Reports that Trump privately told donors “we need to elect JD” fueled speculation that the president had already chosen his heir. Trump later poured cold water on an immediate endorsement, publicly calling the discussion “way too early,” according to the New York Post.

Vance, meanwhile, has said he will discuss a potential campaign with his wife after the midterm elections, telling CBS News that he expects Trump to support whatever decision he ultimately makes.

For Cruz, however, the coming contest is about more than personalities. He wants Republicans to decide whether they remain a small-government, free-market party and whether they favor American leadership abroad or a more isolationist approach.

The warning to Vance was unmistakable: Being the heir apparent does not make someone the nominee.

Longstanding Ground Zero Rule Upends Trump’s 9/11 Plans

David B. Gleason from Chicago, IL, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

A rule that has kept politics out of Ground Zero’s Sept. 11 ceremony for more than a decade reportedly helped send President Donald Trump’s anniversary plans in a different direction.

Trump is now expected to deliver remarks at the Pentagon on the 25th anniversary of the terrorist attacks rather than travel to the World Trade Center memorial in Manhattan, according to multiple reports.

The native New Yorker had shown interest in appearing at Ground Zero, but people briefed on the planning told CNN that the president wanted to deliver a speech.

That presented a problem.

Politicians have not been permitted to speak during the Manhattan commemoration since 2012. The restriction is intended to keep the solemn ceremony nonpartisan and focused on victims and their families.

Instead, Trump is expected to appear at the Pentagon, where presidents may deliver formal remarks. Vice President JD Vance will attend the Ground Zero ceremony in his place.

A White House official told NewsNation that Vance is “still traveling to NYC” and that the Trump administration will be represented at all three sites attacked on Sept. 11, 2001.

White House spokesperson Anna Kelly also pushed back against any suggestion that Trump’s absence from Manhattan would diminish his connection to the anniversary.

“As a proud New Yorker, President Trump has spoken about his own experiences watching the horrific events,” Kelly said.

The president will honor the victims, their families and the first responders who “put their lives on the line,” she added.

Trump attended the Pentagon observance last year with First Lady Melania Trump. During his remarks, he praised the courage Americans displayed in New York, Virginia and Pennsylvania and declared that the country would “never yield.”

The official White House account of the ceremony said Trump also participated in a wreath-laying and renewed America’s promise never to forget the 2,977 lives lost.

Meanwhile, the 25th-anniversary ceremony at Ground Zero will remain centered on the families. Relatives will read aloud the names of 2,983 people killed in the 2001 attacks and the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

Six moments of silence will mark the attacks and collapse of the towers, the strike on the Pentagon and the crash of Flight 93. A seventh will honor those who later died from 9/11-related illnesses.

Trump’s decision also simplifies a packed travel schedule. The president is expected to leave for Ireland on Sept. 12 to attend the Irish Open at his golf course in Doonbeg.

The location may have changed, but the White House’s message has not: Trump intends to use the historic anniversary to remember the victims and honor the Americans who ran toward danger when the country was under attack.

GOP Governor Sounds Alarm Over Trump DOJ’s Election-Day Tactics

0
Missvain, CC BY 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons

A Republican governor is pushing back against the Trump administration after Justice Department election monitors allegedly tried to question voters and gain access to voting equipment during Wyoming’s primary.

Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon called the federal officials’ conduct “aggressive” and “irregular” after two attorneys from the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division visited polling locations in Laramie County on Aug. 18.

“It sounded like the behavior of the observers was a bit aggressive,” Gordon said Wednesday as Wyoming’s canvassing board met to certify the primary results.

“It just was irregular,” he added.

Gordon has directed Wyoming Attorney General Keith Kautz to investigate the federal operation and determine whether the monitors exceeded the authority granted to them by Congress.

“I’m not objecting to the observers,” Gordon said. “But their behavior seemed to exceed what the authority that Congress had given them was.”

Clerk Details Unexpected DOJ Visit

Laramie County Clerk Debra Lee said two people identifying themselves as Justice Department election monitors appeared at a polling location with little warning.

“Two individuals, identifying themselves as DOJ election monitors, informed our poll worker that they were here to monitor Wyoming’s Primary Elections,” Lee said in a statement.

“They did not offer their credentials until I requested they do so.”

Lee said a Justice Department official later told her that the deployment had been arranged on short notice and that an email intended for her office may have been sent to the wrong address.

The federal attorneys reportedly began asking poll workers about their training, written election manuals and the county’s purchase of new voting equipment.

They also sought access to examine ballot tabulators, according to Lee.

Those requests appeared to extend beyond the enforcement of federal voting-rights and ballot-access laws, the clerk argued.

But the greatest concern arose when the monitors reportedly sought permission to speak directly with voters inside polling places.

The Justice Department said the proposed interviews would help determine whether Laramie County was complying with federal voting laws.

Lee refused the request.

“We do not allow interviews to be conducted in polling places,” she said.

Wyoming restricts activity inside voting locations to protect ballot secrecy, prevent disruptions and ensure voters can cast their ballots without interference.

“This was a poorly managed exercise and one that showed complete disregard for our state laws and administration of our elections,” Lee said.

The clerk did not accuse the attorneys of handling ballots, changing votes or disrupting the final count. State officials described the primary as successful and reported no evidence of fraud or voting-rights violations.

Republicans Split Over Federal Monitoring

The controversy has exposed a rare disagreement among Republican officials in one of America’s most conservative states.

Wyoming Secretary of State Chuck Gray has generally supported the Trump administration’s election-integrity efforts and defended the legal basis for allowing observers inside polling places.

Gray also disputed Gordon’s suggestion that federal officials had failed to communicate with state authorities.

When Gordon asked whether the Justice Department contacted the secretary of state’s office before Election Day, Elections Division Director Paul Raines acknowledged receiving a message.

“Our office had received an email, but that’s the extent of communications I’m aware of,” Raines said.

Gordon said the Wyoming Office of Homeland Security, the state attorney general and the Laramie County clerk were not properly informed about the deployment.

“To my knowledge, the U.S. attorney was unaware of it,” Gordon added.

U.S. Attorney Darin Smith, however, released a statement supporting the monitoring operation several hours after it was announced.

“Voters deserve absolute confidence that their ballots are secure and their voices are heard without interference,” Smith said. “We are working alongside local officials to ensure every lawful vote is protected.”

Trump DOJ Expands Election Oversight

The Justice Department announced on primary morning that it was deploying two Civil Rights Division attorneys to Laramie County and four more to Miami-Dade County, Florida.

“Election monitoring is an ongoing priority for this office,” Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon said.

“Nondiscriminatory monitoring ensures all elections remain free, fair, and accessible to all.”

The department said the operation was designed to promote “transparency, ballot security, and compliance with federal law.”

Federal attorneys routinely monitor elections for compliance with the Voting Rights Act, the National Voter Registration Act, the Help America Vote Act and other federal protections.

The department has not explained why Laramie County was selected or identified a specific complaint that prompted the visit.

It also had not publicly responded to Lee’s detailed allegations as of Thursday.

The Wyoming deployment came as the Trump Justice Department dramatically expanded its election-monitoring operation. The Civil Rights Division said it sent more than 75 monitors to approximately 200 polling locations across five states during the 2026 primary season.

The administration reportedly could deploy as many as 1,000 federal employees nationwide for November’s general election.

Gordon framed the dispute as a matter of states’ rights rather than a partisan attack against President Donald Trump.

“I feel very strongly about federal government coming in and taking our guns,” he said. “I don’t like that. And I don’t like federal government coming in and taking our votes either.”

The governor stressed that he was not accusing federal officials of stealing ballots or corrupting the election.

“I’m not saying anything went wrong or anything else, and I certainly think the conduct of this election was phenomenal,” Gordon said.

His concern is whether the federal government attempted to assert power over state election administration that Congress never authorized.

With a much larger federal presence expected in November, Wyoming’s investigation could determine whether state officials seek new restrictions—or even head to court—before Justice Department monitors return.

Bret Baier Fires Back After Trump Unleashes On Fox News Colleague

0

Fox News anchor Bret Baier pushed back on President Donald Trump in real time Thursday after the president accused one of the network’s veteran correspondents of airing an “inaccurate” report about Iran.

The unusual on-air showdown erupted during “Special Report,” shortly after chief correspondent Jonathan Hunt updated viewers on diplomatic efforts surrounding the ongoing conflict.

Hunt reported that there had been no major breakthrough in efforts to end the fighting and aired a clip of Trump saying his administration was not seeking a meeting with Tehran.

“We’re not looking to meet or anything,” Trump said in the clip, according to additional coverage of the segment.

But before the broadcast had even ended, Trump took aim at both Hunt and Baier on Truth Social.

“Jonathan Hunt of Fox News did a particularly inaccurate report on the Failing Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump wrote.

The president insisted he had no interest in requesting talks, declaring that Iranian officials were the ones “begging to make a deal.”

Then he dragged Baier directly into the fight.

“Bret Baier should straighten out his flunkies, for a change!” Trump wrote.

Baier was not about to let that one pass.

Before signing off, the anchor read Trump’s post and delivered a rare, point-by-point rebuttal to the president.

“First of all, Jonathan is not a flunky. He is a great reporter,” Baier said, according to The Hill’s account of the exchange.

Baier then addressed Trump directly, stressing that Fox had never reported that the president wanted to meet with Iran.

Instead, Baier explained, the network had aired Trump’s own comments ruling out a meeting. Hunt’s report focused on Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s effort to rally Group of 20 nations behind Washington’s pressure campaign against Tehran.

Baier added that Gulf allies, including Qatar, were attempting to persuade Iranian leaders to accept concessions.

“That’s what we said,” the anchor concluded.

The clash unfolded as the Trump administration dramatically escalated its attempt to isolate Iran economically.

Bessent announced “Operation Economic Outcast” earlier this week, describing it as an unprecedented effort to sever the regime’s financial connections around the world.

“Any entity that facilitates money laundering on behalf of Iran will be removed from the U.S. dollar system,” Bessent warned in remarks published by the Treasury Department.

The administration has also expanded the threat of secondary sanctions to entities doing business with Iran in areas including shipping, aviation, gold, technology and digital assets.

Trump’s dispute with Hunt appears to have centered on how Fox characterized the diplomatic maneuvering surrounding that campaign—not on whether the administration was increasing economic pressure.

Baier’s swift defense of his colleague was especially striking given his long relationship with Trump. As Fox’s chief political anchor, Baier has interviewed the president repeatedly and regularly speaks with him directly.

Trump, meanwhile, has never hesitated to unload on Fox personalities when he believes the network’s coverage is unfair. Earlier this year, he criticized anchor Shannon Bream and demanded that Fox executives remove liberal co-host Jessica Tarlov from the air, TheWrap reported.

This time, however, the president’s criticism landed while the show he was attacking was still live.

And Baier made sure the president received an answer before the credits rolled.

Biden Considered Pardoning Trump Before Leaving Office

0
The White House, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Joe Biden may have come closer than anyone knew to handing Donald Trump the ultimate political get-out-of-jail-free card.

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox claims Biden revealed during a private 2023 conversation that he and first lady Jill Biden had discussed pardoning Trump as the former president faced a growing pile of criminal charges.

The startling exchange appears in Cox’s upcoming book, Off Ramp: How to Be a Peacemaker in an Age of Contempt, according to an excerpt published by The Atlantic and reported by Mediaite.

Cox said the conversation unfolded inside a limousine during Biden’s August 2023 visit to Salt Lake City.

The Republican governor decided to make a wildly unexpected pitch: Biden should use his presidential pardon power to spare the man who could soon become his general-election opponent.

Biden’s reported response was even more surprising.

“You know, I’ve actually considered this for a while,” Biden told him, according to Cox.

The then-president allegedly added that he and Jill Biden had held a lengthy conversation about the idea in bed earlier that same week. Cox said Biden promised to give the proposal serious consideration.

At the time, Trump was facing two federal prosecutions—one involving classified documents kept at Mar-a-Lago and another tied to his efforts to challenge the 2020 election results.

Those were the only cases Biden could have touched. A presidential pardon applies to federal offenses, not Trump’s state charges or the civil fraud case brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James.

The private conversation reportedly came as Cox publicly went out of his way to welcome Biden to deep-red Utah.

Cox was the lone high-profile Utah Republican to attend Biden’s speech at a Salt Lake City veterans hospital, where the president promoted expanded benefits for veterans exposed to toxic substances.

“There has been some question over whether or not the governor of the state of Utah would welcome the president of a different party,” Cox told the crowd, according to KUTV.

Cox called the controversy over simply welcoming a president from the opposing party “insane” and urged Americans to find ways to disagree without treating political rivals as enemies.

That appeal became the central theme of his new book—and apparently drove his extraordinary pardon proposal.

Biden ultimately kept the pardon pen away from Trump.

But he certainly did not put it away altogether.

After repeatedly insisting that he would not intervene in his son’s criminal cases, Biden issued Hunter Biden a sweeping pardon in December 2024 covering potential federal offenses committed over nearly 11 years.

Hours before leaving office, Biden also granted preemptive pardons to five family members, Dr. Anthony Fauci, retired Gen. Mark Milley, members of the House Jan. 6 committee and police officers who testified before it, according to Roll Call.

Cox was not the only prominent Utah Republican who believed pardoning Trump could have lowered the nation’s political temperature.

Then-Sen. Mitt Romney made the same argument publicly in May 2024, saying Biden should have acted immediately after the federal indictments were announced.

“I’d have pardoned President Trump,” Romney said, arguing that the country did not want to endure the prosecution of a former president in the middle of an election.

No pardon ever came.

Trump instead won his way back to the White House, and the federal cases against him were abandoned after the 2024 election under the Justice Department’s longstanding policy against prosecuting a sitting president.

Cox later endorsed Trump after the 2024 assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, hoping the near-tragedy would push him toward a more unifying political style.

Trump’s Secret Service Rocked By Suspected Betrayal From Within

President Donald Trump’s protective agency is confronting a suspected betrayal from within—just weeks after details of one of its most sensitive security operations spilled into public view.

Three senior Secret Service employees, including communications chief Anthony Guglielmi, were escorted from the agency’s Washington headquarters on Monday and placed on administrative leave, according to RealClearPolitics.

The officials reportedly had their security clearances suspended, lost access to their government devices and were designated “do not admit,” barring them from Secret Service facilities while investigators examine how classified or sensitive information may have reached the media.

All three worked in the agency’s communications office and were non-law-enforcement personnel—not field agents.

RealClearPolitics reported that the Secret Service’s Office of Professional Responsibility is leading the investigation. One source told the outlet that the FBI and CIA are also participating, suggesting the case could extend far beyond a routine personnel dispute.

The Secret Service has confirmed the suspensions but has not disclosed what the employees are accused of doing.

“Three non-law enforcement personnel at the U.S. Secret Service have been placed on administrative leave pending an investigation into potential misconduct,” an agency spokesperson told CBS News.

The agency said its “zero-fail mission” requires employees to maintain an unwavering commitment to honesty, courage and professionalism.

Placing employees on leave and temporarily revoking their access is standard during an internal investigation and does not prove wrongdoing. The Secret Service has also not publicly connected the three officials to any particular disclosure.

However, the investigation comes as the Trump administration hunts for the source of leaks involving a clandestine maneuver used to protect the president from an alleged Iranian assassination plot.

After attending the NATO summit in Ankara on July 8, Trump publicly boarded an older Air Force One while reporters and numerous administration officials watched. Behind the aircraft, however, a catering truck was being used as part of an elaborate escape plan.

Trump was secretly moved off Air Force One and taken to a nearby Air Force C-32A. He then flew to the United Kingdom aboard the smaller aircraft while reporters and members of his staff continued on the original plane, believing the president was traveling with them.

The operation was reportedly ordered after U.S. intelligence detected a credible Iranian plot to fire a missile at Trump’s aircraft.

Trump later confirmed that the military and Secret Service “wanted me to go in a different flight.”

“Any consequential president has a lot of threats,” he told reporters.

Several Trump administration officials were reportedly furious when details of the operation became public, warning that exposing classified protective tactics could make it harder to safeguard presidents during future emergencies. FBI Director Kash Patel helped establish an earlier investigation into the disclosure, according to RealClearPolitics.

The agency is also investigating a separate suspected leak involving Vice President JD Vance’s protective detail.

In July, an agent was placed on leave after allegedly disclosing operational information about Vance’s travel, including a planned Marine Corps helicopter trip involving the vice president’s son.

At the time, it was Guglielmi who announced that investigation.

“Any conduct that potentially threatens the safety of a protectee will not be tolerated,” Guglielmi said in a Secret Service statement reported by CBS News.

Now Guglielmi—who has led the agency’s communications operation since 2022—is among those sidelined while investigators determine whether another internal line was crossed.

His attorney, Gregg Bernstein, pushed back against any implication of wrongdoing.

“Anthony Guglielmi is a professional of deep integrity whose decades-long public record advocating for local, state and federal agencies speaks for itself,” Bernstein told CBS News, adding that Guglielmi is cooperating fully.

The turmoil presents another major test for Secret Service Director Sean Curran, the longtime member of Trump’s detail who helped shield him during the 2024 assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania.

Curran was personally selected by Trump to rebuild an agency battered by security failures, communication breakdowns and internal distrust. Six agents were previously disciplined over the Butler debacle, while a government review released by Sen. Chuck Grassley found that senior officials failed to share critical threat intelligence with personnel responsible for securing the rally.

The current investigation strikes at an even more fundamental question: Can the president trust the people given access to his most sensitive security information?

There is currently no proof that Guglielmi or the other two employees leaked Trump’s movements. But the decision to pull their clearances, cut off their devices and bar them from Secret Service facilities shows how seriously the agency is treating the possibility that its latest threat came from inside its own walls.

Philly DA Vows to ‘Blow Up’ Trump’s White House Ballroom

8
The White House during construction of the State Ballroom on 2026-01-14, Washington, DC

Philadelphia’s far-left district attorney is dreaming about demolishing President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom—and keeping a piece of the wreckage as a souvenir.

Larry Krasner made the stunning remarks Tuesday during Philadelphia’s annual slavery commemoration ceremony at the President’s House site near Independence Hall.

According to video obtained by NBC10 Philadelphia, Krasner predicted that Trump’s ballroom would be destroyed within the next 10 to 15 years.

“I’m gonna have a paperweight sitting on my desk,” Krasner said, according to the Washington Examiner. “You know what that paperweight is gonna be? It’s gonna be a piece of a ballroom after we all blow it up.”

Krasner later clarified that he envisioned the destruction taking place during an “official ceremony,” with pieces of the building sold as paperweights to reimburse taxpayers.

But the clarification did little to take the edge off the extraordinary image of an elected district attorney talking publicly about blowing up part of the White House complex.

Krasner also unleashed a personal tirade against Trump during the event, calling the president a “pain in the a–” and agreeing with an audience member who described Trump as “the devil.”

The progressive prosecutor accused Trump of embodying hatred and ignorance before turning his fury toward two of the president’s high-profile renovation projects.

“There will not be a ballroom,” Krasner declared. “There will not be a Kennedy Center renamed for a fool.”

The White House quickly fired back.

“Only people who suffer from a severe and incurable disease known as Trump Derangement Syndrome would find a problem with that,” White House spokesman Davis Ingle told Fox News Digital.

Ingle said Trump was carrying out long-overdue renovations designed to beautify and preserve the White House for future generations as the nation celebrates its 250th anniversary.

The Secret Service also took notice.

“The U.S. Secret Service investigates anything that can be perceived as a threat toward our protectees,” agency spokesman Nate Herring told Fox News Digital, while declining to discuss specific protective-intelligence matters.

Krasner’s outburst came amid an escalating fight over how American history is presented at the President’s House site, where George Washington lived while Philadelphia served as the nation’s capital.

Trump signed an executive order in March 2025 directing federal museums, parks and historical sites to eliminate what his administration considers divisive ideological narratives and instead emphasize America’s achievements and progress.

Acting under that order, the National Park Service removed interpretive panels and disabled video exhibits at the President’s House site in January. The displays focused heavily on the nine enslaved people Washington brought to the Philadelphia residence.

The city sued, and a federal judge initially ordered the displays restored. But the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later vacated that injunction, concluding that the lower court lacked jurisdiction over several of Philadelphia’s claims.

Krasner insisted Tuesday that the slavery memorial and its educational materials would ultimately survive the Trump administration.

His ballroom prediction, however, targeted a project that is still moving rapidly toward completion.

The approximately $400 million, 90,000-square-foot addition is designed to accommodate roughly 1,000 guests and includes major security infrastructure beneath the building. Trump has argued that the facility will allow presidents to host large events without leaving the heavily protected White House grounds.

The ballroom is reportedly about 65% complete. Chief Justice John Roberts recently issued a temporary order allowing construction to continue while the Supreme Court considers the administration’s challenge to lower-court restrictions on the project.

Trump-Backed Republican Draws Impeachment-First Challenger

3
President Donald J. Trump hosts a Rose Garden Club dinner in honor of Police Week in the White House Rose Garden, Monday, May 11, 2026. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

Oklahoma Democrats have chosen a political newcomer who is already plotting President Donald Trump’s removal from office.

N’Kiyla Jasmine Thomas, a nurse making her first run for elected office, defeated attorney and nonprofit executive Jim Priest in Tuesday’s Democratic Senate runoff. Thomas captured approximately 61% of the vote, according to KOSU’s report on unofficial results.

The victory sends Thomas into a November showdown with Republican Rep. Kevin Hern—and puts her explosive promise to target Trump squarely in the spotlight.

In a July interview with KOSU, Thomas was asked how she would work with a president whom Hern has fiercely supported.

Her answer left little room for compromise.

Thomas vowed that “within my first 100 days” she would work to “impeach, remove and convict” Trump. She added that opponents would have to “pry that pen out of my cold, dead hands.”

She later doubled down, making clear that removing Trump—not finding common ground with his administration—would be her objective.

There is one constitutional hitch: A senator cannot impeach a president.

The House of Representatives holds the sole power to approve articles of impeachment. The Senate conducts the resulting trial and requires a two-thirds vote of members present to convict and remove a president, according to the Senate’s official explanation of the process.

Thomas, a Chickasaw Nation citizen and nurse from Ardmore, identifies as a democratic socialist, according to KOSU. Her platform also calls for higher teacher pay, expanded access to government-backed health insurance, abortion protections and broader federal civil-rights legislation.

But it was her impeachment pledge that quickly became the campaign’s defining sound bite after Fox News Digital highlighted the remarks following her runoff victory.

Thomas’ win capped her second upset of the campaign. She entered the five-candidate June primary with no previous political experience but finished first with approximately 45% of the vote, forcing the runoff against Priest.

November will be an entirely different ballgame.

Oklahoma has not elected a Democrat to the U.S. Senate since 1990. Trump carried the state by nearly 35 percentage points in 2024, while Hern cruised through the June Republican primary with nearly 70% of the vote.

Thomas will also enter the general election facing a staggering financial disadvantage.

Her campaign reported approximately $57,000 in total receipts through Aug. 5 and had less than $500 in cash on hand, according to Federal Election Commission records. Hern’s campaign reported nearly $10 million in receipts through June and finished the period with roughly $2.5 million available, FEC filings show.

Hern, a former McDonald’s franchise owner who has represented Oklahoma’s 1st Congressional District since 2018, also carries Trump’s endorsement.

“Oklahomans love President Trump and the America First Agenda,” Hern told Fox News Digital after Thomas’ victory.

He called Thomas “wildly out of touch with the values of Oklahomans” and accused Democrats of focusing on partisan attacks while Republicans work to advance Trump’s agenda.

Thomas has already proven she should not be underestimated in a Democratic primary. But defeating a Trump-endorsed Republican in one of America’s reddest states—and assembling the congressional votes needed to carry out her impeachment promise—would require an upset on an entirely different scale.

Trump Ally Byron Donalds Taps Cuban-American Conservative as Florida Running Mate

0
Political representation of parties making money

Rep. Byron Donalds has selected Florida state Sen. Bryan Avila as his running mate, adding a Cuban-American military officer and veteran state lawmaker to the Republican ticket in Florida’s race for governor.

Donalds announced the decision Tuesday at Miami’s historic Freedom Tower, calling Avila a “proven warrior” and “conservative fighter” who has battled higher taxes, rising costs and “woke ideology” in Tallahassee.

“He has fought woke ideology, he’s fought higher taxes, he’s fought higher costs every single day, and I could not be more proud to have him stand by my side,” Donalds said, according to The Hill.

The announcement came one week after Donalds won the Republican primary to succeed term-limited Gov. Ron DeSantis. He will face Democratic nominee David Jolly, a former Republican congressman who joined the Democratic Party in 2025, in November.

Avila has represented portions of Miami-Dade County in the Florida Senate since 2022. Before moving to the Senate, he served eight years in the Florida House, including two years as speaker pro tempore.

The Hialeah native currently chairs the Florida Senate’s Finance and Tax Committee and serves as vice chair of its Transportation Committee. He has also served as a captain in the Florida Army National Guard since 2016, according to his official Senate biography.

Donalds emphasized Avila’s personal connection to Florida’s large Cuban-American community, describing him as the son of Cuban exiles who fled communism in search of freedom.

“My parents escaped communist Cuba because they believed America offered something socialism never could — freedom,” Avila said in remarks reported by WFLA.

Avila pledged that the Republican ticket would build on DeSantis’ conservative legacy, make Florida more affordable, protect public safety and defend the freedoms that have attracted millions of new residents to the state.

The selection also strengthens Donalds’ presence in heavily Hispanic South Florida. Avila’s district includes part of Miami-Dade County, while Donalds has represented a Southwest Florida congressional district since 2021.

Donalds enters the general election with the enthusiastic backing of President Donald Trump, a friend and political ally who helped propel his gubernatorial campaign from the beginning.

Their alliance became especially visible during the 2024 presidential race. Donalds endorsed Trump over his own governor, DeSantis, and became one of the Trump campaign’s most prominent congressional surrogates. He appeared at campaign events across the country and helped lead the campaign’s outreach to Black voters.

Trump returned that loyalty in February 2025, endorsing Donalds before the congressman had formally entered the governor’s race. Trump personally called Donalds before urging him to run in a Truth Social post declaring, “Run, Byron, Run!”

Donalds responded at the time by thanking Trump and promising, “I will never let you down,” according to WUSF.

The president reaffirmed his support ahead of Florida’s primary, describing Donalds as a “total winner” and saying he would work closely with the White House to advance the America First agenda in Tallahassee.

“Byron Donalds will be a truly Great and Powerful Governor for Florida,” Trump wrote while reiterating his “Complete and Total Endorsement,” according to Space Coast Daily.

If elected, Donalds would become Florida’s first Black governor. His partnership with Avila would unite two politically important parts of the state while pairing Trump’s chosen candidate with a lawmaker deeply rooted in Miami-Dade’s Cuban-American community.

Jolly responded to Avila’s selection by arguing that Trump—not Donalds’ running mate—would remain the central issue in the campaign.

“This race won’t come down to Byron Donalds’ relationship with Avila; it will come down to Byron’s relationship with Donald Trump,” Jolly said in a statement reported by WFLA.

Donalds, however, mocked the opposing Jolly-Gwen Graham ticket as “boring” and tied Florida Democrats to state Rep. Angie Nixon, a Democratic Socialists of America member who won the party’s U.S. Senate nomination last week.

“They’ve joined forces to create the most boring and uninspiring ticket Florida Democrats could have ever put together,” Donalds told supporters.

Republicans will begin the general-election campaign with a sizable historical advantage. No Democrat has won a Florida governor’s race since 1994, and DeSantis carried the state by nearly 20 percentage points in 2022.

With Avila now at his side and Trump firmly behind him, Donalds is pitching the Republican ticket as the team that will preserve Florida’s conservative direction—and keep one of the nation’s most important states solidly red.

Trump Scores Major Supreme Court Win In Mail-In Ballot Fight

2
Duncan Lock, Dflock, CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

President Donald Trump scored a major legal victory Monday as the Supreme Court cleared the way for his administration to advance new mail-in ballot safeguards ahead of November’s midterm elections.

In a 6-3 decision divided along ideological lines, the justices lifted an injunction that had prevented the administration from implementing key portions of Trump’s election integrity executive order in 23 states and the District of Columbia.

The ruling reverses a significant lower-court setback for Trump, who has repeatedly called for tighter controls on mail-in voting and stronger citizenship verification requirements.

At the center of the dispute is Trump’s March 31 executive order, titled “Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections.”

The order directs the Department of Homeland Security, working with the Social Security Administration, to compile state-specific lists of confirmed U.S. citizens who will be eligible by age to vote in upcoming federal elections.

It also orders the Justice Department to prioritize investigations and, when appropriate, prosecute election officials or others accused of distributing federal ballots to ineligible voters.

A third provision directed the U.S. Postal Service to establish new standards for federal ballots sent through the mail. Those standards include uniquely serialized barcodes, approved envelope designs and a federal portal through which election officials would submit information about voters receiving mail ballots.

Democratic officials from 23 states and Washington, D.C., sued, arguing that Trump was attempting to seize authority the Constitution gives to states and Congress.

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani agreed and blocked the administration from implementing portions of the order. The First Circuit Court of Appeals subsequently refused to pause her ruling, prompting the Trump administration to take the fight to the Supreme Court.

The high court’s conservative majority concluded that the states had sued too soon because the executive order itself only directed federal agencies to begin taking action.

The order “imposes no obligations on the States,” the court said in its unsigned ruling, meaning the states had not demonstrated the concrete injury necessary to establish standing.

The majority similarly rejected arguments that Trump’s order immediately interfered with state voter-registration systems.

“This internal directive does not regulate the States’ voter registration processes,” the court wrote. “Nor does it impinge on the States’ authority ‘to create and enforce a legal code’ for elections.”

The ruling gives the administration a powerful procedural victory, but it does not settle whether every part of Trump’s order is ultimately constitutional.

“The Court’s disposition of this application does not mean that any measure taken by the Government to implement the Order will necessarily be lawful,” the majority cautioned. “On that score, time will tell.”

The practical impact before November also remains uncertain. The Postal Service has finalized a rule establishing its new ballot-mail standards, but the agency said it would not enforce those changes for the 2026 election while two court injunctions remained in place.

Monday’s ruling lifts one of those injunctions. A separate order issued in League of Women Voters of Massachusetts v. Trump still stands, meaning the administration may need additional relief before the Postal Service can fully implement its plan.

The Postal Service said it intends to move quickly if that remaining barrier is removed, according to the agency’s final rule scheduled for publication in the Federal Register.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented.

Jackson accused the majority of injecting “chaos and uncertainty” into the midterm elections by forcing states to wait before challenging federal actions that could alter their voting procedures.

For Trump, however, Monday’s decision removes a major obstacle at a critical moment. With control of Congress hanging in the balance, the administration can now continue building its citizenship-verification system and pressing ahead with its wider election integrity agenda while the remaining courtroom battles play out.