Home Blog

Adam Schiff Announces ‘Strong Agreement’ With Trump

    0
    Austin Green, CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons

    Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA), one of President Donald Trump’s fiercest political adversaries, offered rare and enthusiastic support for the president Monday after Trump called on Congress to approve a federal incentive aimed at reviving American film and television production.

    “I am in strong agreement with the President,” Schiff wrote on X, sharing Trump’s announcement.

    “Congress should immediately take up and pass a federal film tax incentive to bring back these good-paying jobs that we’ve lost to other countries,” Schiff continued. “Let’s work together — Republicans and Democrats — to get this done, and bring the movie magic back to America.”

    The declaration represented an extraordinary moment of agreement between Trump and the California Democrat who helped lead the president’s first impeachment and has remained a relentless administration critic.

    Trump unveiled his proposal after meeting with actor Jon Voight, whom the president appointed as a special ambassador to Hollywood alongside Sylvester Stallone and Mel Gibson.

    “I am going to suggest that Republicans and Democrats get together, and immediately craft Legislation to save the Movie, Television, and Entertainment Business in America,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

    “Congress should approve, immediately, a Federal Production Incentive to create Entertainment Jobs in America,” he added. “It can be done very easily, and EVERYBODY WILL BE HAPPY!”

    Trump argued that Hollywood had become a “Complete and Total Disaster” as productions increasingly moved to Canada and other foreign competitors offering generous financial incentives.

    “There is no incentive to be there, and it is hurting California very badly,” Trump wrote. “The amount of money spent on Tax Incentives will be made up tenfold by the money pouring into the Treasury’s coffers.”

    The president said Voight and others had persuaded him that federal tax incentives could “Make our Movie and Television Production Business GREAT AGAIN, perhaps GREATER THAN EVER BEFORE!”

    Voight and his advisers have promoted a federal credit covering as much as 20% of qualifying production costs. Trump did not endorse a specific percentage in his announcement, however, and Congress has not yet introduced a final bill.

    Schiff’s support was surprising politically, but not entirely unexpected on policy grounds.

    The senator has spent months advocating for a nationwide incentive and circulated a proposal offering a 15% credit on labor costs for productions made in the United States, according to Mediaite.

    During a March Senate hearing in Burbank, Schiff warned that state-level programs alone could not compete with the incentives offered by foreign governments.

    “State programs simply cannot substitute for the kind of globally competitive federal tax incentive that is needed to bring production back to American soil and stop its offshoring,” Schiff said at the hearing.

    Schiff said the industry directly supports roughly 800,000 American jobs and indirectly affects millions more, including carpenters, caterers, drivers, hotel workers and equipment suppliers. He also noted that Los Angeles County lost more than 42,000 motion-picture production jobs over two years.

    Trump’s endorsement marks a shift from his previous proposal to slap a 100% tariff on movies produced overseas. Studios and entertainment unions argued that tax incentives would offer a more practical way to compete with Canada, the United Kingdom and other foreign production centers.

    The Motion Picture Association welcomed Trump’s support, while the Wall Street Journal reported that studios, unions and lawmakers had been privately lobbying the White House for a national incentive since last year.

    Whether Congress can translate the unlikely Trump-Schiff alliance into legislation remains uncertain. For the moment, however, two of Washington’s most bitter rivals have found themselves reading from the same Hollywood script.

    Trump Reportedly ‘Expressed Concern’ Over Hegseth’s Army Purge In Closed-Door Meeting

    1
    By Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America - Pete Hegseth, CC BY-SA 2.0

    President Donald Trump was reportedly caught off guard by the scale of Secretary of War Pete Hegseth’s purge of senior Army leaders—just days before the service’s top civilian official abruptly resigned.

    Outgoing Army Secretary Dan Driscoll personally warned Trump about the leadership shake-up during a private White House meeting last week, according to The Atlantic.

    The magazine, citing four people familiar with the conversation, reported that Trump was surprised to learn how many generals and other senior officers had been fired, pressured to leave or denied promotions under Hegseth.

    Driscoll argued that the upheaval was undermining the Army’s ability to modernize and prepare for future threats.

    Trump “expressed concern about the deep cuts to the Army’s senior leadership,” one person familiar with the meeting told the magazine.

    During the same closed-door conversation, Driscoll informed Trump that he planned to resign. His departure became official Monday evening, escalating a months-long power struggle inside the Pentagon.

    The White House confirmed the resignation but did not publicly address Trump’s reported concerns about Hegseth.

    “Secretary Driscoll has been highly effective in advancing President Trump’s agenda to Make America Strong Again at the Department of the Army,” White House spokesperson Anna Kelly told CBS News.

    Kelly credited Driscoll with providing “outstanding leadership during historic military operations,” restoring the Army’s focus on “readiness and lethality” and assisting with negotiations between Russia and Ukraine.

    “The United States Army is more powerful than ever thanks to his work alongside the Commander-in-Chief and Secretary of War,” she added.

    Trump has not personally commented in public on Driscoll’s exit or indicated whether he intends to rein in Hegseth’s personnel overhaul.

    Driscoll, a former Army officer who served in Iraq, became the youngest Army secretary in history when he took office at age 38. The close friend and former Yale Law School classmate of Vice President JD Vance quickly earned a reputation as a reformer determined to drag the Army’s weapons and drone programs into the future.

    But personnel decisions became a major flashpoint between Driscoll and Hegseth.

    Driscoll strongly supported former Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George, whom Hegseth forced out in April without publicly explaining the decision. Gen. Chris Donahue, the commander of U.S. Army Europe and Africa, later filed for retirement.

    Driscoll and George had worked together on the Army Transformation Initiative, an ambitious modernization effort emphasizing drones and other unmanned systems. The Army has since moved to phase out a European drone battalion supported by both men, CBS News reported.

    The leadership purge has left a striking vacuum at the top of America’s largest military branch.

    The Army now lacks both a permanent civilian secretary and a Senate-confirmed chief of staff. NPR reported that the number of active-duty Army four-star generals has fallen from 10 when Hegseth took office to just five.

    Gen. Christopher LaNeve, Hegseth’s choice for the Army’s No. 2 position, has served as acting chief of staff since George’s departure. According to The Atlantic, LaNeve repeatedly bypassed Driscoll and took major decisions directly to Hegseth.

    Hegseth is now expected to nominate LaNeve for the permanent chief of staff position, although Senate opposition could complicate his confirmation.

    Meanwhile, Deputy Army Undersecretary Dave Fitzgerald, a Driscoll ally, is also expected to step down this week, according to CBS News.

    Pentagon officials are reportedly watching closely to see who Trump selects to replace Driscoll. Hegseth ally and chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell has emerged as a possible contender, a move that could give the secretary even tighter control over the Army and its personnel.

    One defense official offered The Atlantic a grim assessment of what could follow if an intensely political Hegseth loyalist takes the job.

    “What happens then?” the official asked. “Generational damage.”

    White House Teleprompter Operator Pays $172K After Betting on Trump’s Speeches

    0

    A former longtime White House teleprompter operator will hand over more than $172,000 after federal regulators found he used advance knowledge of President Trump’s speeches to cash in on prediction-market bets.

    Gabriel Perez, who ran the teleprompter for Trump since 2016, settled with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission on Friday. He must return $107,539 in profits and pay a $65,000 civil penalty. A three-year trading ban is also in place.

    According to the CFTC, Perez traded so-called “mention market” contracts on Kalshi between December 2025 and February 2026. These contracts pay out based on whether specific words or phrases appear in a speech. As teleprompter operator, Perez saw the prepared remarks before the President delivered them and used that nonpublic information to place winning bets.

    The agency said he misappropriated the material “in breach of his duty of trust and confidence,” generating over $107,500 in profits. The $65,000 penalty was reduced because of Perez’s “exemplary cooperation” with investigators. Kalshi flagged the activity and assisted the probe.

    Former White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed earlier that Perez was placed on unpaid administrative leave after the allegations surfaced. He is no longer employed by the federal government. The White House has long maintained strict ethics rules and previously warned staff against using nonpublic information for prediction-market bets.

    ABC News first reported the investigation last month. Federal prosecutors in Manhattan were notified but declined to pursue a criminal case.

    Kalshi’s lead lawyer welcomed the outcome, stating that no one is above the rules. The settlement closes the matter on a staffer who broke trust—and underscores that even in the White House, the rules apply.

    Report: Letitia James Prosecutor Says He Was Told To Target Trump Allies

    1
    Alec Perkins from Hoboken, USA, CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons

    New York Attorney General Letitia James is facing a stunning accusation from inside her own office.

    Assistant Attorney General Daniel Wiesenfeld claimed he was instructed “to find and pursue crimes committed by specific individuals and organizations affiliated with Donald Trump,” according to an agency-wide email obtained by the Times Union.

    The Friday email reportedly landed in the inboxes of more than 2,000 employees before abruptly vanishing from the office’s computer servers.

    Wiesenfeld, a prosecutor in the office’s Investor Protection Bureau, specifically accused bureau chief Shamiso Maswoswe of directing him to target Trump, his Truth Social platform and Hewlett Packard without a credible underlying reason.

    The reference to Hewlett Packard apparently involved Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s $14 billion acquisition of Juniper Networks, a deal James’ office has opposed despite its approval by the Justice Department.

    Wiesenfeld accused the attorney general’s office of spending taxpayer money pursuing politically convenient enemies while failing to act aggressively against nonprofit homeless-shelter fraud and antisemitic crimes near synagogues.

    He also urged his colleagues to prosecute known crimes and identify those responsible instead of “targeting individuals and then finding crimes,” the Times Union reported.

    The email was quickly followed by another agency-wide message from James’ general counsel, Kumiki Gibson, describing the controversy as an “internal” matter and assuring employees that no one was in danger.

    James’ office then placed Wiesenfeld on administrative leave with full pay.

    “This is a personnel matter,” a spokesperson told the Daily Caller, adding that the office protects New Yorkers regardless of their political beliefs and “strongly reject[s] any assertion to the contrary.”

    Wiesenfeld is no fringe employee. A former Brooklyn assistant district attorney, he recently worked on one of James’ major cases: an April lawsuit accusing Coinbase and Gemini of operating illegal prediction-market gambling platforms in New York, according to the attorney general’s office.

    The allegations are especially explosive given James’ history with Trump. During her 2018 campaign, the Democrat pledged to investigate and prosecute Trump over his New York business dealings.

    Her office later secured a civil fraud judgment against Trump, his sons and his company. An appeals court upheld the fraud finding in 2025 but eliminated the enormous financial penalty after determining it was excessive, Courthouse News Service reported.

    New York Republican Party Chairman Ed Cox accused James of turning her office into a “political hit squad,” according to the New York Post.

    Even Melissa DeRosa, a former top aide to Democratic ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, condemned the alleged conduct, arguing that politicized prosecutions are “wrong when either side does it.”

    Ted Cruz Flatly Rejects Claim GOP Is United Behind JD Vance

    1
    Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America,

    Vice President JD Vance may be the early favorite to inherit the MAGA mantle, but Ted Cruz is warning Republicans that there will be no automatic coronation in 2028.

    Asked during an interview with MS NOW’s Ali Vitali whether the GOP had already coalesced behind Vance, Cruz delivered a blunt answer.

    “Oh, no!” Cruz declared. “There’s going to be a full discussion about who we are and what we believe,” according to Mediaite.

    The Texas Republican said there is “no Never Trump lane” inside today’s GOP and praised President Donald Trump as a fearless and extraordinary political figure. But he argued that Trump’s support cannot simply be transferred to a handpicked successor.

    “Trump is a black swan event,” Cruz said, predicting Republicans will spend the coming years debating the party’s identity after Trump leaves office.

    Cruz also made clear that he intends to have a voice in that fight.

    “There’ll be time to figure that out,” he said when asked whether he could enter the 2028 contest. “I’ll certainly be part of the discussion.”

    Days later, Cruz stripped away even more of the mystery.

    “It’s no secret that I want to be president,” the senator said Wednesday during an appearance on Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick’s podcast. Asked directly whether he would launch another campaign, Cruz replied, “Time will tell,” according to The Texas Tribune.

    Cruz is also scheduled to campaign in Iowa this weekend—his second trip to the early-voting state this year. The senator won the Iowa caucuses during his 2016 presidential campaign and ultimately finished second to Trump after carrying 11 states.

    Vance remains the strongest prospective candidate in the emerging field, but the numbers leave plenty of room for a fight. A May Emerson College poll placed Vance at 36% among likely Republican primary voters, just one point ahead of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, with 15% undecided.

    Reports that Trump privately told donors “we need to elect JD” fueled speculation that the president had already chosen his heir. Trump later poured cold water on an immediate endorsement, publicly calling the discussion “way too early,” according to the New York Post.

    Vance, meanwhile, has said he will discuss a potential campaign with his wife after the midterm elections, telling CBS News that he expects Trump to support whatever decision he ultimately makes.

    For Cruz, however, the coming contest is about more than personalities. He wants Republicans to decide whether they remain a small-government, free-market party and whether they favor American leadership abroad or a more isolationist approach.

    The warning to Vance was unmistakable: Being the heir apparent does not make someone the nominee.

    Longstanding Ground Zero Rule Upends Trump’s 9/11 Plans

    David B. Gleason from Chicago, IL, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

    A rule that has kept politics out of Ground Zero’s Sept. 11 ceremony for more than a decade reportedly helped send President Donald Trump’s anniversary plans in a different direction.

    Trump is now expected to deliver remarks at the Pentagon on the 25th anniversary of the terrorist attacks rather than travel to the World Trade Center memorial in Manhattan, according to multiple reports.

    The native New Yorker had shown interest in appearing at Ground Zero, but people briefed on the planning told CNN that the president wanted to deliver a speech.

    That presented a problem.

    Politicians have not been permitted to speak during the Manhattan commemoration since 2012. The restriction is intended to keep the solemn ceremony nonpartisan and focused on victims and their families.

    Instead, Trump is expected to appear at the Pentagon, where presidents may deliver formal remarks. Vice President JD Vance will attend the Ground Zero ceremony in his place.

    A White House official told NewsNation that Vance is “still traveling to NYC” and that the Trump administration will be represented at all three sites attacked on Sept. 11, 2001.

    White House spokesperson Anna Kelly also pushed back against any suggestion that Trump’s absence from Manhattan would diminish his connection to the anniversary.

    “As a proud New Yorker, President Trump has spoken about his own experiences watching the horrific events,” Kelly said.

    The president will honor the victims, their families and the first responders who “put their lives on the line,” she added.

    Trump attended the Pentagon observance last year with First Lady Melania Trump. During his remarks, he praised the courage Americans displayed in New York, Virginia and Pennsylvania and declared that the country would “never yield.”

    The official White House account of the ceremony said Trump also participated in a wreath-laying and renewed America’s promise never to forget the 2,977 lives lost.

    Meanwhile, the 25th-anniversary ceremony at Ground Zero will remain centered on the families. Relatives will read aloud the names of 2,983 people killed in the 2001 attacks and the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

    Six moments of silence will mark the attacks and collapse of the towers, the strike on the Pentagon and the crash of Flight 93. A seventh will honor those who later died from 9/11-related illnesses.

    Trump’s decision also simplifies a packed travel schedule. The president is expected to leave for Ireland on Sept. 12 to attend the Irish Open at his golf course in Doonbeg.

    The location may have changed, but the White House’s message has not: Trump intends to use the historic anniversary to remember the victims and honor the Americans who ran toward danger when the country was under attack.

    GOP Governor Sounds Alarm Over Trump DOJ’s Election-Day Tactics

    0
    Missvain, CC BY 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons

    A Republican governor is pushing back against the Trump administration after Justice Department election monitors allegedly tried to question voters and gain access to voting equipment during Wyoming’s primary.

    Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon called the federal officials’ conduct “aggressive” and “irregular” after two attorneys from the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division visited polling locations in Laramie County on Aug. 18.

    “It sounded like the behavior of the observers was a bit aggressive,” Gordon said Wednesday as Wyoming’s canvassing board met to certify the primary results.

    “It just was irregular,” he added.

    Gordon has directed Wyoming Attorney General Keith Kautz to investigate the federal operation and determine whether the monitors exceeded the authority granted to them by Congress.

    “I’m not objecting to the observers,” Gordon said. “But their behavior seemed to exceed what the authority that Congress had given them was.”

    Clerk Details Unexpected DOJ Visit

    Laramie County Clerk Debra Lee said two people identifying themselves as Justice Department election monitors appeared at a polling location with little warning.

    “Two individuals, identifying themselves as DOJ election monitors, informed our poll worker that they were here to monitor Wyoming’s Primary Elections,” Lee said in a statement.

    “They did not offer their credentials until I requested they do so.”

    Lee said a Justice Department official later told her that the deployment had been arranged on short notice and that an email intended for her office may have been sent to the wrong address.

    The federal attorneys reportedly began asking poll workers about their training, written election manuals and the county’s purchase of new voting equipment.

    They also sought access to examine ballot tabulators, according to Lee.

    Those requests appeared to extend beyond the enforcement of federal voting-rights and ballot-access laws, the clerk argued.

    But the greatest concern arose when the monitors reportedly sought permission to speak directly with voters inside polling places.

    The Justice Department said the proposed interviews would help determine whether Laramie County was complying with federal voting laws.

    Lee refused the request.

    “We do not allow interviews to be conducted in polling places,” she said.

    Wyoming restricts activity inside voting locations to protect ballot secrecy, prevent disruptions and ensure voters can cast their ballots without interference.

    “This was a poorly managed exercise and one that showed complete disregard for our state laws and administration of our elections,” Lee said.

    The clerk did not accuse the attorneys of handling ballots, changing votes or disrupting the final count. State officials described the primary as successful and reported no evidence of fraud or voting-rights violations.

    Republicans Split Over Federal Monitoring

    The controversy has exposed a rare disagreement among Republican officials in one of America’s most conservative states.

    Wyoming Secretary of State Chuck Gray has generally supported the Trump administration’s election-integrity efforts and defended the legal basis for allowing observers inside polling places.

    Gray also disputed Gordon’s suggestion that federal officials had failed to communicate with state authorities.

    When Gordon asked whether the Justice Department contacted the secretary of state’s office before Election Day, Elections Division Director Paul Raines acknowledged receiving a message.

    “Our office had received an email, but that’s the extent of communications I’m aware of,” Raines said.

    Gordon said the Wyoming Office of Homeland Security, the state attorney general and the Laramie County clerk were not properly informed about the deployment.

    “To my knowledge, the U.S. attorney was unaware of it,” Gordon added.

    U.S. Attorney Darin Smith, however, released a statement supporting the monitoring operation several hours after it was announced.

    “Voters deserve absolute confidence that their ballots are secure and their voices are heard without interference,” Smith said. “We are working alongside local officials to ensure every lawful vote is protected.”

    Trump DOJ Expands Election Oversight

    The Justice Department announced on primary morning that it was deploying two Civil Rights Division attorneys to Laramie County and four more to Miami-Dade County, Florida.

    “Election monitoring is an ongoing priority for this office,” Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon said.

    “Nondiscriminatory monitoring ensures all elections remain free, fair, and accessible to all.”

    The department said the operation was designed to promote “transparency, ballot security, and compliance with federal law.”

    Federal attorneys routinely monitor elections for compliance with the Voting Rights Act, the National Voter Registration Act, the Help America Vote Act and other federal protections.

    The department has not explained why Laramie County was selected or identified a specific complaint that prompted the visit.

    It also had not publicly responded to Lee’s detailed allegations as of Thursday.

    The Wyoming deployment came as the Trump Justice Department dramatically expanded its election-monitoring operation. The Civil Rights Division said it sent more than 75 monitors to approximately 200 polling locations across five states during the 2026 primary season.

    The administration reportedly could deploy as many as 1,000 federal employees nationwide for November’s general election.

    Gordon framed the dispute as a matter of states’ rights rather than a partisan attack against President Donald Trump.

    “I feel very strongly about federal government coming in and taking our guns,” he said. “I don’t like that. And I don’t like federal government coming in and taking our votes either.”

    The governor stressed that he was not accusing federal officials of stealing ballots or corrupting the election.

    “I’m not saying anything went wrong or anything else, and I certainly think the conduct of this election was phenomenal,” Gordon said.

    His concern is whether the federal government attempted to assert power over state election administration that Congress never authorized.

    With a much larger federal presence expected in November, Wyoming’s investigation could determine whether state officials seek new restrictions—or even head to court—before Justice Department monitors return.

    Bret Baier Fires Back After Trump Unleashes On Fox News Colleague

    0

    Fox News anchor Bret Baier pushed back on President Donald Trump in real time Thursday after the president accused one of the network’s veteran correspondents of airing an “inaccurate” report about Iran.

    The unusual on-air showdown erupted during “Special Report,” shortly after chief correspondent Jonathan Hunt updated viewers on diplomatic efforts surrounding the ongoing conflict.

    Hunt reported that there had been no major breakthrough in efforts to end the fighting and aired a clip of Trump saying his administration was not seeking a meeting with Tehran.

    “We’re not looking to meet or anything,” Trump said in the clip, according to additional coverage of the segment.

    But before the broadcast had even ended, Trump took aim at both Hunt and Baier on Truth Social.

    “Jonathan Hunt of Fox News did a particularly inaccurate report on the Failing Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump wrote.

    The president insisted he had no interest in requesting talks, declaring that Iranian officials were the ones “begging to make a deal.”

    Then he dragged Baier directly into the fight.

    “Bret Baier should straighten out his flunkies, for a change!” Trump wrote.

    Baier was not about to let that one pass.

    Before signing off, the anchor read Trump’s post and delivered a rare, point-by-point rebuttal to the president.

    “First of all, Jonathan is not a flunky. He is a great reporter,” Baier said, according to The Hill’s account of the exchange.

    Baier then addressed Trump directly, stressing that Fox had never reported that the president wanted to meet with Iran.

    Instead, Baier explained, the network had aired Trump’s own comments ruling out a meeting. Hunt’s report focused on Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s effort to rally Group of 20 nations behind Washington’s pressure campaign against Tehran.

    Baier added that Gulf allies, including Qatar, were attempting to persuade Iranian leaders to accept concessions.

    “That’s what we said,” the anchor concluded.

    The clash unfolded as the Trump administration dramatically escalated its attempt to isolate Iran economically.

    Bessent announced “Operation Economic Outcast” earlier this week, describing it as an unprecedented effort to sever the regime’s financial connections around the world.

    “Any entity that facilitates money laundering on behalf of Iran will be removed from the U.S. dollar system,” Bessent warned in remarks published by the Treasury Department.

    The administration has also expanded the threat of secondary sanctions to entities doing business with Iran in areas including shipping, aviation, gold, technology and digital assets.

    Trump’s dispute with Hunt appears to have centered on how Fox characterized the diplomatic maneuvering surrounding that campaign—not on whether the administration was increasing economic pressure.

    Baier’s swift defense of his colleague was especially striking given his long relationship with Trump. As Fox’s chief political anchor, Baier has interviewed the president repeatedly and regularly speaks with him directly.

    Trump, meanwhile, has never hesitated to unload on Fox personalities when he believes the network’s coverage is unfair. Earlier this year, he criticized anchor Shannon Bream and demanded that Fox executives remove liberal co-host Jessica Tarlov from the air, TheWrap reported.

    This time, however, the president’s criticism landed while the show he was attacking was still live.

    And Baier made sure the president received an answer before the credits rolled.

    Biden Considered Pardoning Trump Before Leaving Office

    0
    The White House, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

    Joe Biden may have come closer than anyone knew to handing Donald Trump the ultimate political get-out-of-jail-free card.

    Utah Gov. Spencer Cox claims Biden revealed during a private 2023 conversation that he and first lady Jill Biden had discussed pardoning Trump as the former president faced a growing pile of criminal charges.

    The startling exchange appears in Cox’s upcoming book, Off Ramp: How to Be a Peacemaker in an Age of Contempt, according to an excerpt published by The Atlantic and reported by Mediaite.

    Cox said the conversation unfolded inside a limousine during Biden’s August 2023 visit to Salt Lake City.

    The Republican governor decided to make a wildly unexpected pitch: Biden should use his presidential pardon power to spare the man who could soon become his general-election opponent.

    Biden’s reported response was even more surprising.

    “You know, I’ve actually considered this for a while,” Biden told him, according to Cox.

    The then-president allegedly added that he and Jill Biden had held a lengthy conversation about the idea in bed earlier that same week. Cox said Biden promised to give the proposal serious consideration.

    At the time, Trump was facing two federal prosecutions—one involving classified documents kept at Mar-a-Lago and another tied to his efforts to challenge the 2020 election results.

    Those were the only cases Biden could have touched. A presidential pardon applies to federal offenses, not Trump’s state charges or the civil fraud case brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James.

    The private conversation reportedly came as Cox publicly went out of his way to welcome Biden to deep-red Utah.

    Cox was the lone high-profile Utah Republican to attend Biden’s speech at a Salt Lake City veterans hospital, where the president promoted expanded benefits for veterans exposed to toxic substances.

    “There has been some question over whether or not the governor of the state of Utah would welcome the president of a different party,” Cox told the crowd, according to KUTV.

    Cox called the controversy over simply welcoming a president from the opposing party “insane” and urged Americans to find ways to disagree without treating political rivals as enemies.

    That appeal became the central theme of his new book—and apparently drove his extraordinary pardon proposal.

    Biden ultimately kept the pardon pen away from Trump.

    But he certainly did not put it away altogether.

    After repeatedly insisting that he would not intervene in his son’s criminal cases, Biden issued Hunter Biden a sweeping pardon in December 2024 covering potential federal offenses committed over nearly 11 years.

    Hours before leaving office, Biden also granted preemptive pardons to five family members, Dr. Anthony Fauci, retired Gen. Mark Milley, members of the House Jan. 6 committee and police officers who testified before it, according to Roll Call.

    Cox was not the only prominent Utah Republican who believed pardoning Trump could have lowered the nation’s political temperature.

    Then-Sen. Mitt Romney made the same argument publicly in May 2024, saying Biden should have acted immediately after the federal indictments were announced.

    “I’d have pardoned President Trump,” Romney said, arguing that the country did not want to endure the prosecution of a former president in the middle of an election.

    No pardon ever came.

    Trump instead won his way back to the White House, and the federal cases against him were abandoned after the 2024 election under the Justice Department’s longstanding policy against prosecuting a sitting president.

    Cox later endorsed Trump after the 2024 assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, hoping the near-tragedy would push him toward a more unifying political style.

    Trump’s Secret Service Rocked By Suspected Betrayal From Within

    President Donald Trump’s protective agency is confronting a suspected betrayal from within—just weeks after details of one of its most sensitive security operations spilled into public view.

    Three senior Secret Service employees, including communications chief Anthony Guglielmi, were escorted from the agency’s Washington headquarters on Monday and placed on administrative leave, according to RealClearPolitics.

    The officials reportedly had their security clearances suspended, lost access to their government devices and were designated “do not admit,” barring them from Secret Service facilities while investigators examine how classified or sensitive information may have reached the media.

    All three worked in the agency’s communications office and were non-law-enforcement personnel—not field agents.

    RealClearPolitics reported that the Secret Service’s Office of Professional Responsibility is leading the investigation. One source told the outlet that the FBI and CIA are also participating, suggesting the case could extend far beyond a routine personnel dispute.

    The Secret Service has confirmed the suspensions but has not disclosed what the employees are accused of doing.

    “Three non-law enforcement personnel at the U.S. Secret Service have been placed on administrative leave pending an investigation into potential misconduct,” an agency spokesperson told CBS News.

    The agency said its “zero-fail mission” requires employees to maintain an unwavering commitment to honesty, courage and professionalism.

    Placing employees on leave and temporarily revoking their access is standard during an internal investigation and does not prove wrongdoing. The Secret Service has also not publicly connected the three officials to any particular disclosure.

    However, the investigation comes as the Trump administration hunts for the source of leaks involving a clandestine maneuver used to protect the president from an alleged Iranian assassination plot.

    After attending the NATO summit in Ankara on July 8, Trump publicly boarded an older Air Force One while reporters and numerous administration officials watched. Behind the aircraft, however, a catering truck was being used as part of an elaborate escape plan.

    Trump was secretly moved off Air Force One and taken to a nearby Air Force C-32A. He then flew to the United Kingdom aboard the smaller aircraft while reporters and members of his staff continued on the original plane, believing the president was traveling with them.

    The operation was reportedly ordered after U.S. intelligence detected a credible Iranian plot to fire a missile at Trump’s aircraft.

    Trump later confirmed that the military and Secret Service “wanted me to go in a different flight.”

    “Any consequential president has a lot of threats,” he told reporters.

    Several Trump administration officials were reportedly furious when details of the operation became public, warning that exposing classified protective tactics could make it harder to safeguard presidents during future emergencies. FBI Director Kash Patel helped establish an earlier investigation into the disclosure, according to RealClearPolitics.

    The agency is also investigating a separate suspected leak involving Vice President JD Vance’s protective detail.

    In July, an agent was placed on leave after allegedly disclosing operational information about Vance’s travel, including a planned Marine Corps helicopter trip involving the vice president’s son.

    At the time, it was Guglielmi who announced that investigation.

    “Any conduct that potentially threatens the safety of a protectee will not be tolerated,” Guglielmi said in a Secret Service statement reported by CBS News.

    Now Guglielmi—who has led the agency’s communications operation since 2022—is among those sidelined while investigators determine whether another internal line was crossed.

    His attorney, Gregg Bernstein, pushed back against any implication of wrongdoing.

    “Anthony Guglielmi is a professional of deep integrity whose decades-long public record advocating for local, state and federal agencies speaks for itself,” Bernstein told CBS News, adding that Guglielmi is cooperating fully.

    The turmoil presents another major test for Secret Service Director Sean Curran, the longtime member of Trump’s detail who helped shield him during the 2024 assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania.

    Curran was personally selected by Trump to rebuild an agency battered by security failures, communication breakdowns and internal distrust. Six agents were previously disciplined over the Butler debacle, while a government review released by Sen. Chuck Grassley found that senior officials failed to share critical threat intelligence with personnel responsible for securing the rally.

    The current investigation strikes at an even more fundamental question: Can the president trust the people given access to his most sensitive security information?

    There is currently no proof that Guglielmi or the other two employees leaked Trump’s movements. But the decision to pull their clearances, cut off their devices and bar them from Secret Service facilities shows how seriously the agency is treating the possibility that its latest threat came from inside its own walls.