Home Blog

Nancy Pelosi Claims Republicans May Hack Voting Machines and Create โ€˜Fake Countโ€™ in Midterms

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is once again sounding alarms ahead of a major electionโ€”this time warning that Republicans aligned with Donald Trump could attempt to manipulate voting systems in the 2026 midterms.

In a sit-down interview with MSNBCโ€™s Ali Vitali, the former House Speakerโ€”long one of Trumpโ€™s most vocal criticsโ€”predicted Democratic success in the upcoming elections but cautioned supporters to stay vigilant against what she suggested could be underhanded GOP tactics.

โ€œThere are so many things that you can do to protect the election, and they are being done, whether itโ€™s litigation or legislation or just mobilization, communication, all of that. But in addition to that, we have to be on guard as to what they may try to do to the technology. They may try to creep into the technology and create a false count,โ€ Pelosi said.

Pelosi, who has spent years opposing Trump and his political movement, framed her concerns as part of a broader battle over the integrity of American democracy. She has consistently accused Trump and his allies of undermining democratic normsโ€”particularly following the 2020 electionโ€”and her latest comments reflect that ongoing distrust.

Her remarks come as Democrats continue to push back against Republican-led redistricting efforts and the SAVE Act, a GOP-backed bill that would require stricter voter identification. While the legislation has passed the House, it faces steep odds in the Senate.

Pelosi didnโ€™t hold back in her assessment of Republicansโ€™ motivations.

โ€œPelosi accused Republicans of having โ€˜no commitment to the rule of law and doing things the appropriate way.โ€™โ€

Despite her warnings, Pelosi struck a confident tone about Democratic prospects, outlining what she sees as the partyโ€™s core mission heading into the midterms.

โ€œWe have three purposes now. One is to win the midterm. Two is to make sure the elections are safe. And three, tell people what we will do when we win. That is the mission,โ€ she said.

The longtime Democratic leader also reflected on the partyโ€™s future, predicting that a woman will eventually become presidentโ€”though she does not expect to see it herself. She credited Vice President Kamala Harris with energizing voters during the 2024 election cycle.

โ€œShe turned out so many more people than who would have voted,โ€ Pelosi said.

Watch:

Trump Make Unprecedented Move And Attend SCOTUS Hearing On Birthright Citizenship

0
Duncan Lock, Dflock, CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

President Donald Trump is set to make an unprecedented appearance at the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday, attending oral arguments in a case that could redefine birthright citizenship in America.

The White House confirmed the visit as justices hear the administrationโ€™s appeal after lower courts blocked Trumpโ€™s executive order restricting automatic citizenship. A decision is expected by early summer.

If he follows through, Trump would become the first sitting president to attend Supreme Court arguments.

The order โ€” signed on the first day of his second term โ€” seeks to deny citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are in the country illegally or on temporary visas, directly challenging long-standing interpretations of the 14th Amendment.

โ€œIโ€™m going,โ€ Trump told reporters Tuesday in the Oval Office, adding: โ€œI think so, I do believe.โ€

For the administration, the case is central to Trumpโ€™s hardline immigration agenda โ€” a defining feature of his second term. Opponents call the effort unconstitutional and unprecedented, warning it could affect roughly 150,000 children born in the U.S. each year to non-citizens.

A ruling in Trumpโ€™s favor would mark a seismic shift in immigration policy, upending decades of legal precedent and forcing immediate action from Congress and federal agencies to determine the status of affected children.


The Constitutional Fight

At the center of the case is the 14th Amendment, which states: โ€œAll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizensโ€ฆโ€

Trump argues that the clause has been misinterpreted.

His Executive Order 14160, โ€œProtecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,โ€ would deny citizenship to children born after Feb. 19, 2025, if their parents are undocumented or in the U.S. on temporary visas. It also bars federal agencies from recognizing those children as citizens.

โ€œThe privilege of United States citizenship is a priceless and profound gift,โ€ the order states. โ€œBut the Fourteenth Amendment has never been interpreted to extend citizenship universally to everyone born within the United States.โ€

In its appeal, the Justice Department called lower court rulings against the order a โ€œmistaken viewโ€ with โ€œdestructive consequences.โ€

โ€œThe lower courts’ decisions invalidated a policy of prime importance to the president and his administration in a manner that undermines our border security,โ€ said Solicitor General John Sauer, who will argue the case. โ€œThose decisions confer, without lawful justification, the privilege of American citizenship on hundreds of thousands of unqualified people.โ€


The Opposition

A coalition of states, immigrant rights groups, and private plaintiffs โ€” including pregnant women โ€” is challenging the order.

They argue it contradicts both the Constitution and longstanding Supreme Court precedent, including an 1898 ruling affirming citizenship for children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents.

โ€œThe federal courts have unanimously held that President Trumpโ€™s executive order is contrary to the Constitution, a Supreme Court decision from 1898, and a law enacted by Congress,โ€ said ACLU legal director Cecillia Wang. โ€œWe look forward to putting this issue to rest once and for all in the Supreme Court this term.โ€

Critics warn the policy could create chaos, forcing families to prove citizenship status at birth and potentially leaving some children stateless.

โ€œUnder the executive order, that child is born a noncitizen,โ€ said UVA law professor Amanda Frost, โ€œdenied all the benefits and privileges of citizenship and theoretically deportable on day one of their life.โ€


What the Court Will Weigh

The legal battle hinges on the phrase โ€œsubject to the jurisdiction thereof.โ€

The administration argues it allows the government to exclude children of undocumented or temporary-status parents. Opponents say precedent limits that exception to narrow cases like children of foreign diplomats.

During earlier arguments, several justices appeared skeptical.

The governmentโ€™s position โ€œmakes no sense whatsoever,โ€ Justice Sonia Sotomayor said, warning it could leave some children โ€œstateless.โ€

Justice Brett Kavanaugh raised practical concerns: โ€œWhat do hospitals do with a newborn? What do states do with a newborn?โ€

โ€œI don’t think they do anything different,โ€ Sauer responded.

โ€œHow are they going to know that?โ€ Kavanaugh pressed.


Why It Matters

The stakes are enormous.

A Pew survey found 94% of Americans support citizenship for children born in the U.S. to immigrants legally in the country. Meanwhile, critics of current policy point to abuses like โ€œbirth tourism,โ€ where foreign nationals travel to the U.S. specifically to secure citizenship for their children.

โ€œThis is the exploitation of America’s birthright citizenship policy,โ€ said Peter Schweizer. โ€œBirth tourism is essentially an industryโ€ฆโ€

Now, the Supreme Court will decide whether to uphold more than a century of precedent โ€” or redefine what it means to be born an American.

And for the first time, the president himself may be in the room when that decision begins.

Federal Judge Halts Construction On White House Ballroom

2

A federal judge on Tuesday ordered an immediate halt to construction on President Trumpโ€™s proposed White House ballroom, delivering a major legal setback to a project the administration has promoted as both a historic expansion and a national security upgrade.

U.S. District Judge Richard Leon ruled that Trump does not have the legal authority to proceed with the estimated $400 million project without explicit approval from Congress, siding with preservation groups that had challenged the effort in court.

โ€œNo statute comes closeโ€ to granting the president the authority he claims, Leon wrote, blocking further construction until lawmakers authorize the project.

โ€œThe President of the United States is the steward of the White House for future generations of First Families,โ€ Leon added. โ€œHe is not, however, the owner!โ€

The ruling stems from a lawsuit brought by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which argued that the administration bypassed required oversight from Congress and federal planning bodies, including the National Capital Planning Commission. The case had raised broader concerns about executive authority and the preservation of the White Houseโ€™s historic character.

Trump has repeatedly defended the ballroom project as a long-overdue upgrade to the White House, arguing that existing spaces are too small to host large diplomatic events and state functions.

โ€œFor 150 years, theyโ€™ve wanted to build a ballroom at the White House. Other presidents have wanted it,โ€ Trump said recently. โ€œWhen we have dignitaries coming like President Xi of China or anybody else, we have very small rooms. Theyโ€™re not big enough to handle the kind of capacity that you need.โ€

The president has also emphasized that the ballroom would be funded entirely through private donations and personal contributions, insisting that โ€œnot one dime of government moneyโ€ is being used for the above-ground structure.

But the project has drawn intensified scrutiny in recent days after Trump revealed that the ballroom would sit atop a previously undisclosed underground military complex.

โ€œNow, the military is building a massive complex under the ballroom, and thatโ€™s under construction, and weโ€™re doing very well,โ€ Trump said aboard Air Force One over the weekend, attributing the public disclosure to a lawsuit that brought details into the open.

He described the ballroom as heavily fortified, with โ€œall bullet-proof glassโ€ and โ€œdrone-proof roofs, ceilings,โ€ adding, โ€œUnfortunately, weโ€™re living in an age when thatโ€™s a good thing.โ€

Trump has also suggested the above-ground structure would effectively serve as a protective layer for what lies beneath.

โ€œThe ballroom essentially becomes a shed for whatโ€™s being built under the military, including from drones and including from any other thing,โ€ he said.

That revelation has fueled further debate over the true scope and purpose of the project, with critics arguing that the combination of a major structural addition and a secretive military component raises both legal and transparency concerns.

Architectural critics have also questioned aspects of the design, while preservationists warn that the addition could alter the historic integrity of the White House complex.

Tuesdayโ€™s ruling now throws the projectโ€™s future into uncertainty. Construction cannot resume unless Congress steps in to authorize the planโ€”an outcome that could prove politically contentious given the growing controversy surrounding both the ballroom and the underground development tied to it.

This is a breaking news story. Please check back for updates.

Report: Pentagon Mulls Deploying Anti-Drone Lasers Near Hegseth, Rubio Homes in DC

1
David B. Gleason from Chicago, IL, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

The Pentagon is weighing the deployment of โ€œpowerfulโ€ anti-drone technology to a Washington, D.C., military installation that houses two top Cabinet officials, according to a report published Tuesday.

Officials are considering sending a laser-based defense system to Fort Lesley J. McNair, where multiple drones of unknown origin were detected earlier this month, The New York Times reported, citing four people briefed on the discussions. The installation sits less than four miles from the White House and is located within some of the most tightly controlled airspace in the country.

The proposal, however, faces logistical challenges. The Times noted that deploying such a system over Washingtonโ€™s high-traffic airspace could complicate efforts, given the risks associated with operating advanced counter-drone technology in a densely populated and heavily regulated flight zone.

The deliberations follow a series of recent drone incidents that have raised security concerns across multiple U.S. military installations. Earlier this month, unidentified drones were spotted over Fort McNair on at least one night, prompting heightened monitoring and internal discussions about potential responses. The sightings also led officials to consider relocating senior officials who reside at the base, though they ultimately remained in place, according to prior reporting.

The incidents in Washington are part of a broader pattern of drone activity near sensitive military sites.

On March 9, personnel at Barksdale Air Force Base in Bossier Parish, Louisiana, were ordered to shelter in place after an unmanned aircraft was observed overhead. Although the order was lifted later that day, additional drone sightings were reported at the base throughout the week.

Officials have not publicly identified the source of the drones in any of the incidents, and investigations remain ongoing. The recent activity has underscored growing concerns within the Pentagon about the vulnerability of domestic military installations to unmanned aerial systems, particularly as global tensions continue to rise.

Eric Trump Unveils First Renderings Of Proposed Donald J. Trump Presidential Library

2
President Donald J. Trump attends the Daytona 500 at Daytona International Speedway in Daytona Beach, Florida, Sunday, February 16, 2025. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

A newly released animated video is offering the first public look at renderings of former President Donald Trumpโ€™s proposed presidential library in downtown Miami, showcasing a waterfront skyscraper and museum complex.

Trump shared the video on Truth Social early Tuesday, while his son Eric Trump posted it on X with additional details about the project. Eric Trump described the development as a โ€œlasting testamentโ€ to his father and his legacy.

โ€œOver the past six months, I have poured my heart and soul into this project with my incredible team,โ€ Eric Trump wrote. He added that the waterfront landmark would stand as a tribute to โ€œan amazing man, an amazing developer, and the greatest President our Nation has ever known.โ€

โ€œThese images have never been seen by the public โ€” until today. Enjoy!โ€ he added.

Eric Trump, who has been leading the projectโ€™s development, serves as president of the Donald J. Trump Presidential Library Foundation and is one of its trustees.

The video, set to orchestral music, opens with aerial views of the proposed waterfront site, featuring landscaped grounds with palm-lined walkways, fountains and green space. It then reveals a towering glass structure topped with a spire.

Renderings show Trumpโ€™s name displayed in gold lettering across the buildingโ€™s facade, along with a large American flag draped down the center. The design includes a presidential aircraft resembling Air Force One on the ground floor, as well as gold escalators reminiscent of Trump Tower in New York City.

Additional images depict military aircraft displayed inside the complex and a large auditorium-style space featuring a gold statue of Trump, a stage and large digital screens.

The plans also include replicas tied to Trumpโ€™s time in the White House, including the Oval Office, the West Colonnade and a ballroom.

The proposed library is being designed by Miami-based architecture and engineering firm Bermello Ajamil and would be built on a roughly 2.6-acre waterfront site.

In late September, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis and the Florida Cabinet approved transferring the Biscayne Boulevard parcel to the Trump Presidential Library Foundation. The site was briefly tied up in a legal dispute after a federal judge paused the transfer from Miami-Dade College before allowing it to proceed in December.

The property is currently used as an employee parking lot for Miami-Dade Collegeโ€™s Wolfson Campus and sits next to the historic Freedom Tower, which served as a resource center for Cuban immigrants fleeing communism in the 1960s and 1970s. The 100-year-old building is widely regarded as a symbol of Miamiโ€™s immigrant heritage.

The surrounding area includes luxury high-rise apartments and waterfront views facing the Kaseya Center, home of the NBAโ€™s Miami Heat, as well as Dodge Island, a major cruise port.

The parcel has been appraised at more than $66 million, according to media reports, though it could sell for at least $360 million, The New York Times reported, citing a real estate consultant.

Trumpโ€™s post also included a link inviting supporters to donate to the Donald J. Trump Presidential Library Foundation. Other trustees include Michael Boulos, the husband of Tiffany Trump, and Trump attorney James Kiley.

Trump carried Miami-Dade County by 13 points, becoming the first Republican to do so since 1988.

The unveiling comes as former President Barack Obamaโ€™s presidential center in Chicago is scheduled to open in June. President Donald Trump was notably left off the guest list for the opening of the Obama Library.

Trump Reveals Identity Of Secret Iran Negotiation Partner

The White House, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

President Donald Trump on Monday confirmed that his administration is engaged in talks with Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, identifying for the first time the official he has described as a key contact in ongoing negotiations.

The confirmation was reported by New York Post national security correspondent Caitlin Doornbos, who said Trump told her the U.S. is negotiating directly with Ghalibaf and suggested it would soon become clear whether the talks could produce results.

Trump โ€œconfirmed to me today that the US is negotiating with Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, saying weโ€™ll โ€˜find out in about a weekโ€™ whether he is someone America can truly work with,โ€ Doornbos reported.

The disclosure follows days of speculation after Trump announced on Truth Social that โ€œVERY GOOD AND PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATIONSโ€ were underway between the United States and Iran, even as tensions remained high following recent military escalation.

Trumpโ€™s announcement of talks came alongside a significant policy shift. Just hours after warning that Iran could face โ€œtotal decimationโ€ if it failed to comply with U.S. demands over the Strait of Hormuz, the president ordered a five-day pause on planned strikes targeting Iranian energy infrastructure, citing progress in negotiations.

Before naming Ghalibaf, Trump had declined to identify his counterpart, telling reporters only that discussions were taking place with โ€œa top person.โ€

โ€œA top person. Donโ€™t forget, we wiped out the leadership, phase one, and phase two and largely phase three. But weโ€™re dealing with a man who I believe is the most respected and the leader. It is a little tough. Weโ€™ve wiped out everybody,โ€ Trump said.

When pressed at the time on whether he was referring to Iranโ€™s leadership, Trump ruled out direct contact with the countryโ€™s newly named supreme leader.

โ€œNo, not the supreme leader. Nobody has heard of the second supreme leader, the son. We have not heard from the son. Everyone said youโ€™ve seen a statement made, we donโ€™t know if he is living. But the people that seem to be running it, and they seem that based on, really, fact because things theyโ€™ve said have taken place.โ€

Following those remarks, The Jerusalem Post reported that Trumpโ€™s backchannel contact was Ghalibaf. The Iranian official quickly denied the claim, posting on X that no negotiations were taking place.

โ€œIranian people demand complete and remorseful punishment of the aggressors. All Iranian officials stand firmly behind their supreme leader and people until this goal is achieved. No negotiations have been held with the US, and fakenews is used to manipulate the financial and oil markets and escape the quagmire in which the US and Israel are trapped.โ€

Despite the denial, Trump reiterated his position in comments to Doornbos, suggesting the administration is actively testing whether Ghalibaf represents a viable negotiating partner as conflict continues to unfold across the region.

โ€œWeโ€™re gonna find out,โ€ Trump told The Post when asked about Iranโ€™s Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf. โ€œIโ€™ll let you know that in about a week.โ€

Trump also indicated that recent developments inside Iran may have altered the diplomatic landscape.

โ€œThere has been total regime change because the regimes of the past are gone and weโ€™re dealing with a whole new set of people. And thus far, theyโ€™ve been much more reasonable,โ€ he said.

The conflicting accounts underscore ongoing uncertainty around the status of negotiations, even as the Trump administration signals optimism about a potential resolution

According to a report from The Hill, Pakistan on Sunday said it would host talks aimed at ending the U.S.-Iran war, after diplomats from Turkey, Egypt and Saudi Arabia met in Islamabad.

โ€œPakistan will be honored to host and facilitate meaningful talks between the two sides in coming days in a comprehensive sentiment of the ongoing conflict,โ€ Pakistan Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said in a speech after the meeting.

It was not immediately clear if the U.S. and Iran would take part in the talks.

On Sunday, Iranโ€™s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard said U.S. universities based in the Middle East โ€œare legitimate targetsโ€ after its military said joint U.S.-Israeli strikes hit two colleges in the country. 

โ€œThe reckless rulers of the White House should know that from now on, all universities of the occupying regime and American universities in the West Asia region are legitimate targets for us until two universities are struck in retaliation for the Iranian universities that have been destroyed,โ€ it wrote in a post on the social platform X. 

โ€œAll staff, professors, and students of American universities in the region, as well as residents in their surroundings, are advised to stay at least one kilometer away from these universities to ensure their safety,โ€ the statement continued. 

Many American universities have satellite campuses in the region, including New York University, Georgetown University, Carnegie Mellon University, Northwestern University and Texas A&M University. 

Additionally, President Trumpย threatened to attackย Iranโ€™s energy infrastructure on Monday morning in aย Truth Social post:

“The United States of America is in serious discussions with A NEW, AND MORE REASONABLE, REGIME to end our Military Operations in Iran. Great progress has been made but, if for any reason a deal is not shortly reached, which it probably will be, and if the Hormuz Strait is not immediately โ€œOpen for Business,โ€ we will conclude our lovely โ€œstayโ€ in Iran by blowing up and completely obliterating all of their Electric Generating Plants, Oil Wells and Kharg Island (and possibly all desalinization plants!), which we have purposefully not yet โ€œtouched.โ€ This will be in retribution for our many soldiers, and others, that Iran has butchered and killed over the old Regimeโ€™s 47 year โ€œReign of Terror.โ€ Thank you for your attention to this matter.”

Trump Reveals Plans For ‘Massive Military Complex’ Under The White House

President Trump said late Sunday that the U.S. military is constructing a โ€œmassive complexโ€ beneath the White House as part of ongoing renovations tied to a controversial new ballroom project on the East Wing.

Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump revealed new details about the underground development, which he suggested had only recently become public due to legal challenges.

โ€œNow, the military is building a big complex under the ballroom, which has come out recently because of a stupid lawsuit that was filed,โ€ Trump said. โ€œBut the military is building a massive complex under the ballroom, and thatโ€™s under construction, and weโ€™re doing very well.โ€

The president described the above-ground ballroom as a highly fortified structure, emphasizing modern security features.

โ€œWe have all bullet-proof glass, we have drone-proof roofs, ceilings,โ€ Trump said while displaying newly produced renderings of the project. โ€œUnfortunately, weโ€™re living in an age when thatโ€™s a good thing.โ€

Trump had previously indicated that elements of the project were intended to remain undisclosed. During a Cabinet meeting last week, he acknowledged a national security component tied to the construction.

โ€œIt was supposed to be secret, but it became unsecret because of people that are really unpatriotic saying things,โ€ he said. โ€œNow itโ€™s no secret, the military wanted it more than anybody.โ€

The ballroom projectโ€”estimated at roughly $400 millionโ€”is being promoted by Trump as a long-overdue upgrade to the White Houseโ€™s event capacity. He argued that existing rooms are too small to host major foreign dignitaries and large-scale gatherings.

โ€œFor 150 years, theyโ€™ve wanted to build a ballroom at the White House. Other presidents have wanted it,โ€ Trump said. โ€œWhen we have dignitaries coming like President Xi of China or anybody else, we have very small rooms. Theyโ€™re not big enough to handle the kind of capacity that you need.โ€

He added that the new structure is designed to visually match the existing White House and could even accommodate presidential inaugurations.

โ€œThis is the same height as the White House. Itโ€™s an incredible fitting,โ€ he said. โ€œI think it will be the finest ballroom of its kind anywhere in the world.โ€

According to Trump, the ballroom is being funded entirely through private donations and personal contributions, with no taxpayer dollars involved.

โ€œAll of this money, all of the money paid is paid by myself and donors, itโ€™s all donors,โ€ he said. โ€œThereโ€™s not one dime of government money going into the ballroom.โ€

However, the project has drawn scrutiny from preservation groups and architects. A recent report raised concerns about design choices, including claims about โ€œfaux windows,โ€ which Trump forcefully denied.

โ€œWe have no fake windows,โ€ he said. โ€œThe glass is extremely thick. Itโ€™s high-grade, bulletproof glass. So, all of the windows are bulletproof.โ€

The construction has also sparked a legal battle. The National Trust for Historic Preservation has filed a lawsuit arguing that the administration bypassed required approvals from Congress and federal planning agencies. A federal judge is currently considering whether to halt construction.

Despite the controversy, Trump insisted the project is progressing smoothly.

โ€œWeโ€™re ahead of schedule and under budget,โ€ he said.

He also framed the ballroom as secondary to the underground military infrastructure being built beneath it.

โ€œThe ballroom essentially becomes a shed for whatโ€™s being built under the military, including from drones and including from any other thing,โ€ Trump said.

The plans are expected to face a key test later this week, when the National Capital Planning Commission is set to review the proposal for final approval.

Mike Lindell Appears To Be Served Lawsuit During Live Interview

1
Mike Lindell via Gage Skidmore Flickr

Mike Lindell, the MyPillow CEO and a prominent Trump ally, appeared to be served with legal papers during a live interview at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) on Thursday, in an interruption that quickly drew attention online.

Lindell was speaking on camera with Michael Casey, a correspondent for Oโ€™Keefe Media Group, at the event in Grapevine, Texas, when a woman stepped into frame holding documents. In footage shared by Casey, the woman approached Lindell mid-interview and said: โ€œHi, sorry to interrupt. I have this for you. Youโ€™ve been served.โ€

Casey described the woman as a โ€œderanged leftist,โ€ though her identity and the nature of the documents have not been independently confirmed.

Lindell attempted to continue the interview, repeatedly asking the woman to move out of the shot. โ€œWeโ€™re on TV here, please. Weโ€™re on TV, please. OK, weโ€™re on TV,โ€ he said, gesturing for her to step aside.

Watch:

As Casey pressed the woman about what she was delivering, Lindell added: โ€œIโ€™m not accepting it.โ€ The woman insisted the papers had been served regardless. Lindell briefly took the documents before tossing them off camera behind him and continuing the interview.

It remains unclear whether the incident involved a legitimate legal filing or was a staged disruption. No details about the alleged lawsuit were immediately available.

Lindell has been a close ally of former President Donald Trump and one of his most vocal supporters since the 2020 election. He has repeatedly promoted Trumpโ€™s false claims that the election was stolen, using his platform, LindellTV, to amplify those assertions. Trump has publicly praised Lindell in the past, often highlighting his loyalty and willingness to fund efforts challenging the election results.

That alignment has also placed Lindell at the center of multiple legal battles. He has faced defamation lawsuits from voting technology companies over his election claims, and earlier this week, he lost a bid to overturn a related defamation verdict.

DOJ To Pay Ex-Trump Adviser Michael Flynn $1M

3
Susan A. Romano, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

The Justice Department has agreed to pay roughly $1.2 million to former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn, settling a lawsuit in which he claimed he was politically targeted during Trumpโ€™s first administration, according to ABC News.

The payout falls far short of the $50 million Flynn initially sought when he filed the lawsuit in 2023. Still, the settlement is likely to raise fresh questions about whether Flynn benefited from his continued loyalty to President Trump.

A federal judge dismissed Flynnโ€™s case in 2024, siding with a Justice Department motion filed during the Biden administration and ruling that Flynn failed to meet the legal standard for malicious prosecution. After Trump returned to office, however, Flynnโ€™s attorneys moved to revive the case. The department later confirmed in a court filing that it had entered settlement discussions with Flynnโ€™s legal team.

In a statement, a Justice Department spokesperson framed the agreement as corrective action: โ€œThose who instigated the Russia Collusion Hoax and Crossfire Hurricane abused their power to mislead the American people and tarnish the reputations of President Trump and his supporters. Todayโ€™s settlement, secured by this Justice Department, is an important step in redressing that historic injustice.โ€

Flynn had previously pleaded guilty to lying to FBI agents during a January 2017 White House interview about his contacts with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, part of the Mueller investigation.

In 2020, under Attorney General William Barr, the Trump Justice Department moved to drop the case entirely, sharply criticizing the FBIโ€™s handling of the investigation and arguing the charges should never have been brought. The move drew skepticism from a federal judge in Washington, D.C., who questioned the departmentโ€™s reasoning. Flynn was ultimately granted a full pardon by Trump after the 2020 election.

Since leaving government, Flynn has remained closely aligned with Trumpโ€™s inner circle and built a large following online, where he has promoted a range of conspiracy-driven claims.

Trump Official Refers New York AG Letitia James For Prosecution – Again

0
Alec Perkins from Hoboken, USA, CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons

A senior Trump administration official has made new criminal referrals against New York Attorney General Letitia James.

Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte said in a letter Wednesday to prosecutors in Florida that James may have falsified information on a homeownerโ€™s insurance application submitted to Fort Lauderdale-based Universal Property Insurance. In a separate letter to prosecutors in Illinois, Pulte alleged that James may have also provided false information on an application to Allstate.

The referrals mark the latest development in a series of legal actions pursued by officials in President Trumpโ€™s administration against James, a longtime political adversary. In a Truth Social post Wednesday night, President Trump wrote that James had been โ€œreferred again for criminal prosecution for alleged homeowner insurance fraud.โ€

One of the referrals was sent to Jason Reding Quiรฑones, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. Quiรฑones is currently leading an investigation into Obama-era officials, including former CIA Director John Brennan, related to intelligence findings that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to benefit Trump. Last year, Quiรฑones also sought records connected to special counsel Jack Smithโ€™s investigations into Trump.

The second referral was sent to Andrew Boutros, the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois.

Abbe Lowell, an attorney for James, rejected the allegations and criticized the administrationโ€™s actions.

โ€œabusing their power to pursue a vendetta against her by trying to rename, refile, and repeat baseless allegations.โ€

โ€œThese desperate tactics will fail โ€” just as every previous attempt has failed โ€” and exposes an Administration that has abandoned its responsibility to the American people in favor of petty political payback,โ€ Lowell said.

The new referrals follow a previously dismissed federal case against James. Last fall, she was charged in federal court with bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution, based on allegations that she misrepresented details about a property in Virginia to secure more favorable mortgage terms. James denied wrongdoing, and the charges were later dismissed.

The earlier indictment came after Pulte referred James for possible mortgage fraud, though the charges ultimately focused on a different property than the one cited in his referral. A federal judge dismissed the case in November, ruling that interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan had been unlawfully appointed. A separate case brought by Halligan against former FBI Director James Comey was also dismissed, and two federal grand juries later declined to re-indict James on bank fraud charges.

According to the original indictment, James purchased a Virginia home in 2020 using a mortgage that required the property to be used as a second residence, but she allegedly rented it out as an investment property to obtain a lower interest rate.

James has argued that she is being targeted for political reasons, particularly after she sued Trump in civil court during the period between his presidential terms. A New York judge found Trump and his company liable for fraud and ordered them to pay hundreds of millions of dollars, though an appellate court later overturned the financial judgment.

In court filings last year, Jamesโ€™s attorneys accused Pulte of using the Federal Housing Finance Agency โ€” which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac โ€” as a โ€œweapon to be brandished against President Trumpโ€™s political enemies.โ€

CBS News previously reported that prosecutors have also examined financial transactions between James and her longtime hairdresser, Iyesata Marsh, as part of a separate line of inquiry. Pulte has since sought a protective security detail, citing threats he said were connected to the case.