Home Blog

Pulitzer Prize Board Doubles Down On Trump Legal Fight

0
Donald Trump via Gage Skidmore Flickr

The Pulitzer Prize Board escalated its legal battle with President Donald Trump on Thursday, filing a discovery request in Trumpโ€™s 2022 defamation lawsuit and declaring it will “not be cowed by the president’s attempt to intimidate journalists or undermine the First Amendment.”

Trump sued the Board after it awarded the 2018 National Reporting Pulitzer Prize to The New York Times and The Washington Post for their coverage of allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russiaโ€”allegations Trump has long argued were baseless and politically motivated.

Pulitzer Board Pushes Discovery, Demands Proof of Harm

In its filing in Okeechobee County Circuit Court in Florida, the Pulitzer Board requested documentation supporting Trumpโ€™s claims that the award caused him reputational or financial harm.

The Board insisted the president must meet the same legal standards as any plaintiff:

“Just like any other plaintiff, the President must articulate and prove his claims with evidence. This filing is a standard step in the discovery process to assess a claim of damages and test their validity. The Pulitzer Board will not be cowed by the president’s attempt to intimidate journalists or undermine the First Amendment,” the organization told Fox News Digital.

Trumpโ€™s lawsuit argues that the Pulitzer-winning stories relied on a โ€œdemonstrably false connectionโ€ between his campaign and Russia and that this flawed premise was the basis for awarding the prize.

Award Recognized Reporting Later Undermined by Federal Investigations

The Times and Post were honored for โ€œdeeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest that dramatically furthered the nationโ€™s understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign, the President-electโ€™s transition team and his eventual administration.โ€

However, Trumpโ€™s complaint highlights several developments that have since cast doubt on the original reporting:

  • Special Counsel Robert Mueller failed to establish evidence of criminal collusion.
  • A Department of Justice Inspector General report identified significant misconduct and inaccuracies in the federal investigation into Trumpโ€™s campaign.

These findings reinforced the belief among many conservatives that the Russia-collusion narrative was politically driven and amplified by a sympathetic media establishment.

Trump Team Predicts Victory

A spokesperson for Trumpโ€™s legal team said the president remains confident:

“President Trump is committed to holding those who traffic in fake news, lies, and smears to account, and he will see this powerhouse lawsuit through to a winning conclusion. This case has always been about correcting the record, revealing the truth, and vindicating the president and his supporters against the lies told to the American people by the Democrats and their PR machine known as ‘legacy media.'”

Trump previously sought a full correction or retraction from the Pulitzer Board, along with the rescinding of the 2018 awards, but the Board has repeatedly refused.


Additional Context: Trump and the Nobel Peace Prize

While Trump now challenges the Pulitzer Board over media accountability, he has also pursued global recognition for his foreign policy accomplishmentsโ€”particularly through nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize.

  • In 2020, Trump received several nominations for brokering the Abraham Accords, historic peace agreements that normalized relations between Israel and multiple Arab nations.
  • He also received nominations for facilitating Serbiaโ€“Kosovo economic normalization, as well as for his administrationโ€™s efforts in the North Korea diplomatic initiative.
  • Despite support from some foreign officials and conservative lawmakers, the Nobel Committee ultimately awarded the prize elsewhere, prompting many Republicans to argue that Trumpโ€™s diplomatic breakthroughs were undervalued for political reasons.

Jack Smith Launches New Law Firm With Trump Prosecution Veterans

    0
    Gage Skidmore Flickr

    Jack Smith โ€” the former special counsel who led the federal prosecutions of President Donald Trump โ€” is starting a private law firm in January 2026. And heโ€™s bringing reinforcements: former federal prosecutors Tim Heaphy, Thomas Windom, and David Harbach.

    Heaphy previously worked at Willkie Farr & Gallagher and served as the lead investigator for the Jan. 6 committee. Windom and Harbach helped Smith run the Trump election interference and classified documents cases.

    The group says its new practice will focus on investigations and litigation for both public and private clients. Theyโ€™re pitching โ€œfull-service representationโ€ built on โ€œintegrity, commitment, and zealous advocacy.โ€

    With multiple veterans of the Trump-era investigations joining forces, Smithโ€™s new firm is poised to become a magnet for clients facing federal probes or regulatory scrutiny. Their background running some of the most complex, high-profile cases in the country gives them instant appeal to companies and individuals navigating an enforcement landscape thatโ€™s grown more unpredictable. And with recent turmoil inside the Justice Department, from shifting legal strategies to rapid staff turnover, demand is rising for lawyers who know exactly how federal cases are assembled.

    The timing isnโ€™t accidental. Earlier this year, the administration suspended security clearances for lawyers at a D.C. firm that offered pro bono help to Smith โ€” a sign of escalating friction around anyone tied to the Trump prosecutions.

    Smith remains under investigation by the Office of Special Counsel, which is probing whether his Trump-era prosecutions crossed the Hatch Actโ€™s limits on political activity. But with his exit from government and the launch of a new private firm, he now has room to rebrand himself for civil and corporate work โ€” a shift likely to attract clients facing pressure from the federal government.

    The firm will open its doors next month, but details on fees, initial clients, or specific specialties remain unknown.

    Smith also still faces political and legal hurdles, including a subpoena from the House Judiciary Committee for a closed-door deposition on his handling of the Trump cases.

    Indiana Governor Vows To Help Primary Republicans Against Redistricting Plan

    0
    Photo via Gage Skidmore Flickr

    Indiana Gov. Mike Braun (R) on Thursday sharply criticized a bloc of Republican state senators who joined Democrats to defeat a GOP-backed redistricting proposalโ€”an effort supported by President Donald Trump. Braun said he will actively assist Trump in backing primary challengers against lawmakers who, in his view, sided against fairer maps and against the interests of Indiana conservatives.

    โ€œI am very disappointed that a small group of misguided State Senators have partnered with Democrats to reject this opportunity to protect Hoosiers with fair maps and to reject the leadership of President Trump. Ultimately, decisions like this carry political consequences,โ€ Braun said in a post on X.

    โ€œI will be working with the President to challenge these people who do not represent the best interests of Hoosiers,โ€ he added.

    Redistricting Bill Fails Despite Republican Majority

    The Indiana Senate rejected the proposed mid-cycle redistricting plan in a 19โ€“31 vote, with more Republicans voting against the measure than for it. The bill sought to strengthen GOP representation by adjusting district lines to reflect population changesโ€”an approach Trump has pushed in multiple states as Democrats continue to deploy aggressive legal and political strategies to secure map advantages nationwide.

    Following the vote, Trump adviser Alex Bruesewitz blasted the dissenting Republicans. โ€œWeโ€™ll be launching primary challenges against every last traitor who voted no, effective immediately! Pack your bags, your time is up!โ€ he wrote on X.

    Some Republican lawmakers defended their decision. State Sen. Spencer Deery (R) argued the proposal conflicted with his conservative philosophy of stable governance.

    โ€œMake no mistake, I, like many of those who will join me in voting no today, are constitutional fiscal and religious conservatives,โ€ Deery said. โ€œMy point is that my opposition to mid-cycle gerrymandering is not in contrast with my conservative principles. My opposition is driven by them.โ€

    Trump Names Names

    Trump directly criticized several figures he sees as obstructing the GOPโ€™s ability to compete more effectively, including former Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels and strategist Cam Savage.

    โ€œThey found some Republican โ€˜SUCKERS,โ€™ and they couldnโ€™t be happier that they did! Guys like Failed Senate Candidate Mitch Daniels, who I opposed in his Race against Senator Jim Banks, and Cam Savage, whoever that is, are fighting against the Republican Party, all the way,โ€ Trump wrote on Truth Social ahead of the vote.

    He also singled out Indiana Senate Leader Rod Bray (R) for failing to rally Republican support.

    โ€œBray and his friends are the favorite Republicans of [House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries], Crazy Nancy Pelosi, and Cryinโ€™ Chuck Schumer. Anybody that votes against Redistricting, and the SUCCESS of the Republican Party in D.C., will be, I am sure, met with a MAGA Primary in the Spring,โ€ Trump said.

    National Context: A Broader Redistricting Fight

    Indianaโ€™s internal GOP clash comes amid a broader national battle over congressional maps, where Democrats have aggressively leveraged courts and commissions to secure more favorable districts:

    • New York: Democrats redrew maps to target several GOP-held seats after the stateโ€™s high court allowed a do-over, boosting Democratic recruitment in key suburban districts.
    • North Carolina: Republicans successfully redrew districts after a conservative shift in the state Supreme Court, likely netting the GOP multiple additional U.S. House seats.
    • Alabama & Louisiana: Federal courts forced both states to create additional majority-Black districts, likely giving Democrats two more congressional seats in 2024 and beyond.
    • Wisconsin: A liberal state Supreme Court struck down longstanding legislative maps, creating uncertainty heading into 2025 and potentially benefiting Democrats.
    • Georgia: The state drew new maps after a court ruling, but Republicans managed to preserve their overall advantage.

    In this landscape, conservatives argue that refusing to strengthen GOP mapsโ€”especially in red statesโ€”amounts to unilateral disarmament. That argument underpins Trumpโ€™s pressure campaign in Indiana, where he insists the party must use every legal tool available to secure representation that reflects the electorate.

    A Turning Point for Indiana Republicans?

    With Trump and Braun both committing to fund and endorse primary challengers, several Indiana state senators could soon face serious political consequences. For Trump-aligned voters and officials, the vote represents a missed opportunity to counter Democrats’ redistricting gains nationwide. For the GOP lawmakers who opposed the measure, it is a stand for what they call principled conservatism.

    Mike Lindell Announces Run For Minnesota Governor

    0

    It’s official…

    On Thursday, MyPillow founder and Trump loyalist, Mike Lindell, announced he is running to become the next governor of Minnesota.

    Lindell made the announcement onย Steve Bannonโ€™sย War Room. The CEO vowed to โ€œstand against rampant fraudโ€ under current Gov.ย Tim Walzย (D).

    Lindell continued:

    Iโ€™m still standing; MyPillow is still standing; and now I want you to know that I will stand for you as the next governor of the state of Minnesota. I will stand for you against the rampant fraud under Governor Walz. I will stand with you against a crime that threatens the safety of your family. I will stand for you against government-sponsored [unintelligible] your livelihood, via exploiting property taxes, excessive fees, and unfair sales tax. Iโ€™ll stand for you against unnecessary regulation that strangle the entrepreneurial spirit. I will stand for businesses of all sizes โ€” small, medium, large, doesnโ€™t matter. We need to defend those who provide our citizens with jobs that they need toโ€ฆ in turn take care of our families.

    I will stand for those of you that are struggling with addiction. I will stand for you by making Minnesotaโ€™s education system one of the best. I am not alone in standing for you. Iโ€™ve never been alone. My Lord and Saviorย Jesus Christย has been standing beside me all the way. Through the good times and the bad, sheโ€™s never let me down; and with Godโ€™s grace, I will never let you down, either.

    Mike Lindell via Gage Skidmore Flickr

    Watch:

    Lindell adds uncertainty in an already crowded Republican field that includes Lisa Demuth, the speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives; Scott Jensen, a former state senator and the 2022 Republican nominee for governor; Chris Madel, a prominent lawyer in Minnesota; and State Representative Kristin Robbins.

    They are competing for the chance to challenge Gov. Tim Walz (D) who is running for a third term.

    This is a breaking news story. Please check back for updates.

    Dem Rep. Rips Kristi Noem In Opening Remarks, Demands Resignation

    0
    Donald Trump via Gage Skidmore Flickr

    Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) called on Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to resign Thursday during opening remarks at a House Homeland Security Committee hearing on โ€œWorldwide Threats to the Homeland.โ€

    โ€œYou have systematically dismantled the Department of Homeland Security, put your own interests above the department, and violated the law. You are making America less safe,โ€ Thompson said. โ€œSo rather than sitting here and wasting your time and ours with more corruption, lies and lawlessness, I call on you to resign. Do a real service to the country and just resign. That is, if President Trump doesn’t fire you first.โ€

    As Noem began delivering her opening statement, several protesters opposed to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) interrupted the proceedings, shouting, โ€œGet ICE off our streets,โ€ and, โ€œStop terrorizing our community.โ€ Capitol Police escorted the protesters out and detained them outside the hearing room.

    Noem, joined at the hearing by National Counterterrorism Center director Joe Kent and Michael Glasheen, operations director of the FBIโ€™s National Security Branch, noted that one of her grandchildren in the audience was upset by Thompsonโ€™s comments.

    โ€œI don’t think she agreed with him,โ€ Noem said jokingly.

    She defended her departmentโ€™s record, telling lawmakers, โ€œDHS is eradicating transnational organized crime and the stopping of deadly drugs from continuing to be funneled into our communities. We’re ending illegal immigration, returning sanity back to our immigration system, and we’re defending against cyberattacks against our critical infrastructure.โ€

    Addressing global threats โ€” including those posed by domestic extremists and radical Islamic terrorism โ€” Noem said the United States should prepare for heightened risks as it readies major events in 2026, such as the World Cup and the nationโ€™s 250th birthday.

    Watch:

    โ€œThese large-scale events will be potential targets for a range of bad actors, and they come with an increased level of risk. DHS is using every tool and authority we have to ensure the safety of U.S. citizens, and our visitors can enjoy next year’s events,โ€ she said.

    Rumors had circulated in recent days that President Donald Trump was considering replacing Noem as head of DHS. Trump dismissed the speculation on Wednesday, telling reporters that Noem has been โ€œfantastic.โ€

    Noem also addressed the rumors in an interview with Fox News ahead of the hearing.

    โ€œOh, that’s absolutely not true,โ€ she said. โ€œPresident Trump and I are doing wonderfully. I’m so proud to work for him, and I’m going to continue to serve at his pleasure.โ€

    Erika Kirk Erupts Over Candace Owens Conspiracy Theories

    0
    Image via Gage Skidmore Flickr

    Erika Kirk, the CEO of Turning Point USA and widow of assassinated conservative activistย Charlie Kirk, erupted on Wednesday over the conspiracy theories โ€” many of them championed by former TPUSA activistย Candace Owensย โ€” proliferating about her husbandโ€™s death.

    During a one-on-one with Fox News host Harris Faulkner in the closing minutes of Wednesdayโ€™s episode of Outnumbered, Faulkner ripped into those profiting off conspiracy theories.

    After Kirk implored the public to keep the site of her husbandโ€™s grave private for the sake of her family, Faulkner asked: โ€œWhat are theyโ€”these conspiracy theoristsโ€”taking from you right now?โ€

    Kirk replied:

    Nothing. But I will tell you what they are doing. It reminds me so much of Chapter Six in the book of Nehemiah. He is building a wall, and the townspeople are at the base of that hill saying, โ€œNehemiah!โ€ calling him all these names, saying all these things: โ€œCome on down!โ€ Every single time, he had the same messageโ€”four times in a row: โ€œI cannot come down. I am busy building.โ€ That is how I feel.

    I do not have time to address the noise. My silence does not mean that I am complacent. My silence does not mean that somehow Turning Point USAโ€”and the handpicked staff who loved my husband and whom my husband lovedโ€”are somehow in on it. We are busy building.

    And you know what I thought? I thought these people are human. We are all grieving in our own way. They are trying to find the answer to something that happened that was so evil. They are trying so hard. And I get that. Weโ€™re doing the same. Anytime we hear a lead or anything at all, we send it to the authorities: Please dig into this. No rock will be left unturned. I want justice for my husband, for myself, for my familyโ€”more than anyone else out there.

    So for me, you want to keep telling me to come down while weโ€™re buildingโ€”I donโ€™t have time for that. But hereโ€™s my breaking point: Come after me, call me namesโ€”I donโ€™t care. Call me what you want, go down that rabbit holeโ€”whatever. But when you go after my family, my Turning Point USA family, my Charlie Kirk Show familyโ€”when you go after the people that I loveโ€”and youโ€™re making hundreds and thousands of dollars every single episode attacking the people that I love because you claim theyโ€™re somehow in on this? No.

    โ€œYou know, I have to say it: Iโ€™ve never seen you like this,โ€ Faulkner observed.

    โ€œNo,โ€ Kirk responded. โ€œThis is righteous anger because this is not okay. Itโ€™s not healthy. This is a mind virus. Yes, I believe in our judicial system. I do. We have a hell of a team working on thisโ€”excuse my French. But this is not okay.โ€

    โ€œSo you want to put these people back in the box where theyโ€™ve been creeping from?โ€ Faulkner followed up.

    โ€œI donโ€™t care what box youโ€™re in,โ€ Kirk said. โ€œBut just know that your words are very powerfulโ€”and we are human. My team are not machines and theyโ€™re not robots. They are human. We have more death threats on our team and our side than I have ever seen. I have kidnapping threats. You name itโ€”we have it.

    โ€œAnd my poor team is exhausted. Every time they bring this back up, what are we supposed to doโ€”relive that trauma all over again? They watched my husband get murdered. I have no idea how I would have reacted if I was there that day, and thank the good Lord that I did not have to see that happen. But my teamโ€”theyโ€™re rocked to the core. So why, every single day, do they have to be dragged through the mud, analyzed, hyperanalyzed?โ€

    She later concluded the segment by saying she has seen the โ€œimpactโ€ the conspiracy theories have had on โ€œthe people that I love.โ€

    โ€œAnd if people think that I was just going to wilt awayโ€”Iโ€™m not going to sit in a corner, cry, and be in the fetal position. This is a duty to my husband, and itโ€™s an absolute honor, and I will never back down. And so my message to them is: stop. Stop!โ€

    Earlier this month, Charlie Kirk Showย producerย Blake Neffย announced that Kirkโ€™s friends will beย holding an eventย to refute Owensโ€™s incendiary claims. Owens has turned down an invitation to attend it in person.

    Owens has a reputation for spreading widely debunked conspiracy theories, includingย once stakingย her entire professional reputation on the claim that the First Lady of France,ย Brigitte Macron,ย is a man. Owens has also suggested that Israel was somehow connected to Charlie Kirkโ€™s death.

    Kirk, who founded the pro-Trump student group Turning Point USA, was shot and killed at a Utah university in September, and his alleged assassin is currently awaiting trial on murder charges. Neff called Owensโ€™s claims โ€œeither lies or they are innuendos thrown around with a total, reckless disregard for the truth,โ€ and added, โ€œI would say we have suffered more harassment from these people than we have from Antifa supporters who overtly celebrate Charlieโ€™s murder.โ€

    He concluded by saying Turning Point will host a live stream to further debunk Owensโ€™s conspiracies and invited her to participate.

    โ€œWe wanted to use this segment at the top of this hour to say something important, something very important. For the past two and a half months, there is a topic that has flooded our Freedom inbox. It has been nonstop on social media, but which we have almost totally avoided on this show. You probably already know what Iโ€™m talking about, which shows just how ubiquitous it has been,โ€ Neffย began.

    Read his full statement below:

    Ever since Charlieโ€™s murder, Candace Owens has leveled a flood of allegations against people at Turning Point USA, people at Turning Point Action, and people who work for this show. She has made them against some of Charlieโ€™s closest friends and against some of his most dedicated employees. She has suggested thatย Michael McCoy, Charlieโ€™s chief of staff, knew Charlie would be murdered, was happy that he died, and stayed silent because he was told he would be the next Charlie.

    She has suggested Michael is not his real name. It isโ€”I have seen his birth certificate myself. She has called it suspicious that Mikeyโ€™s wife, who works at Turning Point, helped plan the campus tour event where Charlie was murdered, which she didnโ€™t, by the way. She doesnโ€™t work on campus events.

    Candace has suggested the Utah Valley University event was unusual and its details suggested a quote โ€œinside job.โ€ She has claimed that foreign aircraft have followedย Erica Kirkย around the country and that Turning Point has lied about this happening. She has accused us of lying about Charlie wanting Erica to take over for him if he died. She has suggested Charlieโ€™s security team intentionally denied him first aid after the shooting to ensure that he died. She has raised suspicions about the head of our technical team because he took an SD card out of a camera. She has spread absurd claims thatย Tyler Boyer, who we just had on the show, sexually abuses male interns. She has suggested that TPUSA Faith-affiliated pastors, like theologianย Frank Turek, who weโ€™ll have on in a moment, and Pastorย Rob McCoy, are part of a military quote โ€œinfiltrationโ€ of Turning Point, either because they are veterans or because they have family members who are.

    Even if not everyone has been named specifically, though, Candace has effectively tarred everyone here with complicity in Charlieโ€™s death by repeatedly saying he was, quote, โ€œbetrayed by,โ€ quote, โ€œeveryone.โ€ She has said Charlieโ€™s murder, quote, โ€œhad to be approved by Charlieโ€™s friends,โ€ and then suggested those friends might have her murdered too for quote โ€œknowing the truth.โ€ She has made claims of financial impropriety and fraud at Turning Point, adding up into the millions of dollars, which again is not true. Charlie made sure the organization was audited by a third party every year. He personally reviewed and signed off on every expense report and literally every single bill paid by the organization down to a single United States dollar. We have never missed a 990 deadline.

    Candace has made other, stranger allegations involving French paratroopers in maroon shirts, Egyptian Air Force planes flying out of Provo, Utah, and potential underground assassins traveling through unseen tunnels. At one point in early November, she started wildly throwing suspicion on members of Utah Valleyโ€™s soccer team for wearing hoodies. I could go on. There is always something new coming up, and none of it ever pans out. Because from the start, there has been nothing there.

    The attacks and allegations from Candace are either lies or they are innuendos thrown around with a total, reckless disregard for the truth, so that Candace can manipulate and string along an audience of people who donโ€™t realize they are being played. Instead of being able to grieve properly after one of the most heinous murders in American history, a murder many of us had to witness, my friends have had to endure harassment from people who have gotten whipped up by what Candace is saying. I would say we have suffered more harassment from these people than we have from Antifa supporters who overtly celebrate Charlieโ€™s murder. And just like a lot of those Antifa members, many of these people take delight in how gross and unpleasant they can be. What our friends have had to endure is not funny and itโ€™s not insignificant. It is evil. I have seen it.

    For months, we have received hundreds, thousands, I suspect, of emails and calls asking us to respond. People have wanted us to invite Candace on the show. But for a long time, our approach was to say nothing. We did that for several reasons. First, we thought that her prevarications were so absurd that nobody would believe them. We shouldnโ€™t have to answer questions about secret tunnels or Egyptian Air Force planes. That sort of thing is justโ€”itโ€™s beneath contempt to respond to. Lastly, we didnโ€™t respond because Charlie always viewed Candace as a friend, and we were holding out hope that she would return that friendship and stop what she was doing.

    But a week from now itโ€™s going to be three months since Charlieโ€™s murder. Candace has not changed her behavior. She has continued to spread falsehoods about Charlieโ€™s friends, and she continues to concoct new ones about new people. Sheโ€™s using these falsehoods to enrich herself while dividing the conservative movement at an absolutely critical time for this country. And far too often, we here have heard from ordinary people, people who loved Charlie and who Charlie loved so much in return. These people have expressed the worry that we are staying silent out of cowardice or as some sort of tacit admission that some of the attacks are true. Neither is the case. Our silence has never been, and it will never be, equal to complacency or approval.

    Still, we decided Charlie would not allow this to go on. Charlie was not a coward. Charlie was a fighter. Charlie would not allow someone to spread lies about the people closest to him with impunity. And he would feel ashamed if other people were stepping up to defend his friends while he never did so himself. Candace has mentioned several times that the ball is in our court.

    So hereโ€™s what is going to happen. In the near future, there will be a livestream here in Phoenix where we address in a clear and comprehensive way the claims and accusations, the false accusations that have been made against Charlieโ€™s family, friends, and the people here at Turning Point. We plan to walk through everything carefully and thoroughly. If Candace is available, we would sincerely welcome her participation in that livestream at our studio here in Phoenix. At this point, we believe the ball is back in her court.

    Our motivation for doing this is not out of any obligation to Candace. It is about honoring Charlie. We feel a deep responsibility to protect his legacy, his work, and the truth. I feel that. I owe Charlie everything in my life. I feel it immensely. And that is why we feel compelled to speak clearly and openly now. Weโ€™ll have more on this in the near future.

    Trump Reportedly Promised โ€˜Sweeping Changesโ€™ at CNN If Paramount Takes Over Warner Bros.

    0

    David Ellison is reportedly already talking about what heโ€™d do to CNNโ€”before he even owns the company.

    According to The Wall Street Journal, the Paramount Skydance CEO told Trump administration officials during a recent Washington visit that heโ€™d make โ€œsweeping changesโ€ at CNN if he manages to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, the networkโ€™s parent. The subtext isnโ€™t subtle: CNN is a longtime Trump target, and Trump has told confidants he wants new ownership and programming changes, the Journal reported.

    Ellisonโ€™s comments come amid a fast-moving takeover scramble involving Warner Bros. Discovery. After the company accepted an offer from Netflix, Ellison said Paramount would pursue a hostile bid directly to shareholders.

    โ€œWBD shareholders deserve an opportunity to consider our superior all-cash offer for their shares in the entire company,โ€ Ellison said in a statement announcing the move. He argued that the competing proposal would leave shareholders exposed to uncertainty around the companyโ€™s linear cable networks business and face a more difficult regulatory path.

    Ellisonโ€™s father, Oracle co-founder and Trump ally Larry Ellison, called President Donald Trump after the announcement that Warner Bros. had accepted the Netflix deal to argue that โ€œthe transaction would hurt competition,โ€ according to The Wall Street Journal.

    โ€œTrump has told people close to him that he wants new ownership of CNN as well as changes to CNN programming,โ€ added the Journal story.

    Trump, for his part, has never been shy about where he thinks CNN belongs on the media food chain. Earlier this year, he dismissed the network as โ€œscumโ€ in remarks on the White House lawn.

    Democrat Drafts Articles Of Impeachment Against HHS Sec. RFK Jr.

    2
    Photo via Gage Skidmore Flickr

    On Wednesday, a House Democrat announced she is drafting articles of impeachment against Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

    Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.) announced the move on Wednesday, arguing Kennedy has failed in his role. Stevens had previously vowed to file the articles in September.

    “Today, I formally introduced articles of impeachment against Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. RFK Jr. has turned his back on science and the safety of the American people. Michiganders cannot take another day of his chaos,” she wrote in a statement posted on social media.

    “Secretary Kennedy remains focused on the work of improving Americansโ€™ health and lowering costs, not on partisan political stunts,” Nixon said.

    By Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America – Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., CC BY-SA 2.0,

    The move comes just days after Stevens’ fellow Democrat, Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) filed articles of impeachment against War Secretary Pete Hegseth.

    Thanedar cited reports that Hegseth issued orders to “kill everybody” onboard a small vessel that was allegedly involved in drug trafficking.

    “Pete Hegseth has been using the United States military to extrajudicially assassinate people without evidence of any crime,” said Thanedar. “Former military attorneys have come out and asserted that his conduct constitutes war crimes. We cannot allow his reprehensible conduct to continue, which is why I have filed these articles to impeach him.”ย 

    He added, โ€œAnd if both parties, if Republicans are willing to look at this for the merit of this case and not just their loyalty to President Trump, this can be done.โ€

    Thanedar pointed first to Hegsethโ€™s use of the encrypted messaging app Signal to discuss a pending strike on Houthi targets in Yemen. A Pentagon inspector general report made public this week faulted Hegseth for using an unapproved channel to share sensitive strike-related information and warned the practice could have endangered U.S. personnel if intercepted.

    The Signal thread drew additional scrutiny after The Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg was inadvertently included in the chat, alongside senior administration officials. Investigators said that exposure of operational detailsโ€”such as timing and other strike specificsโ€”could have put U.S. forces at risk.

    Thanedar also cited reporting around a separate episode involving a Sept. 2 strike on an alleged drug-smuggling boat in the Caribbean. According to that reporting, Hegseth ordered military leaders to โ€œkill everybody,โ€ and a follow-up strike occurred even after survivors were seen in the waterโ€”raising questions about targeting decisions and command accountability.

    This is a breaking news story. Please check back for updates.

    Suspects Charged In Plot To Kill Top Noem Deputy

    Police image via Pixabay free images

    Two brothers from Absecon, New Jersey, were arrested Tuesday and charged in connection with alleged online threats targeting Tricia McLaughlin, the Department of Homeland Securityโ€™s Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs and a top public-facing spokesperson for Secretary Kristi Noem, authorities said.

    Ricardo Antonio Roman-Flores and Emilio Roman-Flores, who are twins, were taken into custody after investigators alleged they posted violent statements on X about McLaughlin and federal immigration officers, including an alleged call to โ€œShoot ICE on sight,โ€ according to the account of the case shared by law enforcement officials.

    Investigators allege one brother responded to McLaughlin with: โ€œ[The Second] Amendment is in place for moments like this. Shoot ICE on sight,โ€ followed by: โ€œWe Americans should find you, tar you, feather you, and hang you as we did to anyone serving tyrants before the Revolutionary War.โ€ A second, partially redacted post attributed to the other brother reportedly read: โ€œShoot ICE on sight.โ€

    Prosecutors say the threats went furtherโ€”allegedly escalating to talk of torturing and killing McLaughlin โ€œin a medieval fashion.โ€ McLaughlin has been front-and-center defending DHS enforcement actions on TV and online, and sheโ€™s repeatedly framed threats against officers as downstream of increasingly incendiary politics around immigration.

    The charge sheet, as described, splits like this:

    • Emilio: unlawful possession of an assault weapon, possession of prohibited weapons, conspiracy, terroristic threats, criminal coercion and cyber harassment.
    • Ricardo: one count of conspiracyโ€”terroristic threats.

    ICE Director Todd Lyons said the arrests came within three days of the alleged posts and warned that threats against federal officials will be prosecuted. โ€œWe will find you, we will arrest you, and we will prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law. We are not afraid of you,โ€ Lyons told Fox News Digital. He added: โ€œIf you threaten our law enforcement or DHS officials, we will hunt you down, and you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.โ€

    DHS is trying to make a broader point: this isnโ€™t just one ugly thread onlineโ€”itโ€™s part of a threat environment they say has intensified alongside the administrationโ€™s border crackdown. In a DHS release dated Oct. 30, 2025, the department claimed ICE personnel have faced an โ€œ8,000% increase in death threats,โ€ citing harassment and threats aimed at officers and their families.

    The issue has also surfaced in recent disputes over whether public-facing tools that track immigration enforcement activity endanger federal officers. In a Reuters report published Monday, a developer sued the Trump administration after an app that let users share locations of immigration agents was removed from Appleโ€™s store; the administration cited safety concerns for federal officers, while the developer argued the app relied on public observations.

    Trump Defends Justices Alito, Thomas From Calls To Resign From Supreme Court

    0
    Duncan Lock, Dflock, CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

    Not so fast…

    President Donald Trump called on Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas to rebuke demands to step down from critics, calling the justices “fantastic.”

    Trumpย made the remark to Politicoย this week as the outlet reported that some members of the Republican Party are hoping the court’s two oldest conservatives consider stepping down before the midterm elections. Their decisions to step down from the bench would enable Trump to nominate conservatives to take their place while the Republican Party is still guaranteed control of the Senate.

    “I hope they stay,” Trump said, adding, “‘Cause I think theyโ€™re fantastic.”

    Alito, 75, has no plans to retire from the Supreme Court anytime soon, a source close with close knowledge of the justice toldย The Wall Street Journalย in November 2024 after Trump was elected.

    “Despite what some people may think, this is a man who has never thought about this job from a political perspective,” a person close to Alito said to the newspaper.

    “The idea that heโ€™s going to retire for political considerations is not consistent with who he is,” this person added. 

    Alito was appointed to the Supreme Court in 2006 by Presidentย George W. Bush.

    Thomas is 77 years old. He was appointed to the court by President George H.W. Bush in 1991.

    Sonia Sotomayor, appointed by President Obama in 2009, is 71. 

    In 2022, Thomasย faced widespread calls to step down from the bench or be impeachedย because he would not recuse himself from cases related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

    Investigators on the Jan. 6 select committee revealed that the justice’s wife, Ginni Thomas, sent text messages to then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows urging him to challenge Donald Trump’sย 2020 election loss.


    “Clarence Thomas should resign,” Ocasio-Cortez said at the time. “If not, his failure to disclose income from right-wing organizations, recuse himself from matters involving his wife, and his vote to block the Jan. 6th commission from key information must be investigated and could serve as grounds for impeachment.”

    Democrats took no action against Thomas.ย 

    Aย ProPublicaย investigation also found that Thomasโ€™ close friendship with real estate developer Harlan Crow allowed him to accompany the Texas billionaire on luxury vacations on his private jet and yacht, as well as enjoy free stays on Crowโ€™s vast vacation property, among other perks. He reportedly failed to disclose the vast majority of Crowโ€™s gifts.

    The ProPublica report prompted several Democratic lawmakers to demand that a strict code of ethics be imposed on the Supreme Court by Congress.

    During his first term, Trump had Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett confirmed to the Supreme Court, along with over 200 federal judges.

    Watch Politico’s full interview with Trump below: