FBI Sued For Records On Collusion With Anti-Trump Group
Americans may soon learn more about how a FBI agent worked with a liberal group to target President Donald Trump in a criminal investigation.
The non-profit public interest law firm Judicial Watch announced in a statement it โfiled a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice for communications between former Assistant Special Agent in Charge Timothy Thibault and the anti-Trump organization American Oversight.โ
โItโs a shame that we must sue to get these records about how the Biden gang at the FBI and DOJ tried to rig an election by jailing Trump for disputing the 2020 election,โ said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. โItโs past time for these institutions to focus on transparency under law, so the American people can know the full truth on the lawfare attack perpetrated on Trump.โ
Judicial Watch reports it filed the suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia โafter the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) failed to respond to a January 31, 2025, FOIA request for:โ
Records and communications between Timothy Thibault, former [Assistant Special Agent in Charge, Washington Field Office] and the non-profit organization American Oversight, 1030 15th St. NW, B255, Washington, D.C. 20005, email domain: @americanoversight. The search terms for this request are a) Trump b) Electors c) Investigation d) election
According to Judicial Watch, โin July 2022, U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) reportedly warned then-Attorney General Merrick Garland that Thibault and an official in the Justice Departmentโs Public Integrity Section, Richard Pilger, were โdeeply involved in the decisions to open and pursue election-related investigations against President Trump. At the time, whistleblowers told Grassley that the Thibault-Pilger investigationโs predicating document was based on information from โliberal nonprofit American Oversight.โโ Thibault retired in August 2022.โ
Grassley and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) have revealed in a statement that:
Internal FBI emails and predicating documents provided to Grassley and released jointly by the two senators show Timothy Thibault, a former FBI Assistant Special Agent in Charge (ASAC) who was forced to retire from the Bureau after Grassley exposed his public anti-Trump bias, authored the initial language for what ultimately became Jack Smithโs federal case against Trump regarding the 2020 presidential election. Records show Thibault essentially opened and approved his own investigation.
Judicial Watch reports American Oversight describes itself as โfounded in 2017 in response to the unprecedented challenges that the Trump administration posed to our nationโs democratic ideals and institutions.โฆโ Earlier this year, Politico described it as, โA left-leaning watchdog group โฆ working to gather materials that could feed Congressional investigations into the Trump administration.โ










Liberal City Hit With Class Action Lawsuit Over Reparations Scheme
A left-wing city council faces a class action lawsuit from concerned citizens over a scheme to give an average $25,000 in financial assistance to citizens based on their skin color.
The non-profit public interest law firm Judicial Watch announced in a statement a hearing in its โclass action civil rights lawsuit filed against Evanston, Illinois, on behalf of six individuals over the cityโs reparations program.โ
โTo date, Evanston has awarded over $6,350,000 to 254 individuals based on their race. The city must be stopped before it spends even more money on this clearly discriminatory and unconstitutional reparations program,โ said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
โThe court ordered the in-person hearing for oral argument on Evanstonโs pending motion to dismiss the lawsuit,โ Judicial Watch reports.
Judicial Watch reports it โfiled the lawsuit over the cityโs use of race as an eligibility requirement for a reparations program, which makes $25,000 direct cash payments to black residents and descendants of black residents who lived in Evanston between the years 1919 and 1969.โ
According to The New Republic, program will also reportedly give financial assistance to their descendants, who never experienced racism in Evanston.
Judicial Watch alleges โthat the program violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.โ
In its response to the cityโs motion to dismiss, Judicial Watch states:
[T]he programโs use of a race-based eligibility requirement is presumptively unconstitutional, and remedying societal discrimination is not a compelling government interest. Nor has remedying discrimination from as many as 105 years ago or remedying intergenerational discrimination ever been recognized as a compelling government interest. Among the programโs other fatal flaws is that it uses race as a proxy for discrimination without requiring proof of discrimination.
Sponsored
Senator Kennedyโs Latest Book Strikes Back โ Politicians Are Stunned [CONTRIBUTE TODAY TO RECEIVE A FREE COPY]