Home Blog Page 58

‘Golden Fleet’: Trump Announces New Class Of Navy Battleships

3

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Monday announced plans for a new class of U.S. Navy warships, reviving the battleship concept roughly 85 years after it was eclipsed by the aircraft carrier as the world’s dominant naval platform.

The proposal is part of a broader shipbuilding initiative Trump has branded the “Golden Fleet.”

Trump made the announcement from his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, flanked by senior national security officials, including War Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Navy Secretary John Phelan.

A New Naval Push

Under the proposal, the Navy would begin construction on two so-called “Trump-class” battleships, with the potential to expand the fleet to as many as 20 to 25 ships over time.

“These will be the largest battleships in the history of our country — the largest in the history of the world,” Trump said, arguing that the United States needs a stronger and more visible naval presence to deter adversaries.

Trump described the ships as larger, faster, and more powerful than any previous U.S. warship, though few technical details were released during the announcement.

What These Ships Would Likely Be

The idea of building new battleships — a vessel type largely phased out after World War II — immediately raised questions within defense circles.

Traditional battleships, such as the Iowa-class, were centered on heavy guns and thick armor. They fell out of favor as aircraft carriers, submarines, and missile-equipped surface combatants proved more effective in modern warfare.

Retired naval officers familiar with early discussions say the proposed vessels would likely resemble oversized surface combatants rather than classic battleships. Instead of large-caliber guns, they would predominantly feature advanced missile systems, air defense capabilities, and modern sensors.

The Hill continues:

The new vessels will mark an upgrade to the Navy’s Arleigh Burke-class destroyers. 

The first ship in the so-called Trump-class will be the USS Defiant, which will carry the nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missile, according to Phelan. 

The Navy secretary said the Defiant will be the “largest, deadliest and most versatile and best looking warship anywhere on the world’s oceans.” 

As outlined by Navy officials, the Golden Fleet concept could also include up to 50 support and auxiliary ships to sustain the larger force.

Trump said one of the proposed new warships could be completed in about 2.5 years.

Cost and Capacity Concerns

Defense analysts caution that building a new class of large U.S. Navy warships would present significant industrial and budgetary challenges.

Preliminary estimates suggest the vessels could displace between 15,000 and 20,000 tons and cost billions of dollars per ship. Meeting those requirements would likely force U.S. shipyards to expand facilities and hire additional workers capable of handling construction at that scale.

Shipbuilding capacity is already under strain from ongoing submarine and aircraft carrier programs, raising concerns that adding another major initiative could lead to delays or cost overruns.

The U.S. Navy has not built a battleship since the 1940s and decommissioned its last battleship in 1992. Critics note that many of the missions once assigned to battleships are now fulfilled by other platforms without the need to construct massive surface combatants.

Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyers and cruisers, for example, perform air defense, anti-submarine warfare, and land-attack missions using Tomahawk cruise missiles. These ships feature modern designs that proponents argue offer greater survivability than a large, highly visible battleship.

Aircraft carriers remain the Navy’s primary power-projection assets, capable of launching aircraft to strike targets hundreds of miles inland, a reach that far exceeds the range of naval guns — including railguns.

Analysts also point to advances in precision-guided missile technology, which allow a variety of platforms to deliver long-range firepower without the risks associated with deploying a single, large vessel.

Strategic Backdrop

The announcement comes as the U.S. military adjusts its global posture amid rising tensions with Venezuela and other regions, and as China continues to expand its navy at a rapid pace.

Critics argue that resources would be better spent on carrier strike groups, submarines, and dispersed missile platforms rather than reviving the battleship concept. Supporters counter that a larger and more formidable surface fleet could strengthen deterrence and signal U.S. resolve.

For now, key questions about design, cost, and strategy are still unresolved.

Fox News Host Defies Conservative Line On Trump’s Christmastime Move

19

Brian Kilmeade isn’t on board.

The Fox & Friends co-host recently broke with several conservative allies after blasting President Trump’s newly unveiled “Presidential Walk of Fame” plaques at the White House, warning the displays go too far — and could come back to haunt Republicans.

Installed along the White House Colonnade, the plaques feature blunt and often mocking descriptions of former presidents. While some on the right have praised the move as funny and overdue, Kilmeade says it crosses a line.

“I’m not for this at all,” he said.

What’s on the plaques

The displays take direct aim at multiple Trump predecessors:

  • Joe Biden: Replaced with an autopen image and labeled “by far, the worst President in American history.”
  • Barack Obama: Called “one of the most divisive political figures in American history.”
  • Bill Clinton: Noted mainly for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 loss to Trump.
  • George W. Bush: Also targeted with critical commentary.

The plaques first sparked debate on The Five, where Jessica Tarlov called them “repulsive behavior.”

Why Kilmeade objects

Kilmeade warned that today’s trolling could become tomorrow’s problem.

“They’re just going to mock President Trump or put something on his plaque,” he said, arguing the displays could fuel endless political payback as power shifts.

He was especially critical of the autopen image used for Biden.

“I am not for the autopen,” Kilmeade said, calling it juvenile and unfit for a historic setting.

“If you’re going to do it,” he added, “just put the profiles up there.”

History — and consequences

Kilmeade also noted that presidential reputations often change, pointing to Ulysses S. Grant as a leader once derided but later reassessed.

Even so, he made clear he opposes using the White House for political trolling.

“I don’t think it’s going to happen with Joe Biden,” he said, “but I am not for the trolling.”

Conservatives divided

Kilmeade’s stance puts him at odds with Fox colleagues Jesse Watters and Greg Gutfeld, who defended the plaques as entertaining and brushed off concerns about decorum or future blowback.

What do you think? Is this harmless trolling that is long overdue in response to the left’s taunts, or is it inappropriate for the president to display on the side of the White House? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

Obama Presidential Center Breaks Silence Over Controversial Building Plan

    2
    The White House, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

    The Obama Presidential Center is responding publicly after years of criticism over its controversial design and rising costs, with a senior Obama Foundation official now attempting to justify the project to skeptics.

    Construction on the center began in 2021, but many Chicago residents have remained openly critical of the 225-foot-tall structure rising on the city’s South Side. The gray, largely windowless tower will house President Barack Obama’s presidential library and museum, departing sharply from the traditional design of most presidential libraries.

    Obama Foundation Deputy Director Kim Patterson said the building’s appearance — including its lack of windows — was intentional.

    “There are not a lot of windows on the building, but that’s intentional, because sunlight is just not a friend to the artwork and the artifacts that are going inside of the building,” Patterson told CBS News during a tour of the site.

    Patterson also defended the building’s symbolism, which critics have widely questioned.

    “The shape of the building was actually meant to mimic four hands coming together to show the importance of our collective action,” she said.

    Despite those explanations, the project has faced sustained backlash from local residents, architects, and fiscal watchdogs. Critics argue the design clashes with Chicago’s architectural heritage and resembles brutalist government structures. Some locals, quoted by the New York Post, have nicknamed the building “The Obamalisk,” a jab at its stark, monolithic appearance.

    The controversy has gone beyond aesthetics. In 2018, a lawsuit accused the City of Chicago of illegally transferring public parkland to the Obama Foundation, raising concerns about favoritism and misuse of public assets. That legal challenge was not resolved until 2022, fueling broader concerns about transparency and governance.

    Protests have also occurred at the construction site, with residents objecting to both the project’s footprint and its impact on surrounding neighborhoods. Patterson acknowledged that community resistance forced at least one major design change — the relocation of a parking garage.

    “If the parking garage was here, it could possibly block sunlight coming to their area, their gardens,” Patterson said.

    She noted that the foundation ultimately decided to place the garage underground.

    Fiscal concerns remain a major point of contention. When announced in 2017, the Obama Presidential Center was projected to cost $500 million. As of 2025, that figure has ballooned to approximately $850 million — an increase critics say reflects a pattern of cost overruns associated with Obama-era initiatives. While the foundation insists private donations are covering expenses, skeptics question whether additional public infrastructure and security costs will ultimately fall on taxpayers.

    The center is currently scheduled to open in June 2026.

    The criticism surrounding the Obama library stands in contrast to proposals discussed by President Donald Trump regarding his own future presidential library. Trump has floated plans to locate his library in Florida, potentially near Mar-a-Lago, emphasizing accessibility, private funding, and minimal disruption to public land. Supporters argue such an approach reflects Trump’s broader philosophy of limiting government entanglement and avoiding taxpayer burden.

    As debates over presidential legacies increasingly play out through massive construction projects, the Obama Presidential Center has become a flashpoint

    Pelosi Slams Trump’s Mental Fitness—Admits She Didn’t Watch the Speech

    6
    Nancy Pelosi via Gage Skidmore flickr

    Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., accused President Donald Trump of “mental incapacity” during a recent interview with ABC News—despite admitting she did not actually watch his speech to the nation.

    “I didn’t even think about his speech, but I did see some of it in the news afterward, and I think it was a demonstration of his mental incapacity,” Pelosi told ABC’s Jonathan Karl in a clip that aired Sunday on This Week.

    Pelosi said she chose not to watch the address, explaining that she had “had enough” of the president. Still, she did not hesitate to publicly criticize Trump, continuing a pattern of weighing in on his presidency even when acknowledging she lacked firsthand exposure to the event in question.

    When pressed by Karl to explain her remarks, Pelosi added, “Well, that was a ridiculous speech. Of course, we were all offended because of what he said about Rob Reiner… and Michele just a few days before, after the tragedy. Something’s wrong there, and something’s wrong with the people around him that they don’t stop him from his ridiculousness.”

    During the speech, Trump said he had brought the nation back from “the brink of ruin” in less than a year back in office, sharply criticized Democrats, and touted that he had made America the “hottest country” in the world. As expected, reactions to the politically charged address largely fell along partisan lines, as Trump continues to face negative polling on the nation’s economic outlook.

    Pelosi’s attack on Trump’s mental capacity comes with notable irony, given her role in 2024 in pressuring President Joe Biden to step aside as the Democratic nominee—a move that fractured their long-standing political relationship.

    Before Biden’s disastrous debate performance against Trump last June, Pelosi had been one of the most vocal defenders of Biden’s mental sharpness. She publicly dismissed concerns about his cognitive decline and criticized a Wall Street Journal report detailing issues behind the scenes.

    Earlier that year, Pelosi praised Biden as “very sharp” and “always on the ball.”

    However, according to a book by Chris Whipple, Pelosi privately told a friend that Biden had “lost a step” last year. After Biden’s debate struggles became impossible to ignore, Pelosi’s carefully worded comments on Morning Joe—which avoided endorsing his insistence on staying in the race—signaled that her confidence had waned.

    Biden ultimately dropped out of the race, but the fallout with Pelosi has lingered. The two longtime allies have not spoken since.

    Pelosi has consistently maintained that she did not push Biden to withdraw, claiming instead that she merely urged him to look honestly at polling data showing the steep odds he faced.

    Still, her latest remarks underscore a familiar dynamic: Pelosi distancing herself from accountability for her years of Democratic leadership failures while remaining eager to criticize President Trump—this time without even watching the speech she condemned.

    Read: Republican Presidents’ Best Christmas Messages

      0
      Office of Congressman Tom Osborne, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

      Over the years, Republican presidents have shared Christmas messages that reflect their administrations’ values and the spirit of the holiday season.

      Here are four notable Christmas messages from past Republican presidents:

      George W. Bush (2001-2009):

      In his first Christmas address after the September 11 attacks, President Bush spoke about the nation’s resilience and the importance of faith during challenging times.

      “This year in the midst of extraordinary times, our Nation has shown the world that though there is great evil, there is a greater good.”

      He emphasized the importance of love and sharing, noting: “Americans have given of themselves, sacrificing to help others and showing the spirit of love and sharing that is so much a part of the Christmas season.”

      Listen:

      George H.W. Bush (1989-1993):

      December 11, 1991

      At Christmas, we celebrate the promise of salvation that God gave to mankind almost 2,000 years ago. The birth of Christ changed the course of history, and His life changed the soul of man. Christ taught that giving is the greatest of all aspirations and that the redemptive power of love and sacrifice is stronger than any force of arms. It is testimony to the wisdom and the truth of these teachings that they have not only endured but also flourished over two millennia.

      Blessed with an unparalleled degree of freedom and security, generations of Americans have been able to celebrate Christmas with open joy. Tragically, that has not always been the case in other nations, but we look to the future with optimism, and we celebrate the holidays with special gladness as courageous peoples around the world continue to claim the civil and religious liberty to which all people are heirs. The triumph of democratic ideals and the lessening of global tensions give us added reason for celebration this Christmas season, and as the world community draws closer together, the wisdom of Christ’s counsel to “love thy neighbor as thyself” grows clearer.

      By His words and by His example, Christ has called us to share our many blessings with others. As individuals and as a Nation, in our homes and in our communities, there are countless ways that we can extend to others the same love and mercy that God showed humankind when He gave us His only Son. During this holy season and throughout the year, let us look to the selfless spirit of giving that Jesus embodied as inspiration in our own lives — giving thanks for what God has done for us and abiding by Christ’s teaching to do for others as we would do for ourselves.

      Ronald Reagan (1981-1989):

      Gerald R. Ford (1974-1977):

      December 24, 1975

      MERRY CHRISTMAS! These two words conjure up all of the good feelings that mankind has ever held for itself and its creator: reverence, tenderness, humility, generosity, tolerance–love. These are the stars we try to follow. These are the most enduring treasures we can bring to our world. I can remember a few Christmases in my own youth when just about the only thing we had to offer each other as a family was the love we shared, and the faith that together we could see things through to a better future. And it did. It made us work harder, study harder, try harder–and it brought out qualities and depths of strength and character that none of us in those days thought we had.

      The spirit of Christmas is ageless, irresistible and knows no barriers. It reaches out to add a glow to the humblest of homes and the stateliest of mansions. It catches up saint and sinner alike in its warm embrace. It is the season to be jolly–but to be silent and prayerful as well.

      I know this will be a particularly happy Christmas for me. I celebrate it surrounded by those I love and who love me. I celebrate it by joining with all of our citizens in observing a Christmas when Americans can honor the Prince of Peace in a nation at peace.

      The Ford family wishes you and your family a Christmas that brings all of the joy, the fulfillment, and the inspiration of this most precious of seasons. May God’s blessings be with you all.

      Ohio Democrat Sues To Remove Trump’s Name From Kennedy Center

        3
        Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts

        Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-Ohio) filed a lawsuit Monday attempting to prevent President Trump’s name from appearing on the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.

        Beatty, an ex-officio member of the Kennedy Center board, alleges in her complaint that adding Trump’s name to the building constitutes a “flagrant violation” of the Constitution.

        “Congress intended the Center to be a living memorial to President Kennedy and a crown jewel of the arts for all Americans, irrespective of party. Unless and until this Court intervenes, Defendants will continue to defy Congress and thwart the law for improper ends,” the filing states.

        Beatty is represented by Norman Eisen, a former Obama White House ethics adviser, along with attorney Nathaniel Zelinsky of the Washington Litigation Group, according to The New York Times.

        The Ohio Democrat also claims that the administration mischaracterized a recent board call, asserting that officials falsely stated board members “unanimously” supported the change. Beatty alleges participants’ microphones were muted, preventing members from raising objections.

        The Kennedy Center updated its exterior signage on Friday to reflect the inclusion of President Trump’s name, a step that follows broader reforms initiated earlier this year. The administration’s overhaul has focused on reorienting programming and tightening standards around performances considered inappropriate for the venue’s mission.

        House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) and other critics have argued the renaming effort is unlawful. But the center’s interim president, Richard Grenell, defended the decision.

        “It’s now a bipartisan space reflecting the new era. Donald Trump saved it,” Grenell wrote on X, pointing to Trump-era initiatives that stabilized the center’s financial footing.

        Beatty’s lawsuit characterizes the updates—including the name change—as “more reminiscent of authoritarian regimes than the American republic—the sitting President and his handpicked loyalists renamed this storied center after President Trump.”

        The dispute now heads to federal court, where judges will determine whether the Kennedy Center’s board acted within its authority or whether Beatty’s challenge can block the newly installed signage.

        Trump Family Christmas Cards Over The Years

        1
        By The White House from Washington, DC - 2019 National Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony, Public Domain,

        The Trump family has shared various Christmas cards over the years, each reflecting their personal style and the spirit of the holiday season. Here are some notable examples:

        President Donald Trump’s White House Christmas Celebrations: A Look Back

        0
        By The White House from Washington, DC - 2019 National Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony, Public Domain,

        Few presidents embraced the Christmas season—and the deeper meaning behind it—with the enthusiasm and clarity that President Donald J. Trump brought to the White House. For many Americans, his Christmas messages were a welcome return to tradition, faith, and a confident acknowledgment of our nation’s Christian heritage. From proudly restoring “Merry Christmas” to the national vocabulary to showcasing patriotic and faith-centered décor, President Trump’s celebrations struck a chord with Republican and conservative families across the country.

        https://cdn01.justjared.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/wh-xmas/white-house-christmas-decorations-2025-03.jpg
        https://pisco-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com/bf4e81db-7aba-4bcf-9052-28ca937a608d.jpg
        https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/9QO.KNS8k5nKLfEIwqdpbQ--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTEyNDI7aD02OTk-/https%3A//media.zenfs.com/en/aol_fox_news_articles_947/583b9c89883a9628416888593ddf8354

        Below is a warm retrospective on the Christmases of the Trump years—and the themes that made them unforgettable.


        🎁 2017: “We Say Merry Christmas Again”

        https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/f20171126ah-1489_original-820x547.jpg
        https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod/images/white-house-christmas-decorations-portico-1511801265.jpg?crop=1xw%3A1xh%3Bcenter
        https://www.washingtonpost.com/resizer/R4KLx94jWAksuIphUPNSBu3gqyU%3D/960x0/arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/BHZCHSBQKI22HDM5OULQZOYMOU.jpg

        President Trump’s first Christmas in the White House set the tone for the next four years. His message was unmistakable: America would celebrate Christmas boldly, respectfully, and unapologetically.

        Key Highlights:

        • Restoring tradition: Trump emphasized the importance of returning “Merry Christmas” to the national spotlight after years of cultural pressure toward secular alternatives.
        • A celebration of faith: In his 2017 address, he spoke openly about the birth of Jesus Christ and the “miracle of Christmas.”
        • Melania Trump’s décor: The First Lady unveiled a classic theme featuring rich reds, gold ornaments, and traditional greenery—reminiscent of historic American Christmases.

        This first year resonated deeply with conservative households who felt the holiday’s religious roots deserved renewed honor.


        2018: “We Remember That Our Faith and Values Guide Us”

        https://thumbs.worthpoint.com/zoom/images1/1/0125/23/first-lady-melania-trump-white-house_1_59f4d06389df4a0226275b8b1ba1890f.jpg
        https://people.com/thmb/gn02U_kYIEt3da7Hl65BstgQj5s%3D/1500x0/filters%3Ano_upscale%28%29%3Amax_bytes%28150000%29%3Astrip_icc%28%29%3Afocal%28776x340%3A778x342%29/melania-trump-christmas-120524-1-f47e4953dd454c7a82e05552cc9c06f3.jpg
        https://s.abcnews.com/images/International/white-house-xmas-decorations-01-ap-jef-181126_hpMain_16x9_992.jpg

        In 2018, the White House emphasized unity, charity, and gratitude.

        Key Themes:

        • Honoring American service: President Trump paid tribute to servicemembers stationed abroad and highlighted the sacrifices of military families during the holidays.
        • A patriotic palette: Melania Trump introduced a bold display featuring red Christmas trees, symbolizing American bravery and the spirit of the season.
        • Renewed emphasis on hope: The President reminded Americans that Christmas celebrates “the greatest story ever told.”

        This year showcased the administration’s commitment to faith, patriotism, and the belief in America’s enduring goodness.


        🎄 2019: “Christmas Reminds Us All of God’s Boundless Love”

        https://hgtvhome.sndimg.com/content/dam/images/hgtv/fullset/2019/12/13/0/BP_HWHC17_White-House-Christmas_2019_East-Room_0444.jpg.rend.hgtvcom.966.644.suffix/1576282988395.jpeg
        https://images.foxtv.com/static.fox5dc.com/www.fox5dc.com/content/uploads/2019/12/932/524/HANDOUT_ChristmasDecor2019_10.jpg?tl=1&ve=1
        https://cbsnews3.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2019/12/02/121d0265-9af5-4a3d-898f-4031595146ce/thumbnail/1200x630/84c015a0640ae46aa4efc5e66672cf3e/melania-holiday-decor-today-main-191202-4-8606fc5539a66488145ece6f0060b837-fit-2000w.jpg

        The 2019 Christmas season brought an elegant and traditional theme, and some of the administration’s strongest spiritual messaging.

        Key Themes:

        • Faith at the forefront: President Trump spoke extensively about Christ’s role in inspiring compassion, unity, and goodwill.
        • Classic American Christmas décor: Melania featured gold, green, and white elements evoking timeless holiday charm.
        • Celebrating American exceptionalism: The President highlighted the blessings of liberty and the responsibility to preserve them.

        This celebration reflected a serene confidence in America’s cultural foundations and its deeply rooted Christian values.


        🎆 2020: “A Season of Hope in a Challenging Year”

        https://www.washingtonian.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/DSC_4237a-1024x683.jpg
        https://www.washingtonian.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/DSC_4300a.jpg
        https://cdn.abcotvs.com/dip/images/8385777_113020-wtvd-white-house-decorations-long-vid.jpg

        Amid the trials of 2020, Christmas at the White House carried a message of resilience and faith.

        Key Themes:

        • Encouraging a nation under strain: President Trump called on Americans to rely on their faith and families to carry them through adversity.
        • Decor honoring essential workers: Melania’s theme celebrated hospital staff, first responders, and volunteers nationwide.
        • A message of unity and prayer: The President emphasized that the Christmas miracle reminds us that God is with us, even in difficult times.

        In a year marked by uncertainty, this message struck a comforting note for many families.


        🎚️ A Legacy of Faith, Patriotism, and “Merry Christmas”

        Across his four Christmas seasons in the White House, President Trump consistently emphasized:

        • The religious meaning of Christmas
        • American tradition and patriotism
        • Gratitude for military and essential workers
        • Unity rooted in faith and freedom
        • A bold return to “Merry Christmas” in public life

        For many on the Right, these celebrations offered a refreshing reaffirmation of America’s founding values and spiritual heritage.


        🌟 Closing Message for This Christmas

        As we celebrate Christmas this year, President Trump’s holiday messages continue to resonate:
        Faith matters. Traditions matter. America matters.
        And the Christmas season remains a time to remember the blessings of liberty, the strength of family, and the boundless love of God.

        From our Great America News Desk team to you and your family—
        Merry Christmas, and God Bless America.

        Republican Senator Signals He Won’t Support Vance In 2028

        2

        Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) made clear Sunday on ABC News’s This Week that he does not see Vice President JD Vance as someone he would support in a hypothetical 2028 presidential bid, underscoring deep philosophical differences over trade and the future direction of the GOP.

        When asked whether he views Vance — widely viewed within GOP circles as a leading contender to carry the Republican banner after President Donald Trump — as the so-called heir apparent, Paul was direct about the limits of their alignment.

        “I think there needs to be representatives in the Republican Party who still believe international trade is good, who still believe in free market capitalism, who still believe in low taxes,” Paul said, emphasizing his long-standing libertarian philosophy.

        Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons

        Pressed on whether that description fits Vance, Paul answered, “No.”

        Paul lamented what he sees as a shift in GOP economic thinking — away from traditional free-market conservatism toward protectionist policies that embrace tariffs.

        “It used to separate conservatives and liberals that conservatives thought it was a spending problem — we didn’t want less revenue, we wanted less spending,” he said.
        “But now all these pro-tariff protectionists, they love taxes. And so they tax, tax, tax, and then they brag about all the revenue coming in. That has never been a conservative position.”

        Paul said he intends to continue championing a free-market, low-tax wing of the party and will let time — and voters — determine where GOP leadership settles.


        Context: Trump, Vance, and a Fractured GOP

        Vance’s position as a prominent Trump loyalist — often touted by MAGA-aligned activists as the next leader of the movement — stands in contrast to Paul’s more classical libertarian outlook. Trump and Vance have worked closely throughout the administration, and Trump himself has suggested both Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio would make strong contenders in 2028, even as speculation swirls about Trump’s own future political plans.

        Paul and Vance’s disagreements aren’t limited to trade. Earlier in 2025, Paul publicly criticized Vance’s support for a controversial U.S. military strike on an alleged Venezuelan drug-smuggling vessel — going so far as to call the actions Vance defended “despicable and thoughtless” for celebrating lethal force without due process. This public spar highlights deeper philosophical divides between the libertarian wing of the party and its more interventionist or nationalist elements.

        Those tensions reflect a broader conversation within the GOP about its core principles — from foreign policy to economic strategy — as the party prepares for post-Trump leadership.


        Erika Kirk Endorses Vance for 2028

        Adding to the political backdrop, Erika Kirk — the widow of conservative activist and Turning Point USA co-founder Charlie Kirk and the organization’s CEO — officially endorsed Vice President Vance for president in 2028 during the group’s annual AmericaFest conference in Phoenix.

        Kirk, speaking to thousands of activists, pledged Turning Point’s powerful grassroots support and framed Vance as a continuation of her husband’s conservative legacy:

        “We are going to get my husband’s friend JD Vance elected for 48 in the most resounding way possible.”

        Her endorsement — and Turning Point’s mobilization capacity on campuses and with younger conservatives — could be a significant boost in the early stages of a national campaign, even though Vance has not yet announced a formal campaign bid

        VP Vance Issues ‘Official’ Two Word Response To Racist Attacks On Wife

        By Xuthoria - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0,

        Vice President Vance has had enough…

        Vice President JD Vance had two choice words for racist troll Nick Fuentes and others like MS NOW host Jen Psaki, who have made comments about the second lady: “Eat s–t.”

        “Let me be clear. Anyone who attacks my wife, whether their name is Jen Psaki or Nick Fuentes, can eat s–t,” Vance told UnHerd in an interview published Sunday.

        “That’s my official policy as vice president of the United States.”

        He then told writer Sohrab Ahmari that “all forms of ethnic hatred” including antisemitism have “no place in the conservative movement.”

        Vance’s response comes after Fuentes bashed him for being a “race traitor” for marrying his wife; Usha Vance is an American citizen born in San Diego to two Hindu Indian immigrants. Fuentes has also used derogatory terms about Indians to describe The Second Lady.

        Fuentes has made a number of racist and antisemitic comments over the years, and he told Piers Morgan earlier this month that he believed Adolf Hitler was “really f*cking cool.” 

        The vice president’s comments were published a few hours after he told the crowd at Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest that President Donald Trump had wisely “relegated DEI to the dustbin of history.” 

        Vance said DEI is antithetical to American values and a meritocratic society — which made it an easy target for the second Trump Administration.

        “We don’t treat anybody different because of their race or their sex,” Vance told the Phoenix crowd.

        Vance continued his message about unity:

        In the United States of America, you don’t have to apologize for being white anymore.

        And if you’re an Asian, you don’t have to talk around your skin color when you’re applying for college. Because we judge people based on who they are, not on ethnicity and things they can’t control.

        We don’t persecute you for being male, for being straight, for being gay, for being anything. The only thing that we demand is that you be a great American patriot. And if you’re that. you’re very much on our team.

        Watch:

        Those comments were also well-received by the arena. His remark on white men comes a few days after a viral Compact article reported a number of professional fields had “gatekeepers [who] promised extra consideration to anyone who wasn’t a white man.”

        Vice President Vance touted a number of accomplishments he said the Trump Administration has had in less than a year, including closing down the southern border. He said the crowd must continue to support the “America First Party” — echoing Donald Trump Jr., who earlier in the day said the Republican Party was no longer a thing.

        Trump Jr. said it is a new era for the conservative movement — one that is constantly under attack from the Democratic Party and Republicans In Name Only (RINOs). He said those attacks are ramping up as both parties plow towards the 2026 midterm elections.

        Here is what the told the AmFest crowd:

        Midterms are coming around the corner and make no mistake, the Democrat Party wants to do whatever they possibly can to shut this movement down. Not just the Democrats. The RINOs.

        You see the manufactured attacks on JD [Vance], myself, my father — anyone who understands that this isn’t the Republican Party anymore. It’s the America First Party. It’s the Make America Great Again Party. And we are not going back!

        Watch: