Opinion

Home Opinion Page 39

C*VID Could Be Linked to Chinaโ€™s Secret Biowarfare Program: House GOP Intel Report

4
Ureem2805, CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

ANALYSIS โ€“ While I never claimed C*VID was a deliberately released Chinese b*oweapon or even explicitly that it was part of a b*oweapons program, I did point out that China had an extensive biowarfare program that could be involved with the creation and leak of the v*rus.

I also explored the likely theory that C*VID-*9 accidentally escaped from the BSL-4 bio lab at the W*han Institute of Vir*logy.

This was the W*han bio-leak theory.

To me, this was a no-brainer and something any intelligence analyst of any merit should have been evaluating when C*VID first surfaced in W*han, China, in December 2019.

However, the mere mention of any of these considerations was immediately crushed by so-called scientific experts, the media, left-leaning politicians and a host of others, branding it disinformation or misinformation to even mention the possibility that C*VID could be man-made.

Big Tech social media platforms quickly made it their job to ferociously suppress any discussion that China may have accidentally created C*VID, much less that it could be tied to a Chinese military b*owarfare program.

This censorship affected scientists, and others, and even resulted in many respected persons, including me, being canceled by social media platforms, such as LinkedIn. [Editor’s Note: This article is currently being censored]

This draconian response was partly due to President Trump noting this was a possibility, producing a visceral reaction to say the opposite.

But the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) was also part of the major effort to downplay any connection between C*VID and Chinaโ€™s b*oweapons, claiming in an October 2021 Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)ย assessmentย thatย S*RS-C*V-2 was โ€œprobably not a b*ological weapon.โ€

Over time, as the evidence piled up, and experts became less afraid to contradict the official narrative, more and more reporting was done pointing to the W*han bio lab as the potential source of an accidental leak.

And now we are going beyond that and potentially linking C*VID to Chinaโ€™s secretive military b*owarfare effort.

A new unclassifiedย reportย released by GOP members of theย House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI)ย argues that C*VID-*9 โ€œmay have been tiedโ€ to Chinaโ€™s b*ological weapons research program.

The minority report, released on Dec. 14 states that โ€œthere are indications that S*RS-C*V-2 may have been tied to Chinaโ€™s biological weapons research program and spilled over to the human population during a lab-related incident at the W*han Institute of Vir*logy (WIV).โ€

Significantly, the committee blamed the intelligence community when it further stated in its report that it has โ€œreason to believe that the IC downplayed the possibility that S*RS-C*V-2 was connected to Chinaโ€™s b*oweapons program based in part on input from outside experts.โ€

These โ€˜outsideโ€™ experts the IC relied on were of course extremely biased, many with political, ideological or financial agendas.

The GOP report also highlights that the intelligence community has โ€œfailed to complyโ€ with numerous requests for informationโ€”including bipartisan committee questions about the experts relied upon for its assessment.

As The Epoch Times reported, Rep. Brad Wenstrup, R-Ohio, noted the ICโ€™s non-compliance when he stated: โ€œWe should know who is making these decisions and how they are coming to their conclusions. I think thatโ€™s our responsibility as oversight, and to date, we have not received that information.โ€

Expect the Republican majority to push the intelligence community harder on this issue when it takes control of the HPSCI and other related committees.

Itโ€™s time we learn the full truth about how these assessments were completed. And also learn as much as possible about the true origins of C*VID.ย 

Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of Great America News Desk.

President Trumpโ€™s Memorial Day Messages: A Legacy of Honor and Respect

2
Donald Trump via Gage Skidmore Flickr

This Memorial Day, as we gather with family, fire up the grill, or visit our local cemeteries and memorials, it’s worth remembering the leaders who never lost sight of the true meaning behind the day. President Donald J. Trump has always placed Americaโ€™s fallen heroes at the center of his message, offering powerful words and sincere gestures that reflect deep respect for our military and their families.

Throughout his presidency, President Trump used Memorial Day not for politicsโ€”but for patriotism. Year after year, he stood before veterans, Gold Star families, and active-duty troops with one purpose: to honor the men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice for this nation.

Hereโ€™s a look back at some of his most moving Memorial Day tributes:


2017 โ€“ Arlington National Cemetery

President Trump delivered his first Memorial Day address at Arlington National Cemetery, laying a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier and offering a solemn promise:

โ€œWords cannot measure the depth of their devotion, the purity of their love, or the totality of their courage.โ€

It was a speech that reminded the countryโ€”and the worldโ€”that America remembers.


2018 โ€“ Arlington Again, and a Call for Prayer

Returning to Arlington in 2018, President Trump spoke of sacred ground and permanent peace:

โ€œWe are gathered here on the sacred soil of Arlington National Cemetery to honor the lives and deeds of Americaโ€™s greatest heroes.โ€

That year, he issued a proclamation declaring Memorial Day a Day of Prayer for Permanent Peace, calling on Americans to pause at 11:00 a.m. for a national moment of prayer.


2019 โ€“ Speaking from the USS Wasp in Japan

While abroad visiting troops, President Trump addressed sailors aboard the USS Wasp in Yokosuka, Japan:

โ€œToday, the unbreakable resolve of our great American heroes is inspiring our nation to achieve new heights.โ€

Even halfway around the world, the president made sure Memorial Day was observed with honor, reflection, and gratitude.


2020 โ€“ Fort McHenry Amid Crisis

During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, while others canceled public observances, President Trump stood tall at Fort McHenry in Baltimore, honoring the brave and the fallen:

โ€œWe remember the young Americans who never got the chance to grow old, but whose legacy will outlive us all.โ€

He reminded us that even in times of hardship, we must continue to honor the past and those who gave everything for our freedom.


A President Who Never Forgot

In every one of these speeches, President Trump put Americaโ€™s heroes firstโ€”not soundbites, not political spin. His words carried the weight of gratitude and the clarity of purpose. Whether in Arlington, Baltimore, or aboard a Navy vessel, he stood firm in his belief that our nation owes eternal respect to those who served and sacrificed.

This Memorial Day, letโ€™s take a moment to reflectโ€”not only on the brave men and women who gave their livesโ€”but also on the kind of leadership that never forgets them.

President Trump didnโ€™t just speak about honoring our military. He lived it. And millions of Americans still remember.

Marines Urged by Woke Study to Use Gender-Neutral Terms in Boot Camp

8

ANALYSIS โ€“ In the most glaring example of wokeness in the military, which the Marine Commandant recently claimed wasnโ€™t an issue in our beloved Corps, jarheads are being urged not to use sir or maโ€™am in Marine boot camp.

According to the Marine Corps Times, this is seen as part of a sweeping effort to avoid ‘misgendering’ drill instructors. This is something all Marines know has been a huge and pressing issue at boot camp for decades, as we have so many non-binary and trans drill instructors.

Please note my sarcasm.

The recommendation is part of a massive, recently completed, 738-page academic report from the University of Pittsburgh, which was commissioned by the Corps in 2020.

Instead of sir or maโ€™am the 22 University of Pittsburgh Academics that concocted the study – headed by biologists Bradley C. Nindl and Mita Lovalekar, recommend aspiring privates call their superiors by their last names. 

The study notes that other military branches have made strides to “de-emphasize gender” by using other names instead. 

The Marine Corps Times reports:

Instead of saying โ€˜maโ€™amโ€™ or โ€˜sir,โ€™ recruits in these Services refer to their drill instructors using their ranks or roles followed by their last names. Gendered identifiers prime recruits to think about or visually search for a drill instructorโ€™s gender first, before their rank or role.

The far-left report is riddled with other woke ideas and includes a detailed study on improving gender integration at boot camp.

One important figure who thankfully appeared hesitant about this gender-neutral proposal was Col. Howard Hall, chief of staff for Marine Corps Training and Education Command.

Hall and others maintain that even if the Corps implements the change at its training facilities, recruits will then need to re-adapt to again addressing senior officers by ‘sir’ or ‘ma’am’ when they enter the fleet, as Marines in the real world would likely not enforce the rule.

 Hall told the Marine Corps Times, in slightly mangled terms, and some big words:

Honestly, thatโ€™s not a quick fix. What are inculcating in our young recruits that will or will not be reinforced when they graduate and enter the fleet Marine force? So again, we want to avoid any quick-fix solutions that introduce perturbations down the line.

And yes, while we all want to avoid โ€˜perturbationsโ€™ down the line, more importantly we want to avoid sheer idiocy right now.

Maybe our Marine officers should learn to be blunter.

This study also shows why the military needs to stop relying so much on outside consultants and academics, and their idiotic, ideologically-driven studies, to guide its policies.

Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of Great America News Desk.

Amanda Head: Supreme Court Smacks Down All The Dems’ Favorite Issues!

0
Duncan Lock, Dflock, CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

The Supreme Court just dealt a crippling blow to Democrats’ radical agenda for America. It’s about time.

Watch Amanda explain the situation below:

Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of Great America News Desk.

Tucker Carlson Jan 6 Exposรฉ โ€“ Partly True and Also Kinda Dumb

20
Photo via Gage Skidmore Flickr

ANALYSIS โ€“ Tucker Carlsonโ€™s misguided attempt to use cherry-picked moments of the newly released video of Jan. 6 to argue that nothing bad happened at the Capitol that day, is horribly timed and very dumb.ย 

As I wrote the day after I personally observed events at the Capitol that day, January 6 was neither a deadly coup, insurrection nor peaceful guided tours of the Capitol.ย 

It was a mixture of some of those things, none of those things, and everything in between.

And Tucker would have been far more effective, and credible had he used the video to show that the Leftโ€™s Jan. 6 narrative was incomplete, distorted, and totally one-sided, rather than trying to say it was totally false.

Because the truth is that Jan 6 was like the story of the blind men and the elephant, each one grasping one part of the animal, like the leg, tail, or trunk, and describing the giant beast as something totally different.

On Jan. 6 what began as a massive peaceful rally of tens of thousands of pro-Trump protesters, soon degraded when smaller elements (a few hundred)ย of the much larger peaceful crowd broke off and did conduct a violent attack on parts of the Capitol.

Hundreds more just stupidly followed the initial ‘attack mob’ inside.

In the first group, some had military training, used stack formations, and were very organized and intent on forcefully breaching the building. 

While none were found with, or used firearms, during the riot, there was violence with sticks, flagpoles, and pepper spray.

I called these violent rioters, thugs, and criminals.

They were similar to the violent BLM rioters who had violently attacked police at the White House in the summer of 2020 or besieged the Portland Federal Courthouse for months.

On Jan. 6 police officers were similarly attacked and beaten, and the Capitol was ultimately breached unlawfully.

Inside, one non-violent protester, Ashley Babbitt, an Air Force security forces veteran, was shot by a Capitol Police Officer. Likely, unjustly. 

She was the only person killed during the riot.

All this occurred in the span of just a few hours.

But the Capitol complex is massive, and what was happening violently on one end was not being replicated at other parts of the Capitol. 

As much of the Tucker video showed truthfully, in many places and entrances, Capitol Police had allowed protesters inside, in some cases escorted them around. 

In other cases, the police simply stood by as the โ€˜touristโ€™ protesters milled around and took selfies or acted stupidly.

Still, ever since then, there has been a profound narrative battle pitting those fanatics on the right who said nothing at all happened and the fanatics on the left who claim Jan. 6 was worse than Pearl Harbor or 9/11, and an insurrection that risked the essence of American democracy. 

Sadly, neither side is correct, but only the most extreme one-sided ‘insurrection’ narrative was put forward by the left and last Congressโ€™ Democratic-run Jan. 6 committee, and repeated daily by the partisan, anti-Trump media.

The insurrection narrative was pushed by cherry-picked videos and photos of the same short-lived Capitol violence from different views and angles, repeated in a nearly constant loop for the most distorted and dramatic effect possible.

But now Tucker has done the same.

As Politico reported:

Capitol Police Chief Thomas Manger wrote in an internal message to officers that Carlsonโ€™s Monday night primetime program โ€œconveniently cherry-picked from the calmer moments of our 41,000 hours of videoโ€ to incorrectly portray the violent assault as more akin to a peaceful protest. He added that Carlsonโ€™s โ€œcommentary fails to provide context about the chaos and violence that happened before or during these less tense moments.โ€

And many Republican leaders agreed.

The timing is also horrible.

As Politico reported:

โ€œItโ€™s definitely stupid to keep talking about this โ€ฆ So what is the purpose of continuing to bring it up unless youโ€™re trying to feed Democrat narratives even further?โ€ Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) said in an interview, noting the videos didnโ€™t show โ€œanything we donโ€™t already know.โ€

โ€œI donโ€™t really have a problem with making it all public. But if your message is then to try and convince people that nothing bad happened, then itโ€™s just gonna make us look silly.โ€

So how should we view the events of the January 6 riot accurately and fairly?

Probably the best description was provided by Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-N.D.) when he said he has โ€œa hard time with all of it.โ€

He added that Jan. 6 โ€œwas not a peaceful protest. It was not an insurrection. It was a riot that should have never happened. And a lot of people share the blame for that. The truth is always messier than any narrative.โ€

Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of Great America News Desk.

Texas GOP Governor Declares Border Invasion, Again – What Next?

0

ANALYSIS – The Biden border crisis just gets worse every day, with no help at all from the White House. 

And now that a federal court has invalidated Trump’s Title 42 C*VID regulation forcing would-be asylum seekers to remain in Mexico, expect a massive new illegal migrant surge.

Much of that surge and chaos is seen along the border with Texas which takes the brunt of the migrant onslaught.

In response, Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced that he is invoking the U.S. Constitutionโ€™s invasion clause and taking โ€œunprecedented measuresโ€ to repel a โ€œborder invasion.โ€

https://twitter.com/josephanunn/status/1592639277590249474

Abbott also sent out a press release and a letter to county officials along the border.

Abbott’s declaration comes one week after he won a third four-year term as governor. Former Trump administration officials had been urging the governors of Arizona and Texas to declare an โ€œinvasionโ€ to justify more aggressive measures to stem the illegal migrant tide.

Infuriating his partisan critics and open border advocates, the Governor can expect severe legal pushback.

The question is – can he win?

As the American Bar Association Journal notes:

The invasion clause is in Article 1, Section 10 of the Constitution.

It provides: โ€œNo state shall, without the consent of Congress, lay any duty of tonnage, keep troops or ships of war in time of peace, enter into any agreement or compact with another state or with a foreign power or engage in war, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay.โ€

Abbott said he will deploy the National Guard to โ€œrepel and turn backโ€ immigrants trying to enter the country illegally. He will also deploy the Texas Department of Public Safety to arrest and return to the border immigrants who came into the country illegally.

Abbott also plans to build a border wall in multiple counties, deploy gun boats, enter into a compact with other states to secure the border, and โ€œenter into agreements with foreign powers to enhance border security.โ€

Abbott first authorized the National Guard and Texas police to act in July, directing them to return immigrants to ports of entry. He also referenced the invasion clause at the time.

However, Abbott has yet to issue a formal invasion declaration or official order. 

His office has not published such a declaration through an official news release or on the governorโ€™s website, which means he has not yet gone much beyond his actions and declarations in July. 

National security expert and Navy JAG Jonathan Hullihan told The Center Square that if Abbott had invoked his constitutional authority on Tuesday, โ€œhe would have done so in an official document, not from a personal Twitter account.โ€ 

Hence โ€œNo document, no order.” 

And critics question its legality. The ABA notes:

Nunn said Abbottโ€™s actions were actually โ€œa thinly veiled effort to take the reins on U.S. immigration policy.โ€ But that would also be unconstitutional under U.S. Supreme Court precedent holding that immigration policy is โ€œunquestionablyโ€ and โ€œexclusivelyโ€ a federal power, Nunn said.

โ€œFor all these reasons, the Biden administration would likely succeed in court if it sued to stop Abbott from carrying out his plans,โ€ Nunn concluded.

But others see this as a well-played political move putting Team Biden in a position it can’t win.

“Weโ€™re literally talking about state officials doing the same exact thing that federal officials do with Title 42,โ€ said Ken Cuccinelli, a senior fellow at the conservative nonprofit organization Center for Renewing America.

And as the Washington Examiner reports:

โ€œHeโ€™s [Abbott] run Operation Lone Star and kept your National Guard up and running for a show. He knows it doesnโ€™t do anything,โ€ said Cuccinelli, adding that the state could win a battle in federal court. 

โ€œIf youโ€™re the federal government and you sue Texas over it … they have to prove there is not an invasion, and they have the burden of proof because they’re the plaintiff in the case. Good luck proving that today with the state of the border. I donโ€™t think it could be done.”

Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of Great America News Desk.

Amanda Head: WHAT on Earth?! NHL Goes Woke!

1

Even more sports teams seem to be regressing into the painfully woke ideology, and this time the National Hockey League is on the hook.

Watch Amanda break down the situation below:

Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of Great America News Desk.

Amanda Head: Southwest Airlines Ruined Christmas

1

Nobody expected Southwest Airlines to be the biggest grinch of all this Christmas.

As a winter storm rolled through much of the United States grounding thousands of airline passengers over the Christmas holidays. While nearly every airline was forced to announce delays and cancellations Southwest airlines was by and far the worst culprit, even drawing ire from the Dept. of Transportation.

Watch Amanda break down the controversy below:

Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of Great America News Desk.

Amanda Head: Biden Admin in Cahoots with Big Media to Hide the Truth!

1

The truth is finally coming out!

Watch Amanda explain the controversy below:

Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of Great America News Desk.

Radical Army Secretary Doesnโ€™t Want White Men from โ€˜Patriotโ€™ Families

6
The White House, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

ANALYSIS โ€“ In oneย of my earlier PDBsย I asked if the Pentagonโ€™s โ€˜Wokenessโ€™ was a deliberate effort to keep straight, white Christian males from joining the military. Of course, I knew the answer was โ€˜yes.โ€™ย 

I even said, โ€œthis may be the leftโ€™s goal – to deliberately alienate [straight] white Christian men from joining, so they can expand efforts to recruit non-religious, non-white, woke LGBT lefties instead.โ€

But now Joe Bidenโ€™s Army Secretary, Christine Wormuth, a lefty civilian bureaucrat who never served a day in uniform, is saying the quiet part out loud. And she is going even farther. Much farther.

Wormuth doesnโ€™t just want to alienate white Christian men, so they wonโ€™t join, she specifically wants to keep out recruits from what I call โ€˜patriot familiesโ€™ โ€“ those who have a history of serving our country going back up to seven generations. 

Most of these patriot family recruits would be white Christian men. Many of them are from the South.

Since the end of the draft in 1973 at the close of the Vietnam War, notes the Wall Street Journal, the Army has relied โ€œheavily on veterans and military families to develop the next generation of recruits, especially in the region known in the military as the โ€˜Southern Smile,โ€™ a curving region from the mid-Atlantic and down across the southern U.S.โ€

But we now also have multi-generational Hispanic service members and a few others. The children of all these military families make up most new recruits in the U.S. military. 

The Journal added:

Today, nearly 80% of all new Army recruits have a family member who has served in uniform, according to the service. That can be a good thing, said Col. Mark Crow, director of the Office of Economic and Manpower Analysis at West Point, because โ€œpeople who know the most about it stick around.โ€ 

But to the far-left Democrats, including Wormuth, all these patriots are dangerous and must be purged from our fighting forces. Thatโ€™s what the Pentagonโ€™s wokeness is really about.

As the Wall Street Journal reported:

Depending too much on military families could create a โ€œwarrior caste,โ€ Wormuth said. Her plans seek to draw in people who have no real connection to the military and to broaden the appeal of service.

What does that nonsense mean in real terms?

Well, Daniel Greenfield says it very well in Frontpage Magazine:

There is a โ€˜warrior casteโ€™ insofar as you have families who have fought for this country since the War of Independence. They showed up, they bled, and now theyโ€™re to be replaced by drag queens and identity politics quotas.

And Wormuth’s radical plan to replace our โ€˜warrior casteโ€™ is being finalized. 

According to the WSJ, โ€œWormuth said she expects within weeks to begin drafting a proposal for a recruiting overhaul so sweeping that Congress might need to pass legislation to enact all of it.โ€

While not going into details, Wormuth has stated that: โ€œThe Army is strategically deploying recruiters to communities across the country based on demographics, ethnicity, race, and gender.โ€ 

How does this translate into policy? 

Greenfield writes in another Frontpage piece that: โ€œRather than getting the best people or even adequately qualified people, the goal is to match the force to the census data in a completely senseless exercise so that the people they do get are 20% black, 7.2% Asian, and 0.6% American Indian, or develop a plan to get those Asians.โ€

He adds:

Thatโ€™s what deciding that the military should โ€œlook like Americaโ€ really means in the ranks. You canโ€™t have too many white men, but too many black men could also become a problem. If the goal is to match the census, then you canโ€™t have too few minorities or too many. Come on in Jiang, we havenโ€™t met our Chinese quota yet, sorry Jose, we have too many Hispanics already.

But as the Pentagonโ€™s annual June โ€˜Prideโ€™ festivities highlight, itโ€™s not just about racial quotas, itโ€™s also about sexual identity politics. Greenfield concludes:

Who needs a few good men when you can have a few good trans-men of color? And who cares if they speak English? No Habla Ingles? No problemo! Having HIVย  is not a problem. Being from an enemy nation is not a problem. Being a man who believes heโ€™s a woman is not a problem.

Being white, especially a heterosexual male, is a very big problem. We need a military that looks like America and white heterosexual men look nothing like America.

Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of Great America News Desk.