Media

Home Media

Lara Trump Teases โ€˜Manyโ€™ Trumps May Run For Office

0
Donald Trump via Gage Skidmore Flickr

Fox News host Lara Trump suggested on Tuesday that โ€œmanyโ€ members of the Trump family could eventually pursue political office, hinting that the political ambitions of President Donald Trumpโ€™s relatives may extend beyond his own career. Her comments came during an appearance on Miranda Devineโ€™s Pod Force One podcast.

Reflecting on her father-in-lawโ€™s influence, Lara Trump said, โ€œI have looked at my father-in-law over the past eleven, almost twelve years now, and Iโ€™ve watched the impact that heโ€™s been able to make in peopleโ€™s lives and itโ€™s amazing. Look, heโ€™s dealt with hell, right? He has gone through so much.โ€ She added that watching Trumpโ€™s persistence has inspired โ€œeveryone in our familyโ€ and left open the possibility that more Trumps could enter electoral politics:

โ€œโ€ฆIโ€™d consider running for a possible Senate seat. So I would never say never to anything. What I do feel like, and whether itโ€™s for Donald Trump runningโ€ฆ or a Senate run, or whatever it might be for me or I think anyone in our family, I think the timing has to be rightโ€ฆโ€

Lara Trump noted that timing thwarted her own past efforts, pointing to earlier years when a run โ€œdidnโ€™t work outโ€ โ€” a reference to when she considered but ultimately declined Senate bids in 2022 and again in 2025.

Turning to the question of broader family ambitions, she said, โ€œweโ€™ve all kind of dipped our toe in the water of politics enough to know that itโ€™s something that I think possibly interests many of us in our familyโ€ฆโ€ before acknowledging that Democrats โ€œwould love to hear that it may not end just with Donald Trump.โ€

When asked whether former President Trump encourages potential family runs, Lara Trump replied that he has been โ€œabsolutely a championโ€ of her own political endeavors, calling her regularly with names of supporters urging her to run. She added that Trump โ€œcertainly would have their backsโ€ if any of the family chose to seek office.

Devine closed the discussion by musing that the future might bring a โ€œPresident Trump of the new generation,โ€ perhaps from among โ€œall threeโ€ of Trumpโ€™s children or close relatives.

Context: Past Speculation About Trump Family Political Runs

Lara Trumpโ€™s comments tap into ongoing speculation that the Trump family might try to extend its influence beyond Donald Trumpโ€™s own career:

โ€ข Lara Trump and the North Carolina Senate:
Before deciding not to run, Lara Trump was widely viewed as a potential Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate in North Carolina after Senator Thom Tillis announced his retirement, drawing substantial interest from GOP leaders and national strategists. Georgia Republicans had even paused their own campaigns pending her decision. However, she ultimately chose not to enter the race, and former RNC Chair Michael Whatley has since picked up key endorsements from Donald Trump and Lara for the seat.

โ€ข Other Trump family members:
There has also been public conversation about other Trump relatives entering politics. Eric Trump, the presidentโ€™s second son, spoke in mid-2025 about the possibility that he โ€” or other family members โ€” could seek public office in the future, suggesting a โ€œTrump political dynastyโ€ might emerge beyond Donald Trumpโ€™s own presidency. Eric said a political career for the family โ€œwould be an easy oneโ€ if the relatives were willing to commit, though no formal campaigns have been launched.

Meanwhile, Donald Trump Jr. has maintained a high public profile through media and podcasting, and Ivanka Trump served as a senior adviser during her fatherโ€™s earlier presidency, though she has since stepped back from active politics. Other younger family members, like Tiffany Trump and Barron Trump, have been less involved publicly, and there is no indication they have declared political intentions

Judge Rejects BBCโ€™s Bid To Halt Discovery In Trump $10B Lawsuit

0

A federal judge on Thursday dealt an early blow to the BBCโ€™s legal strategy in President Donald Trumpโ€™s $10 billion defamation lawsuit, refusing the broadcasterโ€™s request to pause discovery and clearing the way for both sides to begin exchanging evidence.

U.S. District Judge Roy Altman ruled that the BBCโ€™s bid to halt the evidence-gathering process was โ€œprematureโ€ and said the network had failed to show it would be unfairly harmed if discovery moved forward. In a separate order, the court scheduled a two-week trial date for February 2027.

The decision represents a significant procedural win for Trump, who has argued that the publicly funded British broadcaster knowingly pushed a misleading narrative about January 6 in an effort to damage him politically.

Trump is suing over edited footage aired in an October 2024 episode of the BBCโ€™s Panorama documentary series. The clips, first reported by The Telegraph in November, allegedly spliced together two separate Trump statements in a way that his legal team says created the โ€œmistaken impressionโ€ that he directed supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.

Trumpโ€™s attorneys argue the editing was not a simple mistake, but part of a broader media pattern that Republicans have long criticized: selectively framing Trump and his supporters as violent extremists while downplaying evidence that Trump repeatedly urged peaceful protest.

The presidentโ€™s lawsuit seeks $5 billion in damages for defamation, along with another $5 billion for alleged violations of trade practices.

The case has already caused turmoil inside the BBC. The fallout reportedly triggered resignations among senior leadership, including director general Tim Davie and BBC News CEO Deborah Turness.

BBC Chair Samir Shah apologized for an โ€œerror of judgment,โ€ but insisted there is โ€œno basis for a defamation caseโ€ and said the corporation is โ€œdetermined to fight this.โ€

Judge Altmanโ€™s ruling means the BBC will now be required to turn over internal communications, production materials, and editorial decision-making documents โ€” evidence that could prove critical in determining whether the broadcaster acted negligently or with actual malice.

GOP Congressman Wildly Says โ€˜a Lot of Congressmen Probably Should Be in Jailโ€™

5
Image via Pixabay

Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) raised eyebrows this week after making blunt remarks about corruption in Washington and the lingering unanswered questions surrounding the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

During a Monday appearance on Newsmax, Burchett argued that the Epstein scandal remains one of the clearest examples of how Americaโ€™s political and elite class often operates under a different set of rules than everyday citizens.

Burchettโ€™s comments came as discussion continues about potential upcoming depositions tied to the Epstein investigation, including speculation about former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

By Ralph Alswang, White House photographer – https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/clinton-epstein-maxwell/, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=143417695

When asked about the possibility of questioning the Clintons, Burchett did not hold back, calling them an โ€œevil pairโ€ and suggesting they have long avoided accountability because of their political skill and influence.

โ€œThereโ€™s a reason that theyโ€™re not in prison and a reason that he was in the White House for two terms and she was secretary of state, because theyโ€™re very slippery and theyโ€™re very smart and I think theyโ€™re an evil pair,โ€ Burchett said.

He went on to argue that while many Americans want answers โ€” particularly given Epsteinโ€™s high-profile connections โ€” he doubts the Clintons or others in their circle will ever face serious consequences.

โ€œI think she is probably the brains behind the operation, but I donโ€™t think weโ€™ll get much on them,โ€ he continued. โ€œI know a lot of people want us to get them, and itโ€™d be great clickbait, Iโ€™m sure, but I think when it comes down to it theyโ€™ll either bail or they wonโ€™t answer very many questions and be very evasive and be very smugโ€ฆโ€

Burchett also expressed frustration with what he described as a two-tiered justice system, where powerful political figures often escape scrutiny while ordinary Americans are held to stricter standards.

โ€œโ€ฆbecause in this world there are two forms of justice โ€“ those like the Clintons and for the rest of us,โ€ he said.

While some commentators have speculated about dramatic legal consequences for high-profile individuals connected to Epstein, Burchett emphasized that Congress itself cannot directly jail anyone.

โ€œEverybody says weโ€™ll put them in handcuffs, all this stuff. All thatโ€™s talk,โ€ he explained. โ€œThe lawโ€™s gotta back you up on it and, you know, we gotta define what those laws were that they broke, and Congress cannot send somebody to jail.โ€

In one of his most striking statements, Burchett suggested that Washingtonโ€™s problems extend far beyond one scandal.

He concluded, โ€œOddly enough, a lot of congressmen probably should be in jail, but the truth is that weโ€™re not gonna. I donโ€™t think itโ€™ll boil down to anything, and thatโ€™s gonna make a lot of people mad, but I believe thatโ€™s the truth.โ€

The Tennessee congressman also weighed in on Epsteinโ€™s longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving a prison sentence for her role in Epsteinโ€™s sex trafficking operation.

Burchett predicted that if Maxwell were ever released early, her fate could mirror the suspicious circumstances many Americans still associate with Epsteinโ€™s death.

โ€œI see maybe she gets out early on good behavior and does a humongous book deal and probably ends up committing suicide by getting shot in the back of the head five times because this thing goes very deep and the people involved in it are very powerful,โ€ he said.

Burchett also repeated a belief shared by many skeptics across the country โ€” that Epsteinโ€™s death in federal custody left far too many unanswered questions.

โ€œAnd Iโ€™m still one of those that believe Epstein didnโ€™t kill himself, maโ€™am. I just donโ€™t think he did.โ€

Marjorie Taylor Greene Bluntly Declares MAGA โ€˜Was All A Lieโ€™

2

Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, once one of President Donald Trumpโ€™s most outspoken allies on Capitol Hill, has escalated her public break with the former presidentโ€”this time taking direct aim at the Make America Great Again movement itself.

In a lengthy interview with independent political commentator Kim Iversen published on YouTube Thursday, Greene accused Trump of abandoning the grassroots voters who fueled his rise, branding MAGA a betrayal of the very people it promised to serve.

โ€œMAGA is โ€” I think people are realizing it was all a lie. It was a big lie for the people,โ€ Greene said.

The Georgia Republican, who resigned from Congress last fall, argued that Trump has shifted his focus away from everyday Americans and toward wealthy donors and entrenched interests. According to Greene, political loyalty is now driven by money rather than principle.

โ€œHeโ€™s more worried about serving the big big donors,โ€ she said, referring to donors who contribute to Trump-aligned PACs and high-dollar projects, including his newly announced ballroom. โ€œThose are the people that get the special favors, the government contracts, they get the pardons.โ€

Greene went on to argue that foreign governments and multinational corporations now wield disproportionate influence over U.S. policy.

โ€œAnd itโ€™s the foreign countries that are running the show here,โ€ she added. โ€œItโ€™s the major big corporations and what is best for the world. Thatโ€™s really what MAGA is.โ€

Her criticism extended to foreign policy, particularly Trumpโ€™s focus on Iran and the Middle East. Greene suggested domestic unrest is being ignored in favor of overseas conflicts.

โ€œIโ€™m sorry, weโ€™ve got civil war practically breaking out in Minnesota, can we not care about that?โ€ she said.

Greene reserved her sharpest criticism for U.S. involvement in Israel and Gaza, accusing Trump of prioritizing foreign interests over American lives and values.

โ€œWeโ€™re seeing war on behalf of Israel,โ€ Greene said. โ€œWeโ€™re seeing the people in Gaza โ€” innocent people in Gaza, hundreds of thousands of them completely murdered, so that they can build some new real estate development and money can pour in and everyone can get rich there in New Gaza.โ€

The remarks mark a dramatic evolution for Greene, who was once considered among Trumpโ€™s most reliable defenders in Congress. Her relationship with the former president began to fracture publicly after she accused him of dragging his feet on releasing government files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epsteinโ€”an issue popular among the GOP base skeptical of elite accountability.

Following those comments, Trump publicly distanced himself from Greene, dubbing her โ€œMarjorie โ€˜Traitorโ€™ Greeneโ€ and claiming she had โ€œsome sort of act going on.โ€ Their feud intensified in the months that followed, culminating in Greeneโ€™s decision to leave Congress altogether.

While Greene has framed her resignation as a rejection of Washington politics, speculation has continued to swirl within conservative circles that she may be positioning herself for a future national run. Allies and critics alike have noted that her recent media appearances, broader ideological critiques, and willingness to challenge Trump directly resemble the early stages of a potential presidential or third-party campaign.

Greene has not formally announced any plans to run for president, but she has also declined to rule it outโ€”fueling rumors that her break with Trump may be less about stepping away from politics and more about redefining the post-Trump conservative movement on her own terms.

According to a November report from Notus, Greene has privately expressed interest in following in Donald Trumpโ€™s footsteps to the White House. The outlet cites four sources familiar with her thinking, saying Greene believes she represents the โ€œreal MAGAโ€ faction โ€” the core conservative movement that has reshaped the GOP since 2016 โ€” and that many Republican leaders have drifted away from those grassroots values. (RELATED: Marjorie Taylor Greene Reportedly Prepping For 2028 Presidential Run)

One source told Notus that Greene feels confident she has built the national donor network and grassroots support needed to mount a serious primary campaign, especially as the GOPโ€™s base remains loyal to Trumpโ€™s populist agenda.

Watch the full interview:

Bill Oโ€™Reilly Flips Out When Host Says Trump โ€˜Backing Downโ€™ After Shooting

0

Veteran broadcaster Bill Oโ€™Reilly forcefully pushed back Monday night against claims that President Donald Trump is โ€œbacking downโ€ following violent unrest in Minneapolis after a Border Patrolโ€“involved shooting that sparked protests and national controversy.

The confrontation unfolded during NewsNationโ€™s On Balance with Leland Vittert, where Oโ€™Reilly accused the host of adopting left-wing media framing by suggesting Trump had retreated under political pressure.

The unrest began Saturday after Border Patrol agents shot Alex Pretti during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis. As video of the incident circulated online, activist groups and Democratic officials immediately accused federal authorities of misconduct, triggering protests that quickly escalated into disorder.

As is often the case in fast-moving, emotionally charged incidents, early claims about the shooting were disputed. Trump administration officials initially described Pretti as a dangerous suspect, while critics accused the government of spreading false narratives. Multiple videos later emerged that fueled further debate over what exactly occurred.

President Trump responded first with a blunt social media statement condemning lawlessness, defending federal officers, and criticizing Democratic leadership in Minnesota for what he has long argued is a refusal to enforce federal immigration law. As tensions grew, Trump administration officialsโ€”including Border Czar Tom Homanโ€”shifted toward de-escalation, engaging with local leaders to restore order.

That shift became the flashpoint of the exchange between Oโ€™Reilly and Vittert.

During the interview, Vittert referenced Oโ€™Reillyโ€™s recent commentary criticizing Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, drawing a historical comparison that sparked sharp disagreement:

LELAND VITTERT: You write โ€œWho is the modern John C. Calhoun,โ€ about Walz, โ€œa despicable South Carolina senator who actually wanted the Civil War to happen.โ€

Do you think Walz wants the Civil War to happen and therefore should be arrested as though he was a southern governor or something in the early or late 1850s?

Oโ€™Reilly responded by arguing that state officials who openly defy federal law should face scrutiny under existing statutes:

BILL Oโ€™REILLY: I think there is evidence that should be examined, and you might be able to charge Walz with insurrection under the, if you want me to read it to you, I got it right here. It fits Walz to a tee.

Pressed on whether such action would be good for the country, Oโ€™Reilly emphasized order and de-escalationโ€”values long central to conservative governance:

LELAND VITTERT: Would that be good for America?

BILL Oโ€™REILLY: I donโ€™t care. Look, anarchy is the worst thing that could happen, the worst. Right now, in this present moment, de-escalation is the best thing that can happen. So Homan meeting with Frey has my 100% endorsement. Walz calling Trump, vice versa, 100%.

Oโ€™Reilly argued that cooperation does not mean capitulationโ€”and that enforcing federal law remains non-negotiable:

BILL Oโ€™REILLY: But that doesnโ€™t excuse what has happened and is happening, which is a rebellion against the United States law passed by Congress, by a state under the governance of Walz and a city where Frey runs.

If you continue, and I say you in a general sense, to allow states and cities to not enforce federal law, you donโ€™t have a country. It goes! Okay? Everybody should understand.

The interview reached its most heated moment when Vittert suggested Trump was โ€œbacking downโ€ in response to public pressure:

LELAND VITTERT: So then why is Trump backing down?

Oโ€™Reilly erupted at the framing, accusing the host of echoing legacy media talking points:

BILL Oโ€™REILLY: Now hereโ€™s the second part of the story. Heโ€™s not backing down! Heโ€™s trying to defuse. Why would you say he was backing down?! Do you want a CNN contract?!

Heโ€™s backing down! Heโ€™s defusing the way he should!

Trump Gives Blunt Answer What Happens To Iran If Heโ€™s Assassinated

3
President Donald Trump gestures to the crowd after delivering remarks at the House GOP Member Retreat, Tuesday, January 6, 2026, at the Donald J. Trump- John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

In an interview broadcast Tuesday night, President Donald Trump delivered a blunt warning to Iranโ€™s ruling regime: any attempt on his life would be met with overwhelming retaliation.

Speaking with NewsNation host Katie Pavlich on โ€œKatie Pavlich Tonight,โ€ Trump said he has already ordered a devastating response if Iran follows through on threats made against him.

โ€œThey shouldnโ€™t be doing it, but Iโ€™ve left notification. Anything ever happens, the whole country is going to get blown up,โ€ Trump told Pavlich. โ€œOriginally, Biden should have said something, when they made a statement. We always said, โ€˜Why isnโ€™t Biden saying anything?โ€™ Because he didnโ€™t.โ€

Trump also criticized what he described as weakness from the Biden administration, arguing that failing to respond forcefully to foreign threats only emboldens Americaโ€™s enemies.

โ€œBut a president has to defend a president. If I were here, and they were making that threat to somebody, even, not even a president, but somebody, like they did with me, I would absolutely hit them so hard,โ€ Trump said. โ€œBut I have very firm instructions โ€” anything happens, theyโ€™re going to wipe them off the face of this earth.โ€

Iranian threats escalate against Trump

Trumpโ€™s comments came as Iranโ€™s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has posted multiple threatening messages about Trump on social mediaโ€”including imagery depicting the president in a coffin. Trump said those threats cannot be ignored, especially given Iranโ€™s long history of supporting terrorism and political violence across the Middle East.

To many conservatives, the threats underscore a larger pattern: Iranโ€™s theocratic leaders grow more aggressive when the United States appears unwilling to enforce red lines. Republicans have repeatedly argued that deterrence only works when America backs it with strength, resolve, and consequences.

Biden administration acknowledged IRGC assassination plot

Even under the Biden administration, the threat from Iran has been formally documented.

Bidenโ€™s Justice Department announced the indictment of a senior member of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) on charges of conspiring to kill former National Security Advisor John Bolton in 2022. Prosecutors alleged that a confidential source was offered $300,000 to carry out the assassination.

For Republicans, the plot was more proof that Iran is not simply a hostile stateโ€”but a regime willing to target Americans directly, including former senior officials.

Trumpโ€™s stance: defend dissidents, punish brutality

Trump has previously warned Iran not to harm protesters who oppose the regime, threatening consequences if demonstrators were executed. While Iran did not hang those specific protesters, the regimeโ€™s security forces killed hundreds during the crackdown.

Conservatives have long viewed Iranโ€™s government as an oppressive theocracy that violently suppresses its own people while funding terrorist proxies abroad. Many Republicans argue the U.S. should side firmly with dissidents and freedom-minded citizens, not appease the clerics in Tehran.

Soleimani strike remains a defining moment

One of the most significant actions of Trumpโ€™s first term against Iran was the January 2020 strike that killed Qasem Soleimani, an IRGC commander widely viewed by U.S. officials as responsible for planning attacks on Americans and allied forces.

The strike was praised by many Republicans as a clear demonstration of deterrence: when Iran targets Americans, the United States responds decisively.

A major 2025 strike on Iranโ€™s nuclear infrastructure

The article also notes that in June 2025, the United States Air Force bombed multiple facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan connected to Iranโ€™s nuclear program, reportedly dropping as many as 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators.

The operation involved a 37-hour flight by seven B-2A Spirit bombers and inflicted significant damage to Iranโ€™s nuclear capabilities with no American losses.

VP Vance Predicts โ€˜Dumbestโ€™ Democrat Candidate Will Secure Nomination In 2028

Vice President JD Vance took aim at the Democratic Partyโ€™s likely 2028 presidential contenders during a lighthearted but pointed exchange on Fox News, joking that the partyโ€™s โ€œdumbestโ€ candidate is most likely to emerge from the primary.

In an exclusive interview released Wednesday on Jesse Watters Primetime, Watters raised speculation about California Gov. Gavin Newsomโ€™s national ambitions, noting the governorโ€™s frequent media appearances and rumored White House aspirations.

โ€œGavin Newsom, obviously, is running for president. Have you seen this guy cross his legs? Have you ever seen anyone cross their legs like that?โ€ Watters asked jokingly.

โ€œMy legs donโ€™t cross like that, Jesse,โ€ Vance replied with a laugh. โ€œYou can interpret that however you want to.โ€

Watters went on to frame the looming Democratic contest as a showdown between Newsom and Vice President Kamala Harris.

โ€œGavin and Kamala are on a collision course,โ€ Watters said. โ€œWhoโ€™s gonna win?โ€

โ€œThe dumbest candidate will probably win,โ€ Vance quipped. โ€œThatโ€™s my guess with the Democratic Party.โ€

Vance argued that the current Democratic bench reflects deeper structural problems within the party, particularly its fixation on identity politics over competence.

โ€œI mean, look, the Democrats have a couple of big issues, and one is that they lean so far into wokeism that they canโ€™t see the obviousness of the fact, which is that Kamala Harris is not qualified to be president of the United States,โ€ Vance said.

โ€œThatโ€™s why she got the vice presidential nomination. Thatโ€™s why she got the presidential nomination. This is who Kamala Harris is.โ€

Vance contrasted Harris with Newsom, describing the California governor as emblematic of failed progressive governance.

โ€œNow, the flip side is, I think you have an unbelievably corrupt and incompetent governor in Gavin Newsom,โ€ he said. โ€œThe fact that those are the two frontrunners just suggests how deeply deranged the Democrat Party is. Let them fight it out. Weโ€™ll figure it out.โ€

A Weak Democratic Bench for 2028

While Newsom and Harris dominate early speculation, Democrats face a thin and fractured 2028 field. Other frequently mentioned names include Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortezโ€”each of whom carries significant liabilities with general-election voters. Many Democrats privately acknowledge that the party lacks a unifying figure with broad national appeal, particularly as voters continue to recoil from progressive economic and cultural policies.

Republicans, by contrast, are positioning themselves as the party of stability, affordability, and public safety heading into the next election cycle.

Cost of Living and Accountability

Watters noted that Democrats are expected to campaign heavily on cost-of-living issues in upcoming elections, a strategy Vance dismissed as deeply hypocritical.

โ€œThatโ€™s a pot-meet-kettle situation,โ€ Vance argued, pointing to Democratic-led policies that fueled inflation, higher energy costs, and housing shortages.

He credited the Trump administration with reversing those trends.

โ€œWe havenโ€™t even been in office for a year, and youโ€™ve already seen prices start to come down. Youโ€™ve seen rents start to come down. Youโ€™ve seen groceries leveling off,โ€ Vance said.

โ€œIs there more work to do? Absolutely. But the people who are going to do that work is the Trump administration, is the president of the United States, who is solving the Democratsโ€™ affordability crisis.โ€

โ€œYou donโ€™t give power back to the very people who set the house on fire,โ€ he added. โ€œYou give more power to the person who put the fire out.โ€

Impeachment Politics

When asked whether Democrats would attempt to impeach President Trump again if they regain control of Congress, Vance said such a move would be predictableโ€”and revealing.

โ€œIโ€™m sure heโ€™ll get impeached,โ€ Vance said. โ€œLook, they have nothing to actually run on or govern on.โ€

โ€œTheir entire obsessive focus of that party is they hate Donald Trump,โ€ he continued. โ€œSo, if they ever get power, are they going to lower Americansโ€™ taxes? No. Are they going to make your life more affordable? No. Are they going to solve the crime crisis? No.โ€

โ€œWhat theyโ€™re going to do is theyโ€™re going to spend all their time and all of your money trying to get Donald Trump.โ€

Vance urged voters to focus on results rather than partisan theatrics.

โ€œI think the American people should vote for the people who want to make their life more affordable, who want to make their neighborhoods safer,โ€ he said. โ€œThatโ€™s what weโ€™re trying to deliver every single day.โ€

Newsom Responds With a Meme

Newsomโ€™s office responded to the interview with a digitally altered image of Vance crossing his legs in an exaggerated pose, captioned: โ€œWe all know JD copies Daddy.โ€

Republican Senator Signals He Won’t Support Vance In 2028

2

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) made clear Sunday on ABC Newsโ€™s This Week that he does not see Vice President JD Vance as someone he would support in a hypothetical 2028 presidential bid, underscoring deep philosophical differences over trade and the future direction of the GOP.

When asked whether he views Vance โ€” widely viewed within GOP circles as a leading contender to carry the Republican banner after President Donald Trump โ€” as the so-called heir apparent, Paul was direct about the limits of their alignment.

โ€œI think there needs to be representatives in the Republican Party who still believe international trade is good, who still believe in free market capitalism, who still believe in low taxes,โ€ Paul said, emphasizing his long-standing libertarian philosophy.

Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Pressed on whether that description fits Vance, Paul answered, โ€œNo.โ€

Paul lamented what he sees as a shift in GOP economic thinking โ€” away from traditional free-market conservatism toward protectionist policies that embrace tariffs.

โ€œIt used to separate conservatives and liberals that conservatives thought it was a spending problem โ€” we didnโ€™t want less revenue, we wanted less spending,โ€ he said.
โ€œBut now all these pro-tariff protectionists, they love taxes. And so they tax, tax, tax, and then they brag about all the revenue coming in. That has never been a conservative position.โ€

Paul said he intends to continue championing a free-market, low-tax wing of the party and will let time โ€” and voters โ€” determine where GOP leadership settles.


Context: Trump, Vance, and a Fractured GOP

Vanceโ€™s position as a prominent Trump loyalist โ€” often touted by MAGA-aligned activists as the next leader of the movement โ€” stands in contrast to Paulโ€™s more classical libertarian outlook. Trump and Vance have worked closely throughout the administration, and Trump himself has suggested both Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio would make strong contenders in 2028, even as speculation swirls about Trumpโ€™s own future political plans.

Paul and Vanceโ€™s disagreements arenโ€™t limited to trade. Earlier in 2025, Paul publicly criticized Vanceโ€™s support for a controversial U.S. military strike on an alleged Venezuelan drug-smuggling vessel โ€” going so far as to call the actions Vance defended โ€œdespicable and thoughtlessโ€ for celebrating lethal force without due process. This public spar highlights deeper philosophical divides between the libertarian wing of the party and its more interventionist or nationalist elements.

Those tensions reflect a broader conversation within the GOP about its core principles โ€” from foreign policy to economic strategy โ€” as the party prepares for post-Trump leadership.


Erika Kirk Endorses Vance for 2028

Adding to the political backdrop, Erika Kirk โ€” the widow of conservative activist and Turning Point USA co-founder Charlie Kirk and the organizationโ€™s CEO โ€” officially endorsed Vice President Vance for president in 2028 during the groupโ€™s annual AmericaFest conference in Phoenix.

Kirk, speaking to thousands of activists, pledged Turning Pointโ€™s powerful grassroots support and framed Vance as a continuation of her husbandโ€™s conservative legacy:

โ€œWe are going to get my husbandโ€™s friend JD Vance elected for 48 in the most resounding way possible.โ€

Her endorsement โ€” and Turning Pointโ€™s mobilization capacity on campuses and with younger conservatives โ€” could be a significant boost in the early stages of a national campaign, even though Vance has not yet announced a formal campaign bid

Trump Files $5B Defamation Lawsuit Against BBC

2
Photo via Gage Skidmore Flickr

President Donald Trump has filed a $5 billion defamation lawsuit against the BBC over its deceptive editing of a speech delivered by Trump on Jan. 6, 2021.

The lawsuit was filed in a federal court in Miami. In the 46-page filing, Trumpโ€™s team argues the edit gave the โ€œmistaken impressionโ€ he called for violence on that day.

โ€œThis instance of doctoringโ€“in the form of distortion of meaning and splicing of entirely unrelated word sequencesโ€“is part of the BBCโ€™s longstanding pattern of manipulating President Trumpโ€™s speeches and presenting content in a misleading manner in order to defame him, including fabricating calls for violence that he never made,โ€ the lawsuit states.

โ€œThe BBC, faced with overwhelming and justifiable outrage on both sides of the Atlantic, has publicly admitted its staggering breach of journalistic ethics, and apologized, but has made no showing of actual remorse for its wrongdoing nor meaningful institutional changes to prevent future journalistic abuses,โ€ it continues.

The footage used in the broadcasterโ€™s Panorama documentary spliced together two separate clips, creating the impression Trump told supporters: โ€œWeโ€™re going to walk down to the Capitolโ€ฆ and Iโ€™ll be there with you. And we fight. We fight like hell.โ€

The two clips are separated by 55 minutes in Trumpโ€™s original speech, and the documentary also left out Trumpโ€™s explicit calls for supporters to protest โ€œpeacefully and patriotically.โ€

Speaking in Washington DC, the president accused the broadcaster of โ€œputting terrible words in my mouth that I didnโ€™t sayโ€ and claimed the BBC โ€œmay have used AIโ€ in its investigative Panorama show. He later added: โ€œThey actually have me speaking with words that I never said, and they got caughtโ€ฆ Letโ€™s call [it] fake news.โ€

In a statement to The New York Times, Trumpโ€™s legal team said: โ€œThe formerly respected and now disgraced BBC defamed President Trump by intentionally, maliciously and deceptively doctoring his speech in a brazen attempt to interfere in the 2024 presidential election.โ€

The fallout has already triggered resignations at the top of the BBC, including director generalย Tim Davieย and BBC News CEOย Deborah Turness.

The BBC later issued an apology to Trump for his portrayal in the documentary:

โ€œ[W]e accept that our edit unintentionally created the impression that we were showing a single continuous section of the speech, rather than excerpts from different points in the speech, and that this gave the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action,โ€ the statement said.

โ€œThe BBC would like to apologize to President Trump for that error of judgement. This programme was not scheduled to be re-broadcast and will not be broadcast again in this form on any BBC platforms,โ€ it added.

Trumpโ€™s latest lawsuit follows a string of high-profile legal battles against U.S.-based media outlets, includingย The New York Timesย andย Wall Street Journal.

Erika Kirk Erupts Over Candace Owens Conspiracy Theories

0
Image via Gage Skidmore Flickr

Erika Kirk, the CEO of Turning Point USA and widow of assassinated conservative activistย Charlie Kirk, erupted on Wednesday over the conspiracy theories โ€” many of them championed by former TPUSA activistย Candace Owensย โ€” proliferating about her husbandโ€™s death.

During a one-on-one with Fox News host Harris Faulkner in the closing minutes of Wednesdayโ€™s episode of Outnumbered, Faulkner ripped into those profiting off conspiracy theories.

After Kirk implored the public to keep the site of her husbandโ€™s grave private for the sake of her family, Faulkner asked: โ€œWhat are theyโ€”these conspiracy theoristsโ€”taking from you right now?โ€

Kirk replied:

Nothing. But I will tell you what they are doing. It reminds me so much of Chapter Six in the book of Nehemiah. He is building a wall, and the townspeople are at the base of that hill saying, โ€œNehemiah!โ€ calling him all these names, saying all these things: โ€œCome on down!โ€ Every single time, he had the same messageโ€”four times in a row: โ€œI cannot come down. I am busy building.โ€ That is how I feel.

I do not have time to address the noise. My silence does not mean that I am complacent. My silence does not mean that somehow Turning Point USAโ€”and the handpicked staff who loved my husband and whom my husband lovedโ€”are somehow in on it. We are busy building.

And you know what I thought? I thought these people are human. We are all grieving in our own way. They are trying to find the answer to something that happened that was so evil. They are trying so hard. And I get that. Weโ€™re doing the same. Anytime we hear a lead or anything at all, we send it to the authorities: Please dig into this. No rock will be left unturned. I want justice for my husband, for myself, for my familyโ€”more than anyone else out there.

So for me, you want to keep telling me to come down while weโ€™re buildingโ€”I donโ€™t have time for that. But hereโ€™s my breaking point: Come after me, call me namesโ€”I donโ€™t care. Call me what you want, go down that rabbit holeโ€”whatever. But when you go after my family, my Turning Point USA family, my Charlie Kirk Show familyโ€”when you go after the people that I loveโ€”and youโ€™re making hundreds and thousands of dollars every single episode attacking the people that I love because you claim theyโ€™re somehow in on this? No.

โ€œYou know, I have to say it: Iโ€™ve never seen you like this,โ€ Faulkner observed.

โ€œNo,โ€ Kirk responded. โ€œThis is righteous anger because this is not okay. Itโ€™s not healthy. This is a mind virus. Yes, I believe in our judicial system. I do. We have a hell of a team working on thisโ€”excuse my French. But this is not okay.โ€

โ€œSo you want to put these people back in the box where theyโ€™ve been creeping from?โ€ Faulkner followed up.

โ€œI donโ€™t care what box youโ€™re in,โ€ Kirk said. โ€œBut just know that your words are very powerfulโ€”and we are human. My team are not machines and theyโ€™re not robots. They are human. We have more death threats on our team and our side than I have ever seen. I have kidnapping threats. You name itโ€”we have it.

โ€œAnd my poor team is exhausted. Every time they bring this back up, what are we supposed to doโ€”relive that trauma all over again? They watched my husband get murdered. I have no idea how I would have reacted if I was there that day, and thank the good Lord that I did not have to see that happen. But my teamโ€”theyโ€™re rocked to the core. So why, every single day, do they have to be dragged through the mud, analyzed, hyperanalyzed?โ€

She later concluded the segment by saying she has seen the โ€œimpactโ€ the conspiracy theories have had on โ€œthe people that I love.โ€

โ€œAnd if people think that I was just going to wilt awayโ€”Iโ€™m not going to sit in a corner, cry, and be in the fetal position. This is a duty to my husband, and itโ€™s an absolute honor, and I will never back down. And so my message to them is: stop. Stop!โ€

Earlier this month, Charlie Kirk Showย producerย Blake Neffย announced that Kirkโ€™s friends will beย holding an eventย to refute Owensโ€™s incendiary claims. Owens has turned down an invitation to attend it in person.

Owens has a reputation for spreading widely debunked conspiracy theories, includingย once stakingย her entire professional reputation on the claim that the First Lady of France,ย Brigitte Macron,ย is a man. Owens has also suggested that Israel was somehow connected to Charlie Kirkโ€™s death.

Kirk, who founded the pro-Trump student group Turning Point USA, was shot and killed at a Utah university in September, and his alleged assassin is currently awaiting trial on murder charges. Neff called Owensโ€™s claims โ€œeither lies or they are innuendos thrown around with a total, reckless disregard for the truth,โ€ and added, โ€œI would say we have suffered more harassment from these people than we have from Antifa supporters who overtly celebrate Charlieโ€™s murder.โ€

He concluded by saying Turning Point will host a live stream to further debunk Owensโ€™s conspiracies and invited her to participate.

โ€œWe wanted to use this segment at the top of this hour to say something important, something very important. For the past two and a half months, there is a topic that has flooded our Freedom inbox. It has been nonstop on social media, but which we have almost totally avoided on this show. You probably already know what Iโ€™m talking about, which shows just how ubiquitous it has been,โ€ Neffย began.

Read his full statement below:

Ever since Charlieโ€™s murder, Candace Owens has leveled a flood of allegations against people at Turning Point USA, people at Turning Point Action, and people who work for this show. She has made them against some of Charlieโ€™s closest friends and against some of his most dedicated employees. She has suggested thatย Michael McCoy, Charlieโ€™s chief of staff, knew Charlie would be murdered, was happy that he died, and stayed silent because he was told he would be the next Charlie.

She has suggested Michael is not his real name. It isโ€”I have seen his birth certificate myself. She has called it suspicious that Mikeyโ€™s wife, who works at Turning Point, helped plan the campus tour event where Charlie was murdered, which she didnโ€™t, by the way. She doesnโ€™t work on campus events.

Candace has suggested the Utah Valley University event was unusual and its details suggested a quote โ€œinside job.โ€ She has claimed that foreign aircraft have followedย Erica Kirkย around the country and that Turning Point has lied about this happening. She has accused us of lying about Charlie wanting Erica to take over for him if he died. She has suggested Charlieโ€™s security team intentionally denied him first aid after the shooting to ensure that he died. She has raised suspicions about the head of our technical team because he took an SD card out of a camera. She has spread absurd claims thatย Tyler Boyer, who we just had on the show, sexually abuses male interns. She has suggested that TPUSA Faith-affiliated pastors, like theologianย Frank Turek, who weโ€™ll have on in a moment, and Pastorย Rob McCoy, are part of a military quote โ€œinfiltrationโ€ of Turning Point, either because they are veterans or because they have family members who are.

Even if not everyone has been named specifically, though, Candace has effectively tarred everyone here with complicity in Charlieโ€™s death by repeatedly saying he was, quote, โ€œbetrayed by,โ€ quote, โ€œeveryone.โ€ She has said Charlieโ€™s murder, quote, โ€œhad to be approved by Charlieโ€™s friends,โ€ and then suggested those friends might have her murdered too for quote โ€œknowing the truth.โ€ She has made claims of financial impropriety and fraud at Turning Point, adding up into the millions of dollars, which again is not true. Charlie made sure the organization was audited by a third party every year. He personally reviewed and signed off on every expense report and literally every single bill paid by the organization down to a single United States dollar. We have never missed a 990 deadline.

Candace has made other, stranger allegations involving French paratroopers in maroon shirts, Egyptian Air Force planes flying out of Provo, Utah, and potential underground assassins traveling through unseen tunnels. At one point in early November, she started wildly throwing suspicion on members of Utah Valleyโ€™s soccer team for wearing hoodies. I could go on. There is always something new coming up, and none of it ever pans out. Because from the start, there has been nothing there.

The attacks and allegations from Candace are either lies or they are innuendos thrown around with a total, reckless disregard for the truth, so that Candace can manipulate and string along an audience of people who donโ€™t realize they are being played. Instead of being able to grieve properly after one of the most heinous murders in American history, a murder many of us had to witness, my friends have had to endure harassment from people who have gotten whipped up by what Candace is saying. I would say we have suffered more harassment from these people than we have from Antifa supporters who overtly celebrate Charlieโ€™s murder. And just like a lot of those Antifa members, many of these people take delight in how gross and unpleasant they can be. What our friends have had to endure is not funny and itโ€™s not insignificant. It is evil. I have seen it.

For months, we have received hundreds, thousands, I suspect, of emails and calls asking us to respond. People have wanted us to invite Candace on the show. But for a long time, our approach was to say nothing. We did that for several reasons. First, we thought that her prevarications were so absurd that nobody would believe them. We shouldnโ€™t have to answer questions about secret tunnels or Egyptian Air Force planes. That sort of thing is justโ€”itโ€™s beneath contempt to respond to. Lastly, we didnโ€™t respond because Charlie always viewed Candace as a friend, and we were holding out hope that she would return that friendship and stop what she was doing.

But a week from now itโ€™s going to be three months since Charlieโ€™s murder. Candace has not changed her behavior. She has continued to spread falsehoods about Charlieโ€™s friends, and she continues to concoct new ones about new people. Sheโ€™s using these falsehoods to enrich herself while dividing the conservative movement at an absolutely critical time for this country. And far too often, we here have heard from ordinary people, people who loved Charlie and who Charlie loved so much in return. These people have expressed the worry that we are staying silent out of cowardice or as some sort of tacit admission that some of the attacks are true. Neither is the case. Our silence has never been, and it will never be, equal to complacency or approval.

Still, we decided Charlie would not allow this to go on. Charlie was not a coward. Charlie was a fighter. Charlie would not allow someone to spread lies about the people closest to him with impunity. And he would feel ashamed if other people were stepping up to defend his friends while he never did so himself. Candace has mentioned several times that the ball is in our court.

So hereโ€™s what is going to happen. In the near future, there will be a livestream here in Phoenix where we address in a clear and comprehensive way the claims and accusations, the false accusations that have been made against Charlieโ€™s family, friends, and the people here at Turning Point. We plan to walk through everything carefully and thoroughly. If Candace is available, we would sincerely welcome her participation in that livestream at our studio here in Phoenix. At this point, we believe the ball is back in her court.

Our motivation for doing this is not out of any obligation to Candace. It is about honoring Charlie. We feel a deep responsibility to protect his legacy, his work, and the truth. I feel that. I owe Charlie everything in my life. I feel it immensely. And that is why we feel compelled to speak clearly and openly now. Weโ€™ll have more on this in the near future.