News

Home News

Barron Trump โ€˜Savedโ€™ Womanโ€™s Life With Heroic Call To Police

0

A woman testified in an English court on Wednesday that Barron Trump โ€œsavedโ€ her life after he realized she was being violently attacked and immediately called police, according to multiple reports.

Metro UK reported jurors at Snaresbrook Crown Court in London heard a dramatic emergency call in which President Donald Trumpโ€™s son told operators, โ€œI just got a call from a girl I know. Sheโ€™s getting beaten up.โ€

According to testimony, Barron Trump contacted authorities after FaceTiming the young woman, a friend of his, expecting a normal call but quickly realizing she was witnessing an assault in real time.

โ€œI just saw a ceiling and could hear screaming. I could see a guyโ€™s head on the phone, and then the camera turns to her crying and getting hit,โ€ Trump told operators. The call was placed from the United States.

The Daily Mail identified the accused as 22-year-old Russian national Matvei Rumiantsev, who allegedly โ€œwas jealous of the Americanโ€™s relationship with the woman and flew into a rage when he tried to phone her earlier that evening.โ€

Jurors were told Rumiantsev later went to the womanโ€™s home and repeatedly punched her. Prosecutors also allege he kicked the woman in the stomach and used degrading language during the video call with Barron Trump, calling her a โ€œwhoreโ€ and a โ€œslut.โ€

During her testimony Wednesday, the woman praised Trump for acting quickly.

โ€œHe helped save my life,โ€ she said. โ€œThat call was like a sign from God at that moment.โ€

Jurors also heard an exchange between Trump โ€” who was reportedly 18 years old at the time โ€” and the police operator, who pressed him for details about his connection to the victim as officers were dispatched.

Here is that back-and-forth:

Operator: โ€œCan you stop being rude and actually answer my questions. If you want to help the person, youโ€™ll answer my questions clearly and precisely, thank you.โ€

Barron Trump: โ€œI met her on social media. Sheโ€™s getting really badly beat up and the call was about eight minutes ago, I donโ€™t know what could have happened by now.โ€

He added a moment later, โ€œSo sorry for being rude.โ€

Trump reportedly told authorities it took him a few minutes to locate the correct phone number for British police. He placed the call at 2:23 a.m. London time, or 9:23 p.m. ET.

Rumiantsev is facing serious charges, including assault, two counts of rape, intentional strangulation, and perverting a court of justice, according to The Daily Mail.

Trump Launches Board Of Peace

2
President Donald Trump gestures to the crowd after delivering remarks at the House GOP Member Retreat, Tuesday, January 6, 2026, at the Donald J. Trump- John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

President Trump and his administration on Thursday unveiled a new โ€œBoard of Peaceโ€ initiative aimed at rebuilding and stabilizing Gaza, rolling out the framework during the World Economic Forum in Davos with leaders from more than 20 countries โ€” a list that notably did not include many major European Union allies.

The White House said countries agreeing to join the board include Argentina, Belarus, Morocco, Vietnam, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kosovo, Hungary, Egypt, Turkey, Qatar, Jordan, Indonesia and Saudi Arabia, among others.

Still, the administrationโ€™s initial member list immediately drew pushback from at least one European country after Belgium was mistakenly included.

โ€œBelgium has NOT signed the Charter of the Board of Peace. This announcement is incorrect,โ€ Belgian Deputy Prime Minister Maxime Prevot wrote in a post on X. โ€œWe wish for a common and coordinated European response. As many European countries, we have reservations to the proposal.โ€

The confusion highlighted a broader challenge for the new initiative: while Trumpโ€™s team appears to be moving quickly to secure international backing, many European governments face legal or political hurdles that prevent them from signing on immediately โ€” even if they see value in the proposal.

Finnish President Alexander Stubb said in an interview with CBS News that Finland and other European nations may be unable to join at first because they need parliamentary approval.

โ€œOne is that this is an international organization which, basically, then needs parliamentary approval. So, you know, we are liberal democracies. We canโ€™t come here and say, โ€˜okay, hereโ€™s the statute,โ€™โ€ Stubb said.

Stubb also said European leaders want the effort more closely tied to the United Nations, reflecting a common preference among Western governments for U.N.-anchored peace and reconstruction missions.

โ€œThe other one is that we want to link it even more closer to the U.N. So I think, for instance, that the Gaza peace board is based on a U.N. mandate, which is really good. So now we just need to make sure that some of the other mandates can be put into the U.N. as well. But weโ€™ll see what the other Europeans do and what we do together. I think itโ€™s a good initiative,โ€ he said.

Trump, along with senior officials in his administration, presented the Board of Peace as a concrete attempt to move beyond endless diplomatic statements and toward a rebuilding plan for Gaza โ€” a territory devastated by war, with large-scale destruction to housing, utilities, and basic infrastructure.

In remarks and presentations shared during the ceremony, the administration laid out a vision that included major construction and investment proposals, including an airport, data centers, workforce housing and new tourist attractions along Gazaโ€™s coastline.

Jared Kushner, Trumpโ€™s son-in-law and a key figure in past Middle East diplomacy, spoke during the Board of Peace ceremony and showed slides illustrating phased redevelopment concepts and what the administration described as a โ€œmaster planโ€ approach.

Kushner argued that a long-term economic transformation is essential if Gaza is ever to have lasting stability, framing the plan as a way to create jobs, attract investment and give residents a real chance to build prosperous lives.

โ€œWe do not have a plan B,โ€ Kushner said. โ€œWe have a plan. We signed an agreement. We are all committed to making that agreement work. Thereโ€™s a master plan.โ€

Kushner added that he hopes Gaza can ultimately become a โ€œdestinationโ€ with strong industry and opportunity โ€œwhere people can thrive,โ€ echoing Trumpโ€™s longstanding push for economic development as a lever for peace.

The initiative comes at a moment when the Middle East remains under intense pressure from continuing conflict, rising humanitarian needs, and deep questions over Gazaโ€™s governance after the war. One of the central issues facing any reconstruction effort is who will administer Gazaโ€™s border crossings, security, public services, and economic recovery while preventing the territory from returning to instability or serving as a launchpad for future violence.

A Palestinian official named to the newly formed National Committee for the Administration of Gaza, Dr. Ali Shaโ€™ath, announced the reopening of the Rafah Crossing โ€” Gazaโ€™s main entry and exit point to and from Egypt. The Rafah Crossing has served as a critical route for aid delivery, medical evacuations, and civilian travel, and its reopening would mark a significant development for the enclaveโ€™s immediate humanitarian situation.

The Trump administration also signaled it expects the Board of Peace to expand beyond its initial signatories, pointing to internal legal procedures in other countries as one reason more allies were not yet included.

During the signing ceremony, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the administration anticipates additional nations will join as their governments complete domestic approval processes.

โ€œMany others who are going to join, you know, others either are not in town today or they have to go through some procedure internally in their own countries, in their own country, because of constitutional limitations, but others will join,โ€ Rubio said.

For now, the Board of Peace initiative is being positioned by the White House as a step toward a post-war pathway for Gaza, with Trumpโ€™s team betting that a mix of security guarantees, regional buy-in, and economic rebuilding can eventually change the trajectory of one of the worldโ€™s most volatile flashpoints.

Republican Issues Impeachment Warning Over Trump’s Greenland Proposal

The White House, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

A Republican Congressman signaled he would move to impeach President Donald Trump if he follows through on his threat to invade Greenland and take it by force.

Inย an interview with theย Omaha World-Herald, Rep.ย Don Baconย (R-NE) said he personally would โ€œlean towardโ€ voting to impeach the president if he were to follow through on threats to take over Greenland.

โ€œIโ€™ll be candid with you. Thereโ€™s so many Republicans mad about this,โ€ Bacon told the paper. โ€œIf he went through with the threats, I think it would be the end of his presidency.โ€

Bacon, a swing state Congressman who is known to split from his Republican colleagues, has become even more outspoken against Trump since announcing he is leaving Congress at the end of the current term.

โ€œItโ€™s about whether the United States intends to face a constellation of strategic adversaries with capable friends โ€” or commit an unprecedented act of strategic self-harm and go it alone,โ€ McConnell said. He added that, โ€œfollowing through on this provocation would be more disastrous for the Presidentโ€™s legacy than withdrawing from Afghanistan was for his predecessor.โ€

On Wednesday in the Oval Office, Trump snapped at a reporter who confronted him about a potential invasion.

โ€œIt sounds like you would potentially acquire Greenland by force,โ€ the reporter said.

โ€œNo, youโ€™re saying that. I didnโ€™t say it,โ€ Trump said. โ€œYouโ€™re telling me that thatโ€™s what Iโ€™m going to do โ€” you donโ€™t know what Iโ€™m going to do.โ€

Watch:

In a speech on the Senate floor Wednesday, former Senate Republican Leaderย Mitch McConnellย (Ky.) warned that President Trumpโ€™s talk of seizing Greenland by force threatens to โ€œincinerateโ€ the nationโ€™s long-standing ties with NATO allies.

McConnell declared that burning the treaty organization that formed after World War II to contain Soviet aggression would be an โ€œunprecedented act of strategic self-harm.โ€

โ€œUnless and until the president can demonstrate otherwise, then the proposition at hand today is very straightforward: incinerating the hard-won trust of loyal allies in exchange for no meaningful change in U.S. access to the Arctic,โ€ McConnell said on the Senate floor, delivering one of the strongest statements criticizing the Trump administrationโ€™s talk about potentially seizing Greenland by force.

He warned that following through on the โ€œill-advised threatsโ€ from the administration would โ€œshatter the trust of allies.โ€

โ€œFollowing through on this provocation would be more disastrous for the Presidentโ€™s legacy than withdrawing from Afghanistan was for his predecessor,โ€ he said.

Watch:

He pointed to polling showing that just 17 percent of Americans think trying to take control of Greenland is a good idea and that 68 percent of Americans view the NATO alliance favorably.

Former Special Counsel Jack Smith to Testify Publicly About Trump Criminal Probes

1

Former Special Counsel Jack Smith is expected to appear publicly before Congress later this month to answer questions about his high-profile investigations into President Donald Trumpโ€”a development Republicans say is long overdue as concerns grow over the Justice Departmentโ€™s handling of politically charged cases.

Smith, who was appointed by then-Attorney General Merrick Garland in 2022, will testify before the House Judiciary Committee on January 22, according to an announcement made Monday night by Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH).

The upcoming hearing follows Smithโ€™s closed-door interview with House lawmakers last month, where he reportedly claimed he had proof โ€œbeyond a reasonable doubtโ€ that Trump conspired to overturn the results of the 2020 electionโ€”an assertion likely to draw close scrutiny from Republicans, who have argued that the federal government has repeatedly applied one set of standards to Trump and another to Democrats.

Smithโ€™s testimony is expected to focus on the two major investigations he previously led: one involving Trumpโ€™s alleged actions following the 2020 election, and another involving the handling of classified records after Trump left office.

โ€œJack has been clear for months he is ready and willing to answer questions in a public hearing about his investigations into President Trumpโ€™s alleged unlawful efforts to overturn the 2020 election and his mishandling of classified documents,โ€ Smithโ€™s attorney, Lanny Breuer, said in a statement to NBC News.

Smith testified for roughly nine hours in the closed-door session, but has since pushed to make his remarks public. According to the report, Smith later demanded that House Republicans release the โ€œfull videotapeโ€ of his nine-hour testimony.

Both the transcript and video were released a week later, after Republicans said the public deserved transparency about an investigation that many conservatives view as a continuation of Washingtonโ€™s long-running legal campaign against Trump.

In his closed-door testimony, Smith reportedly claimed he had proof โ€œbeyond a reasonable doubtโ€ that Trump committed a crime related to efforts to challenge the 2020 election outcome. Supporters of Trump, however, have argued that contesting election procedures and raising objectionsโ€”especially through legal channelsโ€”is not unusual in American politics and has occurred in disputed elections in the past, including challenges by Democrats to Republican victories.

Smith also addressed his classified-documents case, claiming his office uncovered evidence that Trump โ€œwillfully retained highly classified documents after he left office in January 2021, storing them at his social club, including in a bathroom and a ballroom where events and gatherings took place.โ€

The documents investigation centered on materials stored at Mar-a-Lago, Trumpโ€™s Florida residence and private club. Republicans have questioned whether Trump was treated fairly compared to other officials who were also found to have mishandled classified materials, arguing that selective enforcement undermines public trust in the justice system.

Smithโ€™s public appearance on January 22 is likely to intensify debate over whether the Justice Department and federal prosecutors have been used as political weaponsโ€”particularly as the country heads deeper into a contentious election cycle and voters demand answers about government power, transparency, and equal justice under the law.

Kimmel Targets Trump During Critics Choice Awards Acceptance Speech

0

Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel used his acceptance speech at Sundayโ€™s Critics Choice Awards to take another swipe at President Donald Trump after his ABC program won Best Talk Show, continuing a yearslong feud that has made Trump a frequent target of Kimmelโ€™s monologues.

โ€œA FIFA Peace Prize would have been better, but this is nice, too,โ€ Kimmel joked from the stage, referencing FIFA President Gianni Infantinoโ€™s decision to award Trump the first-ever FIFA Peace Prize in early December. โ€œMost of all, I want to thank our president, Donald Jennifer Trump, without whom we would be going home empty-handed tonight.โ€

Kimmel went on to mock Trump directly, adding, โ€œThank you, Mr. President, for all the many ridiculous things you do each and every day. Itโ€™s been a banner couple of weeks, and we canโ€™t wait to get back on the air tomorrow night to talk about them.โ€

Trump and Kimmel have clashed publicly for nearly a decade, with the comedian routinely criticizing Trumpโ€™s policies, personality, and supporters on his show. Trump, in turn, has repeatedly dismissed Kimmel as a partisan entertainer and โ€œratings-challengedโ€ host who uses political outrage to stay relevant.

Kimmelโ€™s remarks came after a turbulent year for his show. In September 2025, ABC briefly suspended Kimmel following controversial comments he made about conservative activist Charlie Kirk. The suspension sparked backlash from free-speech advocates on the right, who argued the network selectively enforces standards when conservatives are involved. Kimmel returned to the air just days later.

During his acceptance speech, Kimmel thanked his wife, his producers, and members of the entertainment industry who supported him during the suspension.

โ€œThanks to all the writers and actors and producers and union members, many of you who are in this room, who supported us, who really stepped forward and reminded us that we do not take free speech for granted in this city or in this country,โ€ Kimmel said. โ€œYour actions were important. We appreciate that.โ€

Critics have noted the irony of Kimmel invoking free speech while routinely advocating for deplatforming or censorship of conservative voices.

Kimmel also reflected on the year during his final episode of 2025, growing emotional as he thanked viewers for their loyalty.

โ€œIt has been a hard year. Weโ€™ve had some lows. Weโ€™ve had some highs โ€” for me, maybe more than any year of my life, but all of us,โ€ he said through tears. โ€œThis year you literally pulled us out of a hole, and we cannot thank you enough personally, professionallyโ€ฆโ€

Even in his closing message, Kimmel appeared unable to resist another jab at Trump and his supporters.

โ€œThere is still much more good in this country than bad,โ€ he told viewers, โ€œand we hope that you will bear with us during this extended psychotic episode that weโ€™re in the middle of.โ€

President Trump has not publicly responded to Kimmelโ€™s latest remarks, though allies have frequently criticized Hollywood figures for using award shows as political soapboxes while claiming to speak for โ€œthe country.โ€

Democrats Attempt To Label Trump’s Venezuela Operation ‘Impeachable Offense’

5

Democrats and Republicans have split sharply over President Donald Trumpโ€™s decision to carry out strikes in Venezuela that resulted in the capture of President Nicolรกs Maduro and his wife, with a growing number of Democratic lawmakers calling the operation unconstitutional and some openly urging impeachment.

Progressive Democrats have led the backlash, accusing the administration of launching an illegal military action without congressional authorization. Several lawmakers argue that the operation amounts to an invasion of a sovereign nation and violates both the Constitution and the War Powers Act.

โ€œMany Americans woke up to a sick sense of dรฉjร  vu,โ€ Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.) a member of the Houseโ€™s progressive โ€œSquad,โ€ wrote on X over the weekend. โ€œUnder the guise of liberty, an administration of warmongers has lied to justify an invasion and is dragging us into an illegal, endless war so they can extract resources and expand their wealth.โ€

Ramirez called for Congress to pass a War Powers Resolution introduced by Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., aimed at blocking further military action against Venezuela, and said Trump โ€œmust be impeached.โ€

Omarโ€™s resolution seeks to reassert Congressโ€™ constitutional authority over war-making and would require the administration to halt hostilities unless lawmakers explicitly approve them.

Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) echoed those concerns, criticizing Trump for bypassing Congress to launch what he described as a war with Venezuela. Goldman said the administration failed to provide lawmakers with โ€œany satisfactory explanationโ€ for the strikes.

โ€œThis violation of the United States Constitution is an impeachable offense,โ€ Goldman said in a statement. โ€œI urge my Republican colleagues in the House of Representatives to finally join Democrats in reasserting congressional authority by holding this president accountable.โ€

Other Democrats struck a more cautious tone. Rep. April McClain Delaney (D-Md.) stopped short of naming Trump but wrote on X that โ€œinvading and running another country without a congressional declaration of war is an impeachable offense,โ€ while also questioning whether impeachment is the most effective strategy. โ€œWhether it makes sense to pursue impeachment as the best strategy to end this lawlessness is a tactical judgment that our Caucus needs to seriously deliberate,โ€ she wrote.

In California, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) a gubernatorial hopeful, said he would not rule out supporting impeachment when asked by reporters, according to the Pleasanton Weekly.

Progressive candidates running for office also weighed in. Kat Abughazaleh, a Democrat seeking an open House seat in Illinois, called Trump a โ€œwar criminalโ€ in a post on Bluesky and demanded Congress โ€œhalt this conflict and impeachโ€ the president.

Still, Democrats are not unified in their opposition. A number of more centrist lawmakers have either defended the administrationโ€™s actions or argued that the removal of Maduro serves U.S. national security interests. Some Democrats have described the operation as a targeted effort to remove a destabilizing authoritarian leader rather than the start of a broader war, while others have said the administration should now work with Congress to define limits and next steps.

Republicans, for their part, have largely rallied behind Trump. GOP leaders characterized the operation as a decisive blow against a longtime adversary of the United States and a win for regional stability.

Senior Republicans have also pushed back on claims that the administration violated the Constitution, arguing that the action was a limited law enforcement or counterterrorism operation rather than a traditional military engagement requiring prior congressional approval.

While impeachment calls are growing among progressives, Democratic leadership has so far stopped short of endorsing that approach

Trump Files $5B Defamation Lawsuit Against BBC

2
Photo via Gage Skidmore Flickr

President Donald Trump has filed a $5 billion defamation lawsuit against the BBC over its deceptive editing of a speech delivered by Trump on Jan. 6, 2021.

The lawsuit was filed in a federal court in Miami. In the 46-page filing, Trumpโ€™s team argues the edit gave the โ€œmistaken impressionโ€ he called for violence on that day.

โ€œThis instance of doctoringโ€“in the form of distortion of meaning and splicing of entirely unrelated word sequencesโ€“is part of the BBCโ€™s longstanding pattern of manipulating President Trumpโ€™s speeches and presenting content in a misleading manner in order to defame him, including fabricating calls for violence that he never made,โ€ the lawsuit states.

โ€œThe BBC, faced with overwhelming and justifiable outrage on both sides of the Atlantic, has publicly admitted its staggering breach of journalistic ethics, and apologized, but has made no showing of actual remorse for its wrongdoing nor meaningful institutional changes to prevent future journalistic abuses,โ€ it continues.

The footage used in the broadcasterโ€™s Panorama documentary spliced together two separate clips, creating the impression Trump told supporters: โ€œWeโ€™re going to walk down to the Capitolโ€ฆ and Iโ€™ll be there with you. And we fight. We fight like hell.โ€

The two clips are separated by 55 minutes in Trumpโ€™s original speech, and the documentary also left out Trumpโ€™s explicit calls for supporters to protest โ€œpeacefully and patriotically.โ€

Speaking in Washington DC, the president accused the broadcaster of โ€œputting terrible words in my mouth that I didnโ€™t sayโ€ and claimed the BBC โ€œmay have used AIโ€ in its investigative Panorama show. He later added: โ€œThey actually have me speaking with words that I never said, and they got caughtโ€ฆ Letโ€™s call [it] fake news.โ€

In a statement to The New York Times, Trumpโ€™s legal team said: โ€œThe formerly respected and now disgraced BBC defamed President Trump by intentionally, maliciously and deceptively doctoring his speech in a brazen attempt to interfere in the 2024 presidential election.โ€

The fallout has already triggered resignations at the top of the BBC, including director generalย Tim Davieย and BBC News CEOย Deborah Turness.

The BBC later issued an apology to Trump for his portrayal in the documentary:

โ€œ[W]e accept that our edit unintentionally created the impression that we were showing a single continuous section of the speech, rather than excerpts from different points in the speech, and that this gave the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action,โ€ the statement said.

โ€œThe BBC would like to apologize to President Trump for that error of judgement. This programme was not scheduled to be re-broadcast and will not be broadcast again in this form on any BBC platforms,โ€ it added.

Trumpโ€™s latest lawsuit follows a string of high-profile legal battles against U.S.-based media outlets, includingย The New York Timesย andย Wall Street Journal.

Kevin McCarthy Warns That MTG Is Likely Just the First of Many House Republicans to Quit

1

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) may not be the only Republican planning to leave Washington soon, according to former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy. During an appearance Monday night on Jesse Watters Primetime on Fox News, McCarthy said Greeneโ€™s resignation could signal broader unrest within the House GOP conference.

โ€œSheโ€™s almost like a canary in a coal mine,โ€ McCarthy told Watters. โ€œAnd this is something inside Congress โ€” they better wake up, because theyโ€™re going to get a lot of people retiring, and theyโ€™ve got to focus.โ€

McCarthy did not name any specific lawmakers he believes are considering departures, nor did he detail what is motivating them. But he warned Republicans to recognize the significance of Greeneโ€™s decision and to make better use of their time holding the House majority.

โ€œI think keeping members out of Congress, you only get two years to be in the majority,โ€ he said. โ€œAnd if the Democrats get you not to work every day for two months, thatโ€™s losing two months of the majority.โ€

McCarthy also remarked on Greeneโ€™s national profile, saying she fits his belief that โ€œif youโ€™re known by three initials, you must be effective at what you do.โ€ He added that he does not view her departure as โ€œthe endโ€ of her political visibility and expects she will remain active after leaving office in January 2026.

Context on Greeneโ€™s Resignation

Greene announced her planned resignation on Nov. 21, a move that stunned many in the Republican Party. She attributed her decision to her increasingly public split with former President Donald Trump, whom she had long supported as a prominent โ€œday oneโ€ MAGA loyalist.

โ€œI have too much self-respect and dignity, love my family way too much, and do not want my sweet district to have to endure a hurtful and hateful primary against me by the President we all fought for, only to fight and win my election while Republicans will likely lose the midterms,โ€ she said. โ€œAnd in turn, be expected to defend the President against impeachment after he hatefully dumped tens of millions of dollars against me and tried to destroy me.โ€

Her break with Trump escalated after she pushed for releasing additional documents related to deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein โ€” an effort Trump reportedly opposed. Tensions rose in the weeks before her announcement, culminating in Trump calling her โ€œMarjorie โ€˜Traitorโ€™ Greeneโ€ and describing her as a โ€œranting lunaticโ€ on Truth Social while withdrawing his endorsement.

Greeneโ€™s exit removes one of the GOPโ€™s most recognizable firebrands from Congress and highlights the deepening internal divisions within the Republican Party heading into the 2026 midterm cycle

Special Prosecutor Assigned To Trump 2020 Election Case

0
President Donald Trump participates in a welcome ceremony with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman Al Saud at the Royal Court Palace in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Tuesday, May 13, 2025. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

A new twist has emerged in the Fulton County election interference case against President Donald Trump. On Friday, a special prosecutor was appointed to replace embattled District Attorney Fani Willis (D), who was disqualified after a court found her romantic relationship with a top prosecutor created an appearance of impropriety.

Peter Skandalakis, executive director of Georgiaโ€™s Prosecuting Attorneysโ€™ Council (PAC), announced that after failing to find another willing candidate, he would step in personally to oversee the case.

โ€œSeveral prosecutors were contacted and, while all were respectful and professional, each declined the appointment,โ€ Skandalakis said in a statement. โ€œOut of respect for their privacy and professional discretion, I will not identify those prosecutors or disclose their reasons for declining.โ€

The move came just as a judge-imposed deadline loomed for PAC to name a new prosecutorโ€”or risk seeing the entire case dismissed.

Skandalakis explained that while โ€œit would have been simpleโ€ to let the deadline expire, he believed โ€œthat was not the right course of action,โ€ citing the publicโ€™s interest in ensuring the matter is resolved properly.

The Georgia courtโ€™s decision to remove Willis cast major doubt on the future of the case, which accuses Trump and several allies of racketeering and other charges related to challenging the 2020 election results. Trump and most of his co-defendants have pleaded not guilty, maintaining that they did nothing wrong in questioning the outcome of the election. Four others accepted plea deals.

With Willis out, Skandalakis now has full discretion over whether to continue pursuing the case or to drop the charges entirely.

โ€œMy only objective is to ensure that this case is handled properly, fairly, and with full transparencyโ€”discharging my duties without fear, favor, or affection,โ€ he said.

This isnโ€™t the first time Skandalakis has been involved in a high-profile matter stemming from Willisโ€™s conduct. After she was previously barred from investigating Georgia Lt. Gov. Burt Jones (R) due to her involvement in a political fundraiser against him, Skandalakis also took overโ€”and ultimately declined to bring charges.

Citing that past experience, he said his familiarity with similar issues makes him the best candidate to take over the Trump case.

The original indictment accused Trump and more than a dozen associates of an โ€œunlawful conspiracyโ€ to challenge President Bidenโ€™s 2020 victory in Georgia. The case is one of several politically charged prosecutions targeting Trump during his campaign to return to the White Houseโ€”the first criminal cases ever brought against a then-former U.S. president.

Trump was previously convicted in New York on business record charges tied to a 2016 hush money payment. Meanwhile, his two federal prosecutionsโ€”for alleged election interference and mishandling classified documentsโ€”were dismissed following his reelection to a second term.

PAC officials had confirmed as late as Thursday that no replacement had been found, suggesting the decision came together quickly.

On Monday, Skandalakis addressed Trumpโ€™s recent presidential pardons for several allies charged in the Georgia case, saying his office had โ€œdiligentlyโ€ worked on the matter since Willisโ€™s removal and would continue to do so โ€œwithout being influenced by matters outside the scope of our assigned task.โ€

He also clarified that Trumpโ€™s pardons apply only to federal charges, not state cases.

โ€œTherefore, the task before my office remains unchanged,โ€ Skandalakis said.

Republicans Uncover Epsteinโ€™s Coordination With Reporters To Smear Trump

3
By Ralph Alswang, White House photographer - https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/clinton-epstein-maxwell/, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=143417695

Just hours after the White House publicly accused congressional Democrats of selectively leaking emails related to Jeffrey Epstein on Wednesday, Republicans on the House Oversight Committee released tens of thousands of additional pages of documents. These include email exchanges between Epstein and prominent journalists.

A significant portion of the new material shows correspondence between Epstein and writer-turned-biographer Michael Wolff. Wolff reached out to Epstein multiple times, discussing not only Epsteinโ€™s public image but how to leverage criticism of Donald Trump for strategic benefit.

In February 2016, Wolff wrote to Epstein:

โ€œNYT called me about you and Trump,โ€
โ€œAlso, Hillary campaign digging deeply. Again, you should consider preempting.โ€

A month later they discussed plans ahead of the release of Filthy Rich โ€” a true-crime book by James Patterson about Epstein, who was Pattersonโ€™s neighbor in Palm Beach. Wolff suggested to Epstein:

โ€œBecoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly donโ€™t have now.โ€
And he added:
โ€œPatterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn’t regarded as a serious writer, he’ll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy โ€ฆ Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you’ve encountered before.โ€

When Epstein asked Wolff what he should say publicly about his relationship with Trump, Wolffโ€™s advice was pointed:

โ€œIf he says he hasn’t been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency,โ€
โ€œYou can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt. Of course, it is possible that, when asked, he’ll say Jeffrey is a great guy and has gotten a raw deal and is a victim of political correctness, which is to be outlawed in a Trump regime.โ€

In further correspondence, Wolff requested introductions for Epstein to two figures close to Trump: business leader and inaugural-committee chair Tom Barrack and former federal prosecutor Kathy Ruemmler. He told Epstein he sought โ€œan off-the-record perspective on White House procedures,โ€ while researching his book about Trumpโ€™s first 100 days in office. He also asked whether former President Bill Clinton would confirm he had never been to Epsteinโ€™s private U.S. Virgin Islands island, Little St. John โ€” a place Clinton has publicly denied visiting. Epsteinโ€™s longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell has also denied seeing Clinton there.

The documents show that Epstein and Wolff planned to meet as recently as May 2019 โ€” months before Epstein died in a federal jail cell while awaiting trial.

Read some of the emails below:

Some of the newly released material included a short video of a dog and what appear to be chew toys modeled after Trump and the 2016 presidential rival Hillary Clinton. Others appear to be slides from an adviser working to generate positive search-engine results for Epstein following his 2008 conviction for child-sex crimes.

Earlier, Democrats had released documents that included an especially cryptic email from Epstein to Maxwell โ€” one that mentions Trump by name, and refers to an unnamed victim of Epsteinโ€™s trafficking network. The email read:

โ€œI want you to realize that that dog that hasn’t barked is Trump,โ€ Epstein wrote on April 2, 2011.
โ€œ[VICTIM] spent hours at my house with himโ€ฆhe has never once been mentioned. Police chief. etc. I’m 75% there.โ€

Officials later identified the โ€œunnamed victimโ€ as well-known Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre, who died by suicide earlier this year. Giuffre repeatedly stated that Trump was not involved in wrongdoing and โ€œcouldnโ€™t have been friendlierโ€ to her in their limited interactions. The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, responded:

โ€œThe fact remains that President Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his club decades ago for being a creep to his female employees, including Giuffre.โ€

In his own post on Truth Social, Trump weighed in:

โ€œThe Democrats cost our Country $1.5 Trillion Dollars with their recent antics of viciously closing our Country, while at the same time putting many at risk โ€” and they should pay a fair price,โ€ he wrote.
โ€œThere should be no deflections to Epstein or anything else, and any Republicans involved should be focused only on opening up our Country, and fixing the massive damage caused by the Democrats!โ€

As a reminder: Epstein secured a highly-controversial so-called โ€œsweetheartโ€ deal in 2008 for child-sex crimes. He was arrested again in 2019 on more serious trafficking charges โ€” but died before the case went to trial. Maxwell was convicted of grooming and procuring girls and young women for Epstein; she is appealing and continues to assert her innocence.


Key Takeaways for a Republican Audience

  • The timing of the document releases and allegations of selective leaking by Democrats raises questions about political motive and media stratagem.
  • The correspondence shows efforts to frame Epsteinโ€™s narrative around Trump โ€” part of a broader attempt to tie the story to the 2016 presidential election and cast Trump in a negative light.
  • Trumpโ€™s defenders argue the documents reinforce his long-standing disassociation from Epstein, as well as serve to remind voters of Democratsโ€™ role in political maneuvering, rather than holding criminals accountable.
  • For Republicans focused on institutional integrity and media accountability, the episode reinforces concerns about selective exposure of documents, agenda-driven leaks, and manipulation of public perception.