National Security

Home National Security

Dem Senator Left โ€˜Baffledโ€™ By Lack of Support for Trumpโ€™s Iran Strikes and Death of โ€˜Evilโ€™ Leaders

Photo via Gage Skidmore Flickr

Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) is expressing disbelief at fellow Democrats who have criticized President Donald Trumpโ€™s military strikes against Iran, calling the action a decisive moment for regional peace and security.

Fetterman questioned members of his own party who voiced opposition to the strikes, arguing that preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon has long been a bipartisan priority.

“Every single member of the Senate has agreed that we can never allow Iran to acquire a nuclear bomb, and clearly they [Iran] were actually intending to do that. So, are you really committed to that?” Fetterman asked Monday on Hannity.

U.S. and Israeli forces launched coordinated strikes on Iranian military and government targets on Feb. 28, deploying air, sea and missile power in what officials described as a sweeping operation. The mission, dubbed Operation Epic Fury, struck more than 1,000 military, intelligence and government sites across Iran within its first 24 hours, according to U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM). Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and dozens of senior regime officials were eliminated in the strikes.

Fetterman said he was โ€œbaffledโ€ that more people were not celebrating the death of what he described as โ€œone of the most evil men everโ€ and the crippling of the Iranian regime.

“It’s a good thing for the region, it’s a good thing for Israel, it’s good for America, and so, for me, that’s why I stand with the country over perhaps what the base may demand,” Fetterman said.

Watch:

He also defended the legality and strategic rationale behind the operation, pushing back on critics who questioned whether the president overstepped his authority.

โ€œImagine if people just listened to the conventional wisdom, that they could have possibly have acquired a bomb if we werenโ€™t bombed back in June. So, yes, there is a threat. Itโ€™s not imminent that it could happen right now. But itโ€™s one that I think is entirely appropriate to deal with it,โ€ Fetterman told CNN host Dana Bash. โ€œAnd thatโ€™s why I support it. So, again, people keepโ€” describe that it was a legal war. Now read the War Powers Act. And, now, that has not been violated at this point what happened yesterday.โ€

The War Powers Act requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing U.S. military forces. The Trump administration notified the โ€œGang of Eightโ€ โ€” the bipartisan group of top congressional leaders and intelligence committee chairs โ€” before the strikes but did not seek formal authorization.

Fetterman noted that Trump had previously attempted diplomacy before resorting to military action.

โ€œWell, what is true is that President Trump tried to negotiate that and tried to find a firm kinds [sic] of agreements, absolutely. And they refused to those basic, basic kinds of things: remind everybody, you are never allowed to acquire nuclear weapons. And, clearly, they was [sic]. And I absolutely supported what happened last June,โ€ Fetterman continued.

Fetterman is one of the few Democrats who backed Operation Midnight Hammer, the June 2025 U.S. strike on Iranian nuclear facilities ordered by President Trump. While most of the Democratic caucus condemned that action, Fetterman later voted as the lone Democratic senator against a war powers resolution seeking to curb the presidentโ€™s authority following the operation.

MTG Accuses Trump Of Implementing ‘Manufactured Crisis’ To Cancel Midterm Elections

Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) said Sunday that she could envision President Donald Trump declaring a โ€œnational emergencyโ€ tied to Iran or another crisis, responding to speculation that such a move could affect the upcoming midterm elections.

The comments came after conservative podcaster Shannon Joy posted on X, โ€œTrump doesnโ€™t seem to care about the midterms. Who wants to bet heโ€™ll declare a โ€˜national emergencyโ€™ because of Iran (or some other manufactured crisis) and try to cancel the elections in November?โ€

Greene replied, โ€œYeah, I could see it. INSANE.โ€

Her response follows a recent public break with the president over U.S. military action against Iran. Greene has sharply criticized the strikes in multiple social media posts, arguing they run counter to the โ€œAmerica Firstโ€ platform that helped elect Trump.

โ€œThe Trump admin actually asked in a poll how many casualties voters were willing to accept in a war with Iran???โ€ Greene wrote Saturday on X. โ€œHow about ZERO you bunch of sick f*cking liars. We voted for America First and ZERO wars.โ€

In another post, she added: โ€œThis is NOT freeing the Iranian people!!! This is murdering their children!!! WTF are you insane people doing??? AMERICA DOES NOT SUPPORT THIS!!!โ€

The exchange comes amid debate within Republican circles about the administrationโ€™s decision to strike Iran. Critics have questioned the timing, noting that Trump said in June that prior U.S. strikes had โ€œobliteratedโ€ Iranโ€™s nuclear capabilities.

In an interview Sunday with Fox Newsโ€™ Jacqui Heinrich, Trump defended the latest action, saying that without U.S. and Israeli missile strikes, Iran โ€œwould have had a nuclear weapon within two weeks.โ€

However, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) offered a more measured assessment during an appearance on CBS Newsโ€™ โ€œFace the Nation.โ€

โ€œI donโ€™t have present-day intelligence on what progress they had made toward rebuilding nuclear weapons since we bombed their facilities,โ€ Cruz said. โ€œI have no indication that they were anywhere close to getting nuclear weapons, because our bombing was devastatingโ€ฆ Thatโ€™s one of the reasons I urged President Trump, โ€˜Now is the timeโ€™โ€ to strike.

The midterm elections, scheduled for November, are expected to be closely contested, with some political analysts projecting potential Republican losses in key districts. Greeneโ€™s comments reflect broader concerns among some conservatives about U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts and their potential domestic political implications.

A January report from Roll Call cited a prior Oval Office meeting in which Trump discussed elections during wartime. According to the report, during an Aug. 18 meeting, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy spoke about the conditions required to restart elections in Ukraine.

โ€œSo you say, during the war, you canโ€™t have elections,โ€ Trump mused, according to the report. โ€œSo you mean if we happen to be in a war with somebody, no more elections. I wonder what the fake news would say to that.โ€

Mexican President Pushes Back On Trump’s Latest Cartel Proposal

By The White House - https://www.flickr.com/photos/202101414@N05/54581054338/, Public Domain,

Mexicoโ€™s new president, Claudia Sheinbaum, says she had โ€œa very good conversationโ€ with President Donald Trump on Monday โ€” a call that focused heavily on cartel violence, cross-border drug trafficking, and the Trump administrationโ€™s push for tougher action against transnational criminal groups

The call lasted about 15 minutes and came after Sheinbaum said she requested direct dialogue with the Trump administration, following a week of escalating rhetoric from Trump about the cartels and Mexicoโ€™s security crisis.

A familiar dispute: U.S. military action vs. Mexican sovereignty

Trump has repeatedly suggested the United States could use the U.S. military to strike cartel networks inside Mexico โ€” an idea that resonates with many Republican voters who view the cartels as a direct national-security threat tied to fentanyl deaths, human trafficking, and illegal immigration.

Sheinbaum, however, again rejected the idea of U.S. intervention, signaling that her government wants continued security cooperation, but on Mexicoโ€™s terms.

Trump โ€œstill insisted that if we ask for it, they could helpโ€ with military forces, Sheinbaum said, adding that she rejected the offer again:

โ€œWe told him, so far itโ€™s going very well, itโ€™s not necessary, and furthermore there is Mexicoโ€™s sovereignty and territorial integrity and he understood.โ€

For Republican-leaning audiences, the tension here is straightforward: Mexico wants U.S. support โ€” but not U.S. control, even as American communities continue facing the fallout of cartel-driven fentanyl trafficking.

Trump presses the issue: โ€œThe cartels are running Mexicoโ€

Trumpโ€™s posture has been consistent: treat cartels like the enemy force they are.

In a Fox News interview aired last week, he said:

โ€œWeโ€™ve knocked out 97% of the drugs coming in by water and we are going to start now hitting land, with regard to the cartels. The cartels are running Mexico. Itโ€™s very sad to watch.โ€

That message plays to a key Republican argument: the U.S. cannot allow criminal organizations to operate with near-military power just across the border, especially when those groups fuel drug deaths and destabilize communities on both sides.

Venezuela raid adds new weight to Trumpโ€™s threats

The conversation also came in the wake of a dramatic U.S. operation in Venezuela โ€” the removal of Venezuelan President Nicolรกs Maduro โ€” which Sheinbaum said Trump raised directly.

โ€œHe (Trump) asked me my opinion about what they had done in Venezuela and I told him very clearly that our constitution is very clear, that we do not agree with interventions and that was it,โ€ Sheinbaum said.

Sheinbaumโ€™s comments reflect a longstanding Mexican government position against foreign military interventions, but the timing matters: the Venezuela operation has made leaders across the region take Trumpโ€™s warnings more seriously โ€” including when he talks about Mexico, Cuba, and even Greenland. AP News+1

Rubio demands โ€œtangible resultsโ€ from Mexico

The Trump administrationโ€™s pressure campaign hasnโ€™t been limited to the president.

Mexicoโ€™s Foreign Affairs Secretary Juan Ramรณn de la Fuente spoke Sunday with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who called for โ€œtangible resultsโ€ and more cooperation to dismantle cartel power, according to the U.S. State Department.

That demand reflects what many Republican voters have argued for years: Mexico must do more than make promises โ€” it must deliver measurable enforcement.

Sheinbaum claims progress โ€” and wants credit

Sheinbaum said Mexico shared results with the U.S. side, including:

  • a significant drop in homicides
  • falling U.S. fentanyl seizures
  • lower fentanyl overdose deaths in the U.S.

Even so, U.S. officials and border-state Republicans have frequently questioned whether Mexicoโ€™s progress is durable and nationwide, or simply temporary or concentrated in certain regions while cartels continue adapting.

Why intervention is still unlikely โ€” for now

Experts say U.S. intervention in Mexico remains unlikely because Mexico is currently doing much of what Washington has requested and remains one of Americaโ€™s most important economic partners. But they also expect Trump to keep using hardline rhetoric to maintain pressure.

Cuba left out โ€” but still a point of friction

Sheinbaum said the two leaders did not discuss Cuba, even though Trump has recently threatened action related to the island. Mexico remains an important ally of Cuba, including through oil shipments, which have become even more significant now that the Trump administration has moved to stop Venezuelan oil from reaching Cuba.

Republican Issues Impeachment Warning Over Trump’s Greenland Proposal

The White House, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

A Republican Congressman signaled he would move to impeach President Donald Trump if he follows through on his threat to invade Greenland and take it by force.

Inย an interview with theย Omaha World-Herald, Rep.ย Don Baconย (R-NE) said he personally would โ€œlean towardโ€ voting to impeach the president if he were to follow through on threats to take over Greenland.

โ€œIโ€™ll be candid with you. Thereโ€™s so many Republicans mad about this,โ€ Bacon told the paper. โ€œIf he went through with the threats, I think it would be the end of his presidency.โ€

Bacon, a swing state Congressman who is known to split from his Republican colleagues, has become even more outspoken against Trump since announcing he is leaving Congress at the end of the current term.

โ€œItโ€™s about whether the United States intends to face a constellation of strategic adversaries with capable friends โ€” or commit an unprecedented act of strategic self-harm and go it alone,โ€ McConnell said. He added that, โ€œfollowing through on this provocation would be more disastrous for the Presidentโ€™s legacy than withdrawing from Afghanistan was for his predecessor.โ€

On Wednesday in the Oval Office, Trump snapped at a reporter who confronted him about a potential invasion.

โ€œIt sounds like you would potentially acquire Greenland by force,โ€ the reporter said.

โ€œNo, youโ€™re saying that. I didnโ€™t say it,โ€ Trump said. โ€œYouโ€™re telling me that thatโ€™s what Iโ€™m going to do โ€” you donโ€™t know what Iโ€™m going to do.โ€

Watch:

In a speech on the Senate floor Wednesday, former Senate Republican Leaderย Mitch McConnellย (Ky.) warned that President Trumpโ€™s talk of seizing Greenland by force threatens to โ€œincinerateโ€ the nationโ€™s long-standing ties with NATO allies.

McConnell declared that burning the treaty organization that formed after World War II to contain Soviet aggression would be an โ€œunprecedented act of strategic self-harm.โ€

โ€œUnless and until the president can demonstrate otherwise, then the proposition at hand today is very straightforward: incinerating the hard-won trust of loyal allies in exchange for no meaningful change in U.S. access to the Arctic,โ€ McConnell said on the Senate floor, delivering one of the strongest statements criticizing the Trump administrationโ€™s talk about potentially seizing Greenland by force.

He warned that following through on the โ€œill-advised threatsโ€ from the administration would โ€œshatter the trust of allies.โ€

โ€œFollowing through on this provocation would be more disastrous for the Presidentโ€™s legacy than withdrawing from Afghanistan was for his predecessor,โ€ he said.

Watch:

He pointed to polling showing that just 17 percent of Americans think trying to take control of Greenland is a good idea and that 68 percent of Americans view the NATO alliance favorably.

Taliban Responds To Trump Push To Reclaim Bagram Air Base

2
By The White House - https://www.flickr.com/photos/202101414@N05/54325633746/, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=159707159

The Taliban on Sunday responded toย President Trumpโ€™sย pushย toย regain controlย of Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan, saying the U.S. should adopt โ€œa policy of realism and rationalityโ€ while rejecting the move.

โ€œIt has been consistently communicated to the United States in all bilateral negotiations that, for the Islamic Emirate, Afghanistanโ€™s independence and territorial integrity are of the utmost importance,โ€ Taliban deputy spokesperson Hamdullah Fitrat said in an official statement posted on the social platform X.

Fitrat pointed to U.S. commitments under the Doha agreement โ€” which Trump aides negotiated in his first term to end the U.S. presence in Afghanistan โ€” not to โ€œuse or threaten force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Afghanistan, nor interfere in its internal affairs.โ€

Trump in recent days has suggested the U.S. wants to wrest back control of Bagram Air Base.

โ€œIf Afghanistan doesnโ€™t give Bagram Airbase back to those that built it, the United States of America, BAD THINGS ARE GOING TO HAPPEN!!!,โ€ Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform on Saturday.

During a joint press conference in Great Britain with that countryโ€™s prime minister, Trump said the U.S. was โ€œtrying to get it backโ€ because the Taliban needed things from the United States.

He also highlighted the baseโ€™s proximity to China.

โ€œWe gave it to them for nothing,โ€ Trump said, repeating a campaign message on the Biden-era unconditional withdrawal from Afghanistan, during a joint news conference with U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

โ€œWeโ€™re trying to get it back, by the way. OK, that could be a little breaking news. Weโ€™re trying to get it back because they need things from us.

โ€œWe want that base back. But one of the reasons we want the base is, as you know, itโ€™s an hour away from where China makes its nuclear weapons.

โ€œSo a lot of things are happening.โ€

Watch:

Bagram was once the largest U.S. base in Afghanistan during the U.S. war in that country, the longest conflict in American history. It was abandoned in 2021 when theย Bidenย administration withdrew U.S. forces from Afghanistan.

Trump Designates Iran-Backed Groups In Iraq Terrorist Organizations

1
By The White House - https://www.flickr.com/photos/202101414@N05/54581054338/, Public Domain,

In a decisive move to confront Iranโ€™s destabilizing influence in the Middle East, the U.S. State Department on Wednesday officially designated four Iran-backed Iraqi militias as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs). The groupsโ€”Harakat al-Nujaba, Kataโ€™ib Sayyid al-Shuhada, Harakat Ansar Allah al-Awfiya, and Kataโ€™ib al-Imam Aliโ€”have long served as armed proxies for Tehran, attacking U.S. and coalition forces and threatening American diplomats.

All four groups were previously sanctioned by the Treasury Department as Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs) in 2023, but the new designations escalate U.S. pressure by invoking additional legal penalties, travel bans, and asset freezes.

โ€œIran-aligned militia groups have conducted attacks on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and bases hosting U.S. and Coalition forces, typically using front names or proxy groups to obfuscate their involvement,โ€ Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in the announcement.


Iranโ€™s Proxy War Network: The Islamic Resistance in Iraq

According to the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD), these four militias form the backbone of a Tehran-controlled umbrella organization known as the Islamic Resistance in Iraq (IRI). The IRI surged in prominence after Hamas launched its deadly October 7, 2023 assault on Israel.

Since then, the IRI has claimed or been linked to hundreds of rocket, drone, and IED attacks on U.S. and allied forces in Iraq, Syria, and Jordan. U.S. officials say the network was responsible for the January 2024 drone attack in Jordan that killed three American service members, marking one of the deadliest assaults on U.S. troops in years.

โ€œThe Trump administration broke the taboo during term one when it proved it could name, shame, and punish Iran-backed militias in Iraq without the country devolving into civil war,โ€ said Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior director of the FDDโ€™s Iran program. โ€œNow in term two the administration is upping the ante continuing a campaign of designations against the agents of influence and terror of Iran in Iraq.โ€


Popular Mobilization Forces: A Trojan Horse for Tehran

The four newly designated groups are also part of Iraqโ€™s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF)โ€”a nominally state-run coalition originally created to fight ISIS, but which has been heavily infiltrated and directed by Iranโ€™s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

โ€œTehran relies on these militias to literally have a state within a state in Iraq,โ€ Ben Taleblu warned. โ€œSandwiching these and other Iran-backed terror groups between Treasury Department [Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons] SDN listings and State Department [Foreign Terrorist Organizations] FTO listings, as the Trump administration previously did with their patron, the IRGC, in term one is the right approach.โ€


Trumpโ€™s Proven Record on Targeting Terror Groups

This new wave of designations continues the Trump administrationโ€™s aggressive posture against Iran and its terror proxies. In 2019, the administration made history by designating the IRGC itself as a Foreign Terrorist Organizationโ€”the first time the U.S. had ever used the FTO label on part of another nationโ€™s military.

That same year, U.S. forces conducted a precision strike in Baghdad killing Qasem Soleimani, the commander of the IRGCโ€™s elite Quds Force, and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the deputy commander of the PMF and leader of the Iran-backed Kataโ€™ib Hezbollah militia, another group long designated as an FTO.

Other Iran-backed entities targeted by the Trump administration included:

  • Asaโ€™ib Ahl al-Haq (AAH) โ€” designated in 2020 for killing U.S. and coalition troops.
  • Harakat Hezbollah al-Nujaba (HHN) โ€” sanctioned in 2019 for its role in attacks on American forces.
  • Kataโ€™ib Hezbollah (KH) โ€” designated in 2009, but further sanctioned and struck by U.S. airpower under Trump following deadly rocket attacks.

These actions sent a clear message that attacks on Americans would carry severe consequencesโ€”a doctrine many national security analysts argue helped restore deterrence in the region.

Mexico Agrees To Extradite 26 Cartel Leaders To US

The White House, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Mexico reached a deal with the United States to hand over 26 topย cartelย leaders.

The cartel figures were scheduled to fly to the U.S. on Tuesday.

“Today is the latest example of the Trump administration’s historic efforts to dismantle cartels and foreign terrorist organizations,” Attorney General Pam Bondi told Fox News. “These 26 men have all played a role in bringing violence and drugs to American shores — under this Department of Justice, they will face severe consequences for their crimes against this country. We are grateful to President Sheinbaum and the Mexican government for their collaboration in this matter.”

Abigael Gonzรกlez Valencia, a leader of the “Los Cuinis,” cartel, which is aligned with the notorious Jalisco New Generation cartel (CJNG) and Roberto Salazar, who is accused of participating in the 2008 killing of a Los Angeles sheriffโ€™s deputy, are among those being handed over to the U.S. 

Mexicoโ€™s Attorney Generalโ€™s Office and Security Ministryย confirmed the men were being handed over, saying the deal was made after the U.S. Justice Department said it wouldnโ€™t seek the death penalty.

President Donald Trump has also reportedlyย secretly authorizedย U.S. military force against cartels in Latin America designated by the U.S. as terrorist organizations, which would allow U.S. forces to engage with them.

The move, reported by the New York Times, would give U.S. forces permission to engage the cartels, which traffic drugs like fentanyl across the US-Mexico border,

“The president is determined to not just dismantle โ€“ but completely destroy โ€“ [Venezuelan dictator Nicolas] Maduroโ€™s Cartel de Los Soles and obliterate their operations in the Western Hemisphere,” a source close to the White House said, the New York Post reported. 

The anti-cartel effort is being coordinated among several departments, including the Department of Defense, Justice Department, Department of Homeland Security, Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Treasury, the source added.

“President Trumpโ€™s top priority is protecting the homeland, which is why he took the bold step to designate several cartels and gangs as foreign terrorist organizations,” deputy White House press secretary Anna Kelly said in a statement to Fox News.

It also comes ahead of 25% tariffs on Mexican goods coming into the U.S. imposed by Trump. 

Mexico also extradited 29 cartel leaders in February, including Rafael Caro Quintero, who prosecutors say was behind the torture and murder of a DEA agent in 1985.ย 

“The previous Administration allowed these criminals to run free andย commit crimesย all over the world. The Trump Administration is declaring these thugs as terrorists, because that is what they are, and demanding justice for the American people,” the White House said at the time.ย 

Kash Patelโ€™s Girlfriend Fires Back at Conspiracy Theories About Being an โ€˜Israeli Spyโ€™ย 

1
Image via gage Skidmore Flickr

Alexis Wilkins, the 26-year-old girlfriend of 45-year-old FBI directorย Kash Patel, was asked byย Megyn Kelly to address recent conspiracy theories that have accused her of being an โ€œIsraeli spyโ€ and โ€œhoneypot.โ€

โ€œYou will, in 2025 America, be accused of being an Israeli spy, that you work for Mossad, and near as I can tell, this is only because youโ€™re dating Kash Patel,โ€ Kelly said during anย interviewย with Wilkins onย The Megyn Kelly Show. โ€œThatโ€™s probably it, to be honest, but I guess if we have to go to a second criterion it would be that youโ€™ve done work with PragerU, with our friendย Dennis Prager, who is totally brilliant.โ€

Wilkins responded, โ€œI think people see certain pieces, and I get it, they wanna connect things. They want to justify, you know, some of the pain that theyโ€™ve been through watching the last four years.โ€

โ€œBut I think that theyโ€™ve taken just these pieces of evidence that youโ€™ve laid out and tied them together in all of the wrong ways. I think PragerU is a great institution that is, as you know Megyn, sets out to educate the youth,โ€ she continued. โ€œSeeing these things twisted is not only very confusing, very out of left field for me, but also incredibly disheartening.โ€

Kelly noted, โ€œAmong others who have come out of PragerU is Candace Owens and, last time I checked, she doesnโ€™t really sound like sheโ€™s part of Mossad. So going through the PragerU process of becoming a star does not turn one into an Israeli spy, and youโ€™ve never lived in Israel, youโ€™re Christian as far as I can gleam.โ€

โ€œYes, I am Christian,โ€ confirmed Wilkins. โ€œThatโ€™s been the most interesting thing is you find out things about yourself that youโ€™ve never put forth and have never, you know, believed in your life and you read them on the internet, but yes, Iโ€™m a Christian.โ€

Asked how she first met Patel, who has received heavy criticism recently over the Trump administrationโ€™s handling of the Epstein files, Wilkins revealed they met several years prior during an event at a friendโ€™s house in Nashville.

โ€œPeople are accusing you of sort of being the โ€˜honeypotโ€™ where, you know, like, theyโ€™ll send over a spy to sort of get one of our officials, like anย Eric Swalwellย type, to sleep with them, like China does this, and some of these dopes do it and before they know it theyโ€™ve been compromised,โ€ said Kelly. โ€œBut boy, if youโ€™re a spy trying to get in with the Trump administration officials, you were really playing a long game. Two-and-a-half years before Trump even got into office, picking some random associate of Trumpโ€™s and betting on him becoming our FBI chief.โ€

Watch:

Report: Obama Admin. ‘Manufactured’ Intelligence To Establish Russian Collusion Narrative

Gage Skidmore Flickr

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Friday released a cache of newly declassified documents that she says contain โ€œoverwhelming evidenceโ€ showing how the Obama administration laid the foundation for the yearslong investigation into alleged collusion between Donald Trumpโ€™s campaign and Russiaโ€”despite intelligence assessments that contradicted key claims.

The declassified material includes a Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) prepared on December 8, 2016, by the Department of Homeland Security in coordination with the CIA, FBI, NSA, State Department, and others. That report stated explicitly: โ€œRussian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.โ€

The PDB also confirmed that although Russian-linked hackers likely compromised a voter registration database in Illinois and attempted similar efforts in other states, those actions were deemed โ€œhighly unlikelyโ€ to have changed any stateโ€™s official vote results. The assessment emphasized that the real aim appeared to be psychologicalโ€”undermining confidence in the electoral systemโ€”rather than directly influencing the outcome.

Earlier intelligence assessments leading up to the 2016 election echoed this view, consistently stating that Russia was โ€œprobably not trying to influence the election by using cyber means.โ€

Internal FBI communications show that the bureau raised concerns about the December 8 PDB, drafting a formal dissent and urging the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) to delay publication. The brief, originally scheduled for release on December 9, was held back following โ€œnew guidance,โ€ according to redacted internal ODNI emails.

A White House Situation Room meeting convened that same dayโ€”December 9, 2016โ€”brought together senior national security officials to address the sensitive issue. A source familiar with the meeting confirmed that the unpublished version of the PDB clearly stated there was no Russian impact on the election outcome through cyberattacks.

Despite these internal conclusions, top Obama-era officials allegedly leaked conflicting information to the press, suggesting Russia had interfered in the election and possibly swayed the outcomeโ€”a narrative that helped ignite the Trump-Russia investigation.

The declassified documents also point to the now-discredited Steele Dossier as a key influence in shaping the subsequent Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA). Officials acknowledged that some of the information used in that assessment was โ€œmanufacturedโ€ or โ€œdeemed not credibleโ€ at the time it was circulated.

Further, sources told Fox News Digital that key agenciesโ€”such as the FBI and NSAโ€”had expressed โ€œlow confidenceโ€ in attributing the Democratic National Committee (DNC) email leaks to the Russian government, even as the ICA concluded otherwise.

Gabbard characterized the entire episode as a โ€œtreasonous conspiracy,โ€ accusing senior Obama-era officials of weaponizing intelligence and launching a coordinated campaign to delegitimize Donald Trumpโ€™s presidency

โ€œThis is not a partisan issue,โ€ Gabbard told Fox News Digital. โ€œThe information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government. Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup.โ€

She warned that the actions of these officials represent โ€œan egregious abuse of power and blatant rejection of our Constitution,โ€ which she believes undermines the integrity of the democratic system itself.

Gabbard and ODNI officials indicated that further investigation is ongoing and that more declassified materials may be released in the coming months.

Read:

US Threatens To Abandon Ukraine Peace Negotiations

By President Of Ukraine - https://www.flickr.com/photos/165930373@N06/54169325552/, CC0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=156221279

Secretary of Stateย Marco Rubioย indicated the United States may back off from assisting in peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine.

Secretary of Stateย Marco Rubioย indicated that it needs to be determined within days whether achieving a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine is “doable in the short term,” warning that he thinks the U.S. will “move on” if it is not achievable.

Rubio has been working alongside Middle East envoyย Steve Witkoffย to broker aย 30-day ceasefire agreementย with Russia and Ukraine, which hasย not yet been seenย to fruition.

โ€œWe are now reaching a point where we need to decide whether this is even possible or not,โ€ Rubio told reporters Friday while departing from negotiations with his counterparts in Paris. โ€œBecause if itโ€™s not, then I think weโ€™re just going to move on.โ€

โ€œItโ€™s not our war. We have other priorities to focus on,โ€ he added, suggesting the U.S. would decide if continued talks were โ€œdoableโ€ in a โ€œmatter of days.โ€

But Rubio noted that the U.S. will help if either or both sides are “serious about peace.”

(Miami – Flรณrida, 09/03/2020) Presidente da Repรบblica Jair Bolsonaro durante encontro com o Senador Marco Rubio..Foto: Alan Santos/PR

“@POTUS has been clear: The time to end the war between Russia and Ukraine is now. Today in Paris, @SE_MiddleEast, @SPE_Kellogg and I met with leaders from France, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Ukraine to talk about how we can stop the killing and reach a just and sustainable peace,” Rubio noted in a post on X. 

Whileย ceasefire negotiationsย have been slow, Trump has maintained that efforts toย obtain a minerals dealย with Ukraine are picking up pace. The U.S. leader said access to the countryโ€™sย critical natural resourcesย would provide a strong interest in maintaining Ukraineโ€™s sovereignty and security for years to come.ย 

The secretary also suggested that the U.K., France and Germany can help โ€œmove the ballโ€ on negotiations. Officials who met in Paris have agreed to meet again in London next week with hopes of gearing peace talks toward a secured deal. 

Kremlin.ru, via Wikimedia Commons

Despite Rubioโ€™s comments,ย Vice President Vanceย said Friday he believes talks will move forward.

โ€œThe negotiations, I wonโ€™t pre-judge them, but we do feel optimistic that we can hopefully bring this war, this very brutal war to a close,โ€ he told reporters during his visit to Rome, where he met with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni โ€” a day afterย she metย withย President Trumpย at the White House.

Ukrainian Economy Minister Yuliia Svyrydenko said she signed a memorandum of intent with the U.S. Treasury Secretaryย Scott Bessentย ahead of a potential agreement.ย 

โ€œI assume theyโ€™re going to live up to the deal, so weโ€™ll see. But we have a deal on that,โ€ Trump said Thursday.