News

Home News

Trump Announces Blockade On Ships Going In or Out of Strait After Talks Collapse

3
President Donald J. Trump visits the El Arepazo Doral restaurant, Monday, March 9, 2026, in Miami, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Vice President JD Vance emerged early Sunday morning from an extended round of high-stakes negotiations with Iranian officials in Islamabad, Pakistan, acknowledging that the two sides failed to reach an agreement to end the ongoing conflict—while signaling that the impasse could carry serious consequences for Tehran.

Speaking to reporters around 6:30 a.m. after what he described as a roughly 21-hour session, Vance said the talks were substantive but ultimately unsuccessful.

“The bad news is that we have not reached an agreement,” Vance said. “And I think that’s bad news for Iran, much more than it’s bad news for the United States of America.”

Flanked by special envoy Steve Witkoff and senior adviser Jared Kushner, Vance emphasized that the U.S. delegation had entered the talks prepared to negotiate in good faith and with flexibility—but that Iran refused to meet core American demands.

“We’ve made very clear what our redlines are, what things we’re willing to accommodate them on, and what things we’re not willing to accommodate them on — and we’ve made that as clear as we possibly could,” he said. “And they have chosen not to accept our terms.”

At the center of the deadlock was Iran’s nuclear program. Vance said the United States required an “affirmative commitment” that Iran would not pursue a nuclear weapon—something Iranian officials declined to provide.

“The president told us, you need to come here in good faith and make your best effort to get a deal,” Vance added. “We did that, and unfortunately, we weren’t able to make any headway.”

The talks—hosted by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir—marked a rare direct engagement between senior U.S. and Iranian officials. Vance became the highest-ranking American official to meet face-to-face with leaders of Iran’s theocratic regime since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. He praised Pakistan’s leadership, noting that “whatever shortcomings” in the meeting were not due to the hosts.

The American delegation met with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf. A major sticking point remained Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz—a critical global oil chokepoint through which a significant portion of the world’s energy supply flows.

The negotiations followed a fragile two-week ceasefire agreement reached days earlier, after President Donald Trump halted planned U.S. strikes on Iranian infrastructure roughly 90 minutes before a self-imposed deadline. Trump had expressed cautious optimism heading into the weekend.

“We’ll see what happens,” Trump said Saturday. “Look, regardless, we win. Regardless what happens, we win. We’ve totally defeated that country, and so let’s see what happens. Maybe they make a deal, maybe they don’t. It doesn’t matter. From the standpoint of America, we win.”

But by Sunday morning, the president’s tone had shifted dramatically.

In a series of lengthy posts on Truth Social, Trump confirmed the collapse of negotiations and announced a sweeping escalation: a U.S.-led naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz.

“Iran is UNWILLING TO GIVE UP ITS NUCLEAR AMBITIONS,” Trump wrote, calling the negotiations productive in many respects but ultimately unacceptable due to Tehran’s stance on nuclear weapons.

“The meeting with Iran began early in the morning, and lasted throughout the night — Close to 20 hours,” he said. “I could go into great detail, and talk about much that has been gotten but, there is only one thing that matters — IRAN IS UNWILLING TO GIVE UP ITS NUCLEAR AMBITIONS!”

Trump also accused Iran of failing to uphold commitments to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, alleging the regime had created uncertainty by suggesting the presence of naval mines.

“They say they put mines in the water… but what ship owner would want to take the chance?” he wrote. “THIS IS WORLD EXTORTION, and Leaders of Countries… will never be extorted.”

Declaring immediate action, Trump announced: “Effective immediately, the United States Navy… will begin the process of BLOCKADING any and all Ships trying to enter, or leave, the Strait of Hormuz.”

He added that U.S. forces would interdict vessels that paid tolls to Iran and begin clearing any mines in the waterway, while warning of severe military retaliation for any Iranian aggression.

“Any Iranian who fires at us, or at peaceful vessels, will be BLOWN TO HELL!” Trump wrote.

The president framed the escalation as both a defensive measure and a continuation of broader U.S. military pressure in the region, claiming Iran’s capabilities had already been significantly degraded.

“Their Navy is gone, their Air Force is gone, their Anti Aircraft and Radar are useless,” he said, reiterating his longstanding position that “IRAN WILL NEVER HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!”

Despite the collapse of talks, Trump insisted progress had been made on other fronts—but emphasized that none of it mattered without resolution on the nuclear issue.

“In many ways, the points that were agreed to are better than us continuing our Military Operations to conclusion,” he wrote. “But all of those points don’t matter compared to allowing Nuclear Power to be in the hands of such volatile, difficult, unpredictable people.”

The developments leave the region at a precarious crossroads, with diplomacy stalled, military pressure increasing, and one of the world’s most critical shipping lanes now at the center of a rapidly escalating standoff.

Historians Sue Trump After DOJ Scraps Records Rule

1
By The White House - https://www.flickr.com/photos/202101414@N05/54581054338/, Public Domain,

The country’s largest group of historians is suing the Trump administration after the Justice Department declared the president doesn’t have to follow the law requiring him to turn over his records.

The American Historical Association and American Oversight filed the lawsuit Monday in federal court, warning the administration is putting the public record at risk.

They called the case an effort to “preserve the historical record that belongs to the American people, before it is forever lost.”

“This case is about the preservation of records that document our nation’s history, and whether the American people are able to access and learn from that history,” the complaint states.

The lawsuit comes days after the DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel said Trump “need not further comply” with the Presidential Records Act — a post-Watergate law that made presidential records public property.

The groups are asking a judge to step in, declare the law constitutional, and block Trump from using the opinion to keep official records.

“The Administration’s actions nullifying a law duly enacted by Congress, based on a legal determination that contravenes a decision of the Supreme Court, violate the separation of powers twice over,” the complaint states.

The Presidential Records Act requires materials like emails, call logs, and internal documents to be turned over to the National Archives after a president leaves office.

Trump previously faced scrutiny for keeping sensitive records at Mar-a-Lago after his first term and was later indicted on charges related to retaining classified information and obstruction. The case was dismissed after a judge questioned the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith.

Trump Asks Court To Throw Out Remnants of ‘Legally Unsound’ Fraud Case

1
Alec Perkins from Hoboken, USA, CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons

President Trump has asked New York’s highest court to dismiss the remaining findings and penalties in the state’s civil fraud case against him, arguing that the lawsuit brought by Attorney General Letitia James was legally flawed and politically motivated.

In a 119-page filing submitted Wednesday to the New York Court of Appeals, Trump’s attorneys described the case as an “unprecedented” use of the attorney general’s authority and urged the court to fully overturn it.

“This Court should put an end to this politically motivated action,” his lawyers wrote.

James filed the civil lawsuit in 2022, accusing Trump and his family business of inflating the value of their assets to secure more favorable loan and insurance terms. The case became one of the most significant legal challenges Trump has faced, threatening both his public image as a successful real estate developer and the future of the Trump Organization. It also elevated James as one of Trump’s most prominent political and legal adversaries.

The case has taken a complex path through the courts. After a bench trial, Judge Arthur Engoron found Trump liable for fraud and imposed a $464 million judgment, which grew to more than $500 million with interest. Engoron also barred Trump from serving in top roles at New York companies for three years, imposed two-year bans on his sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, and appointed an independent monitor to oversee the Trump Organization’s business practices.

However, a mid-level appellate court later struck down the financial penalty as excessive, removing the largest monetary consequence while leaving the liability finding and other restrictions in place. The appellate judges were sharply divided in their ruling.

Despite that partial victory, Trump’s legal team is now seeking to eliminate the remaining penalties and the underlying liability determination. His lawyers acknowledged the “unusual posture” of the appeal, since the prior ruling largely benefited him, but argued that the decision still rests on an “erroneous finding” that must be reversed.

“This unprecedented and legally unsound case is about far more than President Trump,” his lawyers said, arguing that James stretched a New York law targeting “persistent fraud or illegality” beyond its intended use.

“If left on the books, the mistaken legal rulings below threaten New York’s position as the Nation’s financial capital, as well as the State’s commercial real-estate industry,” they added.

The New York attorney general’s office, which has also appealed aspects of the appellate ruling, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The appeal comes amid a broader and highly contentious legal and political battle between Trump and James. During the period between Trump’s presidential terms, James secured a major civil fraud ruling against him, while Trump and his allies have repeatedly accused her of pursuing politically motivated cases.

More recently, Trump administration officials have sought to pursue criminal cases against James. She was indicted last fall on mortgage fraud allegations, but a federal judge dismissed the charges, finding that the prosecutor who brought the case had been unlawfully appointed. Prosecutors later sought two additional indictments, but grand juries declined to bring charges.

Trump’s latest appeal now asks the state’s highest court to bring the long-running civil case to a close by wiping out the remaining findings and penalties that continue to affect him and his business.

Influencer Files to Challenge Trump-Backed Rep. Randy Fine

0

A social media personality known more for viral posts than political campaigns is stepping into a deeply red congressional race—against one of President Trump’s most outspoken allies.

Dan Bilzerian, an influencer with millions of followers, has filed paperwork to run as a Republican against Rep. Randy Fine in Florida’s 6th District, according to federal filings.

The move sets up a long-shot primary challenge against a first-term congressman who has quickly built a national profile—and strong ties to Trump.

Fine isn’t just another Republican incumbent. His campaign notes that Trump has endorsed him three separate times in the past two years, including in his current reelection bid. The district itself isn’t likely to offer much room for an upset: Trump carried it by roughly 30 points in 2024.

But Bilzerian isn’t entering quietly.

He has already taken aim at Trump directly, blasting the former president’s foreign policy in a recent social media post and suggesting he should be removed from office—remarks that could prove politically toxic in a GOP primary.

That puts him not only at odds with Fine, but also with the voters he would need to win over.

Meanwhile, Fine has been leaning into a different kind of national attention.

In recent days, the Florida Republican made headlines for a blunt argument tying immigration directly to the cost of living. He has called for deporting all illegal immigrants, arguing the move would reduce demand for housing, health care, education, and even car insurance.

“DEPORTATIONS = AFFORDABILITY,” Fine wrote in a series of posts, framing immigration enforcement as an economic solution.

He has also drawn a hard line against any form of amnesty, pledging he would “never, ever” support it.

The contrast between the two candidates is already stark: a Trump-aligned incumbent emphasizing immigration and affordability, versus a social media figure openly criticizing the president while trying to run in a pro-Trump district.

For now, the race looks lopsided on paper.

The district’s strong Republican tilt—and Fine’s backing from Trump—give the incumbent a clear advantage heading into the Aug. 18 primary.

Still, Bilzerian’s entry adds an unpredictable element to a race that otherwise might have flown under the radar.

Trump Hails Iran Ceasefire Deal As US Victory

President Donald Trump holds a Cabinet meeting, Wednesday, April 30, 2025, in the Cabinet Room. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

President Trump on Wednesday hailed the newly reached ceasefire with Iran as a “total and complete victory” for the United States, even as questions remain about the durability of the agreement and the scope of concessions secured from Tehran.

In a brief interview with Agence France-Presse (AFP), Trump was unequivocal in claiming success.

“Total and complete victory. 100 percent. No question about it,” he said.

Trump added that there is “no question” the outcome represents a U.S. win and suggested China played a behind-the-scenes role in bringing Iran to the negotiating table.

“We have a 15-point transaction, of which most of those things have been agreed on,” he said. “We’ll see what happens. We’ll see if it gets there.”

The ceasefire—brokered just hours before Trump’s self-imposed Tuesday deadline to escalate attacks—marks a dramatic turn in the Iran Conflict, which has intensified for weeks around the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global shipping route.

The agreement, which also involves Israel, includes Iran’s key concession to allow shipping to resume through the strait. A regional official told The Associated Press that vessels from Iran and Oman will pay fees that will go toward Iran’s reconstruction.

Trump also claimed that Iran’s enriched uranium would be secured under the deal, though he did not provide specifics.

“Iran’s enriched uranium will be perfectly taken care of, or I wouldn’t have settled,” he said.

Stopping Iran’s nuclear program and preventing Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon has been a central objective of the Trump administration throughout the conflict, though Iran has long maintained its program is for peaceful purposes.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt echoed the president’s framing, arguing the agreement was made possible by military pressure.

“The success of our military created maximum leverage, allowing President Trump and the team to engage in tough negotiations that have now created an opening for a diplomatic solution and long-term peace,” she wrote on X. “Additionally, President Trump got the Strait of Hormuz reopened.”

However, Vice President Vance characterized the two-week ceasefire deal between the U.S. as “a fragile truce” while speaking in Hungary on Wednesday.

“If the Iranians are willing in good faith to work with us, I think we can make an agreement,” Vance said.

 “If they’re going to lie, if they’re going to cheat, if they’re going to try to prevent even the fragile truce that we’ve set up from taking place, then they’re not going to be happy,” he continued.

“Because what the president has also shown is that we still have a clear military, diplomatic, and maybe most importantly we have extraordinary economic leverage,” he said. “The president has told us not to use those tools. He’s told us to come to the negotiating table, but if the Iranians don’t do the exact same thing, they’re going to find out that the president of the United States is not one to mess around.”

The ceasefire follows a period of sharp escalation in rhetoric and military activity. In the hours leading up to the deadline, Trump warned that Iran’s “whole civilization” could be destroyed if a deal was not reached—remarks that drew widespread backlash from Democrats and some conservative figures, who accused the president of threatening actions that could constitute war crimes.

Asked whether he would revive that threat, Trump told AFP: “You’re going to have to see.”

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reinforced the administration’s victory narrative during a Pentagon briefing Wednesday, describing the U.S. campaign—dubbed “Operation Epic Fury”—as decisive.

“Operation Epic Fury was a historic and overwhelming victory on the battlefield, a capital V military victory by any measure,” Hegseth said. “Epic fury decimated Iran’s military and rendered it combat ineffective for years to come.”

Hegseth said Iran had been driven to negotiate by the threat of further strikes on critical infrastructure.

“You see, had Iran refused our terms, the next targets would have been their power plants, their bridges and oil and energy infrastructure, targets they could not defend and could not realistically rebuild,” he said. “President Trump had the power to cripple Iran’s entire economy in minutes.”

He further claimed that U.S. and Israeli forces had “achieved every single objective,” citing more than 800 strikes that he said dismantled Iran’s defense industrial base.

“In less than 40 days, [U.S. Central Command], using less than 10 percent of America’s total combat power, dismantled one of the world’s largest militaries,” Hegseth said.

Still, officials acknowledged the situation remains fluid. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan Caine noted that the ceasefire is only a pause for now and that U.S. forces remain prepared for further action if needed.

Regional tensions also appeared far from resolved. Missile and drone activity continued in the hours after the deal was announced, with the United Arab Emirates intercepting incoming threats and Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Bahrain issuing alerts. An Iranian missile strike in southern Israel triggered additional warnings across the country early Wednesday, according to local reports.

The agreement’s long-term implications remain uncertain. While Iran has agreed to a temporary ceasefire and to participate in talks on a broader peace framework—reportedly set to begin Friday in Islamabad—it has not publicly committed to curbing uranium enrichment or surrendering nuclear material, key demands of U.S. hardliners. The deal also leaves Iran’s current leadership structure intact.

Trump indicated the United States would play an active role in managing the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.

“We’ll be loading up with supplies of all kinds, and just ‘hangin’ around’ in order to make sure that everything goes well,” he wrote on Truth Social.

For now, the ceasefire has halted the immediate trajectory toward wider escalation. But with core disputes unresolved and both sides maintaining military readiness, the Iran Conflict appears to be entering a new, uncertain phase.

77-year-old House Dem Files 13 Articles Of Impeachment Against Trump

8
President Donald Trump takes questions after signing Executive Orders, Tuesday, February 18, 2025, at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok) President Donald Trump signs Executive Orders, Tuesday, February 18, 2025, at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.) is making a long-shot push to impeach President Donald Trump, unveiling a sweeping set of charges as he faces growing pressure from younger primary challengers at home.

Larson, 77, introduced 13 articles of impeachment on Monday, targeting Trump’s second-term actions, including military intervention in Venezuela, the deployment of National Guard troops in U.S. cities, and an executive order aimed at birthright citizenship.

The resolution goes even further, accusing Trump of “murder, war crimes and piracy.” Larson points to a naval blockade around Venezuela ahead of the U.S. capture of President Nicolás Maduro, along with strikes on suspected drug trafficking vessels in the Eastern Pacific and Caribbean.

“Through his serial usurpation of the congressional war power and commission of murder, war crimes, and piracy, Donald J. Trump has acted contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of law, liberty, and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States,” the resolution reads in part.

The effort has virtually no path forward in the Republican-controlled House. Even if Larson forces a vote when lawmakers return the week of April 13, it is expected to fail, with no chance of a Senate trial.

Still, the move highlights rising pressure on Trump from both critics and unexpected corners.

On Tuesday, former ally Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene called for invoking the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office, citing concerns about his recent actions—an extraordinary break from one of his most loyal supporters.

Larson’s impeachment push also comes as he faces a serious primary challenge. Luke Bronin, 46, a former Hartford mayor and military veteran, is leading a generational challenge and has already outraised Larson early in the race. Bronin has urged Larson to step aside after nearly three decades in Congress.

Questions about Larson’s age and health have also surfaced following a complex partial seizure he suffered on the House floor in February 2025.

It is unclear whether Democratic leadership supports the impeachment effort. A spokesperson for House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries did not respond to requests for comment.

Larson is the latest Democrat to introduce impeachment articles against Trump in his second term, adding to a growing drumbeat within parts of the party.

Trump has repeatedly warned that Democrats will try to impeach him again if they regain control of the House in 2027.

Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently added to that speculation, declining to rule out impeachment if Democrats take power, while stressing it would be up to a new Congress and not the party’s starting point.

For now, Larson’s effort is unlikely to go anywhere—but it underscores how impeachment is already looming over the next political fight.

Trump’s Lethal Threat Against Iranian Civilization Sparks Backlash

President Donald J. Trump visits the El Arepazo Doral restaurant, Monday, March 9, 2026, in Miami, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

President Trump issued his most ominous warning yet toward Iran on Tuesday, declaring that “a whole civilization will die tonight” ahead of an 8 p.m. EDT deadline tied to escalating U.S. military action in the ongoing Iran Conflict.

In a Truth Social post, Trump coupled sweeping threats with a suggestion that last-minute change could still alter the course of events.

“A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will,” Trump wrote. “However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalized minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS?”

The president has repeatedly escalated his rhetoric in recent days, previously warning that the United States could target Iran’s infrastructure—including power plants and bridges—and declining to rule out sending ground troops. He has also set and extended multiple deadlines for Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global shipping route that has remained effectively closed for weeks during the conflict.

Trump’s claim that Iran has undergone “Complete and Total Regime Change” remains unclear. While the country’s longtime supreme leader was killed at the outset of the Iran Conflict, Iran’s leadership has since consolidated power under his son, and senior officials have continued to project defiance.

That defiance has extended to public mobilization efforts. Iranian figures have encouraged civilians to form human chains around key infrastructure sites that Trump has threatened to strike.

Alireza Rahimi, identified by Iranian state television and the Associated Press as secretary of the Supreme Council of Youth and Adolescents, issued a video message calling on “all young people, athletes, artists, students, and university students, and their professors” to link arms around power plants on Tuesday.

Even as he warned of catastrophic destruction, Trump struck a contradictory tone, pairing threats with praise for the Iranian people.

“We will find out tonight, one of the most important moments in the long and complex history of the World. 47 years of extortion, corruption, and death, will finally end,” he wrote. “God Bless the Great People of Iran!”

The Pentagon appeared to begin acting ahead of the deadline, launching strikes Tuesday on military targets on Iran’s Kharg Island, a key energy hub.

Behind the scenes, diplomatic efforts have continued. The United States and Iran have received a ceasefire proposal brokered by Egypt, Pakistan, and Turkey that would include a 45-day pause in fighting and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Trump said earlier this week that Iran had made a “significant” offer, but added it was “not good enough.”

Markets have reacted to the uncertainty, with oil prices climbing to $113.40 per barrel Tuesday morning, up $2.15 from the previous day.

While Trump has leaned into maximalist threats, other U.S. officials have signaled a more measured approach. Vice President JD Vance, speaking from Hungary where he is supporting Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s reelection bid, emphasized that negotiations remain ongoing.

“We’re going to find out but there’s going to be a lot of negotiation between now and then,” Vance said.

The president’s latest remarks have also triggered backlash from some of his allies and conservative figures. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), once a close Trump ally, called for his removal from office under the 25th Amendment.

“25TH AMENDMENT!!!” Greene wrote on X. “Not a single bomb has dropped on America. We cannot kill an entire civilization. This is evil and madness.”

Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones echoed that criticism, calling Trump’s language a “war crime” and comparing his rhetoric to that of “an unhinged super villain.”

Trump’s Tuesday deadline marks the latest flashpoint in a rapidly intensifying Iran Conflict, where threats of large-scale escalation now sit alongside fragile diplomatic efforts—leaving the immediate path forward uncertain as the clock ticks toward the president’s self-imposed ultimatum.

SCOTUS Paves Way For Dismissal Of Steve Bannon Contempt Of Congress Case

1
Duncan Lock, Dflock, CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

The Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for a lower court to dismiss former Trump adviser Steve Bannon’s contempt of Congress case, a move that would effectively erase his 2022 conviction tied to the Jan. 6 investigation.

The justices declined to hear arguments in Bannon’s appeal, instead granting his petition only to vacate a lower court ruling and send the case back to the trial judge. The procedural step leaves the ultimate outcome to the district court, where dismissal is now expected.

The Justice Department signaled that outcome earlier this year. In February, prosecutors moved to dismiss the two-count indictment filed against Bannon nearly five years ago, indicating the government no longer intends to pursue the case.

“The government has determined in its prosecutorial discretion that dismissal of this criminal case is in the interests of justice,” Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the justices last month.

Bannon, a longtime ally and former chief strategist to President Donald Trump, was a central figure in Trump’s political orbit both during and after his time in the White House. He played a key role in shaping Trump’s populist messaging in 2016 and remained an influential outside voice in Trump-aligned media and political circles after leaving the administration in 2017.

A federal jury in Washington, D.C., found Bannon guilty in 2022 on two counts of contempt of Congress after he defied a subpoena from the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack. He refused both to appear for a deposition and to provide requested documents.

Bannon argued that he had relied on his attorney’s advice to delay compliance while disputes over executive privilege involving Trump were still unresolved. His legal team maintained that the prosecution itself was flawed.

“The government acknowledges that Petitioner’s criminal prosecution was unjust,” Bannon’s attorney, Michael Buschbacher, told the high court.

Bannon was sentenced to four months in prison. U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols allowed him to delay serving that sentence for roughly two years while he pursued appeals. He ultimately served the time in 2024.

The case has been closely watched as part of a broader legal battle over the Jan. 6 investigation and the limits of congressional subpoena power, particularly when executive privilege claims are involved.

Bannon was the second Trump adviser to serve prison time for defying the Jan. 6 committee. Former White House trade adviser Peter Navarro was also convicted on the same two counts and served a four-month sentence. Navarro’s appeal remains ongoing, even as the Justice Department has dropped its defense of that case.

With the Supreme Court’s action, Bannon’s case now returns to the trial court, where the government’s request to dismiss is expected to bring the legal saga to a formal close.

This is a breaking news story. Please check back for updates.

White House Responds To Reports Trump Plans To Fire Another Admin Official

2
President Donald Trump answers questions from members of the media aboard Air Force One en route to Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania, for a rally on the economy, Tuesday, December 9, 2025. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

The White House is forcefully denying a new report that President Trump is preparing to fire Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard—just one day after ousting Attorney General Pam Bondi in a major Cabinet shakeup.

White House Communications Director Steven Cheung dismissed the report outright, saying Trump has “total confidence” in Gabbard and that “any insinuation otherwise is totally fake news.”

“The President has assembled the most talented and impactful Cabinet ever, and they have collectively delivered historic victories on behalf of the American people,” Cheung added in a post on X.

The response came after a report from The Guardian claimed Trump had begun quietly exploring Gabbard’s potential replacement, even polling Cabinet members about the idea.

According to the report, Trump has been privately frustrated with Gabbard’s handling of internal dissent—particularly her defense of former counterterrorism official Joe Kent, who resigned in protest over the administration’s military operations in Iran.

“Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby,” Kent wrote in his resignation letter, shortly after U.S. and Israeli forces carried out joint strikes.

Gabbard, a longtime critic of U.S. intervention abroad, declined to publicly rebuke Kent—fueling tensions inside the administration. Trump has been “venting frustration that she shielded a former deputy who undercut his rationale for war with Iran, according to two people briefed on the discussions,” the report said.

Her recent congressional testimony added to the strain. When pressed by lawmakers, Gabbard refused to offer her personal view on the legality of the Iran strikes—a position consistent with her past skepticism of executive war powers, but one that reportedly irritated the president.

Despite the internal friction, it remains unclear whether Trump is prepared to act.

“It is not clear that Trump will actually fire Gabbard over the episode,” the report noted, adding that “currently, there is no standout candidate to take the job, and advisers have cautioned that creating a high-profile vacancy before a successor is ready could cause unhelpful political distractions.”

Trump himself has sent mixed signals. When asked aboard Air Force One whether he still had confidence in Gabbard, he offered only a lukewarm endorsement:

“Yeah, sure,” Trump said. “I mean, she’s a little bit different in her thought process than me, but that doesn’t make somebody not available to say it.”

The episode comes at a sensitive moment for the administration. Trump’s decision to remove Bondi marked the most significant personnel shakeup of his second term—and raised new questions about whether additional changes could follow.

For now, the White House is trying to shut down that narrative. But with tensions simmering over foreign policy—and Trump’s track record of abrupt personnel moves—the speculation is unlikely to fade anytime soon.

President Trump Officially Fires Attorney General Bondi

2

President Trump announced Thursday that he has fired Attorney General Pam Bondi.

“Pam Bondi is a Great American Patriot and a loyal friend, who faithfully served as my Attorney General over the past year. Pam did a tremendous job overseeing a massive crackdown in Crime across our Country, with Murders plummeting to their lowest level since 1900,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

“We love Pam, and she will be transitioning to a much needed and important new job in the private sector, to be announced at a date in the near future, and our Deputy Attorney General, and a very talented and respected Legal Mind, Todd Blanche, will step in to serve as Acting Attorney General.”

Bondi, a fierce defender of the president, has been under increasing scrutiny due to her handling of the Epstein files.

This is a breaking news story. Please check back for updates.