Foreign Affairs

Home Foreign Affairs

Trump Issues Ultimatum To Cuba

The White House, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Time is running out…

President Donald J. Trump doubled down on his firm foreign-policy agenda Sunday, delivering a stark ultimatum to the Communist regime in Cuba.

In a Truth Social post, Trump declared: โ€œTHERE WILL BE NO MORE OIL OR MONEY GOING TO CUBA โ€” ZERO! I strongly suggest they make a deal, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.โ€

The warning comes on the heels of a decisive U.S. operation that resulted in the capture of Venezuelan strongman Nicolรกs Maduro โ€” a key ally of Havana โ€” by U.S. forces, a watershed moment in halting the flow of oil and cash that long sustained Cubaโ€™s moribund economy.

Trump noted bluntly that Cuba has long depended on โ€œlarge amounts of OIL and MONEY from Venezuelaโ€ โ€” support that has now effectively ended following the removal of Maduro from power.

The Trump administration has aggressively moved to isolate regimes that bankroll corruption, undermine democracy, and threaten American security. Venezuelaโ€™s massive oil reserves once underpinned its regional influence, including subsidized shipments to Havana โ€” a relationship the president has now dismantled as part of a broader push to reshape Western Hemisphere energy flows and break the grip of hostile governments.

In recent days Trump also publicly characterized Cubaโ€™s authoritarian leadership as โ€œsickโ€ and close to collapse without Venezuelan support โ€” a reflection of the islandโ€™s deep economic crisis and prolonged energy shortages in the absence of Maduroโ€™s patronage.

While Trump provides Cuban leaders a clear path โ€” negotiate and engage on terms favorable to the U.S. โ€” Havana has so far refused to back down.

President Trump Issues Warning To ‘Sick’ Colombian Leader

0
President Donald Trump answers questions from members of the media aboard Air Force One en route to Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania, for a rally on the economy, Tuesday, December 9, 2025. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

Hours after a dramatic U.S. military operation in Venezuela that led to the capture of President Nicolรกs Maduro, President Donald Trumpย sharply escalated his rhetoric toward other foreign governments, criticizing Colombiaโ€™s president and reviving his long-standing idea of acquiring Greenland.

Trump, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, was initially responding to questions about a U.S. military operation in Caracas that resulted in the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolรกs Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, as well as the future of Venezuela, when he shifted his focus to another South American country.

“Columbia’s very sick too, run by a sick man who likes making cocaine and selling it to the United States. And he’s not going to be doing it very long. Let me tell you,” Trump said.

When pressed by a reporter to clarify his remarks, Trump claimed that Gustavo Petro has “cocaine mills andย cocaine factories.”

“So there will be an operation by the U.S. in Colombia?” the reporter asked.

“It sounds good to me,” Trump responded.

The comments marked an unusually direct threat to a longtime U.S. partner, officially designated a Major Non-NATO Ally, and drew swift condemnation from Bogotรก.

Colombia Condemns Remarks

Colombiaโ€™s government rejected Trumpโ€™s statements, calling any threat of force against an elected leader a violation of international law and national sovereignty. Officials emphasized that disagreements over narcotics trafficking do not justify military rhetoric against a democratic ally.

Analysts told the Associated Press that while no formal policy change has been announced, Trumpโ€™s remarks risk destabilizing diplomatic relations with a key U.S. security and trade partner. Colombia has long collaborated with Washington on counter-narcotics efforts, even as cocaine production has surged in recent years.

The episode follows Trumpโ€™s intensifying criticism of Latin American governments he says have failed to curb drug trafficking and migration.

Trump Renews Greenland Focus

Amid the fallout from the Venezuela operation and the Colombia comments, Trump also renewed his interest in Greenland, the Arctic territory governed by NATO ally Denmark.

Trump has repeatedly argued that U.S. control of Greenland is vital to American strategic interests. Both Greenlandic and Danish leaders have firmly rejected the idea, saying the territory is not for sale.

The White House has appointed Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry as a special envoy to Greenland, with an informal mandate to strengthen ties. Danish officials have criticized the move as an unacceptable challenge to Denmarkโ€™s territorial integrity.

While a formal acquisition remains highly unlikely because of legal and diplomatic barriers, Trumpโ€™s renewed focus on Greenland has reignited debate over Arctic security and great-power competition.

Echoes of the Monroe Doctrine

Trump has not formally announced a new Monroe Doctrine, but his rhetoric has revived comparisons to the 19th-century policy that treated the Western Hemisphere as a U.S. sphere of influence.

Throughout his political career, Trump has noted that China and Russia are expanding their footprint in Latin America through ports, telecommunications, and energy projects. At the same time, he has argued for withdrawing from overseas wars while taking a harder line closer to home.

Supporters often frame this approach as โ€œAmerica Firstโ€ realism: resisting foreign powers in the hemisphere while avoiding large-scale military commitments elsewhere. Critics counter that it risks justifying intervention and could lead to a new generation of implacable military campaigns under a different label.

Divisions Inside the MAGA Coalition

Although largely supportive, reactions among Trumpโ€™s supporters are not uniform.

Populist nationalists within the MAGA movement strongly support a Monroe-style approach, viewing it as common-sense security and a way to push China out of the region without policing the entire world.

Libertarian-leaning and anti-interventionist conservatives are more skeptical. While they favor restraint abroad, they warn that asserting hemispheric dominance could lead to new interventions closer to home.

Evangelical and values-based conservatives are divided, often supporting resistance to leftist regimes such as Venezuela and Cuba but expressing concern about U.S. backing of governments with poor human rights records, as has been the case in Latin America.

A smaller group of traditional hawks aligned with MAGA favors a tougher posture, particularly to counter China, even if it risks deeper U.S. involvement overseas as domestic problems continue to mount.

The Bottom Line

In the aftermath of the Venezuela operation, Trump has adopted a more confrontational tone toward neighboring governments and revived controversial territorial ambitions abroad. Together, they signal a foreign policy posture that emphasizes regional dominance, skepticism of global institutions, and unilateral U.S. leverage โ€” a combination that has unsettled allies and reopened debates over Americaโ€™s role in its own hemisphere.

As Trump allies debate whether this approach reflects strategic restraint or intervention by another name, the administrationโ€™s next steps will determine whether the rhetoric translates into lasting policy shifts.

Trump then shifted his attention to Greenland, where he once again reiterated an interest in acquiringย the Danish territory.

“We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security, and Denmark is not going to be able to do it,” Trump said.

“We need Greenland from a national security situation. It’s so strategic,” he added.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen sharply rebuked Trumpโ€™s comments, urging him to cease what she described as baseless threats against a close ally.

“The Kingdom of Denmark – and thus Greenland – is part of NATO and is thus covered by the alliance’s security guarantee. We already have a defense agreement between the Kingdom and the USA today, which gives the USA wide access to Greenland. And we have invested significantly on the part of the Kingdom in the security of the Arctic,” said Frederiksen in a press release.

“I would therefore strongly urge that the U.S. stop the threats against a historically close ally and against another country and people who have said very clearly that they are not for sale,” Frederiksen added.

Trump Sends Ultimatum to Maduro Allies as U.S. Signals End to Negotiations

President Donald Trump monitors U.S. military operations in Venezuela, from Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, on Saturday, January 3, 2026.

President Donald Trump has delivered a blunt message to Venezuelan strongman Nicolรกs Maduro and his inner circle: cooperate with the United Statesโ€”or step aside.

Fox News senior foreign correspondent Benjamin Hall revealed Sunday that Trump personally warned Maduroโ€™s allies that they must either โ€œsurrender or play ball,โ€ underscoring what the administration describes as a decisive shift away from diplomacy and toward direct action.

According to Hall, President Trump spoke directly with Maduro roughly a week before Saturdayโ€™s strike in Caracas. During that call, Trump reportedly issued a clear ultimatum demanding Maduroโ€™s surrender. Maduro, Trump said, โ€œwas not willing.โ€

Hall noted that while Maduro has now been removed, several senior figures within the Venezuelan regime remain aligned with him, presenting an ongoing challenge for U.S. policymakers seeking stability in the region and an end to what they describe as narco-terrorist activity emanating from the country.

Operation Absolute Resolve – January 3rd, 2026

That message was reinforced by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who made clear that the Trump administration has no intention of tolerating continued obstruction from Venezuelaโ€™s remaining leadership.

โ€œPresident Trump is done negotiating. He proved that a couple of days ago, that he is a man of action, that when someone is threatening the United States, he will defend it with every resource that we have, and he’ll continue to do that,โ€ Noem said on Fox News Sunday.

Noem explained that Trumpโ€™s communications with Venezuelaโ€™s vice president were deliberately direct and unambiguous.

โ€œHis conversations now with the vice president in Venezuela are very matter-of-fact and very clear: โ€˜You can lead, or you can get out of the way because we’re not going to allow you to continue to subvert our American influence and our need to have a free country like Venezuela to work with rather than to have dictators in place who perpetuate crimes and drug trafficking,โ€™โ€ she said.

Her remarks followed the Trump administrationโ€™s high-profile operation on Saturday that resulted in the capture of Nicolรกs Maduroโ€”an unprecedented move that sparked intense debate in Washington. While Democrats and some Republicans raised questions about the legality of the action and the long-term implications for Venezuela, supporters of the operation argued it sent a long-overdue message to hostile regimes.

The operation capped months of U.S. efforts to dismantle what officials describe as a network of narcoterrorism tied to the Venezuelan government. Those efforts included strikes against suspected drug trafficking vessels operating in Caribbean waters and increased enforcement against illicit oil shipments.

Noem pointed to those actions as further proof that the administration is committed to protecting American security interests and cutting off financial lifelines to adversarial governments.

โ€œThe Coast Guard has been heavily involved in stopping a lot of this shadow fleet of oil that has been trafficking illegally to many of our enemies in other countries,โ€ she said.

Administration officials argue that Venezuelaโ€™s instability has long fueled drug trafficking, mass migration, and regional insecurity, and that decisive action was necessary after years of what they view as failed appeasement. Supporters say Trumpโ€™s approach represents a return to peace through strengthโ€”using American power to deter threats before they reach U.S. shores.

Israelโ€™s President Directly Refutes Trumpโ€™s Pardon Claim

0
President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shake hands during their joint press conference, Wednesday, Feb. 15, 2017, in the East Room of the White House in Washington, D.C. (Official White House Photo by Leslie N. Emory)

President Donald Trump sparked a brief diplomatic dust-up this week after remarks he made during a bilateral press appearance suggested that Israelโ€™s president was preparing to pardon Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Trump and Netanyahu met for several hours at Mar-a-Lago on Monday, followed by an extended question-and-answer session with reporters. During the exchange, Trump was asked whether Netanyahuโ€”who is currently facing multiple corruption trials in Israelโ€”deserved a pardon.

โ€œI think he will,โ€ Trump replied. โ€œHow do you not? Heโ€™s a wartime prime minister whoโ€™s a hero. How do you not give a pardon?โ€

Trump went further, telling reporters that he had personally discussed the matter with Israelโ€™s head of state. โ€œI spoke to the president, he tells me itโ€™s on its way,โ€ Trump said. โ€œYou canโ€™t do better than that, right?โ€

Within hours, however, Israeli President Isaac Herzogโ€™s office publicly pushed back, disputing Trumpโ€™s account. In a statement released shortly after the press conference, Herzogโ€™s office said there had been no such conversation.

โ€œThere has been no conversation between President Herzog and President Trump since the pardon request was submitted,โ€ the statement said.

The clarification went on to explain that while there had been prior contact involving Trumpโ€™s team, it did not involve any new assurances or commitments. According to Herzogโ€™s office, โ€œSeveral weeks ago, a conversation took place between President Herzog and a representative on behalf of Trump, who inquired about the American presidentโ€™s letter. He was given an explanation of the stage the request is currently at, and that a decision on the matter would be made in accordance with the established procedures.โ€

The statement emphasized that this explanation mirrored what Herzog had already told the Israeli public.

Trump has been outspoken in his support of Netanyahu, both during and after his presidency. In October, while addressing Israelโ€™s Knesset, Trump publicly urged Herzog to issue a pardon, brushing aside the allegations against Netanyahu as politically motivated. โ€œI have an idea, why donโ€™t you give Netanyahu a pardon?โ€ Trump said at the time. โ€œWho cares about cigars and champagne?โ€

Netanyahuโ€™s legal troubles stem from several ongoing cases. He has been charged with unlawfully accepting giftsโ€”including cigars and champagneโ€”from wealthy associates, as well as more serious allegations involving quid pro quo arrangements. Prosecutors claim Netanyahu offered regulatory benefits to major media companies in exchange for favorable coverage, charges his supporters argue reflect judicial overreach and a politicized legal system targeting Israelโ€™s most successful conservative leader.

Herzog, a former leader of Israelโ€™s Labor Party, has the constitutional authority to issue pardons, though such decisions are traditionally handled cautiously and through formal procedures. While Trump formally requested a pardon in a letter sent in November, Herzog has made clear that no final decision has been reached.

Democrat Senator Openly Backs Trump’s Iran Proposal

Gage Skidmore Flickr

President Donald Trump said Monday that the United States and Israel have already destroyed Iranโ€™s nuclear program and warned that Tehran would face renewed military action if it attempts to rebuild its weapons capabilities. His remarks came as new reports allege the Iranian regime is pursuing chemical and biological warheads for its ballistic missiles.

Speaking at Mar-a-Lago alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump delivered a blunt warning to Tehran over its nuclear and missile ambitions.

โ€œNow I hear that Iran is trying to build up again, and if they are, weโ€™re going to have to knock them down,โ€ Trump said. โ€œWeโ€™ll knock the hell out of them.โ€ He added that Iran would be โ€œmuch smarterโ€ to pursue a deal.

Trump framed Iranโ€™s defeat as central to restoring stability in the Middle East, crediting joint U.S.-Israeli military action with fundamentally shifting the regional balance of power.

โ€œWe just won a big war together,โ€ he said. โ€œIf we didnโ€™t beat Iran, you wouldnโ€™t have had peace in the Middle East. We wiped it out.โ€

When asked whether he would support further Israeli military action if Iran continues advancing its missile or nuclear programs, Trump responded without hesitation.

โ€œIf they continue with the missiles โ€” yes,โ€ he said. โ€œThe nuclear โ€” absolutely.โ€

Pressed on whether he would support efforts to overthrow Iranโ€™s ruling regime, Trump declined, while pointing to the countryโ€™s internal turmoil and economic collapse.

โ€œIโ€™m not going to talk about overthrow of a regime,โ€ he said. โ€œBut they have tremendous inflation. Their economy is busted.โ€

Trump also noted that widespread protests inside Iran are frequently met with deadly force by the government.

The presidentโ€™s comments followed a report Sunday from Iran International alleging that Iranโ€™s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is accelerating work on unconventional missile payloads, including chemical and biological weapons. The report cited unnamed military and security sources.

Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) echoed Trumpโ€™s hardline stance in a Monday post on X, saying he would support military strikes to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.

โ€œIran canโ€™t ever develop a nuclear weapon,โ€ Fetterman wrote.

โ€œFully supported the strike earlier this year. Fully support any future strikes to damage or destroy their nuclear ambitions,โ€ added Fetterman, a vocal supporter of Israel.


USA Strikes ‘Big Facility’ In Campaign Against Venezuela

President Donald Trump holds a Cabinet meeting, Wednesday, April 30, 2025, in the Cabinet Room. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

President Donald Trump suggested this week that U.S. forces may have carried out a direct strike on a major drug-related facility inside Venezuela, a development thatโ€”if confirmedโ€”would represent a significant escalation in his administrationโ€™s campaign against narco-trafficking and the Maduro regime.

In an interview Friday with radio host John Catsimatidis on The Cats & Cosby Show, the president discussed ongoing U.S. military operations targeting suspected drug-smuggling vessels operating off the Venezuelan coast. During that conversation, Trump appeared to reference a successful strike on a fixed facility connected to those operations.

โ€œThey have a big plant or a big facility where the ships come from,โ€ the president said. โ€œTwo nights ago, we knocked that out.โ€

While Trump did not publicly identify the location of the facility, U.S. officials later told The New York Times that the president was referring to a drug facility located inside Venezuela that had been destroyed. At this time, the presidentโ€™s comments remain the only public indication such a strike occurred. Neither the Venezuelan government nor other Latin American governments have acknowledged or confirmed an attack of this kind.

If U.S. forces did strike a facility on Venezuelan soil, it would mark the first known land-based military action in Trumpโ€™s broader effort to disrupt drug trafficking networks tied to the regime of Venezuelan strongman Nicolรกs Maduro. That effort has intensified since September, when the administration began authorizing military strikes on vessels believed to be transporting narcotics in international waters near Venezuela.

According to public reporting, more than 100 people have been killed since those maritime strikes began. The administration has defended the operations as necessary to combat transnational criminal organizations that U.S. officials say operate with the protectionโ€”or direct involvementโ€”of the Maduro government. The Trump administration has repeatedly labeled Venezuela a โ€œnarco-state,โ€ accusing senior regime figures of facilitating cocaine trafficking into the United States.

In October, The New York Times reported that the president had โ€œsecretly authorized the C.I.A. to conduct covert action in Venezuela,โ€ a claim Trump later confirmed publicly. The authorization reportedly expanded U.S. intelligence and operational capabilities aimed at undermining drug cartels and weakening Maduroโ€™s grip on power.

Beyond military operations, the administration has steadily increased pressure on Caracas through economic and strategic measures. Trump ordered the shutdown of Venezuelan airspace, citing security concerns, and earlier this month the U.S. began seizing oil tankers near Venezuelan shores as part of what officials describe as an enforcement action against illicit oil shipments funding the regime. Supporters of the policy argue these moves are designed to cut off revenue streams used to prop up corruption and criminal networks.

The president has previously made clear that land-based options were under consideration.

โ€œWhatโ€™s the next step in this war on cartels, and are you considering options? Are you considering strikes on land?โ€ an off-camera reporter asked Trump in the Oval Office in October.

โ€œWell, I donโ€™t want to tell you exactly, but we are certainly looking at land now because weโ€™ve got the sea very well under control,โ€ Trump replied.

That comment, combined with Trumpโ€™s remarks during Fridayโ€™s radio interview, has fueled speculation that the administration may already be acting on those plans.

Despite the presidentโ€™s statements, military officials told The New York Times they had no information to share regarding the reported destruction of a โ€œbig facility.โ€ Both the CIA and the White House declined to comment, a response consistent with the administrationโ€™s approach to sensitive national security operations.

Supporters of the president argue that Trumpโ€™s aggressive posture reflects a long-overdue willingness to confront drug cartels and hostile regimes head-on, rather than relying solely on diplomatic pressure. Critics, meanwhile, warn that direct military action inside Venezuela could escalate tensions in the region.

For now, the administration has offered no further detailsโ€”but Trumpโ€™s remarks make clear that his campaign against drug trafficking and the Maduro regime is far from over.

Nobel Laureate Praises Trumpโ€™s Tough Stance on Maduro

By Kevin Payravi - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=179718533

Nobel Peace Prize winner Marรญa Corina Machado, one of Venezuelaโ€™s most prominent pro-democracy leaders, is strongly backing President Donald Trumpโ€™s hard-line approach toward Nicolรกs Maduroโ€™s authoritarian regime. In a new interview that aired Sunday on CBSโ€™s Face the Nation, Machado said Trumpโ€™s strategy has given hope to millions of Venezuelans suffering under socialist rule.

Asked whether she supports increased U.S. sanctions on Venezuelan officials and further U.S. seizures of illicit oil shipments, Machado was unequivocal.

โ€œLook, I absolutely support President Trumpโ€™s strategy, and we, the Venezuelan people, are very grateful to him and to his administration, because I believe he is a champion of freedom in this hemisphere,โ€ Machado told host Margaret Brennan.

Speaking from Oslo, where she accepted the Nobel Peace Prize after spending nearly a year in hiding, Machado noted that she had dedicated part of the award to Trump.

โ€œI think that he finally has put Venezuela in where it should be, in terms of a priority for the United Statesโ€™ national security.โ€

Machado argued that Maduroโ€™s regime is far more dangerous than a conventional dictatorship.

โ€œThis is a very complex criminal structure that has turned Venezuela into a safe haven of international crime and terrorist activities, starting with Russia, Iran, Cuba, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Colombian guerrilla [groups], [and] the drug cartels operating freely and directed in partnership with Maduro and his regime.โ€

Machado has long been one of Maduroโ€™s most effective opposition figures. After she overwhelmingly won the opposition primary in 2023, the regime barred her from running, then orchestrated an election that independent experts later declared โ€œmathematically and statistically impossible.โ€ Despite that, Maduro claimed victory and refused to relinquish power. Machado endorsed a stand-in candidate but remained the movementโ€™s central figureโ€”until she was forced into hiding for her safety.

Now, speaking publicly for the first time in months, Machado is calling for increased international pressure.

โ€œWe want every legal action through law enforcement โ€ฆ not only from the United States, also from other Caribbean, Latin American and European countries that further block the illegal activities of the regime.โ€

Her argument is straightforward:

โ€œWe need to increase the cost of staying in power by force. Once you arrive to that point in which the cost of staying in power is higher than the cost of leaving power, the regime will fall apart. And itโ€™s the moment where we advance into a negotiated transition.โ€


Additional Context: Trump and the Nobel Peace Prize

Machadoโ€™s praise comes as Trump has repeatedly been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, particularly for:

  • The Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nationsโ€”an achievement some foreign-policy experts called one of the most important diplomatic breakthroughs in decades.
  • His diplomatic efforts in reducing tensions with North Korea, which earned him multiple nominations from European lawmakers.
  • His support for democracy movements in Latin America, including Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua.

Tucker Carlson Reveals Plans To Purchase Home In Qatar

1
Tucker Carlson via Gage Skidmore Flickr

DOHA, Qatar โ€” Tucker Carlson told an audience at the Doha Forum on Sunday that he plans to buy real estate in Qatar on Monday, framing the move as a statement of personal independence after months of criticism from fellow conservatives over his foreign-policy views and his media business relationships.

During an on-stage interview with Qatarโ€™s prime minister, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani, Carlson addressed allegations that he and his media outlet, the Tucker Carlson Network, have benefited from Qatari-linked money. Carlson denied it โ€” then announced his intended purchase.

โ€œI have been criticized as being a tool of Qatar, and I just want to say, which you already know, which is I have never taken anything from your country and donโ€™t plan to,โ€ Carlson said. โ€œI am, however, tomorrow buying a place in Qatar.โ€

He continued: โ€œI like the city, I think itโ€™s beautiful, but also to make a statement that Iโ€™m an American and a free man and Iโ€™ll be wherever I want to be.โ€

Carlsonโ€™s remarks drew a brief round of applause from the crowd.

Why itโ€™s causing heartburn on the Right

For many Republican voters โ€” especially those who view Qatar primarily through the lens of Hamas, Iran, and Middle East conflict โ€” the announcement landed like a political grenade. Some prominent conservatives have long labeled Qatar a bad actor because it maintains ties to Hamas and has hosted some Hamas leaders. Carlson raised that criticism directly, referencing Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) describing Qatar as a โ€œterror state,โ€ and asked the prime minister to respond.

Al Thani defended Qatarโ€™s posture by arguing it had been asked by the U.S. and Israel โ€œmore than a decade agoโ€ to maintain channels to Hamas, claiming those channels were useful in negotiations. Carlson presented the exchange as a case for diplomacy and communication โ€” but critics argue it blurs moral lines and underplays the danger of legitimizing terror-linked organizations.

The Gaza exchange: what Qatar said on stage

In the interview, Al Thani rejected the idea that Qatar should bankroll reconstruction in Gaza, saying:

โ€œWe are not the ones who are going to write the check to rebuild what others destroyed.โ€

He added: โ€œWhen you are talking about Gaza, Israel flattened this land.โ€

Those comments come as Qatar continues to present itself as a central player in negotiations surrounding Gaza, even as the region remains volatile.

Doha Forumโ€™s unusual mix of speakers

Carlson wasnโ€™t the only headline name in Doha. The forum featured a wide-ranging lineup that included Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump Jr., and Bill Gates, along with journalists from major outlets spanning left and right.

Carlsonโ€™s growing fractures with the GOP โ€” and the Nick Fuentes backlash

Carlsonโ€™s Qatar appearance is also landing amid a broader tension between Carlson and parts of the Republican coalition. In recent months, he has drawn increasing criticism from elected Republicans and conservative institutions who say his platform has drifted from defending core U.S. interests and has instead amplified figures and arguments that divide the party.

One flashpoint: Carlsonโ€™s recent interview with Nick Fuentes, a far-right influencer widely denounced for antisemitic rhetoric. The decision to give Fuentes a high-profile platform triggered condemnation from within the party โ€” including House Speaker Mike Johnson, who reportedly called the interview a โ€œbig mistakeโ€ and described Fuentes as โ€œvile.โ€

That controversy has widened a fault line on the Right: between voters who want a harder line against antisemitism and extremist activism, and voices in the โ€œpopulistโ€ media sphere who argue theyโ€™re simply questioning establishment taboos. The dispute has spilled into open feuds among prominent conservatives โ€” and Carlsonโ€™s Qatar announcement only added fuel.

Report: Ukraine Agrees To US-Brokered Peace Deal

4
By President Of Ukraine - https://www.flickr.com/photos/165930373@N06/54169325552/, CC0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=156221279

Ukraine has agreed to a peace deal with Russia that was brokered by the United States, but a cautiousย Volodymyr Zelenskyย warned โ€œmuch workโ€ remains to be done.

โ€œFollowing the meetings in Geneva, we see many prospects that can make the path to peace real,โ€ Zelensky wrote in an X post on Tuesday. โ€œThere are solid results, and much work still lies ahead.โ€

A U.S. military official in Abu Dhabi told CBS News Driscoll spent hours negotiating Tuesday with Russian representatives, going in and out of meetings all day. 

“We remain very optimistic,” the official said. “Secretary Driscoll is optimistic. Hopefully, we’ll get feedback from the Russians soon. This is moving quick.”

It is not clear who else is in the U.S. delegation in Abu Dhabi. A U.S. official told CBS News on Tuesday that a Ukrainian delegation was also there and has been in contact with Driscoll and his team.

A source with knowledge told CBS News that Driscoll was working in Abu Dhabi off of a revised version of the White House’s 28-point proposal, following productive negotiations in Geneva.

Report: US Planning Prisoner Swap With Russia

0
Kremlin.ru, via Wikimedia Commons

The United States and Russia are reportedly quietly reopening talks on a possible prisoner-exchange that could determine the fate of at least eight Americans still held in Russia. According to Russian special envoy Kirill Dmitrievโ€”who visited Washington in late Octoberโ€”discussions with U.S. officials were โ€œhumanitarian in nature, such as possible exchanges of prisoners that the U.S. side has been working on.โ€ A senior U.S. official confirmed the outreach and described the atmosphere as constructive, though emphasized that no agreement has yet been reached.

โ€œThe U.S. will welcome the release of any detained American,โ€ the official said, underscoring that Washington views this strictly through the lens of American lives, not political grandstanding.

During Dmitrievโ€™s trip he met U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff. A source familiar with the conversations told Axios that Moscow hopes such a swap would โ€œcreate more trust between the countries.โ€ From a Republican perspective, this is exactly the kind of outcome our diplomacy should be pursuing: Americans held abroad should be brought home, and Russia should see we are serious, not passive.

While a handful of Americans were released earlier this year under separate agreements, these talks focus squarely on the eight who remain behind barsโ€”several caught up in cases the U.S. describes as politically tinged or based on contested evidence. According to Axios, the names sent to Moscow earlier by the U.S. include:

  • Stephen James Hubbard, 73, accused of fighting as a mercenary in Ukraine
  • David Barnes, serving a 21-year sentence after a cross-border custody dispute
  • Robert Gilman, former Marine convicted of assaulting a police officer
  • Eugene Spector, sentenced on bribery and espionage charges
  • Michael Travis Leake and Robert Romanov Woodland, jailed on drug offenses
  • Daniel Joseph Schneider, convicted of abducting his son
  • Gordon Black, a U.S. soldier imprisoned for theft and alleged threats

U.S. officials havenโ€™t confirmed whether these eight are the focus of the current discussionsโ€”but with Moscow signalling interest, and Washington keen to show it can deliver for detained Americans, the groundwork for a high-stakes swap is clearly in motion.

Why this matters

For the Republican-minded audience, this is about America first: no American left behind, accountability for Russiaโ€™s malign practices, and the restoration of American strength in diplomacy. Critics of past Democratic administrations argue that Russia has often treated U.S. citizens as bargaining chipsโ€”and the fact that Washington is now engaging quietly, but seriously, signals a turn toward a tougher posture.

What have we achieved so far under Trump?

Itโ€™s worth remembering that under the Trump administration, significant steps were taken to bring Americans home:

  • In February 2025, the U.S. secured the release of Marc Fogel, an American schoolteacher imprisoned in Russia for possession of medical cannabis (a 14-year sentence), in what was acknowledged as a prisoner exchange.
  • In April 2025, another U.S. citizen, dual-national ballet dancer Ksenia Karelina, was freed from Russia in a swap described by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio as secured through Trumpโ€™s efforts.

These releases underscore a Trump-era focus on returning Americans held by adversarial powers, not leaving them forgotten. While this upcoming swap is not yet finalized, the very fact that Moscow and Washington are in active dialogue is a sign the U.S. is not passive when its citizens are wrongfully detained.

The road ahead

There are still major questions to resolve: who exactly will be part of the swap? What will the U.S. give up?