Foreign Affairs

Home Foreign Affairs Page 2

Democrat Senator Openly Backs Trump’s Iran Proposal

Gage Skidmore Flickr

President Donald Trump said Monday that the United States and Israel have already destroyed Iranโ€™s nuclear program and warned that Tehran would face renewed military action if it attempts to rebuild its weapons capabilities. His remarks came as new reports allege the Iranian regime is pursuing chemical and biological warheads for its ballistic missiles.

Speaking at Mar-a-Lago alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump delivered a blunt warning to Tehran over its nuclear and missile ambitions.

โ€œNow I hear that Iran is trying to build up again, and if they are, weโ€™re going to have to knock them down,โ€ Trump said. โ€œWeโ€™ll knock the hell out of them.โ€ He added that Iran would be โ€œmuch smarterโ€ to pursue a deal.

Trump framed Iranโ€™s defeat as central to restoring stability in the Middle East, crediting joint U.S.-Israeli military action with fundamentally shifting the regional balance of power.

โ€œWe just won a big war together,โ€ he said. โ€œIf we didnโ€™t beat Iran, you wouldnโ€™t have had peace in the Middle East. We wiped it out.โ€

When asked whether he would support further Israeli military action if Iran continues advancing its missile or nuclear programs, Trump responded without hesitation.

โ€œIf they continue with the missiles โ€” yes,โ€ he said. โ€œThe nuclear โ€” absolutely.โ€

Pressed on whether he would support efforts to overthrow Iranโ€™s ruling regime, Trump declined, while pointing to the countryโ€™s internal turmoil and economic collapse.

โ€œIโ€™m not going to talk about overthrow of a regime,โ€ he said. โ€œBut they have tremendous inflation. Their economy is busted.โ€

Trump also noted that widespread protests inside Iran are frequently met with deadly force by the government.

The presidentโ€™s comments followed a report Sunday from Iran International alleging that Iranโ€™s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is accelerating work on unconventional missile payloads, including chemical and biological weapons. The report cited unnamed military and security sources.

Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) echoed Trumpโ€™s hardline stance in a Monday post on X, saying he would support military strikes to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.

โ€œIran canโ€™t ever develop a nuclear weapon,โ€ Fetterman wrote.

โ€œFully supported the strike earlier this year. Fully support any future strikes to damage or destroy their nuclear ambitions,โ€ added Fetterman, a vocal supporter of Israel.


USA Strikes ‘Big Facility’ In Campaign Against Venezuela

President Donald Trump holds a Cabinet meeting, Wednesday, April 30, 2025, in the Cabinet Room. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

President Donald Trump suggested this week that U.S. forces may have carried out a direct strike on a major drug-related facility inside Venezuela, a development thatโ€”if confirmedโ€”would represent a significant escalation in his administrationโ€™s campaign against narco-trafficking and the Maduro regime.

In an interview Friday with radio host John Catsimatidis on The Cats & Cosby Show, the president discussed ongoing U.S. military operations targeting suspected drug-smuggling vessels operating off the Venezuelan coast. During that conversation, Trump appeared to reference a successful strike on a fixed facility connected to those operations.

โ€œThey have a big plant or a big facility where the ships come from,โ€ the president said. โ€œTwo nights ago, we knocked that out.โ€

While Trump did not publicly identify the location of the facility, U.S. officials later told The New York Times that the president was referring to a drug facility located inside Venezuela that had been destroyed. At this time, the presidentโ€™s comments remain the only public indication such a strike occurred. Neither the Venezuelan government nor other Latin American governments have acknowledged or confirmed an attack of this kind.

If U.S. forces did strike a facility on Venezuelan soil, it would mark the first known land-based military action in Trumpโ€™s broader effort to disrupt drug trafficking networks tied to the regime of Venezuelan strongman Nicolรกs Maduro. That effort has intensified since September, when the administration began authorizing military strikes on vessels believed to be transporting narcotics in international waters near Venezuela.

According to public reporting, more than 100 people have been killed since those maritime strikes began. The administration has defended the operations as necessary to combat transnational criminal organizations that U.S. officials say operate with the protectionโ€”or direct involvementโ€”of the Maduro government. The Trump administration has repeatedly labeled Venezuela a โ€œnarco-state,โ€ accusing senior regime figures of facilitating cocaine trafficking into the United States.

In October, The New York Times reported that the president had โ€œsecretly authorized the C.I.A. to conduct covert action in Venezuela,โ€ a claim Trump later confirmed publicly. The authorization reportedly expanded U.S. intelligence and operational capabilities aimed at undermining drug cartels and weakening Maduroโ€™s grip on power.

Beyond military operations, the administration has steadily increased pressure on Caracas through economic and strategic measures. Trump ordered the shutdown of Venezuelan airspace, citing security concerns, and earlier this month the U.S. began seizing oil tankers near Venezuelan shores as part of what officials describe as an enforcement action against illicit oil shipments funding the regime. Supporters of the policy argue these moves are designed to cut off revenue streams used to prop up corruption and criminal networks.

The president has previously made clear that land-based options were under consideration.

โ€œWhatโ€™s the next step in this war on cartels, and are you considering options? Are you considering strikes on land?โ€ an off-camera reporter asked Trump in the Oval Office in October.

โ€œWell, I donโ€™t want to tell you exactly, but we are certainly looking at land now because weโ€™ve got the sea very well under control,โ€ Trump replied.

That comment, combined with Trumpโ€™s remarks during Fridayโ€™s radio interview, has fueled speculation that the administration may already be acting on those plans.

Despite the presidentโ€™s statements, military officials told The New York Times they had no information to share regarding the reported destruction of a โ€œbig facility.โ€ Both the CIA and the White House declined to comment, a response consistent with the administrationโ€™s approach to sensitive national security operations.

Supporters of the president argue that Trumpโ€™s aggressive posture reflects a long-overdue willingness to confront drug cartels and hostile regimes head-on, rather than relying solely on diplomatic pressure. Critics, meanwhile, warn that direct military action inside Venezuela could escalate tensions in the region.

For now, the administration has offered no further detailsโ€”but Trumpโ€™s remarks make clear that his campaign against drug trafficking and the Maduro regime is far from over.

Nobel Laureate Praises Trumpโ€™s Tough Stance on Maduro

By Kevin Payravi - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=179718533

Nobel Peace Prize winner Marรญa Corina Machado, one of Venezuelaโ€™s most prominent pro-democracy leaders, is strongly backing President Donald Trumpโ€™s hard-line approach toward Nicolรกs Maduroโ€™s authoritarian regime. In a new interview that aired Sunday on CBSโ€™s Face the Nation, Machado said Trumpโ€™s strategy has given hope to millions of Venezuelans suffering under socialist rule.

Asked whether she supports increased U.S. sanctions on Venezuelan officials and further U.S. seizures of illicit oil shipments, Machado was unequivocal.

โ€œLook, I absolutely support President Trumpโ€™s strategy, and we, the Venezuelan people, are very grateful to him and to his administration, because I believe he is a champion of freedom in this hemisphere,โ€ Machado told host Margaret Brennan.

Speaking from Oslo, where she accepted the Nobel Peace Prize after spending nearly a year in hiding, Machado noted that she had dedicated part of the award to Trump.

โ€œI think that he finally has put Venezuela in where it should be, in terms of a priority for the United Statesโ€™ national security.โ€

Machado argued that Maduroโ€™s regime is far more dangerous than a conventional dictatorship.

โ€œThis is a very complex criminal structure that has turned Venezuela into a safe haven of international crime and terrorist activities, starting with Russia, Iran, Cuba, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Colombian guerrilla [groups], [and] the drug cartels operating freely and directed in partnership with Maduro and his regime.โ€

Machado has long been one of Maduroโ€™s most effective opposition figures. After she overwhelmingly won the opposition primary in 2023, the regime barred her from running, then orchestrated an election that independent experts later declared โ€œmathematically and statistically impossible.โ€ Despite that, Maduro claimed victory and refused to relinquish power. Machado endorsed a stand-in candidate but remained the movementโ€™s central figureโ€”until she was forced into hiding for her safety.

Now, speaking publicly for the first time in months, Machado is calling for increased international pressure.

โ€œWe want every legal action through law enforcement โ€ฆ not only from the United States, also from other Caribbean, Latin American and European countries that further block the illegal activities of the regime.โ€

Her argument is straightforward:

โ€œWe need to increase the cost of staying in power by force. Once you arrive to that point in which the cost of staying in power is higher than the cost of leaving power, the regime will fall apart. And itโ€™s the moment where we advance into a negotiated transition.โ€


Additional Context: Trump and the Nobel Peace Prize

Machadoโ€™s praise comes as Trump has repeatedly been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, particularly for:

  • The Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nationsโ€”an achievement some foreign-policy experts called one of the most important diplomatic breakthroughs in decades.
  • His diplomatic efforts in reducing tensions with North Korea, which earned him multiple nominations from European lawmakers.
  • His support for democracy movements in Latin America, including Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua.

Tucker Carlson Reveals Plans To Purchase Home In Qatar

1
Tucker Carlson via Gage Skidmore Flickr

DOHA, Qatar โ€” Tucker Carlson told an audience at the Doha Forum on Sunday that he plans to buy real estate in Qatar on Monday, framing the move as a statement of personal independence after months of criticism from fellow conservatives over his foreign-policy views and his media business relationships.

During an on-stage interview with Qatarโ€™s prime minister, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani, Carlson addressed allegations that he and his media outlet, the Tucker Carlson Network, have benefited from Qatari-linked money. Carlson denied it โ€” then announced his intended purchase.

โ€œI have been criticized as being a tool of Qatar, and I just want to say, which you already know, which is I have never taken anything from your country and donโ€™t plan to,โ€ Carlson said. โ€œI am, however, tomorrow buying a place in Qatar.โ€

He continued: โ€œI like the city, I think itโ€™s beautiful, but also to make a statement that Iโ€™m an American and a free man and Iโ€™ll be wherever I want to be.โ€

Carlsonโ€™s remarks drew a brief round of applause from the crowd.

Why itโ€™s causing heartburn on the Right

For many Republican voters โ€” especially those who view Qatar primarily through the lens of Hamas, Iran, and Middle East conflict โ€” the announcement landed like a political grenade. Some prominent conservatives have long labeled Qatar a bad actor because it maintains ties to Hamas and has hosted some Hamas leaders. Carlson raised that criticism directly, referencing Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) describing Qatar as a โ€œterror state,โ€ and asked the prime minister to respond.

Al Thani defended Qatarโ€™s posture by arguing it had been asked by the U.S. and Israel โ€œmore than a decade agoโ€ to maintain channels to Hamas, claiming those channels were useful in negotiations. Carlson presented the exchange as a case for diplomacy and communication โ€” but critics argue it blurs moral lines and underplays the danger of legitimizing terror-linked organizations.

The Gaza exchange: what Qatar said on stage

In the interview, Al Thani rejected the idea that Qatar should bankroll reconstruction in Gaza, saying:

โ€œWe are not the ones who are going to write the check to rebuild what others destroyed.โ€

He added: โ€œWhen you are talking about Gaza, Israel flattened this land.โ€

Those comments come as Qatar continues to present itself as a central player in negotiations surrounding Gaza, even as the region remains volatile.

Doha Forumโ€™s unusual mix of speakers

Carlson wasnโ€™t the only headline name in Doha. The forum featured a wide-ranging lineup that included Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump Jr., and Bill Gates, along with journalists from major outlets spanning left and right.

Carlsonโ€™s growing fractures with the GOP โ€” and the Nick Fuentes backlash

Carlsonโ€™s Qatar appearance is also landing amid a broader tension between Carlson and parts of the Republican coalition. In recent months, he has drawn increasing criticism from elected Republicans and conservative institutions who say his platform has drifted from defending core U.S. interests and has instead amplified figures and arguments that divide the party.

One flashpoint: Carlsonโ€™s recent interview with Nick Fuentes, a far-right influencer widely denounced for antisemitic rhetoric. The decision to give Fuentes a high-profile platform triggered condemnation from within the party โ€” including House Speaker Mike Johnson, who reportedly called the interview a โ€œbig mistakeโ€ and described Fuentes as โ€œvile.โ€

That controversy has widened a fault line on the Right: between voters who want a harder line against antisemitism and extremist activism, and voices in the โ€œpopulistโ€ media sphere who argue theyโ€™re simply questioning establishment taboos. The dispute has spilled into open feuds among prominent conservatives โ€” and Carlsonโ€™s Qatar announcement only added fuel.

Report: Ukraine Agrees To US-Brokered Peace Deal

4
By President Of Ukraine - https://www.flickr.com/photos/165930373@N06/54169325552/, CC0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=156221279

Ukraine has agreed to a peace deal with Russia that was brokered by the United States, but a cautiousย Volodymyr Zelenskyย warned โ€œmuch workโ€ remains to be done.

โ€œFollowing the meetings in Geneva, we see many prospects that can make the path to peace real,โ€ Zelensky wrote in an X post on Tuesday. โ€œThere are solid results, and much work still lies ahead.โ€

A U.S. military official in Abu Dhabi told CBS News Driscoll spent hours negotiating Tuesday with Russian representatives, going in and out of meetings all day. 

“We remain very optimistic,” the official said. “Secretary Driscoll is optimistic. Hopefully, we’ll get feedback from the Russians soon. This is moving quick.”

It is not clear who else is in the U.S. delegation in Abu Dhabi. A U.S. official told CBS News on Tuesday that a Ukrainian delegation was also there and has been in contact with Driscoll and his team.

A source with knowledge told CBS News that Driscoll was working in Abu Dhabi off of a revised version of the White House’s 28-point proposal, following productive negotiations in Geneva.

Report: US Planning Prisoner Swap With Russia

0
Kremlin.ru, via Wikimedia Commons

The United States and Russia are reportedly quietly reopening talks on a possible prisoner-exchange that could determine the fate of at least eight Americans still held in Russia. According to Russian special envoy Kirill Dmitrievโ€”who visited Washington in late Octoberโ€”discussions with U.S. officials were โ€œhumanitarian in nature, such as possible exchanges of prisoners that the U.S. side has been working on.โ€ A senior U.S. official confirmed the outreach and described the atmosphere as constructive, though emphasized that no agreement has yet been reached.

โ€œThe U.S. will welcome the release of any detained American,โ€ the official said, underscoring that Washington views this strictly through the lens of American lives, not political grandstanding.

During Dmitrievโ€™s trip he met U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff. A source familiar with the conversations told Axios that Moscow hopes such a swap would โ€œcreate more trust between the countries.โ€ From a Republican perspective, this is exactly the kind of outcome our diplomacy should be pursuing: Americans held abroad should be brought home, and Russia should see we are serious, not passive.

While a handful of Americans were released earlier this year under separate agreements, these talks focus squarely on the eight who remain behind barsโ€”several caught up in cases the U.S. describes as politically tinged or based on contested evidence. According to Axios, the names sent to Moscow earlier by the U.S. include:

  • Stephen James Hubbard, 73, accused of fighting as a mercenary in Ukraine
  • David Barnes, serving a 21-year sentence after a cross-border custody dispute
  • Robert Gilman, former Marine convicted of assaulting a police officer
  • Eugene Spector, sentenced on bribery and espionage charges
  • Michael Travis Leake and Robert Romanov Woodland, jailed on drug offenses
  • Daniel Joseph Schneider, convicted of abducting his son
  • Gordon Black, a U.S. soldier imprisoned for theft and alleged threats

U.S. officials havenโ€™t confirmed whether these eight are the focus of the current discussionsโ€”but with Moscow signalling interest, and Washington keen to show it can deliver for detained Americans, the groundwork for a high-stakes swap is clearly in motion.

Why this matters

For the Republican-minded audience, this is about America first: no American left behind, accountability for Russiaโ€™s malign practices, and the restoration of American strength in diplomacy. Critics of past Democratic administrations argue that Russia has often treated U.S. citizens as bargaining chipsโ€”and the fact that Washington is now engaging quietly, but seriously, signals a turn toward a tougher posture.

What have we achieved so far under Trump?

Itโ€™s worth remembering that under the Trump administration, significant steps were taken to bring Americans home:

  • In February 2025, the U.S. secured the release of Marc Fogel, an American schoolteacher imprisoned in Russia for possession of medical cannabis (a 14-year sentence), in what was acknowledged as a prisoner exchange.
  • In April 2025, another U.S. citizen, dual-national ballet dancer Ksenia Karelina, was freed from Russia in a swap described by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio as secured through Trumpโ€™s efforts.

These releases underscore a Trump-era focus on returning Americans held by adversarial powers, not leaving them forgotten. While this upcoming swap is not yet finalized, the very fact that Moscow and Washington are in active dialogue is a sign the U.S. is not passive when its citizens are wrongfully detained.

The road ahead

There are still major questions to resolve: who exactly will be part of the swap? What will the U.S. give up?

FBI Director Kash Patel Shuts Down Charlie Kirk Foreign Intelligence Probe

Image via gage Skidmore Flickr

FBI Director Kash Patel reportedly shut down efforts by Joe Kent, head of the National Counterterrorism Center and a close ally of Tulsi Gabbard, to investigate whether a foreign power was behind the assassination of conservative leader Charlie Kirk.

Kent Pushes to Expose Possible Foreign Ties

According to The New York Times, Kent began reviewing FBI case files to determine if Kirkโ€™s alleged killer, Tyler Robinson, received outside help. Robinson, 22, has been charged with fatally shooting Kirk with a sniper rifle while the Turning Point USA founder was addressing students at Utah Valley University on September 10.

Kentโ€™s investigation raised alarms at the FBI. Patel reportedly believed Kent was overstepping his authority by digging into an active bureau investigation โ€” even though Kentโ€™s mandate at the Counterterrorism Center includes monitoring potential foreign threats to national security.

White House Tensions Boil Over

When Patel learned Kent had accessed internal FBI materials, he demanded a high-level White House meeting. The tense roundtable brought together Patel, Kent, Gabbard, Vice President JD Vance, Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and senior DOJ officials.

Kent defended his actions, saying a lower-level FBI official had granted him access. Supporters of Kent argue he was doing his duty to ensure foreign adversaries werenโ€™t behind the killing of one of the conservative movementโ€™s most prominent voices.

However, Patel and other officials worried the probe could complicate the prosecution, possibly giving Robinsonโ€™s defense attorneys an opening to claim there were multiple suspects or motives at play.

Jurisdictional Turf War

The standoff reflects ongoing turf battles between the FBI and the Counterterrorism Center, particularly over how intelligence is shared during active criminal cases. Despite the controversy, Kentโ€™s team reportedly collected intelligence from other agencies about potential foreign funding or coordination, including possible links to left-wing extremist groups like Antifa.

So far, itโ€™s unclear whether either agency is still investigating possible foreign involvement in the attack.

Trump Warns Hamas of U.S. Military Action if Violence in Gaza Continues

5
Photo via Gage Skidmore Flickr

President Trump warned Thursday that the United States will have โ€œno choiceโ€ but to use lethal force against Hamas if the militant group does not stop its renewed violence in Gaza.

โ€œIf Hamas continues to kill people in Gaza, which was not the Deal, we will have no choice but to go in and kill them. Thank you for your attention to this matter!โ€ Trump wrote on Truth Social.

The warning comes amid reports that Hamas has reasserted control in Gaza, launching a campaign of retribution following Israelโ€™s withdrawal under a U.S.-brokered ceasefire. According to Reuters, Hamas fighters have killed at least 33 people since the ceasefire began last week. One widely circulated video showed several men being dragged into a Gaza City square and executed.

On Wednesday, the U.S. military also issued a stern message to Hamas, urging the group to โ€œimmediately suspend violence and shooting at innocent Palestinian civilians in Gaza.โ€

Residents in Gaza told Fox News Digital that Hamas fighters have returned to the streets and issued an ultimatum to suspected Israeli collaborators, giving them until Sunday to surrender and seek amnesty.

Hamas has also failed to uphold its agreement to return all deceased hostages to Israel. Families of the victims described the ongoing wait as โ€œtorturous.โ€

On Thursdayโ€™s episode of Fox & Friends, Orna Neutra โ€” the mother of Israel Defense Forces Capt. Omer Neutra โ€” said it is โ€œdevastatingโ€ to wait for her sonโ€™s remains to be returned.

โ€œWe came here on Sunday, prepared to receive him on Monday and, as the day went by and only four hostages were released, and our son wasnโ€™t among them, it was devastating,โ€ she said.

Omer Neutra, a fallen platoon commander, is one of two American citizens whose bodies have not yet been returned by Hamas under the first phase of the peace deal.

Report: Trump Authorized Covert CIA Action In Venezuela

2
President Donald Trump signs Executive Orders, Thursday, April 17, 2025, in the Oval Office. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

The Trump administration has escalated its campaign against Venezuela’s authoritarian leader, Nicolas Maduro, and has secretly authorized the C.I.A. to conduct covert action in the country, the New York Times reported on Wednesday, while citing United States officials.

The authorization is the latest escalation in the Trump administrationโ€™s intensifying pressure campaign against Venezuela. For weeks, the U.S. military has beenย targeting drug boats off the Venezuelan coast. American officials have been clear, privately, that the end goal is toย drive Maduro from power.

The new authority would allow the C.I.A. to carry out lethal operations in Venezuela and conduct a range of operations in the Caribbean.

The New York Times reports:

The agency would be able to take covert action against Mr. Maduro or his government either unilaterally or in conjunction with a larger military operation. It is not known whether the C.I.A. is planning any operations in Venezuela or if the authorities are meant as a contingency.

The development comes as the U.S. military is planning to escalate its ongoing operation, drawing up options for President Trump to consider, including strikes inside Venezuela.

The scale of the military buildup in the region is substantial: There are currently 10,000 U.S. troops there, most of them at bases in Puerto Rico, but also a contingent of Marines on amphibious assault ships. In all, the Navy has eight surface warships and a submarine in the Caribbean.

The new authorities, known in intelligence jargon as a presidential finding, were described by multiple U.S. officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the highly classified document.

The Trump administrationโ€™s strategy on Venezuela, developed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, with help from John Ratcliffe, the C.I.A. director,ย aims to oust Maduro from power.

Mr. Ratcliffe has said little about what his agency is doing in Venezuela. But he has promised that the C.I.A. under his leadership would become more aggressive. During his confirmation hearing, Mr. Ratcliffe said he would make the C.I.A. less averse to risk and more willing to conduct covert action when ordered by the president, โ€œgoing places no one else can go and doing things no one else can do.โ€

President Trump orderedย an end to diplomatic talks with theย Maduro governmentย this month as he grew frustrated with the Venezuelan leaderโ€™s failure to adhere to U.S. demands to give up power voluntarily and the continued insistence by officials that they had no part in drug trafficking.

Trump Touts Another US Strike On Foreign Narcoterrorists

9

On Tuesday, President Trump confirmed that the U.S. military carried out another strike on a suspected drug vessel off the coast of Venezuela, killing six suspected drug smugglers.

Fox News reports:

“Under my Standing Authorities as Commander-in-Chief, this morning, the Secretary of War, ordered a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel affiliated with a Designated Terrorist Organization (DTO) conducting narcotrafficking in the USSOUTHCOM area of responsibility โ€” just off the Coast of Venezuela. Intelligence confirmed the vessel was trafficking narcotics, was associated with illicit narcoterrorist networks, and was transiting along a known DTO route,” Trump wrote Tuesday on Truth Social. 

“The strike was conducted in International Waters, and six male narcoterrorists aboard the vessel were killed in the strike,” Trump said. “No U.S. Forces were harmed.” 

Tuesday’s strikes comes after the White House sent lawmakers a memo Sept. 30 informing them that the U.S. is now participating in a “non-international armed conflict” with drug smugglers.ย 

The strike also falls on the heels of four other fatal strikes against alleged drug boats in the Caribbean since September.

This is a breaking news story. Please check back for updates.