Featured

Home Featured
Featured posts

Trump Signals New Debate Against Harris

    1
    Donald Trump via Gage Skidmore Flickr

    In a Wednesday morning appearance on โ€œFox & Friends,โ€ former President Donald Trump stated that he will debate Vice President Kamala Harris in the โ€œpretty near future.โ€ The surprise announcement has stirred considerable interest and speculation about the dynamics of this potential face-off.

    Trump’s Remarks

    During Fox News‘ morning program, Trump commented on Harris, saying, โ€œI hear she’s sort of a nasty person, but not a good debater.โ€ He added, โ€œBut we’ll see because we’ll be debating her, I guess, in the pretty near future.โ€

    The Hill reports:

    โ€œIt’s going to be announced fairly soon. But we’ll be debating her. I would like to see it on Fox, by the way,โ€ the former president added.

    Trump indicated that other networks, such as NBC and CBS, have also been lobbying to host the event.

    โ€œI want to debate her. I think it’s important for the country that we debate,โ€ the GOP nominee said. โ€œNow where it is, I’m all for Fox. I think Fox would do a really good job. But two people have to agree.โ€

    Debate Dilemmas: Fox vs. ABC

    The potential debate between Trump and Harris comes following a standoff between their campaigns over the choice of news networks.

    The ABC News debate, which was originally scheduled for Sept. 10, was supposed to feature both Trump and President Biden. However, Biden’s withdrawal from the race immediately cast doubt on the status of the debate. Eventually, Trump also backed away from the debate, citing his lawsuit against ABC News host George Stephanopoulos as a primary reason.

    The Harris campaign likewise rejected Trump’s proposal to appear on Fox News on Sept. 4. They claimed that the Republican nominee is โ€œrunning scaredโ€ and attempting to back out of the debate he had already agreed to, allegedly hoping for more favorable coverage from Fox News instead.

    What’s Next?

    With both campaigns appearing to yield little ground, the scheduling and platform for the Trump-Harris debate remain in question. Will they find a middle ground and proceed with the debate? Only time will tell.

    Article Published With The Permission of American Liberty News.

    Incensed Mika Brzezinski Slams Trump – Says He Endangers Womenโ€™s Lives

    5
    US Department of Labor, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

    MSNBC’s Morning Joe co-host Mika Brzezinski delivered a strong rebuke against former President Donald Trump during Thursdayโ€™s broadcast, accusing him of endangering womenโ€™s health and expressing frustration with those who question recent reports critical of Trump.

    Brzezinski argued that Trumpโ€™s actions have serious implications for women, specifically regarding reproductive health. “He is putting our reproductive health at risk, and some women have already died because of this,” Brzezinski stated, emphasizing the potential dangers she believes his policies pose. “I’m talking about us women. He’s killing us. He is making us afraid to have babies.”

    Her comments also extended to those who question the veracity of recent reporting, including a so-called “October surprise” from The Atlantic that criticize Trump. “These headlines and very good reporting, by the way, shouldnโ€™t be questioned by idiots about what Trump has said about Hitler. Thatโ€™s incredibly important to know,” she added.

    Of course, Brzezinski did not mention that Trump was the first U.S. president to formally recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. On Dec. 6, 2017, he announced this recognition, marking a significant shift in U.S. policy. Previous presidents had avoided this move, keeping the U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv to placate Palestinian opposition.

    Critics argue that Brzezinski’s diatribe implies Democrats are losing and that their only option now is to scare the public into voting for Kamala Harris.

    READ NEXT: Trump Assassination Attempt 911 Calls Released

    House GOP Moves To Censure Congressman After Interrupting Trump Speech – Again

    Ted Eytan from Washington, DC, USA, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

    A new effort is underway among House Republicans to censure Rep. Al Green (D-Texas) after he was removed from President Donald Trumpโ€™s primetime address for the second consecutive year.

    Green was ejected from Trumpโ€™s State of the Union address Tuesday night just minutes after the president entered the House chamber. As Trump approached the podium, Green stood holding a sign that read, in all capital letters, โ€œBlack people are not apes.โ€ He remained standing with the sign visible as the president began speaking, prompting intervention by the Sergeant at Arms.

    Rep. Mike Rulli (R-Ohio) told Fox News Digital on Wednesday that he is seeking support for a formal censure resolution against Green.

    โ€œHis shenanigans at the State of the Union were uncalled for,โ€ Rulli said. โ€œWe canโ€™t really put up with that kind of conduct in Congress. Something had to be done.โ€

    Rulli added, โ€œIโ€™m looking for as many co-sponsors from our conference as possible. And Iโ€™m reaching across the aisle for anyone over there that was embarrassed by their own guy.โ€

    According to the text of Rulliโ€™s resolution, first obtained by Fox News Digital, Greenโ€™s actions constituted a โ€œbreach of conduct.โ€ The resolution further notes that it โ€œwas the second time in less than a year that the Representative from Texas had to be removed from the chamber by the Sergeant at Arms due to unpatriotic disruptions that violated numerous House rules related to decorum.โ€

    This is not the first time Green has faced formal rebuke from the House. In March 2025, the House of Representatives voted to censure him after he disrupted a previous presidential address by waving his cane and shouting over Trump as the president attempted to deliver his remarks. Ten Democrats joined Republicans in passing that resolution.

    Green has long been one of Trumpโ€™s most vocal critics in Congress. During Trumpโ€™s first term, Green repeatedly introduced articles of impeachment against the president, beginning as early as 2017. His efforts, which cited allegations ranging from obstruction of justice to rhetoric he characterized as discriminatory or inflammatory, were unsuccessful and did not advance out of the House. While Democrats later pursued separate impeachment proceedings that led to two Senate trials, Greenโ€™s early impeachment resolutions did not gain sufficient support within his own party to move forward.

    Following his removal Tuesday night, Green defended his actions.

    โ€œI refuse to tolerate this level of hate that the president is in fact putting into policy. We must take a stand against this level of invidious discrimination,โ€ Green told reporters.

    โ€œI wanted him to know, and I wanted them to see it and hear it. Up close. But judging from the expression on his face, he got the message. He saw it,โ€ Green said.

    Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) stopped short of committing to a vote on Rulliโ€™s latest censure resolution but indicated he would allow members to decide.

    โ€œAl Green was removed pretty quickly. I donโ€™t know if censure is going to be appropriate. Iโ€™ll let our colleagues decide that,โ€ Johnson said. โ€œThe point of a censure, is to bring someone to the House floor and bring shame upon them for their actions. I think they showed the American people shame already.โ€

    Trump Says New Conservative Host Should be Fired from ‘The View’

      1
      Alyssah Farah Griffin on GMA via screenshot

      Trump has a heavy opinion about “The View’s” latest additions.

      The former President slammed his former communications director Alyssa Farah Griffin and called for her to be fired from ABC’s daytime political talk show.

      โ€œAlyssa Farah totally misrepresented her true feelings about me and the Trump Administration in order to get her job at ratings disaster CNN, and a seat with the low IQ people at The View,โ€ Trump said in a Truth Social post.

      โ€œLook at what she said about me, and that doesnโ€™t include the beautiful letter she sent and other statements she made. They should fire her for misrepresentation or fraud. Release the letter, Alyssa!โ€

      Trump also referenced a number of tweets from Griffin where she said it was the “honor of a lifetime” working for his administration. However, since her departure from the White House Griffin has publicly turned on her former boss and was named a new panelist for “The View” over the summer, filling Meghan McCain’s seat.

      Griffin has faced accusations from both sides of the political aisle that she’s shifted her own political views to gain notoriety.

      Vanessa Trump Announces Cancer Diagnosis

      The White House, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

      Former Trump family member Vanessa Trump revealed Wednesday that she has been diagnosed with breast cancer, prompting an outpouring of support from relatives, friends, and supporters connected to President Donald Trump’s extended family circle.

      The 48-year-old former model and television personality shared the news in an emotional Instagram statement, describing the diagnosis as an unexpected challenge while emphasizing that she remains optimistic.

      “I’ve recently been diagnosed with breast cancer,” Vanessa wrote. “While this isn’t news anyone expects, I’m working closely with my medical team on a treatment plan.”

      Vanessa also revealed that doctors performed a procedure earlier this week, though she did not provide additional details regarding the nature of the procedure or the stage of her diagnosis. She said she is relying heavily on her family and close loved ones as she begins treatment.

      “I am staying focused and hopeful while surrounded by the love and support of my family, my kids, and those closest to me,” she wrote.

      Vanessa concluded the statement by thanking supporters for their encouragement and asking for privacy while she focuses on recovery.

      The announcement quickly drew public reactions from members of the Trump family.

      President Trump’s daughter, Ivanka Trump, posted a heartfelt response beneath Vanessa’s announcement.

      “Praying for your continued strength and a swift recovery. Love you mama,” Ivanka wrote.

      Vanessa’s daughter, Kai Trump, also shared an emotional message, calling her mother “the strongest person I know” in a social media tribute that resonated with supporters.

      Additional support reportedly came through social media engagement from other members of the Trump family as Vanessa’s announcement spread online.

      Vanessa was married to Donald Trump Jr. for more than a decade before the pair divorced in 2018. The former couple share five children together and have largely maintained a cooperative relationship centered around family matters.

      In recent years, Vanessa has kept a lower public profile compared to many members of the Trump family. However, she returned to headlines after legendary golfer Tiger Woods publicly confirmed their relationship in 2025. The two have since been seen together at family events and golf-related appearances.

      Her diagnosis sparked an immediate wave of support online, with many supporters offering prayers and well wishes as she begins what could be a difficult health battle.

      Hush Money Judge Stops Trump Jurors From Disclosing Responses To Employer Questions

        0
        Gavel via Wikimedia Commons Image

        Judge Juan Merchan ruled on Thursday morning that the media is not allowed to publish the jurorsโ€™ responses to questions 3a and 3d on the juror qualification questionnaire.

        The questions ask: “Who is your current employer and who is your previous employer?”

        The ruling comes as the seated jury in former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial fell to six as a sworn juror expressed concerns about her identity being made public by the media.

        The juror told Judge Merchan:

        “Aspects of my identity have already been out there in the public, yesterday alone I had friends colleagues and family push things to my phone questioning my identity as a juror.”

        A number of people observing the jury selection process (voir dire) have expressed similar concerns about the intense political climate.

        Merchan proceeded to address members of the press in the courtroom: “We just lost what probably would’ve been a very good juror.”

        Though the judge agreed with Trump’s lawyers that having that information is essential, the court will redact it from the public record.

        Merchan also instructed journalists to refrain from revealing any information regarding the physical appearance of the jurors.

        Jury selection continues. Twelve New Yorkers and six alternates need to be selected.

        This article was republished with permission from American Liberty News.

        Fani Willis Breaks Silence On Latest Misconduct Allegations

          5
          Gage Skidmore Flickr

          On Sunday, Georgia District Attorney Fani Willis broke her silence after former President Donald Trump’s co-defendant accused her of having a romantic relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade in the stateโ€™s case against Trump.

          For the first time since the allegations were made, Willis spoke on the matter at the Big Bethel AME Church in Atlanta on Sunday.

          “They only attacked one,” she said. “First thing they say, โ€˜Oh, sheโ€™s gonna play the race card now.โ€™

          “But no God, isnโ€™t it them thatโ€™s playing the race card when they only question one,” Willis asked.

          Citing โ€œsources closeโ€ to both Willis and Wade, Romanโ€™s lawyer, Ashleigh Merchant, claimed the pair have been involved in an โ€œongoing, personal and romantic relationship,โ€ and went on vacations together. The filings argued the alleged relationship, which Merchant claims started before the election interference began, makes the indictment โ€œfatally defectiveโ€ and requests it be dismissed.

          โ€œIโ€™m a little confused. I appointed three special counselors. Itโ€™s my right to do, paid them all the same hourly rate. They only attack one,โ€ Willis said Sunday. โ€œI hired one white woman, a good personal friend and a great lawyer, a superstar, I tell you. I hired one white man โ€” brilliant โ€” my friend and a great lawyer. And I hired one Black man, another superstar, a great friend and a great lawyer.โ€

          Although she never mentioned Wade by name during the speech on Sunday, she referred to the man as “a great friend and a great lawyer.”

          Earlier this month, court documents filed say Willis hired special prosecutor Nathan Wade, her alleged partner, to prosecute Trump and benefited financially from the relationship in the form of lavish vacations the two went on using funds his firm received for working the case.

          “The district attorney chose to appoint her romantic partner, who at all times relevant to this prosecution has been a married man,” court documents read.

          Fulton County records show Wade has been paid nearly $654,000 in legal fees since January 2022.

          Inside The White House Correspondents’ Dinner Suspect’s ‘Manifesto’

          The man accused of opening fire outside the White House Correspondentsโ€™ Dinner left behind a detailed โ€œmanifestoโ€ describing his intent to target members of the Trump administration, โ€œprioritized from highest-ranking to lowest,โ€ according to a copy obtained by CBS News.

          Cole Allen, 31, allegedly sent the writing to family members before the attack. In it, he stated that while law enforcement, hotel employees, and guests were not his intended targets, he was willing to harm them if necessary to reach administration officials. โ€œI really hope it doesnโ€™t come to that,โ€ he wrote.

          Authorities say Allen charged a security checkpoint outside the Washington Hilton on Saturday night armed with a shotgun, a handgun, and knives. President Donald Trump and other officials were quickly escorted from the event, which was later canceled. A Secret Service agent who was shot during the incident, while wearing a bulletproof vest, has since been released from the hospital.

          The suspectโ€™s brother reportedly alerted police in Connecticut after receiving the email, prompting law enforcement to intervene. Investigators later recovered additional writings from Allenโ€™s home in Torrance, California, and his hotel room at the Hilton.

          A chilling and ironic tone

          Throughout the message, Allen adopted a matter-of-fact tone, at times veering into irony.

          โ€œHello everybody!โ€ he began. โ€œSo I may have given a lot of people a surprise today.โ€

          He apologized to his parents โ€œfor saying I had an interview without specifying it was for โ€˜Most Wanted,โ€™โ€ and to colleagues and students for claiming he had a personal emergency. He suggested that by the time the email was read, he might already require medical attention, referring to potential injuries as โ€œself-inflicted status.โ€

          Declared targets โ€” with one exception

          Allen wrote that he chose to act because he did not want the administrationโ€™s alleged โ€œcrimesโ€ to โ€œcoat [his] hands.โ€ While he did not explicitly name Trump or the event, he described a plan to target officials in descending order of rank.

          He made one notable exception: โ€œnot including Mr. Patel,โ€ he wrote, referencing the FBI director, who was also in attendance.

          Allen added that he would avoid targeting Secret Service, Capitol Police, or National Guard personnel unless necessary. โ€œI hope they are wearing body armor,โ€ he wrote.

          He also detailed tactical decisions, claiming, โ€œIn order to minimize casualties, I will also be using buckshot rather than slugs (less penetration through walls).โ€

          Anticipating criticism

          The manifesto included a section addressing hypothetical objections to his actions, along with rebuttals.

          โ€œAs a half-black, half-white person, you shouldnโ€™t be the one doing this,โ€ he wrote as a potential criticism. โ€œRebuttal: I donโ€™t see anyone else picking up the slack.โ€

          He also referenced his Christian faith, writing that some might argue he should โ€œturn the other cheek.โ€

          โ€œRebuttal,โ€ he continued, โ€œTurning the other cheek is for when you yourself are oppressed.โ€

          Allen then described various unnamed individuals experiencing hardship, in some cases attributing their struggles to the administration.

          โ€œI donโ€™t expect forgiveness, but if I could have seen any other way to get this close, I would have taken it,โ€ he added.

          Criticism of security

          In a postscript, Allen sharply criticized security measures at the event.

          โ€œPSโ€ฆ what the hell is the Secret Service doing? โ€ฆ No damn security. Not in transport. Not in the hotel. Not in the event,โ€ he wrote.

          He claimed that if he had been a foreign agent, he could have brought in heavier weaponry without detection. Officials note that while the Washington Hilton hosted the event, it remained an operational hotel with public access, and only specific areas were secured.

          Family warnings and prior behavior

          Allenโ€™s sister reportedly told investigators that he frequently used โ€œradicalโ€ rhetoric and had previously discussed doing โ€œsomethingโ€ to address what he saw as problems in society and government.

          She also revealed her brother was a regular visitor to the shooting range, was a member of a group called “The Wide Awakes” and had previously attended a “No Kings” rally inย California.ย 

          Political reaction and unanswered questions

          The motive behind the attack remains under investigation.

          Former President Barack Obama emphasized the lack of confirmed details while condemning political violence broadly.

          โ€œAlthough we donโ€™t yet have the details about the motives behind last nightโ€™s shootingโ€ฆ itโ€™s incumbent upon all of us to reject the idea that violence has any place in our democracy,โ€ Obama wrote. He also praised the Secret Service, calling their work โ€œa sobering reminder of the courage and sacrificeโ€ they show.

          During a โ€œ60 Minutesโ€ interview, Trump reacted angrily after host Norah Oโ€™Donnell read excerpts from the alleged manifesto.

          โ€œYou read that crap from some sick person? I got associated with all stuff that has nothing to do with me,โ€ Trump said, adding, โ€œYou should be ashamed of yourselfโ€ฆ Youโ€™re a disgrace.โ€

          More than 2,500 people had gathered for the annual dinner, which celebrates the First Amendment. Trump, who has typically declined to attend during his presidency, had made a historic appearance this year and has since said he hopes to reschedule the event within 30 days.

          The Full Manifesto

          To read Allen’s full 1,052-word manifesto as published by The New York Post, with minor edits to improve profanity, see below:

          Hello everybody!

          So I may have given a lot of people a surprise today. Let me start off by apologizing to everyone whose trust I abused.

          I apologize to my parents for saying I had an interview without specifying it was for โ€œMost Wanted.โ€

          I apologize to my colleagues and students for saying I had a personal emergency (by the time anyone reads this, I probably most certainly DO need to go to the ER, but can hardly call that not a self-inflicted status.)

          I apologize to all of the people I traveled next to, all the workers who handled my luggage, and all the other non-targeted people at the hotel who I put in danger simply by being near.

          I apologize to everyone who was abused and/or murdered before this, to all those who suffered before I was able to attempt this, to all who may still suffer after, regardless of my success or failure.

          I donโ€™t expect forgiveness, but if I could have seen any other way to get this close, I would have taken it. Again, my sincere apologies.

          On to why I did any of this:

          I am a citizen of the United States of America.

          What my representatives do reflects on me.

          And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.

          (Well, to be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity Iโ€™ve had to do something about it.)

          While Iโ€™m discussing this, Iโ€™ll also go over my expected rules of engagement (probably in a terrible format, but Iโ€™m not military so too bad.)

          Administration officials (not including Mr. Patel): they are targets, prioritized from highest-ranking to lowest

          Secret Service: they are targets only if necessary, and to be incapacitated non-lethally if possible (aka, I hope theyโ€™re wearing body armor because center mass with shotguns messes up people who *arenโ€™t*

          Hotel Security: not targets if at all possible (aka unless they shoot at me)

          Capitol Police: same as Hotel Security

          National Guard: same as Hotel Security

          Hotel Employees: not targets at all

          Guests: not targets at all

          In order to minimize casualties I will also be using buckshot rather than slugs (less penetration through walls)

          I would still go through most everyone here to get to the targets if it were absolutely necessary (on the basis that most people *chose* to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, and are thus complicit) but I really hope it doesnโ€™t come to that.

          Rebuttals to objections:

          Objection 1: As a Christian, you should turn the other cheek.

          Rebuttal: Turning the other cheek is for when you yourself are oppressed. Iโ€™m not the person raped in a detention camp. Iโ€™m not the fisherman executed without trial. Iโ€™m not a schoolkid blown up or a child starved or a teenage girl abused by the many criminals in this administration.

          Turning the other cheek when *someone else* is oppressed is not Christian behavior; it is complicity in the oppressorโ€™s crimes.

          Objection 2: This is not a convenient time for you to do this.

          Rebuttal: I need whoever thinks this way to take a couple minutes and realize that the world isnโ€™t about them. Do you think that when I see someone raped or murdered or abused, I should walk on by because it would be โ€œinconvenientโ€ for people who arenโ€™t the victim?

          This was the best timing and chance of success I could come up with.

          Objection 3: You didnโ€™t get them all.

          Rebuttal: Gotta start somewhere.

          Objection 4: As a half-black, half-white person, you shouldnโ€™t be the one doing this.

          Rebuttal: I donโ€™t see anyone else picking up the slack

          Objection 5: Yield unto Caesar what is Caesarโ€™s.

          Rebuttal: The United States of America are ruled by the law, not by any one or several people. In so far as representatives and judges do not follow the law, no one is required to yield them anything so unlawfully ordered.

          I would also like to extend my appreciation to a great many people since I will not be likely to be able to talk with them again (unless the Secret Service is *astoundingly* incompetent.)

          Thank you to my family, both personal and church, for your love over these 31 years.

          Thank you to my friends, for your companionship over many years.

          Thank you to my colleagues over many jobs, for your positivity and professionalism.

          Thank you to my students for your enthusiasm and love of learning.

          Thank you to the many acquaintances Iโ€™ve met, in person and online, for short interactions and long-term relationships, for your perspectives and inspiration.

          Thank you all for everything.

          Sincerely,

          Cole โ€œcoldForceโ€ โ€œFriendly Federal Assassinโ€ Allen

          PS: Ok now that all the sappy stuff is done, what the hell is the Secret Service doing? Sorry, gonna rant a bit here and drop the formal tone.

          Like, I expected security cameras at every bend, bugged hotel rooms, armed agents every 10 feet, metal detectors out the wazoo.

          What I got (who knows, maybe theyโ€™re pranking me!) is nothing.

          No damn security.

          Not in transport.

          Not in the hotel.

          Not in the event.

          Like, the one thing that I immediately noticed walking into the hotel is the sense of arrogance.

          I walk in with multiple weapons and not a single person there considers the possibility that I could be a threat.

          The security at the event is all outside, focused on protestors and current arrivals, because apparently no one thought about what happens if someone checks in the day before.

          Like, this level of incompetence is insane, and I very sincerely hope itโ€™s corrected by the time this country gets actually competent leadership again.

          Like, if I was an Iranian agent, instead of an American citizen, I could have brought a damn Ma Deuce in here and no one would have noticed s**t.

          Actually insane.

          Oh and if anyone is curious is how doing something like feels: itโ€™s awful. I want to throw up; I want to cry for all the things I wanted to do and never will, for all the people whose trust this betrays; I experience rage thinking about everything this administration has done.

          Canโ€™t really recommend it! Stay in school, kids.

          Man Who Falsely Claimed To shoot Charlie Kirk Sentenced To Prison

          0
          Image via Pixabay

          In a strikingly bizarre footnote to the tragic assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, a Utah man who falsely claimed responsibility for the fatal shooting has now been sentenced and faces up to 15 years in prison.

          Seventy-one-year-old George Hodgson Zinn โ€” who dramatically approached law enforcement at Utah Valley University, yelling โ€œI shot him โ€” now shoot meโ€ moments after Kirk was gunned down โ€” has now pleaded no contest to obstruction of justice and guilty to two counts of sexual exploitation of a minor, according to court records.

          While Zinnโ€™s initial false confession drew headlines and confusion during the chaotic aftermath of the shooting โ€” leading some to believe he was the shooter โ€” investigators quickly ruled him out as a suspect in Kirkโ€™s assassination.

          During questioning at a hospital after the incident, Zinn shocked authorities by admitting he had child sexual abuse material on his phone. A warrant later uncovered more than 20 images depicting abused minors, and prosecutors charged him accordingly.

          In Salt Lake County district court, Zinn was sentenced to zero to five years for obstruction and one to 15 years for each exploitation count, with the judge ordering the terms to run concurrently. The exact amount of time he will serve will be decided by the Utah parole board.


          Remembering Charlie Kirk: A Conservative Voice Silenced

          The backdrop to this strange prosecution is one of the most shocking episodes of political violence in recent U.S. history. On Sept. 10, 2025, Charlie Kirk โ€” founder and executive director of the conservative youth advocacy group Turning Point USA and a leading voice in the MAGA movement โ€” was assassinated by a sniper while speaking at an outdoor event on the Utah Valley University campus.

          Kirk, just 31 years old, had become one of the most recognizable young conservative figures in America. He built Turning Point USA from a student organization into a powerful grassroots force shaping Republican campaigns, energizing young voters, and challenging campus liberal orthodoxy across the country.

          Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

          His death prompted an outpouring of grief and outrage from Republican leaders and conservative grassroots activists, who saw the attack as not just a crime but part of a broader pattern of hostility toward conservatives. Thousands attended memorial events, and his legacy has become a rallying point in debates over political violence and free speech on college campuses and beyond.

          The suspect in the shooting โ€” 22-year-old Tyler James Robinson โ€” was later arrested and charged with aggravated murder. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, underscoring the gravity of the crime and the national attention still focused on the case.


          What This Means Going Forward

          Zinnโ€™s sentencing closes one strange chapter in the unfolding story of the Kirk assassination, but it also highlights the turmoil that followed one of the most prominent conservative leaders of his generation. A man who tried โ€” for reasons still unclear โ€” to throw law enforcement off the trail of the real shooter now faces prison time for his own criminal behavior.

          Will Trump Take Back Our Panama Canal? Cruz Blows Whistle On Communist Chinese Control

          1
          Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America,

          U.S. Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Cruz met with Panamanian officials about growing Communist Chinese influence over the Panama Canal, a crucial artery for global trade that was built and once controlled by the United States, until it was given away by liberal the-President Jimmy Carter.

          Cruz announced in a statement he โ€œrecently traveled to Panama and underscored the Panama Canalโ€™s strategic importance to the United States.โ€

          Cruz reports he โ€œmet with top Panamanian officials, including the Minister of Economy and Finance, Felipe Chapman; Minister of Public Security, Frank Abrego; and Panama Canal Authority Administrator, Ricaurte Vรกsquez Morales. During these meetings, Sen. Cruz reiterated the growing threats posed by China and other foreign actors seeking to exert influence over the region, threatening both American and Panamanian national and economic security.โ€

          โ€œThe Senate Commerce Committee has primary jurisdiction over the Panama Canal due to its role in the facilitation of global trade and U.S. commerce,โ€ Cruz notes.

          โ€œThere is undoubtedly a strong Chinese presence, and I believe a threat to the canal. The purpose of my visit is number one, to try to strengthen the longtime friendship and alliance between the United States and Panama. And number two, I’m the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, which, among other things, has jurisdiction over the Panama Canal and the Panama Canal is vital, both to national security and economic security of the United States and Panama,โ€ said Cruz.

          Cruz summarized the long-brewing issue of Communist Chinese control of the Panama Canal and its threat to the United States, writing:

          Previously, Sen. Cruz convened a Senate Commerce Committee hearing to examine the growing number of challenges facing the maritime industry in the region due to capacity limitations and increased transit fees. Sen. Cruz sounded alarms over Chinaโ€™s growing foothold in Panama, which poses a direct threat to U.S. trade. China has exploited Panamaโ€™s institutional weakness to evade U.S. sanctions and has taken controlling stakes in critical infrastructure surrounding the Panama Canal. During the hearing, multiple senators raised concerns about Panamaโ€™s management of the canal, citing allegations of corruption, suggesting that they may be violating the Neutrality Treaty.

          One week after the hearing, a preliminary deal was announced that would give an American company primary control of Port Balboa and Port Cristobal, which are container ports on either end of the canal. However, the deal has faced delay amid pressure from China seeking to secure a stake in the deal, stalling progress to protect both American and Panamanian interests.

          Sen. Cruz concluded, โ€œChina is not America’s friend, and China is not Panama’s friend, and if God forbid, a military conflict emerges between the United States and China, I believe there is an unacceptable risk that China would act to shut down the Panama Canal, which would have a devastating impact on the United States and an even worse impact on Panamaโ€ฆ

          โ€œThere is strong American interest in expanding and improving commerce and transportation through the Panama Canal. The United States built the Panama Canal more than a century ago and our nations have been close friends for a long, long time. The economies of both the United States and Panama benefit enormously from the Panama Canal, and there are strong American interests in investing in ports on both ends of the Panama Canal and assisting in new infrastructure, whether it is gas pipelines to transport gas from one end to the other, or whether it is building a new reservoir and expanding the ability to ensure there’s