Featured

Home Featured
Featured posts

Kamalaโ€™s Trump-Epstein ‘Bombshell’ Falls Apart – Fact-Check Reveals Glaring Problem

5
The White House, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Thursdayโ€™s unveiling of a decades-old sexualย assaultย allegation againstย Donald Trump, purported involvingย Jeffrey Epsteinย and former model Stacey Williams, has sparked more questions than answers. The allegation surfaced during aย paidย Zoom call hosted by the Harris campaign, raising immediate doubts about the timing and intent behind the claim. Even more curious, the story found its way into print not in the United States but in the left-leaning British newspaper,ย The Guardian, after multiple Americanย mediaย outlets reportedly passed on the story.

Even some users who arenโ€™t exactly Trump supporters found the release disappointing. On X, Election Wizard voiced frustration with the Harris campaignโ€™s so-called โ€œOctober surprise.โ€ โ€œI feel very let down by the Harris people. I was promised a โ€˜bombshell Trump storyโ€™ that would upend the race,โ€ Election Wizard tweeted. โ€œInstead, I got tabloid pieceโ€ published in a partisan British newspaper.

A Timeline That Doesnโ€™t Add Up

Adding to the skepticism is the timeline of the alleged events, which is, at best, murky. The accusation, now over 30 years old, reportedly involves an encounter between Williams, Epstein and Trump. In a video interview, Williams recounts a walk with Epstein โ€œfrom his brownstone on the Upper East Side down Fifth Avenueโ€ in โ€œlate winter of 1993,โ€ claiming they visited Trump on a whim.

However, this is where the details begin to unravel. According to ZeroHedge, Epstein only moved into the Wexler mansion on 9 East 71st Street in 1996โ€”three years after this supposed impromptu visit with Trump was said to have taken place. So, how could such a meeting have happened in a location Epstein hadnโ€™t even acquired yet?

As reported by American Liberty News on Wednesday, political journalist Mark Halperin warned about โ€œactorsโ€ attempting to influence the 2024 presidential race. Halperin mentioned that he was approached with a story supposedly capable of โ€œending Trumpโ€™s campaign,โ€ but he did not find it credible and chose not to pursue it:

โ€œThe point I was making is actors who want a certain outcome are on social media and in pitches to reporters, and in the case of The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldbergโ€ฆ are trying to affect the end of the race because theyโ€™re so desperate to try to pull a Comey,โ€ Halperin stated, referencing the 2016 electionโ€™s late-stage developments. He reiterated, โ€œIโ€™m not pursuing the story. I donโ€™t think itโ€™s trueโ€ฆ All Iโ€™m saying is there are people out there pitching stuff.โ€ (RELATED: Slain Soldierโ€™s Family Dismisses The Atlanticโ€™s Trump โ€˜Hit Pieceโ€™)

This clarification comes amid signs of stronger-than-expected early voting turnout for Republicans, though prominent conservatives are warning supporters not to become complacent.

This article originally appeared on American Liberty News. It is republished with permission.

READ NEXT: Democratic Party Operative Allegedly Caught Tampering With Ballot Drop Box In Montana

Homeland Security May Be Forced To Give Up These Hidden Records On The Attempt On Trumpโ€™s Life

    1

    Americans may soon know more on the inexplicable failure of seemingly every security measure in the July 13, 2024 attempt on President Donald Trumpโ€™s life, after an ethics watchdog filed a sweeping lawsuit.

    The non-profit public interest law firm Judicial Watch reports it has โ€œfiled a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for records related to security provided for the July 13, 2024, rally in Butler, PA, during which there was an assassination attempt on President Trump (Judicial Watch Inc. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (No. 1:25-cv-00704)).โ€

    โ€œFederal agencies need to come clean on the events that led up to the assassination attempts on President Trump,โ€ said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. โ€œIt is now eight months since the first attempt, and the American people have yet to receive any answers under FOIA on the failures of the Biden administration to protect President Trump.โ€

    Judicial Watch reports the lawsuit was filed โ€œafter the agency failed to comply with a July 15, 2024, FOIA request to for:โ€

    All records, including emails, email chains, email attachments, text messages, video or audio recordings, photographs, outlook calendars, meeting minutes, correspondence, statements, letters, memoranda, reports, briefings, presentations, notes, summaries, requests for assistance, agreements, travel records, receipts, or other form of record, regarding providing support or manpower to President Donald Trumpโ€™s presidential campaign rally that was held in Butler, PA, on July 13, 2024.

    Judicial Watch notes the request โ€œspecifically sought records from the agencyโ€™s Homeland Security Investigations, which is believed to have helped provide security at the Butler event.โ€

    โ€œOn July 13, 2024, at a campaign rally in Butler, PA, 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks attempted to assassinate President Donald Trump. After the attempt on President Trumpโ€™s life, former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro N. Mayorkas named a bipartisan panel to conduct a 45-day independent review of the planning for and actions before, during, and after the rally,โ€ Judicial Watch reports.

    Judicial Watch notes it has โ€œan ongoing, independent investigation into the assassination attempts on President Trump,โ€ writing:

    In August 2024, Judicial Watch received Secret Service records that showed the Secret Service has made it a top priority that โ€œdiversity and inclusion is not just โ€˜talked aboutโ€™ โ€“ but demonstrated by all employees through โ€˜Every Action, Every Day.โ€™โ€ [Emphasis in original]

    Judicial Watch also uncovered records from the district attorneyโ€™s office in Butler County, PA, detailing the extensive preparation of local police for the rally at which former President Trump was shot, including sniper teams, counter assault teams and a quick response force.

    In response to a separate open records request, Judicial Watch obtained bodycam footage of the July 13 assassination events from the Butler Township Police Department.

    Judicial Watch reported that the FBI withheld information on a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for information about its coordination with the U.S. Secret Service regarding the July 13 Butler, PA, rally.

    On July 31, Judicial Watch reported that the United States Secret Service completely denied multiple Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for documents about the assassination attempt on former President Trump.

    Man Who Falsely Claimed To shoot Charlie Kirk Sentenced To Prison

    0
    Image via Pixabay

    In a strikingly bizarre footnote to the tragic assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, a Utah man who falsely claimed responsibility for the fatal shooting has now been sentenced and faces up to 15 years in prison.

    Seventy-one-year-old George Hodgson Zinn โ€” who dramatically approached law enforcement at Utah Valley University, yelling โ€œI shot him โ€” now shoot meโ€ moments after Kirk was gunned down โ€” has now pleaded no contest to obstruction of justice and guilty to two counts of sexual exploitation of a minor, according to court records.

    While Zinnโ€™s initial false confession drew headlines and confusion during the chaotic aftermath of the shooting โ€” leading some to believe he was the shooter โ€” investigators quickly ruled him out as a suspect in Kirkโ€™s assassination.

    During questioning at a hospital after the incident, Zinn shocked authorities by admitting he had child sexual abuse material on his phone. A warrant later uncovered more than 20 images depicting abused minors, and prosecutors charged him accordingly.

    In Salt Lake County district court, Zinn was sentenced to zero to five years for obstruction and one to 15 years for each exploitation count, with the judge ordering the terms to run concurrently. The exact amount of time he will serve will be decided by the Utah parole board.


    Remembering Charlie Kirk: A Conservative Voice Silenced

    The backdrop to this strange prosecution is one of the most shocking episodes of political violence in recent U.S. history. On Sept. 10, 2025, Charlie Kirk โ€” founder and executive director of the conservative youth advocacy group Turning Point USA and a leading voice in the MAGA movement โ€” was assassinated by a sniper while speaking at an outdoor event on the Utah Valley University campus.

    Kirk, just 31 years old, had become one of the most recognizable young conservative figures in America. He built Turning Point USA from a student organization into a powerful grassroots force shaping Republican campaigns, energizing young voters, and challenging campus liberal orthodoxy across the country.

    Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

    His death prompted an outpouring of grief and outrage from Republican leaders and conservative grassroots activists, who saw the attack as not just a crime but part of a broader pattern of hostility toward conservatives. Thousands attended memorial events, and his legacy has become a rallying point in debates over political violence and free speech on college campuses and beyond.

    The suspect in the shooting โ€” 22-year-old Tyler James Robinson โ€” was later arrested and charged with aggravated murder. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, underscoring the gravity of the crime and the national attention still focused on the case.


    What This Means Going Forward

    Zinnโ€™s sentencing closes one strange chapter in the unfolding story of the Kirk assassination, but it also highlights the turmoil that followed one of the most prominent conservative leaders of his generation. A man who tried โ€” for reasons still unclear โ€” to throw law enforcement off the trail of the real shooter now faces prison time for his own criminal behavior.

    Democrat Lawmaker To File Impeachment Articles Against Trump

      8
      President Donald Trump signs Executive Orders, Thursday, April 17, 2025, in the Oval Office. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

      Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, announced Thursday morning that he plans to once again introduce articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump โ€” a move that highlights ongoing divisions within the Democratic Party over how to confront the president.

      โ€œThere will be articles of impeachment filed before the Christmas break. This, I pledge,โ€ Green declared, framing the action as a test of Democratsโ€™ willingness to oppose the Trump administration. โ€œWe have to participate. This is a participatory democracy. The impeachment requires the hands and the guidance of all of us.โ€

      Green said he will file the measure as a privileged resolution, a procedural maneuver that forces the House to consider the articles within two legislative days. Even so, the chamber can vote to table the effort before it reaches an actual impeachment vote โ€” something that has happened repeatedly in the past.

      A Long Record of Failed Impeachment Attempts

      Thursdayโ€™s announcement marks Greenโ€™s fifth attempt to impeach Trump. Since 2017, Green has repeatedly pushed impeachment articles, often without the backing of House Democratic leadership. His previous filings โ€” including charges such as “bigotry” and “bringing disrepute to the presidency” โ€” were consistently tabled with bipartisan support, underscoring how little traction his efforts gained even before Trumpโ€™s two formal impeachments in 2019 and 2021.

      This history has led many observers to view Greenโ€™s actions as largely symbolic, aimed more at appealing to the partyโ€™s activist base than at producing any practical outcome.

      Progressive Frustrations with Democratic Leadership

      Greenโ€™s renewed push comes as the partyโ€™s progressive wing expresses growing dissatisfaction with Democratic leaders like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y. Critics argue that leadership has failed to secure meaningful concessions during recent legislative battles โ€” including a 43-day government shutdown โ€” and has not mounted an effective resistance to Republican policy priorities.

      Some Democrats, such as Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner, have even called for new leadership in Congress to more aggressively oppose GOP momentum.

      Dave Mytych, outreach lead for the activist group For Liberation and Resistance Everywhere (FLARE), joined Green at the press conference and directly criticized top Democrats.

      โ€œThis is what the American people want. They want fighters that hold the line. Democrats, are you listening? Leader Schumer, are you listening? Leader Jeffries, are you listening?โ€ Mytych said.

      Questions About the Effortโ€™s Purpose

      When asked whether another failed impeachment vote might reflect poorly on Democratic leadership, Green avoided directly answering. He instead noted that up to 80 House members have supported his proposals in the past.

      โ€œHere’s my perspective. I believe in the Constitution,โ€ Green said. โ€œPeople who vote to table the articles are voting against impeachment.โ€

      He did not specify which charges he intends to bring this time.

      A Familiar Outcome Likely

      The House has impeached Trump twice before โ€” first in 2019 over abuse of power and later in 2021 for inciting an insurrection. In both cases, the Senate ultimately voted to acquit. Greenโ€™s repeated attempts, none of which have succeeded or gained broad support, leave little expectation that this latest effort will produce a different result.

      Green also announced plans for a peaceful protest at the Lincoln Memorial on Saturday alongside other advocates.

      Nebraska Democrat-Turned-Republican Senator Blocks Trump’s Electoral Vote Plan

      2
      Photo via Gage Skidmore Flickr

      In a surprising political move, Nebraska State Sen. Mike McDonnell, a former Democrat-turned-Republican, has effectively derailed efforts by former President Donald Trump and his allies to alter the stateโ€™s method of distributing electoral votes just ahead of the 2024 election. The proposal, if passed, could have shifted Nebraska to a winner-take-all system, favoring the GOP in a heavily conservative state.

      McDonnellโ€™s Decision: A Game-Changer

      On Monday, McDonnell announced that he would not support the push to change the way Nebraska awards its electoral votes. “I understand the motivations of some of my colleagues,” McDonnell told The Washington Post. “However, after considerable reflection, itโ€™s clear that with just over a month left before Election Day, now is not the right time to make this change.” (McDonnell has long been seen as a swing vote in the legislature, making his decision particularly impactful.)

      How Nebraskaโ€™s System Works

      Nebraska and Maine are unique in how they allocate their electoral votes. Unlike the typical winner-take-all system, these states distribute votes by congressional district. This allowed President Joe Biden to secure one electoral vote from Nebraskaโ€™s 2nd Congressional District, covering the Omaha area, in the 2020 election. Trump allies aimed to shift Nebraska to a winner-take-all model to bolster Republican chances.

      Pushback From Trump Allies

      Trump supporters have lobbied for months to change Nebraskaโ€™s system, viewing it as a crucial battleground. Their aim was to prevent Vice President Kamala Harris from easily winning the Omaha district, which could combine with her victories in other swing states like Wisconsin and Michigan.

      Rising Pressure

      Last week, South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, a vocal Trump ally, visited Nebraska to lobby for the change. Trump also personally reached out to state legislators. However, McDonnellโ€™s decision has made it unlikely that Nebraskaโ€™s governor, Jim Pillen, will call a special session to vote on the matter.

      Trumpโ€™s Response

      Trump expressed his frustration on Truth Social, accusing McDonnell of blocking a โ€œhuge Republican victory.โ€ Calling him a โ€œgrandstander,โ€ Trump made it clear that he views this decision as a significant setback for his 2024 campaign.

      Whatโ€™s Next?

      Although the current effort has stalled, State Sen. Loren Lippincott, who sponsored the bill, stated that he plans to reintroduce the legislation during the next session. โ€œThis fight isnโ€™t over,โ€ Lippincott said, signaling that Nebraskaโ€™s electoral system may be contested well beyond 2024.

      What It Means for the 2024 Election

      McDonnellโ€™s decision could have significant implications. By keeping the congressional district-based allocation in place, the Omaha area remains competitive for both parties. This keeps Nebraskaโ€™s 2nd Congressional District in play and could provide a critical edge in a tight race between Trump and Harris.

      For now, McDonnellโ€™s refusal to back the change has ensured that Nebraska’s 2nd District will remain a swing district, at least through the 2024 election.

      READ NEXT: Awesome News: Former Fox News Star Drops BIG Professional Announcement [WATCH]

      Mexico Agrees To Extradite 26 Cartel Leaders To US

      The White House, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

      Mexico reached a deal with the United States to hand over 26 topย cartelย leaders.

      The cartel figures were scheduled to fly to the U.S. on Tuesday.

      “Today is the latest example of the Trump administration’s historic efforts to dismantle cartels and foreign terrorist organizations,” Attorney General Pam Bondi told Fox News. “These 26 men have all played a role in bringing violence and drugs to American shores — under this Department of Justice, they will face severe consequences for their crimes against this country. We are grateful to President Sheinbaum and the Mexican government for their collaboration in this matter.”

      Abigael Gonzรกlez Valencia, a leader of the “Los Cuinis,” cartel, which is aligned with the notorious Jalisco New Generation cartel (CJNG) and Roberto Salazar, who is accused of participating in the 2008 killing of a Los Angeles sheriffโ€™s deputy, are among those being handed over to the U.S. 

      Mexicoโ€™s Attorney Generalโ€™s Office and Security Ministryย confirmed the men were being handed over, saying the deal was made after the U.S. Justice Department said it wouldnโ€™t seek the death penalty.

      President Donald Trump has also reportedlyย secretly authorizedย U.S. military force against cartels in Latin America designated by the U.S. as terrorist organizations, which would allow U.S. forces to engage with them.

      The move, reported by the New York Times, would give U.S. forces permission to engage the cartels, which traffic drugs like fentanyl across the US-Mexico border,

      “The president is determined to not just dismantle โ€“ but completely destroy โ€“ [Venezuelan dictator Nicolas] Maduroโ€™s Cartel de Los Soles and obliterate their operations in the Western Hemisphere,” a source close to the White House said, the New York Post reported. 

      The anti-cartel effort is being coordinated among several departments, including the Department of Defense, Justice Department, Department of Homeland Security, Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Treasury, the source added.

      “President Trumpโ€™s top priority is protecting the homeland, which is why he took the bold step to designate several cartels and gangs as foreign terrorist organizations,” deputy White House press secretary Anna Kelly said in a statement to Fox News.

      It also comes ahead of 25% tariffs on Mexican goods coming into the U.S. imposed by Trump. 

      Mexico also extradited 29 cartel leaders in February, including Rafael Caro Quintero, who prosecutors say was behind the torture and murder of a DEA agent in 1985.ย 

      “The previous Administration allowed these criminals to run free andย commit crimesย all over the world. The Trump Administration is declaring these thugs as terrorists, because that is what they are, and demanding justice for the American people,” the White House said at the time.ย 

      Former Governor Schwarzenegger Teases A Fight Against Newsom Over Redistricting Plan

        2
        Austin Green, CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons

        Former Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger teased a potential return to politics…

        On Friday, the Hollywood icon teased a fight with Gov. Gavin Newsomโ€™s (D) redistricting push in a post on social media as Democrats in the state look to redraw their maps in response to similar moves in Texas, which triggered some lawmakers to flee the state.

        โ€œIโ€™m getting ready for the gerrymandering battle,โ€ Schwarzenegger wrote, including a photo of him lifting weights. He also wore a shirt that read โ€œF*** the politiciansโ€ and โ€œterminate gerrymandering.โ€ 

        California is moving forward with their own plans to redraw their stateโ€™s map as it looks to neutralize a proposed House map in Texas that would net the Republicans five seats there. 

        โ€œWeโ€™re putting maps on the ballot, and weโ€™re giving the power to the people,โ€ Newsom said at a rally on Thursday. โ€œThis will be the first redistricting thatโ€™s ever done that. Thatโ€™s the difference.โ€  

        California is expected to see a special election over the mid-decade redistricting in November.

        โ€œGovernor Schwarzenegger has a 20 year history of battling gerrymandering, taking power from the politicians and returning it to the people where it belongs, and he believes gerrymandering is evil no matter who does it. He still stands by the rule we learn in pre-school: two wrongs donโ€™t make a right,โ€ Daniel Ketchell, a spokesman for the former governor, said in a statement earlier this year. 

        โ€œHe will continue to be on the side of the people and not politicians โ€“ from either party โ€“ on this issue,โ€ he added. 

        Florida Republican Introduces Bill To Add Trump To Mount Rushmore

          11
          By Idawriter, CC BY-SA 3.0, curid=53439616

          Rep.ย Anna Paulina Lunaย (R-Fla.)ย introducedย aย bill Tuesday seekingย to addย President Trumpโ€™sย face to the Mount Rushmore monument.ย 

          โ€œHis remarkable accomplishments for our country and the success he will continue to deliver deserve the highest recognition and honor on this iconic national monument,โ€ Luna wrote in a Tuesday post on the social platform X.

          โ€œLetโ€™s get carving!โ€

          The Interior Department would be in charge of undertaking Trumpโ€™s addition to the South Dakota landmark if approved by Congress.

          โ€œMount Rushmore, a timeless symbol of our nationโ€™s freedom and strength, deserves to reflect his towering legacyโ€”a legacy further solidified by the powerful start to his second term,โ€ Luna shared in a separate statement

          โ€œHe will be forever remembered among the great like Presidentsย George Washington,ย Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and Theodore Roosevelt.โ€

          Luna is not the first person to float the idea. Fox News contributors this weekย suggestedย adding Trumpโ€™s faceย to Mount Rushmore to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the countryโ€™s founding, which is set for 2026.

          โ€œIf you did, like, the 250th anniversary of the country at Mount Rushmore with President Trumpโ€™s face, it would be epic,โ€ย Kayleigh McEnany,ย Trumpโ€™s former press secretary,ย said this week onย Fox News Channelโ€™s โ€œOutnumbered.โ€

          Amanda Head: Trump Masters The Art Of Blue Collar Appeal

          0

          Like it or not Donald Trump is still popular…

          The 2024 Republican frontrunner recently attended a UFC fight and the night’s events were interesting, to say the least.

          Watch Amanda explain the situation below:

          Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of Great America News Desk.

          Pelosi Leaves Door Open To Impeachment If Dems Retake Power

          1
          Gage Skidmore Flickr

          Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi declined to rule out a future impeachment effort against President Donald Trump if Democrats regain control of Congress, leaving the decision to a potential new majority while emphasizing that the partyโ€™s immediate focus remains on policy priorities.

          In an interview Tuesday with MSNBCโ€™s Ali Vitali, Pelosi was pressed on whether Democrats would consider impeaching Trump during his second term, particularly amid ongoing voter concerns about โ€œcorruption.โ€ While she did not directly endorse such a move, Pelosi made clear that the possibility would ultimately depend on the actions of a future Congress.

          “Well, I think that, I’m not, that’s just not where we’re starting with this, but when we get power, we will have power to go there to do what we said we’re going to do, lower the cost of living. Some people say you should use other language, but lower the costs of living, A. B, fix what they have done to the healthcare system with their trillion dollars from Medicaid, half a trillion dollars for Medicare, and the money from SNAP. I do believe that food is medicine as well, especially for children, and again fight their corruption. So that’s what we’re setting out to do,” Pelosi said.

          Recent polling has fueled speculation about a potential shift in power. Several surveys show Republicans facing a difficult midterm environment, with Democrats gaining ground in key battleground districts and generic ballot polling tightening or tilting left. That has raised the stakes of questions about what Democrats might do if they reclaim the House.

          Vitali followed up, asking Pelosi directly whether she believes Trump has committed impeachable offenses in his second term.

          “We have a convicted felon who’s president of the United States. That was then, this is now. I think, that that’s subject to review. But I don’t think that’s something, that’s not where you start. That’s what you have to do because of what he has done. That’s subject a great review. We had great review as to what were the grounds for impeachment. And that’s up to a new Congress to come to that decision. But the fact is that, people want to know what we’re doing for them,” Pelosi responded.

          Pelosi repeatedly emphasized that impeachment is not a political starting point but a process that requires evidence and deliberation.

          “You’re asking about what comes next. That’s up to the new Congress. And that’s up to them to decide where we go of reviewing what he’s done. And that requires power, all the kinds of things that build a case. It’s not just about, ‘I feel like doing this,'” she added.

          Trump, for his part, has already predicted that Democrats would pursue impeachment if they regain control, framing it as a likely political outcome of a Democratic victory in November. His allies have echoed that warning, arguing that impeachment would be a central focus of a Democratic-led House.

          Pelosi, however, sought to contrast that narrative by stressing economic and policy concerns as the partyโ€™s primary message heading into the midterms. She pointed to lowering costs, restoring healthcare funding, and addressing nutrition programs as top priorities.

          The former speaker also reiterated that she has no regrets about leading the House in impeaching Trump twice during his first term, decisions she has long defended as necessary and grounded in evidence.

          Her comments mark a notable shift from late 2025, when she told USA Todayโ€™s Susan Page that there was not sufficient cause at that time to pursue impeachment again.

          “If he crosses the border again,” Pelosi said in that earlier interview. “But thatโ€™s not an incidental thing. You say, ‘Weโ€™re going to do that.’ No, there has to be cause. There has to be reason. We had review. This was a very serious, historic thing.”

          Pelosi, who announced she will not seek re-election when her term ends in January 2027, appears to be leaving the question of impeachment deliberately open-endedโ€”framing it as a decision for future lawmakers rather than a defined campaign promise, even as political pressure builds on both sides ahead of a potentially pivotal midterm election.