Featured

Home Featured
Featured posts

Watch: Hecklers Derail Pelosi Event

    6
    Nancy Pelosi via Gage Skidmore flickr

    Things quickly went off the rails at an event featuring former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

    The heckler interruptedย Pelosi, who was speaking alongside economist Paul Krugman at The City University of New Yorkโ€™s Graduate Center โ€” and accused her of having โ€œa very bad obsessionโ€ with getting the United States into war.

    โ€œYou know Pelosi, thatโ€™s a very good place for you, in the depths of hell,โ€ the heckler began, and continued to shout over the booing crowd as security quickly surrounded him to remove him from the venue.

    โ€œFor some reason, you have a very bad obsession of getting us into war. Hey, why is it that you did not admit that there were no WMDs in Iraq? You lied us into a war in Iraq. You got us to invade Afghanistan. Now over 90% of those people are impoverished and are dying,โ€ he shouted. โ€œWhy donโ€™t you tell the truth about Nordstream? Youโ€™re leaving millions of Germans without energy! You have a knack for getting us into war! People like you should be arrested. You are a war criminal!โ€

    Pelosi said nothing, sitting calmly on the stage and waiting for the chaos to die down โ€” but another heckler quickly picked up where the first had left off.

    โ€œHey, Congresswoman! I came to see a warmonger, but youโ€™re a sad old drunk. What happened?โ€ the second protester asked. โ€œWhen you went to Taiwan, were you looking for Ukraine? Did we blow up the Nordstream on accident or on purpose? Did you know about that?โ€

    He continued to shout at her, calling her a โ€œwar criminalโ€ as security moved to take him out as well. โ€œHow many people have died in your f***ing name? How many people have died because of Iraq?โ€ he asked.

    Once the second protester had been removed, a third stood up, and then a fourth โ€” each criticizing Pelosi for provoking war

    Trump Names Two Potential Successors: Watch

      0
      (Miami - Flรณrida, 09/03/2020) Presidente da Repรบblica Jair Bolsonaro durante encontro com o Senador Marco Rubio..Foto: Alan Santos/PR

      Trump has his eye on the future of the Republican Party.

      During a recent interview with NBCโ€™sย Kristen Welkerย about who might succeed him atop the partyโ€™sย 2028ย ticket on Sundayโ€™s edition ofย Meet the Press President Trump didn’t shy away from naming two potential candidates.

      After observing that Trump had โ€œbuilt a political movement that has transformed the Republican Party,โ€ Welker asked, โ€œWhen you look to the future, Mr. President, do you think the MAGA movement can survive without you as its leader?โ€

      โ€œYes, I do. I think itโ€™s so strong, and I think we have tremendous people. I think that we have a tremendous group of people. We talked about a number of them. You look atย Marco [Rubio], you look atย JD Vance, whoโ€™s fantastic,โ€ replied Trump, who continued:

      You look at-, I could name 10, 15, 20 people right now just sitting here. No, I think they have a tremendous party. And you know what I canโ€™t name? I can name one Democrat. I mean, I look at the Democrats, theyโ€™re in total disarray. They have a new person namedย [Jasmine] Crockett. I watched her speak the other day, sheโ€™s definitely a low IQ person, and they said sheโ€™s the future of the party. I said, you have to be kidding. I donโ€™t know what theyโ€™re going to do. And I really believe in a two-party system. Because itโ€™s good to be challenged, itโ€™s really good to have a two party, you know itโ€™s good, being challenged is okay. It keeps you sharp. I donโ€™t know what theyโ€™re gonna do. They have nobody. Bernieโ€™s 87-years-old or something. And you know,ย [Joe] Bidenย is the worst thing that ever happened to old people because he was grossly incompetent. And I think maybe for artificial reasons, you know, he had operations and things. So maybe thatโ€™s an artificial. But I know people that are unbelievably sharp and theyโ€™re older than 87. But I watchedย Bernie Sanders, heโ€™s a nut job, but heโ€™s still sharp. Heโ€™s sharp, heโ€™s the same guy he was. He hasnโ€™t gone down, but Biden is really-, eโ€™s the worst thing to happen to old people.

      โ€œI know that you are only 100 days in, but as we sit here today, who do you see as your successor, Mr. President?โ€ followed up Welker.

      โ€œWell, itโ€™s far too early to say that, but, you know, I do have a vice president and typically it would be and JDโ€™s doing a fantastic job, but-โ€ answered Trump before Welker interjected to ask โ€œHe would be at the top of the list?โ€

      โ€œIt could very well be,โ€ mused Trump. โ€œI donโ€™t want to get involved in that. I think heโ€™s a fantastic, brilliant guy. Marco is great. Thereโ€™s a lot of them that are great. I also see tremendous unity, but certainly you would say that somebodyโ€™s the VP, if that person is outstanding, I guess that person would have an advantage. But I think the other people would all stay in unbelievably high positions. But, you know, it could be that heโ€™d be challenged by somebody. We have a lot of good people in this party.โ€

      Watch:

      Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) has also been widely floated as a potential Democratic candidate for president.

      Ocasio-Cortez hasย recently dodged questions aboutย the possibility, stressing a focus on the current political moment, but anticipation is building as she tours the country alongside Sen.ย Bernie Sandersย (I-Vt.), revving up her base and reaching out to voters across the country.ย 

      โ€œIt would not be out of the realm of possibility that she would want to be a presidential candidate. Sheโ€™s very ambitious. Sheโ€™s very smart. She has an uncanny ability to raise money. She understands social media. Sheโ€™s incredibly popular with younger voters, and sheโ€™s got the right issues,โ€ said Hank Sheinkopf, a Democratic strategist based in the Empire State.

      โ€œItโ€™s a question of timing. When is best? When is the most opportune time for her to take advantage of all that?โ€

      Trump Attends Al Smith Charity Dinner

        0

        Donald Trump attended the Al Smith charity dinner customary for presidential candidates, and by most accounts, outdid himself, even with his reputation as an entertainer preceding him. His jokes landed well both with the in-person audience and viewers on social media, with X users sharing clips of his jokes hundreds of thousands of times. His masterful delivery only highlighted Harris’s absence, and the video she sent in place of her attendance seemed especially dull in comparison.

        Fox News reports:

        This year’s Al Smith dinner, however, was set to be a bit different from previous years, as Vice President Kamala Harris skipped the in-person event, sending a pre-recorded video instead. The 2020 Al Smith dinner was also different from previous election years, as it was held virtually amid the pandemic’s lockdowns and social distancing requirements. 

        Harris’s video featured SNL actress Molly Shannon playing an obsessive and socially Catholic supporter who gave a short monologue about the importance of voting for a woman who had “more heart,” “more compassion” and “had to be smart to become a top contender in a field dominated by men.” It also included a couple of jabs at former President Trump, with Shannon advising Harris not to lie and her quipping, “especially about election results,” and not to say anything negative about Catholics, and Harris responding that she would never do that, and it would be like criticizing Detroit in Detroit, referencing recent comments made by Trump that her campaign insisted were rooted in racism.

        While the audience seemed to roar in laughter at Trump’s jokes throughout the night, her video appeared to fall flat, receiving minimal laughter.

        Some have speculated that she chose not to attend the iconic dinner because she’s not the most talented speaker, and without the scales tipped in her favor like at the ABC presidential debate where moderators Linsey David and David Muir joined her in her debate against Donald Trump, she can’t perform — especially side by side with Donald Trump.

        The campaign denied these claims however, insisting, “The Vice President is going to be campaigning in a battleground state that day, and the campaign wants to maximize her time in the battlegrounds this close to the election. Her team also told the organizers that she would very much like to attend their event as President. This would make her one of the first sitting Presidents to attend.”

        Trump took advantage of her absence, joking at the dinner, “I must say I was shocked when I heard that Kamala was skipping the Al Smith dinner. I’d really hoped that you would come, because we can’t get enough of hearing her beautiful laugh. She laughs like crazy.”

        Prior to the event, Trump posted on social media, “Just found out that Lyinโ€™ Kamala is doing a video message tonight instead of being at the Al Smith Dinner. She shouldnโ€™t be allowed to do a video message. Kamala should be there like almost every other Presidential Candidate in their History, except Walter Mondale, who lost 49-1. They didnโ€™t give me the option of a video message, nor would I have done it. This is very disrespectful to everyone involved. She should be here, or lose the Catholic Vote!”

        Fox News continues:

        Dolan said he anticipates the dinner to raise roughly $9 million, which will be given to various charities to assist women and children in need, as part of the Church’s pro-life mission, according to a press release from the foundation. 

        Article Published With The Permission of American Liberty News.

        READ NEXT: Kamala Harris Will Skip Historic Dinner Benefitting Catholic Charities

        Bret Baier Suggests Trump Is The ‘Holdup’ In Potential Fox News Presidential Debate

        9
        The White House from Washington, DC, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

        Fox News anchor Bret Baier suggested this week that former President Donald Trump may be the “holdup” preventing a potential Fox News debate between him and Vice President Kamala Harris. During an interview with radio host Hugh Hewitt, Baier expressed his belief that the Harris campaign would likely agree to a debate on Fox News.

        “I actually believe โ€“ this is me talking โ€“ that the Harris campaign would do a Fox debate,” Baier said, adding that Trump seems hesitant to move forward with the idea.

        Others feel differently, as The Daily Caller reports:

        CNNโ€™s Chris Wallaceย saidย on Sept. 13 that there is no chance that Harris will debate Trump on Fox News.

        โ€œI would say that there is an absolutely 0%, whatโ€™s lower than 0, chance that she would agree to debate on Fox,โ€ Wallace said. โ€œLet me tell you a quick story. Back in 2019 when she was running, the president of Fox News and I, who was seen as being pretty even handed, went to meet with a bunch of the Democrats to try and get them to do town halls or do an interview. [Democratic Massachusetts Sen.] Elizabeth Warren met with us, [independent Vermont Sen.] Bernie Sanders met with us, the only Democrat who refused to meet with us off-the-record just to consider the possibility of going on Fox was Kamala Harris. There is a 0% chance that she will agree to an interview on Fox.โ€

        Harris accepted an Oct. 23 debate with CNN, but Trump said it is โ€œtoo lateโ€ because of how close it would be to the November election.

        โ€œAs President Trump has said, only losers request a rematch. Kamala Harris lost the debate, and she knows it,โ€ Karoline Leavitt, Trump campaign national press secretary, told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

        Following the Sept. 10 debate on ABC News, Trump has declared there will be no further debates. Meanwhile, Harris has agreed to a CNN debate on Oct. 23. A prior Fox News debate proposal, which Trump had agreed to, never materialized.

        READ NEXT: Speaker Johnson Lays SHOCK Allegations At Zelenskyโ€™s Feet, Demands Immediate Action To Restore Relations

        JD Vance Accuses Politico of โ€˜Journalistic Malpractice’

        0

        On Friday, Vice President JD Vance took to X to blast what he called โ€œforeign influenceโ€ in a Politico report targeting Steve Witkoff, President Trumpโ€™s special envoy for peace missions and chief negotiator on Ukraine.

        โ€œThis story from Politico is journalistic malpractice,โ€ Vance wrote, tagging Politico correspondent Felicia Schwartz. โ€œBut itโ€™s more than that: itโ€™s a foreign influence operation meant to hurt the administration and one of our most effective members. Notice how all of the people attacking Steve are on background? That means itโ€™s two or three deep staters who are angry that Witkoff has succeeded where theyโ€™ve failed.โ€

        Vance made clear that he sees the article as an attempt not just to smear Witkoff, but to undermine Trumpโ€™s broader foreign policy success in shifting the conversation toward peace in Ukraine.


        What the Politico Story Claimed

        Schwartzโ€™s piece, co-authored with Nahal Toosi and Jack Detsch, framed Witkoff as an inexperienced outsider whose โ€œgo-it-alone styleโ€ frustrates American, Ukrainian, and European officials. According to Schwartz, 13 anonymous sourcesโ€”none of whom were willing to go on the recordโ€”painted Witkoff as someone who views the Ukraine conflict โ€œthrough a real estate lensโ€ and misses diplomatic details.

        Politicoโ€™s reporting emphasized that Witkoff has met with Vladimir Putin five times in six months but claimed those meetings havenโ€™t led to tangible breakthroughs. The piece also alleged Witkoff sometimes appeared โ€œuninformed or unprepared,โ€ citing unnamed U.S. and foreign officials.

        One anonymous voice was quoted as saying, โ€œHis inexperience shines through, he has the presidentโ€™s ear, which is evident, but there has been some confusion about what has been said and agreed.โ€


        What Politico Left Out

        Vance accused Politico of cherry-picking information to fit a predetermined narrative. He said the outlet deliberately left out quotes from him, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and senior advisor Jared Kushnerโ€”each of whom had praised Witkoffโ€™s diplomatic efforts.

        In fact, Vance had told Politico directly: โ€œWitkoff has made more progress towards ending the bloodshed in Ukraine than all his critics combined.โ€ That single line was briefly included, but stripped of context and buried among anonymous complaints.

        According to Schwartz herself, the White House sent Politico a list of officialsโ€™ supportive quotes about Witkoff. Most were left on the cutting room floor.


        The Larger Pattern: Anonymous Sources and Double Standards

        The story is the latest example of the corporate media using anonymous leaks from entrenched bureaucrats to undermine Trump officials. Both Trump and Vance have criticized this practice for years, pointing out that it gives cover to partisan โ€œdeep stateโ€ operatives while denying the American people transparency.

        By contrast, those willing to speak openlyโ€”Vance, Rubio, Kushnerโ€”were ignored or minimized in Politicoโ€™s coverage. The result is a slanted article that elevates anonymous gossip over the testimony of elected leaders and senior officials.


        Why Witkoff Matters

        Steve Witkoff, a successful real estate developer and longtime Trump ally, was tapped for a unique mission: break the stalemate on Ukraine by applying Trumpโ€™s outsider approach to diplomacy. Unlike career diplomats who have presided over endless wars and gridlock, Witkoff has leveraged direct relationships, including multiple meetings with Putin, to seek pragmatic solutions.

        For Trumpโ€™s critics in the establishment, that makes him a threat. For everyday Americans who are weary of endless foreign wars, it makes him a symbol of a possible new path toward peace.


        Vance: Media Trying to Derail Peace Efforts

        Vance argued that the Politico piece is not just unfair journalismโ€”itโ€™s part of a deliberate effort to derail peace negotiations. โ€œThe quotes on Witkoff were meant to complicate and derail peace efforts,โ€ he said, warning that anonymous smears serve the interests of those who profit from prolonging the war.

        Republicans have long argued that entrenched Washington interests, including defense contractors and globalist bureaucrats, benefit from keeping conflicts alive rather than resolving them. By attacking Witkoff, Vance suggested, the media is doing their bidding.


        The Takeaway

        Politicoโ€™s story highlights a familiar clash: Trumpโ€™s America First agendaโ€”focused on ending foreign wars and prioritizing U.S. interestsโ€”versus the entrenched establishment in Washington and its allies in the corporate media.

        Vanceโ€™s defense of Witkoff signals that the White House isnโ€™t backing down. Despite attacks from the press and anonymous bureaucrats, Trump and his team are determined to keep pursuing peace in Ukraineโ€”an effort the mainstream media seems determined to undermine at every step

        Released DOJ Search Warrant For Trumpโ€™s Twitter Account Reveals Broader Investigation

          8
          Photo via Pixabay images

          Back in August,ย Department of Justiceย Special Counselย Jack Smithย obtained a search warrant for former Presidentย Donald Trump’sย X/Twitterย account despite pushback from the social media giant.

          The initial resistance prompted a federal judge to hold the company in contempt and issue a $350,000 fine.

          Eventually, the social media company now known as X complied (after the court-ordered deadline) but was prohibited from telling Trump about it.

          An unsealed indictment revealed that Smith’s team cited Trump’s tweets while outlining his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

          But that’s not at, as Twitchyย reports:

          More is now known about the warrant, and you might not be shocked to know this was about more than just Trump:

          These people are completely out of control:

          Unreal:

          Republished with permission from American Liberty News.

          Senator Responds To Trump Considering Him For Vice President

          1
          [Photo Credit: The White House from Washington, DC, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons]

          South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott (R) responded to former President Donald Trump’s comments over the weekend naming him as a potential running mate.

          Trumpย revealed to Fox News’s Maria Bartiromoย over the weekend he is considering Scott, along with South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem to be the next vice presidential running mate. (RELATED: Trump Names Two People When Asked About Potential VPย Picks)

          “The only thing I can tell you is that the one thing we need is four more years of President Donald Trump,” Scott told Fox News Digital on Monday.

          “We were better off under Trump. In order for us to be successful, the one thing I can’t afford to do is take my eye off the ball. The eye on the ball means making sure that President Trump gets four more years,” he added.

          Over the weekend, Trump told Bartiromo that his top priority in choosing a vice presidential candidate is selecting someone who could easily step into his shoes in case of an emergency.

          “Always, it’s got to be who is going to be a good president. Obviously, you always have to think that because in case of emergency. Things happen, right? No matter who you are, things happen. That’s got to be No. 1,” Trump said.

          On Monday, former Trump senior adviser Kellyanne Conway advised the President to consider choosing a person of color for VP during an op-ed published in The New York Times.

          โ€œWith a crisis on the border, economic dissatisfaction, fears about crime, a parentsโ€™ rights renaissance and multiple wars and threats across the globe, Mr. Trumpโ€™s deputy must be able to navigate chaos and challenges at home and abroad,โ€ Conway wrote.

          โ€œTaking all of this into consideration, if I were advising Mr. Trump, I would suggest he choose a person of color as his running mate, depending on vetting of all possibilities and satisfaction of procedural issues like dual residency in Florida,โ€ Conway wrote. โ€œNot for identity politics a la the Democrats, but as an equal helping to lead an America First movement that includes more union workers, independents, first-time voters, veterans, Hispanics, Asian Americans and African Americans.โ€

          Conway listed Sen. Tim Scott, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), and Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) among the potential options.

          Actor Dennis Quaid Says Why He’s Voting For Trump

            1

            He’s team Trump…

            Well-known actor Dennis Quaid said in a recent interview that he plans to vote for Donald Trump in the November election.

            The celebrity announced his support of the Republican candidate during an interview with Piers Morgan on British television when asked by Morgan what he thought of Trump.

            โ€œI think Iโ€™m gonna vote for him in the next election,โ€ the actor said. โ€œIt just makes sense. I was ready not to vote for Trump, until what I saw is, more than politics, I see a weaponization of our justice system and a challenge to our Constitution.โ€

            โ€œTrump is the most investigated person, probably in the history of the world, and they havenโ€™t been able to really get him on anything,โ€ he added.

            Quaid went on to reference many of Trump’s accomplishments…

            โ€œWhat he did with Korea, with Rocket Baby, the way he defeated ISIS in three weeks,โ€ he continued. โ€œYou know, people donโ€™t even remember, it happened so fast. How he stood up for us overseas. The way he responded to China. He stands up to people and thatโ€™s what makes him a leader. Rather than, what I kind of compare it to, what was going on in Jimmy Carterโ€™s administration, where weโ€™re trying to be everybodyโ€™s friend and pal.โ€

            โ€œAnd thereโ€™s some evil people and bad actors in this world and so, you know, people might call [Trump] an a**hole but heโ€™s my a**hole,โ€ Quaid said. โ€œIโ€™ll tell you one true thing about him is that I really feel that he is working for the American people. Thatโ€™s what heโ€™s all about, and I do believe that to be true and sincere.โ€

            Trump To Have Annual Checkup At Walter Reed This Month

            President Donald Trump participates in a welcome ceremony with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman Al Saud at the Royal Court Palace in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Tuesday, May 13, 2025. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

            President Donald Trump will have his annual medical checkup at a hospital near Washington on May 26, the White House said Monday night.

            The oldest person ever inaugurated as President, Trump, turns 80 in June. Trump traveled to China for a summit with that countryโ€™s leader, Xi Jinping this week.

            Read the full statement from the White House:

            President Donald J. Trump will visit Walter Reed National Military Medical Center on May 26 for his annual dental and medical evaluations, and to visit with the men and women of the military. This will include the Presidentโ€™s routine annual dental and medical assessments as part of his regular preventive health care. The President will also spend time with service members and staff at Walter Reed in recognition of their service, professionalism, and dedication to the nation. Additional details regarding the Presidentโ€™s schedule will be released at a later date.

            In March, the White House doctor said the president was taking a prescription โ€œpreventative skin treatmentโ€ to treat irritation on his neck. 

            Last July, the White House said Trump had been diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency, a common condition tied to swelling in the legs, but that doctors had otherwise found the president to be in โ€œexcellent health.โ€

            Pam Bondi Fires Jeffrey Epstein Prosecutor

            1

            On Wednesday, Attorney General Pam Bondi firedย Maurene Comey, a prosecutor with the Southern District of New York who had prosecuted deceased financier and child sex traffickerย Jeffrey Epsteinย andย Ghislaine Maxwell.

            Comey, a senior trial counsel, is the daughter of former FBI Directorย James Comey, whom Trump fired in 2017.

            โ€œThe reason for her firing was not immediately clear. She did not immediately respond to phone calls and an email seeking comment,โ€ Politico said. โ€œComey, who had worked in the U.S. attorneyโ€™s office for nearly a decade, prosecuted both Jeffrey Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell.โ€

            Maurene Comey worked at the SDNY for almost a decade.

            Maurene Comeyโ€™s termination at the DOJ comes amid an investigation into her father, who posted an image of seashells on a beach arranged to sayย  โ€œ86 47.โ€ Though โ€œ86โ€ is restaurant industry lingo for refusing service to a patron or kicking them out of an establishment, many conservatives insisted Comey was calling for the presidentโ€™s death. Last week, The New York Times reported that the Secret Service hadย trackedย the former FBI director after the incident.

            The Justice Department last week released a memo concluding there was no evidence suggesting the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender kept a โ€œclient listโ€ to blackmail high-profile individuals. The memo also found no evidence to suggest foul play in Epsteinโ€™s death, which had previously been ruled a suicide.

            The memo spurred fierce backlash from many Trump supporters, who had long called on the government to release material on Epstein that they argue would expose wrongdoing at the highest level of elite circles.

            Trump has brushed aside calls to reveal more information about the Epstein case and has shown increasing frustration when asked about it over the past week.

            โ€œYou mentioned past supporters when you were talking about the Epstein issue. Does that mean that youโ€™re effectively disowning any supporters who are now callingโ€”โ€ a reporter asked Trump in the Oval Office on Tuesday.

            Trump cut off the question and added, โ€œIโ€™ve lost a lot of faith in certain people, yeah, Iโ€™ve lost. Because they got duped by the Democrats.โ€

            In a lengthy social media post, which included references to the presidentโ€™s previous claims about the 2017 Russian election interference probe, Trump blamed Democrats for creating what he called a โ€œscamโ€ and โ€œhoax.โ€

            โ€œScams and Hoaxes are all the Democrats are good at โ€“ Itโ€™s all they have โ€“ They are no good at governing, no good at policy, and no good at picking winning candidates,โ€ Trump said. He added, โ€œTheir new SCAM is what we will forever call the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax, and my PAST supporters have bought into this โ€˜bullshit,โ€™ hook, line, and sinker. They havenโ€™t learned their lesson, and probably never will, even after being conned by the Lunatic Left for 8 long years.โ€