Featured

Home Featured
Featured posts

Did Fauci Lie To Congress? New Investigation May Reveal The Truth.

1
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony S. Fauci. Photo Credit: Fogarty International Center from Bethesda, MD, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

In the wake of revelations that the former Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Dr. Anthony Fauci may have knowingly lied to Congress in sworn testimony, U.S. Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is asking the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation.

Paul has asked U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C., Matthew Graves to open an investigation into testimony Fauci made to the United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) on May 11, 2021, in which Fauci denied funding research at viral laboratory in China where the COVID-19 virus reportedly originated.

โ€œThe NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology,โ€ Fauci said under oath in May.

But a month later a June 14, 2023,  Government Accountability Office report concluded the Wuhan Institute of Virology did receieve NIH funding.

There are concerns the COVID-19 virus โ€œmay have been genetically engineered because gain-of-function research was taking place in Wuhan before the pandemic,โ€ Paul reports.

Now Paul wants to determine if Fauciโ€™s statements were illegal.

โ€œI warned Dr. Fauci of the criminal implications of lying to Congress and offered him an opportunity to recant his previous statement,โ€ Paul wrote in a letter to Graves. โ€œDr. Fauciโ€™s testimony is inconsistent with facts that have since come to light.โ€

โ€œBefore Congress, Dr. Fauci denied funding gain-of-function research, to the press he claims to have a dispassionate view on the lab leak hypothesis, and in private he acknowledges gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology to his colleagues. His own colleagues have acknowledged Dr. Fauciโ€™s inconsistency. A congressional hearing, however, is not the place for a public servant to play political games โ€“ especially when the health and well-being of American citizens is on the line,โ€ Paul writes.

Under 18 U.S.C. ยง 1001 it is a federal crime to make โ€œany materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representationโ€ as part of โ€œany investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.โ€

The penalty for an offense includes criminal fines and imprisonment of up to five years.

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of Great America News Desk. It was first published in American Liberty News.

READ NEXT: Ukrainian Special Forces Reportedly โ€˜Pinned Downโ€™ During Night Raid In Crimea By Security Guard In Underwear

Rosie O’Donnell Asks For Prayers As Daughter Chelsea Faces ‘Scary Future’ In Prison

3
By David Shankbone - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3937757

TV personality Rosie Oโ€™Donnell is appealing for prayers as her daughter Chelsea faces what she calls a โ€œscary future.โ€

Oโ€™Donnell posted on Instagram: โ€œMy child Chelsea Belle โ€“ before addiction took over her life โ€“ I loved her then, I love her now as she faces a scary future โ€“ prayers welcomed. #addiction awareness #love #family.โ€

According to court documents reviewed by Fox News Digital, Chelsea had her probation revoked on October 22 and was sentenced to serve time in prison.

In a written statement, Oโ€™Donnell said, โ€œI have compassion for those struggling with addiction โ€” Chelsea was born into addiction and it has been a painful journey for her and her four young children. We continue to love and support her through these horrible times. Prayers welcomed.โ€

Last year, authorities charged Chelsea with two counts of felony possession of methamphetamine and felony possession of narcotic drugs, along with two counts of possession/illegally obtaining prescription drugs and resisting or obstructing an officer. Her arrest followed a traffic stop in Niagara, Wisconsin, where officers pulled over a vehicle for loud exhaust โ€” they recovered a clear smoking device on Chelseaโ€™s person that tested positive for methamphetamine, and a prescription pill bottle containing a handful of pills and a crystal-like substance was found in her possession. At the time, Chelsea was out on bond for separate charges including child neglect and drug possession.

Oโ€™Donnellโ€™s Instagram post on December 3 responding to Chelseaโ€™s earlier arrest read: โ€œSo yes this is true โ€“ after being bailed out by her birth mother โ€“ Chelsea was arrested again โ€“ and is facing many charges related to her drug addiction โ€“ we all hope she is able to get the help she needs to turn her life around.โ€


Bring in the Trump context

Itโ€™s worth noting that Rosie Oโ€™Donnell has for years been a vocal critic of Donald Trump, and the public feud between them has become almost legendary. Back in December 2006, while hosting the daytime talk show The View, Oโ€™Donnell called Trump out over his handling of the Miss USA controversy and mocked him as no moral authority for young people โ€” saying, โ€œThis is not a self-made manโ€ฆ left the first wife, had an affair, left the second wife, had an affairโ€ฆโ€ People.com+2The List+2

Trump responded with scorn, calling Oโ€™Donnell โ€œa woman out of controlโ€ and a โ€œloser,โ€ threatening legal action though he never followed through. People.com+1 Over the years he repeatedly used her name as a punchline โ€” during the 2016 Republican primary debate when asked about his language toward women he quipped, โ€œOnly Rosie Oโ€™Donnell.โ€ The New Daily+1

In recent years their feud escalated further: After Oโ€™Donnell announced she had moved to Ireland following Trumpโ€™s second inauguration (January 2025), Trump publicly floated the idea of revoking her U.S. citizenship, calling her โ€œa Threat to Humanityโ€ and saying โ€œshe should remain in the wonderful country of Ireland, if they want her.โ€

Trump Says US Attempting Re-secure Bagram Airbase From Taliban

0

President Donald Trump said Thursday he is seeking to reclaim control of Afghanistan’s Bagram Airfield, calling it a “little breaking news” and linking the move to U.S. leverage over China.

“We gave it to them for nothing,” Trump said, repeating a campaign message on the Biden-era unconditional withdrawal from Afghanistan, during a joint news conference with U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

“We’re trying to get it back, by the way. OK, that could be a little breaking news. We’re trying to get it back because they need things from us.

“We want that base back. But one of the reasons we want the base is, as you know, it’s an hour away from where China makes its nuclear weapons.

“So a lot of things are happening.”

While Trump did not mention specifics, the Taliban-controlled Afghanistan might seek U.S. concessions in exchange for returning control of Bagram. Potential demands could include increased foreign aid, economic investment, access to military or intelligence support, or diplomatic recognition.

The historic Soviet-built airstrip was the main base for American forces in Afghanistan following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks up until their 2021 withdrawal led to an immediate takeover by the Islamist Taliban movement.

Trump has long lamented the handover of Bagram Airfield because of its proximity to China. The Taliban leadership has rejected past Trump claims that China is moving in on taking Bagram as an important military air superiority hub in the region.

“They should refrain from making emotional statements based on unsubstantiated information,” Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said in March when asked for a response to Trump’s claims that China currently controls the air base, according to Voice of America.

“Bagram is controlled by the Islamic Emirate [Taliban regime], not China. Chinese troops are not present here, nor do we have any such pact with any country.”

Supreme Court Justices Targets of Assassination by Left-wing Abortion Extremists: Alito

    3
    Duncan Lock, Dflock, CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

    ANALYSIS โ€“ย Following the first-ever leak of a pendingย Supreme Courtย decision, left-wingย abortionย extremists have threatened the lives of the conservative justices.

    First by calling for violence and posting their personal details online, then by having daily aggressive protests at their homes.

    The threats even extended to their families and children.

    There was also a specific assassination attempt against Justiceย Brett Kavanaughย in June when an armed man,ย Nicholas John Roske, 26,ย traveled across the country to Justice Kavanaughโ€™s home to kill him.

    In that case, the U.S. Marshalsย discoveredย Roske had a โ€œblack tactical chest rig and tactical knife,โ€ a pistol with two magazines and ammunition, pepper spray, zip ties, a hammer, a screwdriver, a nail punch, a crowbar, a pistol light and duct tape, in addition to other items, according to the affidavit.ย 

    The affidavit noted that his plan was to break into the house, kill the justice and then kill himself.

    And the threats to the court continue.

    These events are unprecedented in the history of the Supreme Court and have been dutifully ignored by the establishment media,ย Joe Bidenย and the Democrats.

    In aย letterย to Bidenโ€™s Attorney Generalย Merrick Garland, attorneys general from 19 states write, โ€œcharities that support pregnant mothers in need have been firebombed and pro-life organizations have been attacked almost daily and terrorized.โ€

    They then urge him to investigate the barrage of threats and attacks made against pro-life judges and pro-life organizations.

    Instead, the left focus endlessly on how conservatives are โ€˜extremistsโ€™ and a danger to democracy.

    They also blather endlessly about MAGA โ€˜election deniersโ€™ while ignoring all those on the left who now deny the legitimacy of the Supreme Court.

    So, as we near the critical midterm election, it is time to remind voters of who the dangerous violent extremists really are.

    As Newsmax reported:

    Supreme Court Justiceย Samuel Alitoย said this week that the leaking of a draft decision to overturnย Roe v. Wadeย put the lives of him and his fellow justices at risk.

    โ€œIt was a grave betrayal of trust by somebody,โ€ Alito said at a public interview with the Heritage Foundation on Tuesday, according toย The New York Times. โ€œIt was a shock, because nothing like that had happened in the past. It certainly changed the atmosphere at the court for the remainder of last term.โ€

    He went on to say, โ€œThe leak also made those of us who were thought to be in the majority in support of overruling Roe and Casey targets for assassination because it gave people a rational reason to think they could prevent that from happening by killing one of us.โ€

    Alito also hit out at those who question the courtโ€™s legitimacy following the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

    โ€œEverybody in this country is free to disagree with our decisions,โ€ he said. โ€œEverybody is free to criticize our reasoning, and in strong terms. And that certainly is done in the media, in writings of law professors and on social media.โ€

    โ€œBut to say the court is exhibiting lack of integrity is something quite different,โ€ he added. โ€œThat goes to character.โ€

    Justice Alito authored the draft and final opinion that reversed the poorly reasoned Roe v. Wade decision that created a non-existing constitutional right to abortion.

    He is part of the 6-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court.

    So, whenever the left screams about โ€˜violentย right-wing extremists,โ€™ or โ€˜election deniersโ€™ being a threat to democracy, remind them of the left-wing violence against pro-life centers and churches, the assassination attempt against a conservative Supreme Court Justice and all thoseย who now deny the legitimacy of our nationโ€™s highest court.ย 

    Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of Great America News Desk.

    Trump To Pardon Pro-Life Activists Prosecuted Under FACE Act

      0
      Washington D.C., USA - January 22, 2015; A Pro-Life woman clashes with a group of Pro-Choice demonstrators at the U.S. Supreme Court.

      President Donald Trump has signaled that he plans to pardon pro-life activists who were convicted under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act during the Biden administration, according to a report from The Daily Wire. The move is expected to provide immediate relief to individuals who have faced significant prison sentences for their involvement in anti-abortion protests.

      Understanding the FACE Act

      Enacted in 1994, the FACE Act is a federal law designed to protect access to reproductive health services, including abortions. It prohibits the use of force, threats or physical obstruction to interfere with individuals seeking or providing such services.

      Violations of the FACE Act carry severe penalties, ranging from fines to imprisonment, depending on the circumstances and whether the offender has a prior record. While the lawโ€™s primary intent is to safeguard access to clinics, it has also been applied to prosecute pro-life activists accused of obstructing clinic entrances or engaging in threatening behavior.

      Controversial Applications and High-Profile Cases

      Over the years, the FACE Act has sparked significant controversy, with critics arguing that it disproportionately targets pro-life advocates. They claim the law infringes on First Amendment rights, penalizing peaceful protests rooted in religious or ideological beliefs.

      – Advertisement –

      One high-profile example involved Mark Houck, a Catholic pro-life advocate charged under the FACE Act in 2022. Houckโ€™s case stemmed from an altercation with a Planned Parenthood volunteer, which he passionately argued was an act of self-defense. A jury later acquitted him, but the case became a rallying point for pro-life groups, who argued it exemplified federal overreach and selective enforcement.

      Critics of the FACE Act also highlight what they perceive as inconsistent enforcement. While the law has been rigorously applied to defend the pro-choice movement, pro-life advocates claim that incidents involving vandalism or harassment at pregnancy resource centers and churches are often overlooked.

      Who Is Being Pardoned?

      If the pardons move forward, several pro-life activists currently in prison will see immediate relief. Among those expected to be pardoned are:

      -Lauren Handy: 57 months

      -John Hinshaw: 21 months

      – Advertisement –

      -Jonathan Darnell: 34 months

      -Herb Geraghty: 27 months

      -Jean Marshall: 24 months

      -Joan Bell: 27 months

      – Advertisement –

      -Paulette Harlow: 24 months

      -Bevelyn Williams: 41 months

      -Heather Idoni: 24 months

      -Calvin Zastro: 6 months

      These individuals were convicted for participating in demonstrations at abortion clinics in Tennessee, Washington, D.C. and New York, which prosecutors argued constituted violations of the FACE Act:

      The D.C. protest involved a group of pro-life protesters singing songs, praying, locking arms in front of the facilityโ€™s staff entrance, and attaching themselves with ropes and chains to block doors inside the infamous Surgi-Clinic in October 2020, a late term abortion facility. In Tennessee, a group of pro-life Christians gathered in a hall outside the Carafem Health Center in Mt. Juliet where they sang hymns, prayed, and urged women not to get abortion in March 2021.

      Many of the defendants have already been imprisoned for over a year with many more months yet to serve.

      โ€œI would love to be home with my family,โ€ 59-year-old Heather Idoni said in September. โ€œI would love to hold my new grandson.โ€

      Idoni was sentenced to two years in prison over the D.C. protest and was given another eight months to serve concurrently from the Nashville protest.

      Broader Implications

      Trumpโ€™s decision to pardon these activists underscores a sharp divide in how federal laws like the FACE Act are interpreted and enforced. For pro-life advocates, the move represents a correction to what they view as unjust and politically motivated prosecutions. For others, it raises questions about the balance between protecting access to health care and safeguarding free speech rights.

      Amanda Head: Meet the Woman Dismantling the Child Gender Ideology Movement

        2

        It’s time to fight back.

        Unhinged liberals refuse to consider the detrimental side effects for children who undergo irreversible gender transition surgeries and medications.

        Watch Amanda below:

        Judge Grants Trump Permission To Attend Son’s Graduation

          1
          Photo via Gage Skidmore Flickr

          Former President Donald Trump will be able to attend his son Barron’s high school graduation in May, according to Judge Juan Merchan.

          Merchan, who is presiding over the New York hush Money trial, said Tuesday that Trump would be permitted to attend the May 17 ceremony in lieu of court proceedings. The judge had previously delayed his decision earlier this month on whether Trump would be able to attend the graduation.

          The Hill has more:

          Trump had previously railed against Merchan for delaying the decision, slamming the judge for potentially barring him from attending the event. Under New York state law, Trump is required to attend the entirety of his trial unless he gets special permission from the judge to skip.

          โ€œI was looking forward to that graduation with his mother and father there,โ€ Trump told reporters at the time. โ€œIt looks like the judge isnโ€™t going to allow me to escape this scam. Itโ€™s a scam trial.โ€

          Other Republicans and Trump allies also criticized Merchan after he delayed the decision. Another of Trumpโ€™s sons, Eric Trump, said earlier this month that the judge โ€œis truly heartless in not letting a father attend his sonโ€™s graduation.โ€


          Trump is being charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records to make alleged hush money payments to porn actress Stormy Daniels.

          On Tuesday, Judge Merchan also fined the former President nearly $10,000 for repeatedly violating the gag order barring him from targeting witnesses, prosecutors, court staff, and the judgeโ€™s family.

          Trump Slams Fox News For Hosting โ€˜Lunaticโ€™ RFK Jr.

            1
            Image via Gage Skidmore Flickr

            Former Presidentย Donald Trumpย harshly criticizedย Robert F. Kennedy Jr.ย andย Fox Newsย afterย Jesse Wattersย interviewed Kennedy on Wednesday evening.

            โ€œSo bad that FoxNews [sic] puts RFK Jr., considered the dumbest member of the Kennedy Clan, on their fairly conservative platform so much. Competitive networks don’t want anything to do with him. He’s a Radical Left Lunatic whose crazyย Climate Changeย views make the Democrat’s Green New Scam look Conservative. He’s polling badly, 8% at best, but says he does well against Crooked Joe and me, one on one. WRONG, he gets trounced!โ€ Trump posted onย Truth Social.

            โ€œJunior said I’m the โ€˜best debater’ in generations, and I want to debate him, and Crooked, but first he’s got to get his bad poll numbers up โ€“ a lot! He would be โ€˜easy pickins,’โ€ Trump boasted.

            โ€œWith all of that said, he probably hurts Sleepy Crooked Joe more than โ€˜US!’โ€

            A recent survey from Emerson College suggests that Kennedy’s presence has benefited Trump’s campaign and harmed Biden’s, eroding the latter’s support in several crucial swing states.

            Nevertheless, Trump and his supporters have increased their criticism of Kennedy’s campaign, indicating concerns on both sides about his impact.

            Trump posted repeatedly about Kennedy on Truth Social following his appearance on โ€œReal Time With Bill Maherโ€ on HBO.

            The former president accused Kennedy of being a โ€œplantโ€ to help Biden win reelection and claimed that voting for him would be a โ€œWASTED PROTEST VOTE,โ€ which could โ€œswing either way.โ€

            Article Published With The Permission of American Liberty News.

            Far-left Democrat Slammed For Inciting Violence Against Prominent GOP Senator

            5
            Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America,

            Progressive Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) is being slammed online as “unhinged” for using violent rhetoric implying that Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, “has to be knocked over the head, like hard.”

            Cruz responded to the controversy simply by posting a meme to X. 

            In response to a question about how Democrats can win elections specifically in the red state of Texas, Crockett said, “I think that you punch, I think you punch, I think you OK with punching.”

            “Itโ€™s Ted Cruz,” she went on. “I mean, like this dude has to be knocked over the head, like hard, right? Like there is no niceties with him, like at all. Like you go clean off on him.”

            Responding to the clip, the White Houseโ€™s “rapid response” X account, called Crockett “another unhinged Democrat inciting violence.”

            Crockett was recently warned by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to “tread very carefully” after calling for Elon Musk to be “taken down.”

            Popular conservative account “Libs of TikTok” also chimed in, calling for Crockett to be investigated.

            “Rep Jasmine Crockett: I am totally against violence! Rep Jasmine Crockett on the same day: Knock Ted Cruz over the head and punch your opponents,” the account said, adding, “The Democratic Party is the party of violence and hypocrisy.”

            Cruz responded to Libs of TikTokโ€™s post about Crockett claiming to be against violence with a meme that read: “You keep using that wordโ€ฆ I do not think it means what you think it means.”  

            Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) commented: “Pro tip: donโ€™t say things like this, whether youโ€™re in Congress or not.”

            Crockett came under fire last week as well for saying during a “Tesla Takedown” online call that, “all I want to see happen on my birthday is for Elon to be taken down.”

            “I have learned, as I serve on the DOGE Oversight committee, that there is only one language that the people that are in charge understand right now, and that language is money,” she said.

            Crockett has said that her calls to action are “nonviolent” and are about figuratively “fighting” for democracy.

            Wall Street Journal Board Urges Potential Trump Impeachment

            2
            Image via Gage Skidmore Flickr

            Yikes…

            In a column published late Friday, a member of theย Wall Street Journalย editorial board claimed it would be “desirable” to subjectย Donald Trumpย to a third impeachment.

            According to longtime columnist Holman W. Jenkins Jr., Trump’s on-again, off-again tariff threats almost makes it appear he wants to be impeached, with Jenkins writing, “A future Trump impeachment seemed all but guaranteed by last Wednesday morning. It seems only slightly less likely now. It may even be desirable to restore Americaโ€™s standing with creditors and trade partners.”

            Read more from the report:

            As he sees it, the president’s last great achievement was being re-elected in 2024, and the damage he has been creating since then belies his promise of a “golden age,” so an impeachment is “already ion the cards.”

            “No consensus or even significant coalition exists for trying to force into existence a new American ‘golden age’ with tariffs, which anyway is like asking a chicken to give birth to a lioness. He invented this mission out of his own confused intuition,” he accused.

            Noting that conservative historian Niall Ferguson labeled Trump’s trade policy going “full retard,” he contributed, “I go with ‘neurotic’ for the wordโ€™s wider applicability to any leader who, lacking a clear bead on his times, fabricates a gratuitously ambitious mission to meet his misguided sense of importance.”

            “Nobody in Mr. Trumpโ€™s orbit actually shares his belief in the magical efficacy of tariffs because it makes sense only in a world that doesnโ€™t exist, where other countries donโ€™t retaliate,” he pointed out before concluding, “The founders never anticipated todayโ€™s instantly responsive trillion-dollar financial markets. And yet these markets neatly adumbrate the foundersโ€™ scheme of checks and balances, also known as feedback. Mr. Trump, still sane enough to appreciate whatโ€™s good for Mr. Trump, listened this week to their feedback.”

            President Donald Trump vowed on Sunday that nobody was getting “off the hook” for unfair trade balances and tariff barriers, which other countries have used against the U.S.

            The Trump administration announced Friday that it was exempting imported smartphones, laptops and other electronics from reciprocal tariffs, but the president wanted to clear a few things up.

            “There was no Tariff โ€˜exceptionโ€™ announced on Friday,” Trump said in a post on X on Sunday. “These products are subject to the existing 20% Fentanyl Tariffs, and they are just moving to a different Tariff ‘bucket.โ€™  The Fake News knows this, but refuses to report it. We are taking a look at Semiconductors and the WHOLE ELECTRONICS SUPPLY CHAIN in the upcoming National Security Tariff Investigations.

            Customs and Border Protection issued new guidance on reciprocal tariff negotiations late Friday, noting the exemption of those goods from Trumpโ€™s April 2 executive order that declared a national emergency due to non-reciprocalย trade practicesย and structural imbalances in the global trading system. Subsequent executive orders ramped up tariffs on China to 125%.

            The updated guidance, which cites a presidential memorandum issued Friday, excluded the products from Trumpโ€™s 125%ย China tariffย and his baseline 10% global tariff on some countries. They apply to goods that left a warehouse as of April 5.

            Products included in the exemption are things like hard drives, computer processors, solar cells, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, flat-panel TV displays and memory chips.

            But in light of the easing of tariffs on electronics, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Sunday the exemption would be temporary.

            “Theyโ€™re exempt from the reciprocal tariffs, but theyโ€™re included in the semiconductor tariffs, which are coming in probably a month or two,” Lutnick told ABCโ€™s “This Week” on Sunday.

            Lutnickโ€™s comments Sunday made clear that more changes were on the horizon.