Featured

Home Featured
Featured posts

Stunner: Documents Many Prove Top CIA Employees Plotted to โ€˜Take Outโ€™ Trump

2
Donald Trump via Gage Skidmore Flickr

A new federal lawsuit may reveal proof two CIA employees discussed a plot to โ€œget rid ofโ€ and โ€œtake outโ€ President Donald Trump.

The non-profit public interest law firm Judicial Watch announced they filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Defense Department for โ€œreports submitted by a military officer to his superiors regarding an alleged conversation around January 2017 between CIA analysts Eric Ciaramella and Sean Misko about trying to โ€˜get ridโ€™ of then-President Trump.โ€

โ€œThe intelligence community targeted Trump for removal for daring to question Biden family corruption and election interference tied to Ukraine and Burisma,โ€ Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. โ€œThe Biden Defense Departmentโ€™s sitting for over a year on a simple FOIA request on the Deep State targeting of Trump is a cover-up plain and simple.โ€

In 2022 Real Clear Investigations reported:

Barely two weeks after Donald Trump took office, Eric Ciaramella โ€“ the CIA analyst whose name was recently linked in a tweet by the president and mentioned by lawmakers as the anonymous โ€œwhistleblowerโ€ who touched off Trumpโ€™s impeachment โ€“ was overheard in the White House discussing with another staffer how to remove the newly elected president from office, according to former colleagues.

Sources told RealClearInvestigations the staffer with whom Ciaramella was speaking was Sean Misko. Both were Obama administration holdovers working in the Trump White House on foreign policy and national security issuesโ€ฆ

At a meeting of National Security Council employees two weeks into the Trump administration, the unidentified military staffer, who was seated directly in front of Ciaramella and Misko, confirmed hearing them talk about toppling Trump.

โ€œAfter Flynn briefed [the staff] about what โ€˜America Firstโ€™ foreign policy means, Ciaramella turned to Misko and commented, โ€˜We need to take him out,โ€™ โ€ the staffer recalled. โ€œAnd Misko replied, โ€˜Yeah, we need to do everything we can to take out the president.โ€™โ€

Added the military detailee, who spoke on condition of anonymity: โ€œBy โ€˜taking him out,โ€™ they meant removing him from office by any means necessaryโ€ฆโ€

Alarmed by their conversation, the military staffer immediately reported what he heard to his superiors.

โ€œIt was so shocking that they were so blatant and outspoken about their opinion,โ€ he recalled. โ€œThey werenโ€™t shouting it, but they didnโ€™t seem to feel the need to hide it.โ€

In response, Judicial Watch file the suit after the Defense Department failed to respond to a January 14, 2022, FOIA request for:

Any and all reports submitted by a US military officer assigned to the National Security Council to his superiors relating to a conversation he overheard circa January 2017 at an โ€œall-handsโ€ NSC staff meeting between CIA analysts Eric Ciaramella and Sean Misko regarding trying to โ€œget ridโ€ of then-President Trump, as discussed in a January 22, 2020 Real Clear Investigations article available at this link.

Any and all records relating to any investigations conducted by the Department of Defense and/or its sub-agencies and departments into the alleged conversation between Misko and Ciaramella referenced above, including but not limited to investigative reports and witness statements.

All emails and communications sent to and from members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff regarding the alleged conversation between Misko and Ciaramella and any related investigations.

Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of Great America News Desk.

Bill Oโ€™Reilly Flips Out When Host Says Trump โ€˜Backing Downโ€™ After Shooting

0

Veteran broadcaster Bill Oโ€™Reilly forcefully pushed back Monday night against claims that President Donald Trump is โ€œbacking downโ€ following violent unrest in Minneapolis after a Border Patrolโ€“involved shooting that sparked protests and national controversy.

The confrontation unfolded during NewsNationโ€™s On Balance with Leland Vittert, where Oโ€™Reilly accused the host of adopting left-wing media framing by suggesting Trump had retreated under political pressure.

The unrest began Saturday after Border Patrol agents shot Alex Pretti during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis. As video of the incident circulated online, activist groups and Democratic officials immediately accused federal authorities of misconduct, triggering protests that quickly escalated into disorder.

As is often the case in fast-moving, emotionally charged incidents, early claims about the shooting were disputed. Trump administration officials initially described Pretti as a dangerous suspect, while critics accused the government of spreading false narratives. Multiple videos later emerged that fueled further debate over what exactly occurred.

President Trump responded first with a blunt social media statement condemning lawlessness, defending federal officers, and criticizing Democratic leadership in Minnesota for what he has long argued is a refusal to enforce federal immigration law. As tensions grew, Trump administration officialsโ€”including Border Czar Tom Homanโ€”shifted toward de-escalation, engaging with local leaders to restore order.

That shift became the flashpoint of the exchange between Oโ€™Reilly and Vittert.

During the interview, Vittert referenced Oโ€™Reillyโ€™s recent commentary criticizing Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, drawing a historical comparison that sparked sharp disagreement:

LELAND VITTERT: You write โ€œWho is the modern John C. Calhoun,โ€ about Walz, โ€œa despicable South Carolina senator who actually wanted the Civil War to happen.โ€

Do you think Walz wants the Civil War to happen and therefore should be arrested as though he was a southern governor or something in the early or late 1850s?

Oโ€™Reilly responded by arguing that state officials who openly defy federal law should face scrutiny under existing statutes:

BILL Oโ€™REILLY: I think there is evidence that should be examined, and you might be able to charge Walz with insurrection under the, if you want me to read it to you, I got it right here. It fits Walz to a tee.

Pressed on whether such action would be good for the country, Oโ€™Reilly emphasized order and de-escalationโ€”values long central to conservative governance:

LELAND VITTERT: Would that be good for America?

BILL Oโ€™REILLY: I donโ€™t care. Look, anarchy is the worst thing that could happen, the worst. Right now, in this present moment, de-escalation is the best thing that can happen. So Homan meeting with Frey has my 100% endorsement. Walz calling Trump, vice versa, 100%.

Oโ€™Reilly argued that cooperation does not mean capitulationโ€”and that enforcing federal law remains non-negotiable:

BILL Oโ€™REILLY: But that doesnโ€™t excuse what has happened and is happening, which is a rebellion against the United States law passed by Congress, by a state under the governance of Walz and a city where Frey runs.

If you continue, and I say you in a general sense, to allow states and cities to not enforce federal law, you donโ€™t have a country. It goes! Okay? Everybody should understand.

The interview reached its most heated moment when Vittert suggested Trump was โ€œbacking downโ€ in response to public pressure:

LELAND VITTERT: So then why is Trump backing down?

Oโ€™Reilly erupted at the framing, accusing the host of echoing legacy media talking points:

BILL Oโ€™REILLY: Now hereโ€™s the second part of the story. Heโ€™s not backing down! Heโ€™s trying to defuse. Why would you say he was backing down?! Do you want a CNN contract?!

Heโ€™s backing down! Heโ€™s defusing the way he should!

Trump Says Democrats Will ‘Find Something’ To Impeach Him If Midterms Go Sideways

0
Photo via Gage Skidmore Flickr

President Donald Trump warned Tuesday that Democrats would waste no time pursuing impeachment if they manage to retake the House of Representatives in November, arguing that their opposition is driven more by hostility than policy disagreements.

โ€œTheyโ€™ll find something. Thereโ€™ll be something,โ€ Trump said during an exclusive interview on โ€œThe Will Cain Show.โ€

โ€œI made the wrong turn at an exit, and letโ€™s impeach him. They did that before. They impeached me on a perfect phone call, turned out. They impeached me twice and, by the way, I won the impeachments very easily and quickly, but they impeach. Theyโ€™re very nasty people [and] they have bad policy.โ€

Trumpโ€™s comments reflect long-standing frustration among Republicans with what they view as Democratsโ€™ reliance on investigations and impeachment rather than legislative solutions. During his first term, Trump became the only president in U.S. history to be impeached twiceโ€”once over a phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and later over events surrounding January 6. In both cases, the Senate declined to convict, outcomes Trump and his supporters cite as vindication.

The president joined Will Cain live from Iowa, where he kicked off a push toward the 2026 midterm elections. The visit included interactions with voters and culminated in a campaign-style event in Clive, underscoring the administrationโ€™s early focus on maintaining Republican momentum and defending narrow congressional margins.

Republicans currently hold a razor-thin majority in the House of Representatives, with 218 seats to Democratsโ€™ 213. That slim advantage has heightened concerns within the GOP about historical trends that tend to favor the out-of-power party during midterm elections.

History suggests Trump and Republicans face an uphill battle heading into November. Since the 1930s, midterm elections have almost always resulted in the presidentโ€™s party losing House seatsโ€”and frequently losing control of the chamber altogether. Political analysts often attribute the pattern to voter complacency among the presidentโ€™s supporters and heightened motivation among the opposition.

Trump acknowledged that reality while speaking to Cain.

โ€œWhether itโ€™s Republican or Democrat, when they win, it doesnโ€™t make any difference. They seem to lose the midterms, so thatโ€™s the only thing I worry about,โ€ he said.

โ€œMaybe they [voters] want to put up a guard fence. You just donโ€™t know. It doesnโ€™t make sense. Even if a president did well, they seemed to lose the midterms, but hopefully weโ€™re going to change that around.โ€

Republicans argue that the stakes of the upcoming midterms are especially high, pointing to Democratic calls for renewed investigations, aggressive regulatory policies, and expanded government spending. Trumpโ€™s message to voters in Iowa centered on the need for unified Republican turnout to prevent what he described as partisan gridlock and politically motivated impeachment efforts from resurfacing.

Trump Takes Part In Influencing Legal Future

1
Donald Trump via Gage Skidmore Flickr

Former President Donald Trump is scheduled for a probation interview Monday, a standard part of the sentencing process for those convicted in New York state court.

The interview, aimed at influencing his upcoming sentencing in July, will take place later today.

NBC News has more on the virtual hearing:

The pre-sentencing probation interview will be done over a special virtual network with added security measures, and the interviewer will be a female, according to two sources with knowledge of the situation. The call is not expected to be held over Zoom, those sources added.

Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, was convicted last month on all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the historic case. The probation interview is required by the court as part of the former presidentโ€™s pre-sentencing report.

Judge Juan Merchan, who is presiding over the hush money case, permitted Blanche to be present for the probation interview after prosecutors did not object. The Trump defense team is scheduled to submit their sentencing recommendation on June 13.

The former president is scheduled to be sentenced for all 34 felony counts in New York on July 11, days before the Republican National Convention begins.

Trump will conduct the interview from Mar-a-Lago in Florida with Blanche by his side.

The probation officer will record Trumpโ€™s lack of criminal history, employment record, current financial status, and observations regarding his “physical and mental condition,” all of which Merchan will consider in his sentencing.

READ NEXT: US Olympic Teamโ€™s Colossal Mistake โ€“ Huge Star Snubbed For Idiotic Reasonโ€ฆ

Vice President Biden Flew Son Hunter On Air Force Two To Close Foreign Business Deals

3
President Joe Biden hugs his family during the 59th Presidential Inauguration ceremony in Washington, Jan. 20, 2021. President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris took the oath of office on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol. (DOD Photo by Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Carlos M. Vazquez II)

ANALYSIS โ€“ Even as the world obsesses over Donald Trumpโ€™s latest legal dangers, the walls are slowly closing in on the Biden crime family. And I donโ€™t use the phrase โ€˜crime familyโ€™ often.

But itโ€™s becoming increasingly clear that Joe Biden used his time as Vice President as a golden opportunity to unlawfully enrich his entire family, often flying his son Hunter on Air Force Two abroad to seal deals.

In one well-known instance, VP Biden leveraged a billion dollars in U.S. aid to fire the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating the energy firm that employed Hunter.

In their ongoing investigation into alleged influence peddling involving Biden, members of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee have asked the National Archives and Records Administration for unrestricted access to Bidenโ€™s travel aboard the vice-presidential jet, known as Air Force Two, and the VPโ€™s official helicopter, known as Marine Two.

They want to determine whether the trips aided his son Hunterโ€™s shady foreign business deals.

House GOP investigators believe Biden, while vice president under Barack Obama, used his power and influence to help his family and a group of associates with foreign business deals involving China, Russia, Ukraine and other countries, worth tens of millions of dollars.

And there is more evidence to back up their beliefs. Last month, Devon Archer, Hunterโ€™s former business partner, told House investigators the foreign deals were secured by selling the Biden โ€œbrand,โ€ essentially, Joe Bidenโ€™s position as vice president of the United States.

โ€œThen-Vice President Joe Biden abused Air Force Two by allowing his son to jet set around the world to sell โ€˜The Brandโ€™ to enrich the Biden family,โ€ said House Oversight Chairman James Comer.

โ€œThis is yet another example of then-Vice President Biden abusing his public office for his familyโ€™s financial gain.โ€

More specifically, the Washington Times reported that:

Lawmakers on the Oversight panel said the presidentโ€™s son Hunter Biden may have traveled to 15 countries with his father while he was vice president and that during that time, Mr. Biden met in Beijing with his sonโ€™s business associate, a Chinese national, while he was on official business.

โ€œThen Vice-President Bidenโ€™s misuse of Air Force Two and Marine Two is indicative of yet another way in which the President has abused his various offices of public trust and wasted taxpayer money to benefit his familyโ€™s enterprise, which consisted of nothing more than access to Joe Biden himself,โ€ Oversight lawmakers wrote to U.S. Archivist Colleen Shogan.

House investigators also believe Biden used numerous aliases to hide his participation in his son’s shady deals. The Times added:

โ€ฆComer also is seeking more than 5,000 White House emails that used aliases for then-Vice President Joseph R. Biden. The National Archives said it is awaiting approval from Mr. Biden and former President Barack Obama before handing them over to Mr. Comer, according to an aide to Mr. Comer.

White House records show that Mr. Biden used the name Robert L. Peters while serving as vice president. Mr. Biden also disguised his name on emails using the pseudonyms Robin Ware and JRB Ware, a play on his middle name and initials paired with his home state of Delaware.

Critically, investigators noted a May 26, 2016, White House scheduling email sent to VP Biden ahead of a call with the Ukrainian president, Petro Poroshenko that was also inexplicably sent to his โ€˜private citizenโ€™ son, Hunter. 

At the same time, the drug-addicted, unqualified Hunter was earning $100,000 a month as a board member of Ukrainian energy firm Burisma Holdings, which was under investigation for corruption.ย The U.S. State Department had said Burisma engaged in bribery.

And in a typical moment of braggadocio, a clueless Biden senior bragged about it. The New York Post reported:

In a 2018 interview at the Council on Foreign Relations, Biden bragged that he unilaterally withheld a billion dollars in US aid from the Ukrainians to force them to fire Prosecutor-General Viktor Shokin.

The Ukrainians balked, but Biden gave them an ultimatum: โ€œI looked at them and said, โ€˜Iโ€™m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, youโ€™re not getting the money.โ€™ Well, son of a bitch. He got fired.โ€

Tough guy, that Biden.

Biden has claimed he demanded Ukraine fire its equivalent of Attorney General because he was corrupt, but weย now know the State Department had found that Ukraine had made great strides in dealing with corruption, and Shokin, specifically, was praised in private correspondence.

The Post added that Devon Archerโ€™s testimony revealed that Burisma executives made the removal of Shokin a top priority and raised it with their hired gun, Hunter.

Archer reportedly described how Burisma officials told Hunter of the importance of neutralizing Shokin, and how โ€œa call to Washingtonโ€ was made in response. The call was of course to Dad.

And thatโ€™s what House investigators are hoping to prove. The Obama-Biden White House call logs, emails, and flight schedules are all part of the mounting evidence against Joe Biden.

Judge Judy Makes Endorsement Ahead Of Iowa Caucus

    3

    On Wednesday, Judge Judith Sheindlin, better known to fans as Judge Judy, announced she is endorsing Nikki Haley for president.

    Fox News first reported the news:

    “I’m proud to endorse Nikki Haley because she is whip smart, has executive credentials and was a superb governor,” Sheindlin said in a statement. “She has international gravitas as Ambassador to the United Nations. She is principled, measured and has that elusive quality of real common sense. I truly think she can restore America and believe she is the future of this great nation.”

    Haley returned the compliment, calling the judge a “no-nonsense lady.”

    “Judge Judy is a no-nonsense lady who has earned the respect of millions of Americans from her courtroom by being thoughtful, fair, and honest. Iโ€™m honored to have her support,”ย Haley said in a press release.ย 

    For 25 years, Sheindlin starred on the beloved show “Judge Judy,” where her witty retorts in the courtroom earned her millions of dedicated fans. Instead of stepping away from television for good, she is now the presiding judge on Amazon Freevee’s “Judy Justice,” which became Freeveeโ€™s No. 1 original show with more than 150 million viewers over the past two years.

    Sheindlin is a graduate of New York Law School, was appointed to the bench in New York City’s Family Court in 1982 and became the Supervising Judge of the Manhattan Court in 1986. 

    JD Vance Accuses Politico of โ€˜Journalistic Malpractice’

    0

    On Friday, Vice President JD Vance took to X to blast what he called โ€œforeign influenceโ€ in a Politico report targeting Steve Witkoff, President Trumpโ€™s special envoy for peace missions and chief negotiator on Ukraine.

    โ€œThis story from Politico is journalistic malpractice,โ€ Vance wrote, tagging Politico correspondent Felicia Schwartz. โ€œBut itโ€™s more than that: itโ€™s a foreign influence operation meant to hurt the administration and one of our most effective members. Notice how all of the people attacking Steve are on background? That means itโ€™s two or three deep staters who are angry that Witkoff has succeeded where theyโ€™ve failed.โ€

    Vance made clear that he sees the article as an attempt not just to smear Witkoff, but to undermine Trumpโ€™s broader foreign policy success in shifting the conversation toward peace in Ukraine.


    What the Politico Story Claimed

    Schwartzโ€™s piece, co-authored with Nahal Toosi and Jack Detsch, framed Witkoff as an inexperienced outsider whose โ€œgo-it-alone styleโ€ frustrates American, Ukrainian, and European officials. According to Schwartz, 13 anonymous sourcesโ€”none of whom were willing to go on the recordโ€”painted Witkoff as someone who views the Ukraine conflict โ€œthrough a real estate lensโ€ and misses diplomatic details.

    Politicoโ€™s reporting emphasized that Witkoff has met with Vladimir Putin five times in six months but claimed those meetings havenโ€™t led to tangible breakthroughs. The piece also alleged Witkoff sometimes appeared โ€œuninformed or unprepared,โ€ citing unnamed U.S. and foreign officials.

    One anonymous voice was quoted as saying, โ€œHis inexperience shines through, he has the presidentโ€™s ear, which is evident, but there has been some confusion about what has been said and agreed.โ€


    What Politico Left Out

    Vance accused Politico of cherry-picking information to fit a predetermined narrative. He said the outlet deliberately left out quotes from him, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and senior advisor Jared Kushnerโ€”each of whom had praised Witkoffโ€™s diplomatic efforts.

    In fact, Vance had told Politico directly: โ€œWitkoff has made more progress towards ending the bloodshed in Ukraine than all his critics combined.โ€ That single line was briefly included, but stripped of context and buried among anonymous complaints.

    According to Schwartz herself, the White House sent Politico a list of officialsโ€™ supportive quotes about Witkoff. Most were left on the cutting room floor.


    The Larger Pattern: Anonymous Sources and Double Standards

    The story is the latest example of the corporate media using anonymous leaks from entrenched bureaucrats to undermine Trump officials. Both Trump and Vance have criticized this practice for years, pointing out that it gives cover to partisan โ€œdeep stateโ€ operatives while denying the American people transparency.

    By contrast, those willing to speak openlyโ€”Vance, Rubio, Kushnerโ€”were ignored or minimized in Politicoโ€™s coverage. The result is a slanted article that elevates anonymous gossip over the testimony of elected leaders and senior officials.


    Why Witkoff Matters

    Steve Witkoff, a successful real estate developer and longtime Trump ally, was tapped for a unique mission: break the stalemate on Ukraine by applying Trumpโ€™s outsider approach to diplomacy. Unlike career diplomats who have presided over endless wars and gridlock, Witkoff has leveraged direct relationships, including multiple meetings with Putin, to seek pragmatic solutions.

    For Trumpโ€™s critics in the establishment, that makes him a threat. For everyday Americans who are weary of endless foreign wars, it makes him a symbol of a possible new path toward peace.


    Vance: Media Trying to Derail Peace Efforts

    Vance argued that the Politico piece is not just unfair journalismโ€”itโ€™s part of a deliberate effort to derail peace negotiations. โ€œThe quotes on Witkoff were meant to complicate and derail peace efforts,โ€ he said, warning that anonymous smears serve the interests of those who profit from prolonging the war.

    Republicans have long argued that entrenched Washington interests, including defense contractors and globalist bureaucrats, benefit from keeping conflicts alive rather than resolving them. By attacking Witkoff, Vance suggested, the media is doing their bidding.


    The Takeaway

    Politicoโ€™s story highlights a familiar clash: Trumpโ€™s America First agendaโ€”focused on ending foreign wars and prioritizing U.S. interestsโ€”versus the entrenched establishment in Washington and its allies in the corporate media.

    Vanceโ€™s defense of Witkoff signals that the White House isnโ€™t backing down. Despite attacks from the press and anonymous bureaucrats, Trump and his team are determined to keep pursuing peace in Ukraineโ€”an effort the mainstream media seems determined to undermine at every step

    Trump Ends Talks With Zelenskyy, Cancels Joint Press Conference

    4
    By The White House - https://www.flickr.com/photos/202101414@N05/54325633746/, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=159707159

    It’s over…

    President Trump has called off negotiations with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to end the conflict in Ukraine after a tense Oval Office meeting in which the two leaders sparred over U.S. support for Kyiv.

    โ€œWe had a very meaningful meeting in the White House today. Much was learned that could never be understood without conversation under such fire and pressure,โ€ Trump posted on Truth Social after the meeting. 

    โ€œItโ€™s amazing what comes out through emotion, and I have determined that President Zelenskyy is not ready for Peace if America is involved, because he feels our involvement gives him a big advantage in negotiations,โ€ Trump continued. โ€œI donโ€™t want advantage, I want PEACE. He disrespected the United States of America in its cherished Oval Office. He can come back when he is ready for Peace.โ€

    Shortly after Trumpโ€™s post on Truth Social, Zelenskyโ€™s motorcade pulled up to the White House, signaling negotiations had ended.

    The two leaders had been scheduled to hold a joint press conference and sign a deal giving the U.S. access to Ukraineโ€™s critical minerals supply later in the day. The press conference has been canceled, and the minerals deal was not signed.

    Trumpโ€™s post followed a stunning exchange in the Oval Office in which the president and Vice President Vance teed off on Zelensky, accusing him of being ungrateful for U.S. support and of having little leverage in talks.

    Watch:

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy reacted publicly for the first time since his Oval Office blowup with President Donald Trump on Friday with a social media post thanking the United States.

    “Thank you America, thank you for your support, thank you for this visit,” Zelenskyy posted on X. “Thank you @POTUS. Congress, and the American people. Ukraine needs just and lasting peace, and we are working exactly for that.”

    If NYT Says GOP Has โ€˜Narrow Lead,โ€™ Expect a โ€˜Red Tsunamiโ€™ in November

      0

      ANALYSIS – With just three weeks to go until the U.S. midterm elections, a New York Times/Siena poll of likely voters finds the Republican party is gaining momentum national over the Democrats as concerns over the economy, inflation, illegal immigration, and crime, grow among voters.

      When the the Times sounds the alarm, even in an understated way, expect things to be far worse for the Democrats than reported.

      But when the Times “Chief Political Analyst” resorts to breaking down the numbers in the most comical and petty way, to lessen the impact on Dems, expect a red wave.

      According to this poll, 49% of likely voters plan to vote for a Republican to represent them in Congress on November 8, compared with 45% who plan to vote for a Democrat.

      Thatโ€™s a four-point lead, versus a one-point lead Democrats reportedly had over Republicans just last month, making the total swing in voter preference in just a few months five points.

      That’s a significant shift.

      Rising inflation and declining stocks are making the economy the number one concern for voters, who believe Republicans are better equipped to deal with these concerns.

      And this could mean that not only will the GOP most certainly win back the House but may gain control of the Senate too.

      As the New York Times writes:

      โ€ฆ [thatโ€™s a] notable swing from last month, when Democrats led by one percentage point among likely voters. Since then, the warning signs for Democrats have begun to add up, including Republican polling gains in key Senate races like those in Nevada, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, and surprising Republican strength in districts in Rhode Island and Oregon where Democrats would normally be safe.

      The Times explains that this isnโ€™t a one-off poll:

      Republicans have led in several high-quality polls, like ABC/Washington PostCBS/YouGov and Monmouth University. Today, the Times/Siena survey adds a fourth such poll to the pile.

      It adds, as I have predicted it would since the Roe vs Wade reversal:

      The evidence for a shift toward Republicans appears to be underpinned by a change in the national political environment. Gas prices went up again. The stock market is down. A variety of data suggests that the electorateโ€™s attention is shifting back to issues where Republicans are on stronger ground in public opinion, like the economy, inflation, crime and immigration, and away from the summerโ€™s focus on democracy, gun violence and abortion, where Democrats have an edge.

      In other words, the conditions that helped Democrats gain over the summer no longer seem to be in place.

      But Americaโ€™s “paper of record” canโ€™t help itself so it desperately still tries to spin the narrative in a less damaging light for the Dems.

      So, Nate Cohn, The Timesโ€™ chief political analyst, formerly with liberal New Republic, then goes on to laughably diminish the GOP four-point advantage into “only” a three-point advantage due to “rounding” of the poll result numbers.

      He further goes on to spend a great deal of time discussing the intricacies of polling, and how imperfect polling is.

      Something that I totally agree with.

      However, this level of inane wonkery to diminish polls showing one partyโ€™s advantage nationally is something Iโ€™ve never seen in over 30 years of politics.

      Meanwhile, many experts point out that the biggest error in polling in todayโ€™s political environment is how undercounted conservative Republicans are in the polls.

      This was highlighted in a recent Washington Post piece that used Ohio as an example:

      A look at the Marist pollโ€™s fine print suggested something that should make Democrats nervous in the run-up to Nov. 8: Pollsters might be seriously undercounting the Republican electorate โ€” specifically, the working-class White voters who were crucial to Trumpโ€™s electoral success.

      What caught my attention in the pollโ€™s details was the information that 45 percent of respondents had a college degree. A check of the most recent census data indicates that in Ohio, only about 29 percent of the adult population has a bachelorโ€™s degree or higher.

      The writer, Mark Weaver, an election law attorney, and communications consultant,adds something I have discussed before – that conservative Republicans and Trump voters have been cowed into silence, but they still vote.

      He notes:

      This isnโ€™t just about a single poll or a single state. I regularly talk with pollsters and campaigns, and I hear a common lament: Trump voters distrust pollsters and the media that reports on poll results, and simply wonโ€™t participate, out of protest or paranoia.

      He continues discussing undercounted โ€˜shyโ€™ or โ€˜submerged Trump votersโ€™:

      Trump supporters might have the added worry of being attacked for frankly stating their views. Stories of those affiliated with Trump being arrested, subpoenaed, doxed or mocked โ€” with Trump providing angry amplification โ€” result in a lower social trust of strangers inquiring about political views.

      So, if the the Times “Chief Political Analyst” wanted to be a real polling wonk, perhaps he should ask why the polls have been so wrong about Republicans recently.ย 

      And instead of doing intellectual summersaults to diminish a four-point GOP lead, admit theย GOP lead is probably MUCH, MUCH, greater.ย 

      Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of Great America News Desk.

      Trump Calls on CNN to Form New Conservative Network

        2
        CNN Headquarters via Wikimedia Commons

        Former President Donald Trump wants CNN to start a new business venture aimed to conquer right-of-aisle viewers.

        In an email statement from his Save America PAC, Trump wrote that CNN should open a “conservative network” with himself as the host.

        “If CNN were smart, they’d open up a Conservative network, only have me on, and it would be the most successful network in History. Fox only made it because of me, Twitter only made it because of me, and even Facebook is now in the tubes, having lost almost $90 billion in value since I was taken off, which was considered one of the biggest mistakes in business over the last two years,” the statement read.

        This story is developing. Stay with Great America News Desk for more updates.